DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2049654/v1
Bangladesh's topography makes it particularly susceptible to climate change. To tackle the impending tragedy of climate change, infrastructural, institutional, and financial capacity of the country must be increased. People's perception of climate change varies greatly based on their social backgrounds. Thus, understanding public perceptions of climate change may help improve government policies, adaption, and community activities. To understand Bangladeshi people's knowledge, perception, and attitude about climate change, an online survey among the general population was conducted using a structured questionnaire methodology. The study participants are mostly from Dhaka (70.25%) and have a moderate level of education (79.75% undergraduate). Most of them have heard of climate change and acknowledge the negative effects of climate change. Over half of participants are willing to give up personal gains to help solve current climatic and environmental issues. The majority of them, however, don't consider environmental factors while purchasing things and have never participated in climate change-related environmental protection initiatives. In Bangladesh, the general public's knowledge, attitude, and perception of climate change varies considerably. While knowledge and perceptions are high, attitude towards climate change is quite different. Along with promoting awareness, people should be encouraged to participate in climate change-related activities.
Due to its topography, Bangladesh is more susceptible to dangers that may rise due to climate change than other countries. Bangladesh is exposed to climate-related calamities due to its place at the mouth of the drainage basin of the powerful Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna River systems[1]. As a result, flooding, cyclones, high rainfall, and drought are all common occurrences in Bangladesh. From 1999 to 2018, Bangladesh has suffered 191 climate-related severe events, placing it in seventh place on the 2020 Global Climate Risk Index[2]. For South and Southeast Asia, the IPCC’s latest report sketched a future that is irrevocable and certain. There will be more and more regular and intermittent flooding episodes as the monsoon becomes stronger[3]. There would be a significant impact on agriculture and food security in coastal region of Bangladesh as a consequence of increased susceptibility to floods and salinity[4]. People's lives and the future generations of this nation are in danger because of climate change-related natural catastrophes.
This imminent disaster of climate change is calling for strengthening the infrastructures, institutional capacity and financial preparation as well as setting up a communal effort to combat it. However, the fact that people's views and perceptions concerning climate change vary widely and are difficult to forecast across a wide range of sociocultural backgrounds should not be overlooked. It is people's attitudes and views about climate change that determine how the general public perceives the issue. A person's innate ability to monitor his or her immediate surroundings is seen as a strength, and individuals who have personally experienced the negative effects of climate change, such as increased air pollution and temperature extremes, are more likely to see these threats. How worried individuals are about climate change depends on where they live, whether it is an urbanized or rural region, and if they have a history of dealing with extreme weather conditions.
Some argue that climate change is a direct result of human activity, while others think that it is an action of God as a retribution for the sins of humanity. Then there are some people who actually do not believe that climate change is in fact, real. There are several sociodemographic elements that influence how people perceive and understand climate change. In addition to sociodemographic factors, religious activity is also connected to climate change perspectives. Now, people can only cope with climate change only if they are aware of it and prepared to deal with its effects. The news, the online world, and people's daily experiences with severe weather events such as flooding, cyclones, and drought all contribute to the informal acquisition of climate change knowledge. Hence it is quite possible that people's daily encounters with severe climatic and weather events might influence their views on climate change. Research on views and perceptions of Bangladeshis about climate change has previously been conducted among university students, indigenous people and at the household level[5, 9], but this study was aimed at obtaining baseline data on the general population's knowledge, perception, and attitude toward climate change. Knowledge, perception, and attitude are the emphasis of this study. In light of its status as one of the world's most vulnerable LDCs, research like this is critical to people’s understanding of climate change. This research hypothesized that Bangladeshis today have minimal to moderate understanding of climate change and believe in its existence rather than rejecting it as a hoax, irrespective of their age, education level, occupation, living area (rural vs. urban), etc. It was discovered that this was definitely the case after concluding the investigation.
The primary objective of this study is to gather baseline data on the general public's knowledge, perception, and attitude about climate change in Bangladesh.
