See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
yongchun zhou
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) versus percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Methods: The clinical data of 1,100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on the 605 patients in Group A, while PTED was performed on the 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Macnab criteria were adopted to evaluate the outcomes. Moreover, the surgery durations, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activities, and postoperative lengths of hospital stay for the two groups were observed.
Results: The follow-up period ranged from 24 months to 60 months, with an average duration of 43 months. As the excellent and good outcome rate was 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B, there were no significant differences in efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest durations and postoperative lengths of hospital stay than did Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B.
Conclusions: Although conventional IFD and PTED had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, transforaminal endoscopic discectomy exhibited several advantages, such as less trauma, less bleeding, and a shorter length of hospital stay, and it can be considered an ideal surgical option for treating LDH.Save and Continue
Keywords
Posterior Approach; Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy; Lumbar Disc Herniation; Efficacy
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 15 Sep, 2020
Editor assigned
On 18 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 17 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 17 Aug, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 06 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Jul, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 09 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Jun, 2020
Version 1
Posted 10 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 26 May, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 15 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 May, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 15 May, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 15 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 16 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 01 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedics
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
yongchun zhou
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 15 Sep, 2020
Editor assigned
On 18 Aug, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 17 Aug, 2020
Editor invited
On 17 Aug, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 06 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Jul, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 09 Jul, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 07 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Jun, 2020
Version 1
Posted 10 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 26 May, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 15 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 May, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 15 May, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 15 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 16 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 14 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 01 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedics
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of conventional interlaminar fenestration discectomy (IFD) versus percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
Methods: The clinical data of 1,100 patients who had been diagnosed with LDH from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. IFD was performed on the 605 patients in Group A, while PTED was performed on the 505 patients in Group B. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and modified Macnab criteria were adopted to evaluate the outcomes. Moreover, the surgery durations, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative off-bed activities, and postoperative lengths of hospital stay for the two groups were observed.
Results: The follow-up period ranged from 24 months to 60 months, with an average duration of 43 months. As the excellent and good outcome rate was 93.5% in Group A and 92.6% in Group B, there were no significant differences in efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, Group B had significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter bed rest durations and postoperative lengths of hospital stay than did Group A (P < 0.05). There were two cases of postoperative recurrence in Group A and three in Group B.
Conclusions: Although conventional IFD and PTED had similar levels of efficacy in treating LDH, transforaminal endoscopic discectomy exhibited several advantages, such as less trauma, less bleeding, and a shorter length of hospital stay, and it can be considered an ideal surgical option for treating LDH.Save and Continue
Loading...