Atrazine (ATZ) is a persistent dryland broad-spectrum herbicide that effectively inhibits the photosynthesis of grasses (Vieira et al., 2021). In recent years, ATZ has been extensively used in agriculture, forestry, fruit cultivation and other economic cultivation areas (Gaffar et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021; Rastegar-Moghaddam et al., 2018). ATZ enters river sediment from the water due to its lipophilic and hydrophobic characteristics, causing pollution to the river sediment as well as potential risks to humans (Liu et al., 2022a; Qu et al., 2018). Hence, a highly efficient and environmentally friendly treatment method needs to be developed to treat organic pollution in river sediment.
Currently, there are two main types of remediation methods for organic pollutants in river sediments: in situ and ex situ remediation. However, on the one hand, in situ remediation technology, represented by substrate dredging and drenching, has problems including difficult treatment of the dredged substrate (Zhang et al., 2019) and easy damage to aquatic ecosystems (Lofrano et al., 2017). On the other hand, ex situ remediation technology, represented by in situ capping, curing and bioremediation, has problems including a poor degradation effect (Wang et al., 2021a), high cost (Labianca et al., 2022) and a long treatment time (Zhang et al., 2021a). Therefore, in view of the environmental and human health hazards caused by ATZ, it is worth developing a novel method to treat ATZ in river sediments. In recent years, dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBDP) technology has been widely considered for treating water (Wang et al., 2021b), air (Dong et al., 2022) and soil pollutants (Jiang et al., 2022). DBDP also produces many physical agents and radicals, such as UV, shock waves, heat, hydroxy radicals (•OH) and superoxide radicals (•O2−) (Liu et al., 2021; Mai-Prochnow et al., 2021). However, the expected degradation efficiency cannot be achieved in a short period of time, which is one of the important problems in river sediment treatment by DBDP. Hence, a synergistic treatment system based on DBDP, should be adopted to achieve excellent degradation results.
The persulfate (PS) oxidation system is widely used as an effective remediation method for organic pollutants and is an advanced oxidation technology (Ike et al., 2018). PS mainly includes ammonium persulfate, potassium persulfate and sodium persulfate (SPS). SPS was selected as the oxidizer in the PS oxidation system in this study in consideration of high solubility and low cost (Nie et al., 2014). Currently, ferrous sulfate (Fesulf) is a commonly used activator for SPS due to its low cost and availability. Moreover, UV and heat can be used as PS activators to further increase the production rate of radicals without the addition of further chemicals, which has attracted the attention of an increasing number of scholars (Shang et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2018). The PS oxidation system produces a large number of strongly oxidizing radicals during degradation, such as sulfate (SO4•−, E0 = 2.5–3.1 V) and hydroxy (•OH, E0 = 2.8 V) radicals (Pan et al., 2018; Zuo et al., 2020). These radicals are promising and environmentally friendly candidates (Soltani et al., 2018). In some cases, SO4•− has better selectivity and a longer half-life than •OH (Qiu et al., 2019).
DBDP can activate PS to achieve highly efficient and environmentally friendly degradation of organic pollutants in river sediment, which has not been fully investigated. Based on the above context, this study proposes the use of a DBDP/PS synergistic system to degrade ATZ in river sediment. The optimal degradation efficiency of ATZ was investigated, and the results revealed the degradation mechanism, mineralization rates, possible degradation pathways, and intermediates biotoxicity of ATZ in the DBDP/PS synergistic system. The ultimate objective is to develop a reference for the industrial application of DBDP/PS synergistic systems for the highly efficient remediation of organic pollutants in river sediments.