To understand Bangladeshi people's knowledge, perception and attitude about climate change, an investigative and anonymized survey among the general population was conducted. A structured questionnaire methodology was used, and an online survey was conducted to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. In order to ensure a high level of accuracy, the survey questions were written in English. Since exact questionnaires relevant for this research, especially in the context of general Bangladeshi citizens, were unavailable, an original, custom questionnaire was devised based on the literature review and media material, and an expert examined the questionnaire. Likert-type answers like "Yes," "No," or "Did not notice" or categorical options were used for most of the climate change knowledge and perception questions. Some questions were deleted or rephrased for better clarity as a result of expert feedback. At last, there were 35 questions in total in the final structured questionnaire[S1 File], divided into following four sections:
Sociodemographic information (10 questions)
Climate change knowledge related questions( 7 questions)
People’s perception regarding climate change (11 questions)
People’s attitude towards climate change( 7 questions)
Participants' socio-demographic variables and their knowledge, perceptions and attitude about climate change were gathered using the final questionnaire.
In order to ensure that the questionnaire was appropriate for this study, the help of an appropriate expert was enlisted to assess its suitability for the job. The expert concluded that the questions and responses were relevant to the objectives of the investigation.
Bangladeshis who were in the country at the time of data collection were the target population of the study. The total population was around 166,961,248 as per Worldometer elaboration of the latest United Nations data[6]. To be included in the survey, applicants had to be Bangladeshi nationals at the time of the survey. Convenient and snowball sampling was used in this research. The google form link for the survey was put on different social media platforms and the participants were requested to share it their networks online.
Survey participants were asked to fill a Google form link and to spread the word about it to their friends and family through social media platforms like Facebook, Messenger, and WhatsApp. The form was also emailed to a number of additional people. Anyone could submit the form from September 17 until November 22, 2021. There were 800 total responses.
At a 95 percent confidence level, with a margin of error of 5 percent, 800 answers were collected. It was predicted that around 50% of the population would be aware of climate change. 385 individuals were needed to estimate this percentage with a 95 percent confidence interval. An overall sample size of 800 people was deemed to be appropriate for this investigation.
Microsoft Excel 2020 was used to clean, modify, sort, and analyze the data. Afterwards, using Microsoft Excel, descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations) and first-order analysis (i.e., chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests) were conducted. Frequency tables were used to summarize and illustrate sociodemographic characteristics and responses of participants. Cross-tabulation and chi-square tests were used to examine the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge of climate change. When the p-value was less than 0.05, all statistical tests were declared significant at a 95% confidence level.
In order to evaluate respondents' degree of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding climate change, those who stated they had heard of it were asked about their source of knowledge, proceeded by questions about its causes and effects. Additionally, all respondents were asked climate-related questions to ascertain their attitude and perspective toward climate change, regardless of their level of knowledge about climate change
The frequency distribution of respondents by their profile characteristics such as age, greatest degree of education, nation, and district is shown in Table 1. Of the total 714 participants, 89.25 percent were between the ages of 16 and 25. The mean age of the participants was 22.63, with a standard deviation (SD) of 6.45 years. It was found that a sizable proportion of respondents were young people from schools, colleges, universities, or other educational institutions, followed by persons in their early adulthood and middle age, who account for 7.75 percent and 2.75 percent of the study population, respectively. Only two (0.25 percent) individuals were above 60 and classified as elderly. In terms of highest level of education, respondents were more likely to be undergraduates, with a percentage of 79.75 percent (638), which explains the research population's high proportion of young individuals. Among the remainder, 91 (11.38%) were postgraduates, followed by 63 (7.88%) with a higher secondary education and just 8 (1%) with a secondary education. There were more inhabitants of Dhaka city than of other districts; around 70.25 percent (562) of the 800 respondents chose Dhaka as their present district of residence. This survey includes participants from different districts in Bangladesh, although they are overwhelmingly Dhaka city dwellers. Finally, all 800 respondents resided in Bangladesh, as the objective of this study was to elicit data on the general public's knowledge, perception, and attitude about climate change in Bangladesh.
