We received a total of 309 responses, and 296 nurses provided their consent to participate in the survey. Of these 296 nurses, n=6 reported that they did not currently work as either a nurse or medical assistants in the state of Montana and n=20 reported that they were not involved with adolescent immunization services; these respondents were excluded. Out of the remaining 270 respondents, we further excluded n=16 respondents who did not provide their nursing or medical credential and n=27 who reported not currently working in direct patient care. Our final analytic sample consisted of 227 respondents. (Figure 1). All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC)
Characteristics of respondents: Of the 227 eligible respondents, most (55.9%) were registered nurses or advanced practice registered nurses, 26.0% were medical assistants, and 17.6% were licensed practical nurses. A majority (94.2%) of the respondents were female and identified themselves as being white (77.1%). About 4.0% of the respondents identified themselves as American Indian or Alaska Native. About 27.4% of the respondents belonged to the age group of 41-50 years, followed by 23.2% of the respondents who reported to be in the age group 51-60 years. Approximately 33.0% of the participants reported working as a nurse or a medical assistant for more than 20 years, 18.2% for about two to six years, and 17.0% for around six to ten years. Only 7.0% of the nurses in our analytic sample had less than two years of experience working as nursing professionals. (Table 2)
Table 2
Respondent and Practice Characteristics
|
n
(N=227)
|
%
|
Nursing Credentials
Registered Nurse (RN/APRN)
Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)
Medical Assistant or Other
|
127
40
60
|
55.9%
17.6%
26.4%
|
Age, in years 21-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-60 years
≥61 years
Prefer not to answer or Missing
|
36
41
52
44
16
38
|
15.9%
18.1%
22.9%
19.4%
7.1%
16.7%
|
Sex
Male
Female
Prefer not to answer or Missing
|
9
180
38
|
4.0%
79.3%
16.7%
|
Clinic Setting
Public health department-operated clinic
Private practice or a hospital/university-based clinic
Other*
Missing
|
44
82
90
11
|
19.4%
36.1%
39.7%
4.9%
|
Practice Location
Non-Metropolitan Statistical Area
Micropolitan Statistical Area
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Missing
|
85
58
47
37
|
37.4%
25.6%
20.7%
16.3%
|
Estimated number of 9-17-year-old patients seen in a typical week
≤5 patients
6-20 patients
>20 patients
Not Sure
|
118
74
23
12
|
52.0%
32.6%
10.1%
5.3%
|
Estimated percentage of 9-17-year-old patients eligible to receive vaccines under the VFC** program
<25%
25%-49%
50%-75%
>75%
Not Sure
Missing
|
24
58
68
35
27
15
|
10.6%
25.6%
30.0%
15.4%
12.0%
6.6%
|
Column percentages do not always total to 100% due to rounding of the values, * includes a community health center, rural health clinic, migrant health center, Indian Health Service (IHS)-operated center, Tribal health facility, or urban Indian health care facility, Military health care facility (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard), WIC clinic, school-based clinic, and any other clinic type, ** VFC indicates Vaccine for Children federal program
Practice Characteristics: While 36.1% of respondents either worked in an independent private clinic or a hospital-based clinic, 19.4% worked at a public health department, and the rest of the respondents (39.7 %) either worked at a community health center, a rural health clinic, a school-based clinic, or a different type of immunization clinic. About 5.0% of respondents did not report their clinic setting. About half of the respondents examined five or fewer 9-17-year-old patients in a typical week. While all respondents were involved in providing immunization services to adolescents, over 85.0% of respondents reported recommending vaccines to adolescents and their parents or caregivers and interacting with them to answer vaccine-related questions. About two-thirds of the respondents reported scheduling clinic visits for immunizations, and about 60.0% reported overseeing vaccine ordering and managing vaccine inventory at their clinics. About 50.0% of the respondents reported that over half of the patients visiting their facility were eligible to receive free vaccines under the VFC program. (Table 2)
Use of Reminder/Recall (R/R) Systems for HPV Vaccination Delivery: About 52.0% of respondents reported using some form of reminder/recall (R/R) processes at their clinics to identify and contact parents/caregivers of adolescents who are due or overdue to receive recommended immunizations. Of those that use some form of R/R at their facilities, about 28.9% of respondents reported that staff availability dictated how often they were able to generate them, and about 25.0% of the nurses responded being able to generate the R/R lists monthly. The most common mode of R/R delivery was by phone (38%), a paper letter or a postcard (30.8%), or a text message (10.1%).