Characteristics | Frequency(800) | Percentage(100) |
---|---|---|
Age 16–25 26–40 41–60 > 60 | 714 62 22 2 | 89.25% 7.75% 2.75% 0.25% |
Highest level of Education Higher Secondary Postgraduate Secondary Undergraduate | 63 91 8 638 | 7.88% 11.38% 1.00% 79.75% |
Country Bangladesh | 800 | 100.00% |
District Manikganj Jessore Khulna Pabna Barguna Barisal Bhola Bogra Brahmonbaria Chandpur Chittagong Comilla Cox's Bazar Dhaka Dinajpur Faridpur Feni Gajipur Habiganj Jessore Jhalakhati Joypurhat Khulna Kushtia Madaripur Mymensingh Naogaon Narail Narayangonj Pabna Patuakhali Pirojpur Rajshahi Rangamati Rangpur Satkhira Sirajganj Sylhet Tangail Thakurgaon | 13 7 8 6 1 13 2 7 6 12 18 11 9 562 3 4 1 12 6 6 1 6 11 1 2 3 6 1 1 6 1 2 13 2 19 1 1 2 8 6 | 1. 625% 0. 875% 1% 0. 75% 0. 125% 1. 625% 0. 375% 0. 875% 0. 75% 1. 5% 2. 25% 1. 375% 1. 125% 70. 25% 0. 25% 0. 5% 0. 125% 1. 5% 0. 75% 0. 75% 0. 125% 0. 75% 1. 375% 0. 125% 0. 375% 0. 25% 0. 75% 0. 125% 0. 125% 0. 75% 0. 125% 0. 375% 1. 625% 0. 375% 2. 375% 0. 125% 0. 125% 0. 375% 1% 0. 75% |
The heading of each column is written in block letters and in bold. Each sociodemographic characteristics is also expressed in bold letters in the first column from left.
The frequency and percentage distributions of respondents' knowledge on climate change are shown in Table 2. The vast majority (n = 800) of research participants (99 percent) were aware of climate change and gained knowledge from various sources, while just 1% had never heard of it.
Additionally, a significant proportion of participants (99.75%) believe that climate change has occurred in the recent decade, and 96.38 percent answered that they understand what the phrase "climate change" means. The majority of knowledgeable participants (31.75 percent) stated that they learned about climate change via newspapers, media, and teachers. When questioned about the causes of climate change, answers ranged from deforestation, fast urbanization and lifestyle change, and excessive carbon emission to industrial effluents, black smoke from vehicles, rapid urbanization and lifestyle change, and excessive carbon emission (0.13 percent ). Over half of respondents (87 percent) believed climate change would have negative consequences, while 13% said it would have both negative and good consequences. In terms of the source gas of greenhouse effect, Carbon di-oxide, Nitrous oxide, C.F.C and Ozone were the most commonly mentioned
( 23%) .
VARIABLES | FREQUENCY(800) | PERCENTAGE(100) |
---|---|---|
Have you ever heard of climate change? | Total | Percentage |
Yes | 792 | 99% |
No | 8 | 1% |
Do you think there has been climate change in last 10 years? | ||
No | 2 | 0.25% |
Yes. | 798 | 99.75% |
Do you know what the term climate change refers to? | ||
Maybe a little | 28 | 3.50% |
Not at all | 1 | 0.13% |
Yes | 771 | 96.38% |
How did you know about climate change? | ||
Newspaper | 7 | 0.88% |
Newspaper; Family members/ Relatives; Others | 1 | 0.13% |
Newspaper; Neighbors; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 14 | 1.75% |
Newspaper; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 4 | 0.50% |
Newspaper; Others | 2 | 0.25% |
Newspaper; Teachers; Family members/ Relatives | 10 | 1.25% |
Newspaper; Teachers; Neighbors; Family members/ Relatives | 3 | 0.38% |
Newspaper; Teachers; Neighbors; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 15 | 1.88% |
Newspaper; Teachers; Neighbors; NGO workers; Others | 2 | 0.25% |
Newspaper; Teachers; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 3 | 0.38% |
Newspaper; Teachers ;Others | 1 | 0.13% |
Newspaper; Television | 32 | 4.00% |
Newspaper; Television; Family members/ Relatives | 24 | 3.00% |
Newspaper; Television; NGO workers | 7 | 0.88% |
Newspaper; Television; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 18 | 2.25% |
Newspaper; Television; Others | 20 | 2.50% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers | 254 | 31.75% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers ;Family members/ Relatives | 164 | 20.50% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers ;Family members/ Relatives; Others | 1 | 0.13% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors | 2 | 0.25% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors; Family members/ Relatives | 46 | 5.75% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors; Family members/ Relatives ;Others | 12 | 1.50% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors; NGO workers | 9 | 1.13% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 25 | 3.13% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Neighbors; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives; Others | 4 | 0.50% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; NGO workers | 2 | 0.25% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives | 46 | 5.75% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives; Others | 1 | 0.13% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; NGO workers; Others | 9 | 1.13% |
Newspaper; Television; Teachers; Others | 5 | 0.63% |
Others | 4 | 0.50% |
Teachers | 26 | 3.25% |
Teachers; Neighbors | 1 | 0.13% |
Television | 9 | 1.13% |
Television; Teachers | 16 | 2.00% |
Television; Teachers; NGO workers; Family members/ Relatives; Others | 1 | 0.13% |
What could be the reason behind climate change? | ||
Deforestation | 29 | 3.63% |
Deforestation; Black smoke of vehicles; Excessive carbon emission | 7 | 0.88% |
Deforestation; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 11 | 1.38% |
Deforestation; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 139 | 17.4% |
Deforestation; Excessive carbon emission | 39 | 4.88% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents | 1 | 0.13% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Black smoke of vehicles | 1 | 0.13% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 6 | 0.75% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 28 | 3.5% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Excessive carbon emission | 1 | 0.13% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth | 7 | 0.88% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles | 2 | 0.25% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Excessive carbon emission | 8 | 1% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 11 | 1.38% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 148 | 18.5% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Excessive carbon emission | 1 | 0.13% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 5 | 0.63% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Population growth; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 25 | 3.13% |
Deforestation; Industrial effluents; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 19 | 2.38% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles | 6 | 0.75% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Excessive carbon emission | 2 | 0.25% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 78 | 9.75% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Excessive carbon emission | 14 | 1.75% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 2 | 0.25% |
Deforestation; Population growth; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 21 | 2.63% |
Deforestation; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 7 | 0.88% |
Deforestation; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 166 | 20.8% |
Excessive carbon emission | 4 | 0.5% |
Industrial effluents; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 1 | 0.13% |
Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles | 1 | 0.13% |
Industrial effluents; Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles; Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle; Excessive carbon emission | 6 | 0.75% |
Population growth; Black smoke of vehicles | 2 | 0.25% |
Rapid urbanization and change in lifestyle | 2 | 0.25% |
What is the effect of climate change? | ||
Both | 104 | 13% |
Negative | 696 | 87% |
Positive | 0 | 0% |
According to your knowledge, which gas causes the greenhouse effect? | ||
C.F.C | 13 | 1.625% |
C.F.C; Ozone | 12 | 1.5% |
Carbon di-oxide | 128 | 16% |
Carbon di-oxide ;C.F.C | 75 | 9.375% |
Carbon di-oxide; C.F.C; Ozone | 139 | 17.375% |
Carbon di-oxide; C.F.C; Ozone; Water | 6 | 0.75% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide | 43 | 5.375% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide; C.F.C | 71 | 8.875% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide; C.F.C; Ozone | 183 | 22.875% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide; C.F.C; Ozone; Water | 31 | 3.875% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide ;C.F.C ;Water | 1 | 0.125% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide; Ozone | 31 | 3.875% |
Carbon di-oxide; Nitrous oxide; Ozone; Water | 1 | 0.125% |
Carbon di-oxide; Ozone | 62 | 7.775% |
Carbon di-oxide; Ozone; Water | 1 | 0.125% |
Nitrous oxide; C.F.C | 2 | 0.25% |
Ozone | 1 | 0.125% |
The heading and sub heading of each column is written in block letters and in bold. Each question about knowledge of climate change is also expressed in bold letters in the first column from left.