Specific to R/R processes for completing the multi-dose HPV vaccine series, most respondents reported that parents were told when they needed to return for the second dose at the initial vaccine appointment (63.4%) or that the subsequent immunization visit was scheduled during the initial appointment (55.5%). Only 26.9% of respondents reported that their clinics proactively reached out to parents or patients to remind them to return for additional HPV vaccine doses, and 5.3% of nurses reported that their clinics had no process to remind adolescents and their caregivers to return to complete the HPV vaccine series.
Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences with HPV Vaccination Delivery: About 90.0% of nurses agreed or strongly agreed that it was important that older children and adolescents be vaccinated against HPV before they engage in early physical intimacy, and a similar percentage (89.8%) expressed confidence in the safety of the HPV vaccine. However, about 34.5% of respondents reported anticipating an uncomfortable conversation while discussing the HPV vaccine with parents of 9 to 12-year-old children. Over two-thirds of respondents (69.6%) reported facing more resistance to the HPV vaccination as compared to tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine since Tdap vaccination is required by Montana state law for school attendance. [13] About 62.6% of nurses reported that parents prefer to initiate the HPV vaccine series for their children at 13 years or older versus at younger ages. Approximately one-third of nurses reported recommending the HPV vaccine more often to age-eligible adolescents at a higher risk of getting an HPV infection. (Figure 2).
Perceived Barriers to HPV Vaccine Delivery: More than two-thirds of nurses reported that they perceived the following as significant barriers to recommending and administering the HPV vaccine: parents not thinking that the vaccine is necessary for their sons (74.5%), misinformation that parents receive from the internet or social media (71.6%), parental concerns about the safety of the HPV vaccine (67.7%), and irregular well-child visits (66.7%). Over half of respondents felt that the amount of time it takes to discuss HPV vaccination with parents or adolescents or the financial cost to get the HPV vaccine were not at all barriers to recommending or administering the HPV vaccine. Through open-ended text box responses, nurses reported additional obstacles to the HPV vaccination, with the most frequently reported barriers being injection site pain, effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on regular well-child visits, and parental consent to receive the HPV vaccine. Respondents reported that parents of younger children (11-12-year-old) were less aware that HPV vaccination is recommended for their child as compared to parents of older children (15-17-year-old).
A higher proportion of respondents reported over half of parental refusal or deferral of the HPV vaccine among younger age groups (11-12-year-old) compared to older adults (15-17-year-old) regardless of the adolescent’s gender. (Figure 3).
Nurses’ Support of Strategies to Improve HPV Vaccination Rates: Interventions and initiatives that were strongly supported by over three-fourths of the nurse respondents were emphasizing cancer prevention when discussing the HPV vaccine with parents and adolescents (85.5%), partnering with a school or other community organizations in educating adolescents and parents about HPV vaccination (82.0%), engaging all staff, clinical and non-clinical, in providing positive and consistent messages about HPV vaccination (75.8%), training nurses and medical providers in strategies for effective vaccine conversations (75.2%). Implementing a state law requiring the HPV vaccine for school attendance was least supported by the respondents (34.4%) as a strategy to increase vaccine uptake. (Figure 4) In open-ended responses, nurses provided additional ideas regarding initiatives to increase HPV vaccination, including school-based vaccination clinics, incorporating immunizations within sports physicals, and providing education about the HPV vaccination through T.V. commercials or mailers.