Table 3 summarizes respondents' perception on climate change. More than 90% of the participants believed there has been an increase in the episode of cyclone, sea waves and drought in last 10 years. Additionally, 98% of respondents stated that they had seen changes in rainfall patterns over the previous decade and 90% stated that there was a lack of fresh water owing to an increase in salinity. The majority of respondents strongly agreed that climate change is responsible for rising occurrences of extreme weather events (80%), and more than 95% believe that climate change is having an influence on people's health and agricultural production. Around 56% strongly agreed with the assertion that climate change is the catalyst for natural ecological crises. Most of the participants (99%) believed that the sea level has risen as a result of climate change. Finally, over 47% of respondents agreed strongly that climate change raises the threat of infectious illnesses.
VARIABLES | FREQUENCY(800) | PERCENTAGE(100) |
---|---|---|
Do you think the episode of cyclone increased in last 10 years? | Total | Percentage |
Didn’t notice | 14 | 1.75 |
No | 4 | 0.5 |
Yes | 782 | 97.8 |
Do you think the episode of sea waves increased in last 10 years? | ||
Didn’t notice | 54 | 6.75% |
No | 4 | 0.50% |
Yes | 742 | 92.75% |
Do you think the episode of drought increased in last 10 years? | ||
Didn’t notice | 45 | 6% |
No | 14 | 2% |
Yes | 741 | 93% |
Did you notice any change in rainfall pattern in last 10 years? | ||
Didn’t notice | 12 | 2% |
No | 4 | 1% |
Yes | 784 | 98% |
Do you think the increase in salinity caused scarcity of fresh water? | ||
Don’t know | 74 | 9% |
No | 8 | 1% |
Yes | 718 | 90% |
Climate change increases extreme weather | ||
Agree | 155 | 19% |
Don't know | 7 | 1% |
Strongly agree | 638 | 80% |
Climate change affects human health | ||
Agree | 280 | 35% |
Disagree | 1 | 0% |
Don’t know | 7 | 1% |
Strongly agree | 512 | 64% |
Climate change affects agricultural production | ||
Agree | 307 | 38% |
Strongly agree | 493 | 62% |
Climate change initiates natural ecological crisis | ||
Agree | 342 | 43% |
Don’t know | 10 | 1% |
Strongly agree | 448 | 56% |
Climate change causes sea-level rise | ||
Agree | 247 | 31% |
Don't know | 7 | 1% |
Strongly agree | 546 | 68% |
Climate change increases threat of infectious diseases | ||
Agree | 369 | 46% |
Disagree | 14 | 2% |
Don’t know | 39 | 5% |
Strongly agree | 378 | 47% |
The heading and sub heading of each column is written in block letters and in bold. Each question about perception regarding climate change is also expressed in bold letters in the first column from left.
Table 4 summarizes respondents' attitude on climate change. The vast majority of respondents (98 percent) believed that human activities (rather than natural factors) are the primary cause of climate change. Among the 800 respondents, 627 (79 percent) agreed that both developed and developing countries should have a greater share of the responsibility for climate change, while 16 percent said the former should bear the responsibility. The majority of respondents (88 percent) stated that while climate change cannot be totally averted, it can be mitigated through endeavor, and an even bigger proportion (93 percent) indicated that they would join actual efforts to mitigate climate change if called upon. On a more positive note, 97 percent of them indicated that they are extremely willing to forego some personal gain in order to address present climate change-related problems. When asked if they consider environmental factors before making a purchase, the percentages revealed a very different picture, with 77 percent of respondents responding that they typically pay little heed to such information. Additionally, 49% of respondents stated that they had never had the opportunity to participate in any environmental protection activities related to climate change, followed by 42% who had previously participated in such activities.
VARIABLES | FREQUENCY(800) | PERCENTAGE(100) |
---|---|---|
Do you believe human activities (compared to natural factors) are the main cause of climate change? | Total | Percentage |
No | 7 | 1% |
Uncertain | 7 | 1% |
Yes | 786 | 98% |
Do you think the developed countries or developing countries need to take a greater responsibility for climate change? | ||
Both | 627 | 79% |
The former | 128 | 16% |
The latter | 4 | 1% |
Unable to explain clearly | 41 | 4% |
Do you think climate change can be avoided? | ||
Absolutely | 44 | 6% |
It can be mitigated through endeavor | 696 | 88% |
Not possible | 49 | 5% |
Unable to explain clearly | 11 | 1% |
If someone called for, will you join the actual efforts to mitigate climate change? | ||
No | 2 | 0.25% |
Uncertain | 52 | 6.5% |
Yes | 746 | 93.25% |
Are you willing to sacrifice some individual benefit to solve existing problems? | ||
Not very willing | 21 | 2.625% |
Not willing at all | 2 | 0.25% |
Very willing | 777 | 97.125% |
Do you consider any environmental factor before your purchase? | ||
I do check these information activities every time before buying | 181 | 23% |
Usually paid little attention to such information | 619 | 77% |
Did you participate in any environmental protection activities related to climate change ever before? | ||
Didn’t get a chance | 388 | 49% |
No | 76 | 10% |
Yes | 336 | 42% |
The heading and sub heading of each column is written in block letters and in bold. Each question about attitude towards climate change is also expressed in bold letters in the first column from left.
Table 5 compares respondents' knowledge of climate change by their age and highest level of education. In the multivariate study, education level and age were shown to be strongly linked with climate change knowledge. This suggests that when respondents are classified according to their age and education level, there is a statistically significant difference in their knowledge. Respondents with an undergraduate degree and those at the young age group (16–25) were more likely to have knowledge about climate change than others, presumably due to the knowledge gained through educational institutions and their effectiveness in obtaining information about climate change through technology.
Education Level | Knowledge of Climate change | Percentage | Result of Chi square test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | No | Yes | ||||
Higher Secondary | 3 | 60 | 37.5% | 7.58% | χ2 = 21.5104 | ||
Postgraduate | 1 | 90 | 12.5% | 11.36% | df = 3 | ||
Secondary | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 0.88% | P = .000082 | ||
Undergraduate | 3 | 635 | 37.5% | 80.18% | |||
Total | 8 | 792 | 100% | 100% | |||
Age-group | Knowledge of Climate change | Percentage | Result of Chi square test | ||||
No | Yes | No | Yes | ||||
Young (16–25 years) | 3 | 727 | 37.5% | 91.79% | χ2 = 96.1948 | ||
Early adulthood (26–40 years) | 1 | 49 | 12.5% | 6.19% | df = 3 | ||
Middle age (45–60 years) | 3 | 15 | 37.5% | 1.89% | P < 0.00001 | ||
Old age (> 60 years) | 1 | 1 | 12.5% | 0.13% | |||
Total | 8 | 792 | 100% | 100% |
The table is divided into 2 sections, one section is for education level and the other is for age group. In both sections, the heading and sub heading of each column is written in bold. The row indicating total frequency and percentages in each section is also expressed in bold letters.
This study is a quantitative endeavor to measure the general public's knowledge, perceptions, and attitude toward climate change in Bangladesh. The bulk of participants were in their twenties and have a rudimentary degree of formal education. They possess extensive knowledge and comprehension of the occurrence, causes, and consequences of climate change. Additionally, they have a strong understanding of climate change and the affiliated diversity in severe weather events, temperature, rainfall, salinity, and sea level, along with the impact of these changes on human health and agriculture, as well as the occurrence of ecological crises and the spread of infectious diseases. Knowledge, perception, and attitude study had been previously conducted among university students and CDC health professionals in Philippines and China, respectively[7, 8]. In Bangladesh, Knowledge and perception study about climate change among university students and Knowledge and perception study about climate change and its impact on human health has been conducted in past[5, 9]. In this study, the authors followed a somewhat identical method, but the sample size was bigger, more representative, and included more diversified population from Bangladesh. Over 95 percent of the 800 participants were aware of 'climate change,' which is a very promising indicator. They were also aware of the detrimental consequences of climate change. According to this study, the majority of people who were aware of climate change cited mass media like television, newspapers, and teachers as their sources. Very few persons reported hearing about climate change via non-governmental organization (NGO) workers, family members/relatives, and others. This demonstrates the importance of mass media and discussions with teachers in educational institutions. Service providers, such as NGO workers and elder members of families, require improved access to resources that provide knowledge of climate change such as television, internet etc. There appears to be a sectoral divergence in the government system's dealing with environmental concerns. In general, the analysis demonstrates that mass media coverage, particularly newspaper and television coverage, and opinion leaders, particularly teachers, are the primary sources of knowledge regarding climate change at the moment.
The majority of the participants thought that the climate change had occurred in the decade before the survey. This notion is borne out by statistics collected at the national level on Bangladesh's climate. According to data from the Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD), any 10-year period between 1951 and 2011 had greater temperatures and unpredictable rainfall than the prior ten years[10]. Additionally, a sizable proportion of respondents cited deforestation, rapid urbanization and lifestyle change, and excessive carbon emissions as the primary causes of climate change, along with mentioning carbon di-oxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and ozone as the primary suspects of the greenhouse effect. The participants' other less scientific explanations, such as black smoke from automobiles, may be explained by their poor education levels and limited exposure to scientific truths. In summary, this implies that they are aware of how anthropogenic actions in their immediate environment contribute to climate change and have expressed an interest in learning more about it.
The general public's perceptions of climate change are likewise aligned with the findings at the national scale. Over Bangladesh, the annual maximum temperature is growing by 0.09°C, while the annual minimum temperature is rising by 0.10°C. The yearly lowest temperature increases at a faster rate than the annual maximum temperature[11]. Over 95% of respondents reported noticing changes in rainfall patterns throughout the previous decade, which is corroborated by the fact that annual average rainfall over Bangladesh is rising by around 10.6 millimeters per decade, whereas monsoonal rainfall is falling by 7.6 mm per decade. The frequency of severe rainfall in June, July, and August has grown during the previous few decades[12]. Additionally, participants believed that extreme weather phenomena such as cyclones, sea waves, and droughts had risen in frequency during the previous decade. Cyclone frequency has been growing in each and every decade since the 1970s, according to the BMD database[13]. Another evidence-based study corroborates our participants' perceptions of salt intrusion, increased water salinity, and lack of fresh water as a result of this[14]. Participants unanimously agreed that agricultural food crop productivity had decreased over the previous decade and that climate change had had a detrimental effect on population health. Additionally, they concurred that climate change is to blame for an increase in the threat of infectious illnesses and the onset of natural ecological disasters. These discoveries have far-reaching consequences for food security and livelihoods. Concerning sea level rise, the participants' perceptions are backed up by past records on sea level rise in 3 coastal districts. The results indicate that the mean annual water level has increased by 4.5 millimeters per year in about 20% of the overall area of these three districts, which is ascribed to global sea level rise caused by human activity[15].
When it comes to attitude towards climate change, the majority of participants feel that human actions (rather than natural processes) are the primary cause. This is one of the study's most significant findings because it demonstrates that they are aware of how manmade activities in their nearby territory contribute to climate change. They believe that while the harm caused by climate change cannot be reversed, climate change may still be mitigated by effort. Additionally, they stated that both developed and developing nations must work cooperatively to combat climate change. LDCs such as Bangladesh are not entirely self-sufficient in terms of mitigating the harmful effects of climate change. Thus, in light of present circumstances, this appears to be the most sensible strategy to addressing climate change. On a more positive note, a sizable proportion of participants shown a strong readiness to forego some personal gain in order to fix current environmental issues. However, when it came to everyday actions, the data revealed a different picture, as the majority of respondents claimed that they paid little attention to environmental factors prior to making a purchase. This clearly demonstrates the need of increasing public knowledge about environmentally friendly products and the building of a green economy in Bangladesh. This discovery is especially beneficial for policy making and government planning. Additionally, the majority of participants stated that they had never had the opportunity to participate in any environmental protection activities connected to climate change, which might be a result of the general public's lack of access to and enthusiasm for environmental conservation activities. This demonstrates a clear sectoral divide in the way the government system addresses environmental concerns, as unmistakably, environmental protection activities require increased promotion to reach out to and engage the majority of Bangladesh's population, in order for these initiatives to be successful in mitigating the damage caused by climate change. In this study, young individuals (aged 16–25) on undergraduate level of education were more likely to have a stronger understanding of climate change than others. Additionally, other research found that respondents' understanding of climate change was highly dependent on their degree of education[8, 9]. As a result of our study, it can be concluded saying that education and educational institutions are critical for improving awareness of climate change and associated adaptation concerns.
The research offers a number of strengths. Participants in the study were drawn from a wide range of climate change-prone regions. Climate-vulnerable places in Bangladesh might benefit from the findings of this study. Using these insights, researchers can devise new methods for changing people's and communities' behavior to better adapt to climate change and reduce the environmental problems it causes. A future cohort research might use these data as a starting point. The research also has a few drawbacks. In the first place, because the research was cross-sectional, causality cannot be established, and findings may not be extrapolated to other time periods. A longitudinal study is essential here. In addition, the study relied on online self-reporting, which is prone to social acceptance bias as well as memory bias. Last but not least, the study adopted snowball sampling approach that might be responsible for selection bias. As a result, a random sampling method should be used to conduct additional inquiry.
The knowledge of climate change far exceeded the expectation (99 percent), and the general public's perception of altering climate was similarly greater (99.75 percent ). Attitudes concerning climate change appear to depict a quite different image, as seen by the general public's lack of active engagement in environmental protection activities in Bangladesh. The general public needs to be increasingly involved in such field-level actions to solve climate change-related environmental challenges. Level of education is a major factor in how people understand climate change and how it affects the surrounding environment. On the basis of these fundamental findings, policymakers may establish effective policies to safeguard the environment from the severe effects of climate change for the general population in Bangladesh and comparable LDCs. Educating children about climate change in schools might be a potential avenue for future study to safeguard future generations[16].
Bangladesh Meteorological Department
Least Developed Countries
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
7.1 Ethical approval and consent
The Ethical Review Board (ERB) of Uttara Adhunik Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh, has authorized the study protocol. Before commencing the survey, a written informed consent was collected from participants using the written consent note at the beginning of the Google form.
7.2 Consent for publication
Not Applicable
7.3 Availability of data and materials
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.
7.4 Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
7.5 Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express their heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Jakir Masud for his insightful and giving advice throughout the planning and development of this research. His generosity in offering his time has been greatly appreciated. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Prof. Dr. Sirajul Hoque, Prof. Md. Sahabuddin Kabir Chowdhury and Prof.Dr.Abu Syed Md. Mosaddek for their advice and assistance in maintaining the research on track. Finally, they would like to thank the study participants for their help in the research.