Trial Design. This study was a 12-week double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised trial with two equal groups run in parallel preceded by 2 weeks of placebo run-in and ending by a 2-week follow-up. The main endpoint was memory function and three secondary end-endpoints, (i) carotid blood velocity, (ii) reactive hyperaemia, and (iii) endothelial inflammatory markers.
Approvals and registration. The protocol used in this study was approved by Naresuan University Ethical Committee for Human Research (NU-IRB) with IRB No. 0898/60 and the certificate COA No. 197/2018. The approval date of the protocol was 16/05/2018. The trial was registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on 30/07/2020, registration ID TCTR20200730002. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, The Belmont Report, CIOMS Guideline and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
Participant specification.
Eligibility criteria were
“A person, aged 55–80 years, who was not suffering from any diseases, including, schizophrenia, dementia, depression, liver disease, kidney disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia treated with therapeutic anti-hyperlipidaemia drugs” that also appeared in the recruitment advertisement.
Inclusion criteria
55–80 years of age, Thai ethnicity, able to listen, speak and write in the Thai language, education at least to 4th -year of primary school and voluntarily signing the consent form.
Exclusion criteria
They were excluded, if they had any of the following conditions, i.e., liver disease, kidney disease, diabetes, cancer, stroke, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia treated by any antihyperlipidaemic drug, schizophrenia or any psychotic disorders, dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, depression (as diagnosed by a physician), pregnant or plan to become pregnant, taking herbal supplements or drugs which may interfere with the nervous system or study outcomes, smoking (> 10 cigarettes per a day), and attempting to lose weight. Definitions followed the Thai guidelines54
Criteria for the withdrawal: Participants were withdrawn if they met any of the following criteria during the study period: Receiving drugs or herbal supplements that may interfere with the nervous system or the study outcomes, diagnosed with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease or depression by a physician, pregnancy, non-adherence to the investigational product, missing an appointment or the physical examination, experiencing high liver enzyme and/or high blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) serum levels, all outside the normal range, receiving injuries rendering them unable to continue the study, the participant voluntarily leaves the study, or experienced any AEs either acute and/or life-threatening or requiring inpatient hospitalisation.
The details of the selection process are illustrated in the participant flow diagram in Fig. 5.
Sample Size. The sample size was calculated using an effect size of 0.15 for the memory speed test comparing BM with placebo treatments after 12 weeks40, power = 0.8 and alpha = 0.0555. A sample size of 32 participants was predicted, 16 for each arm, would detect a clinically important difference. To allow for dropouts, this was increased to at least 40 participants.
Recruitment and settings. Prospective participants were found by advertisements posted around Naresuan University and nearby health-promoting hospitals, direct contact with villagers in the University district. Recruitment took place from 1st June 2018 to 31st July 2018 and the trial was conducted from August 2018 to February 2019 at Phitsanulok, Thailand. All testing was performed on the campus of Naresuan University at the Faculty of Medical Science and the Cosmetics and Natural Products Research Center (CosNat), the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Applicants attended the University where a researcher explained the study aims, duration, visit times, procedures, potential harms and risks, answered questions, and signed an informed consent form.
In addition, the following screening tools and questionnaires were applied:
-
A personal and general information questionnaire,
-
Medical history questionnaire,
-
MMSE – Thai version 2002 (MMSE-Thai 2002)56,57,
-
TGDS58
Screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied by 2 physicians and a researcher. Participants were paid expenses for attending at each visit (a fixed 500Baht, ~US$14.00).
Randomisation and allocation. Trial codes were allocated to participants at enrolment and the codes were randomised by block of four tables59. This was conducted by one of the researchers who also secured the allocation table and had no role in data collection. All other researchers and participants were blinded to treatments and this embargo continued to apply to withdrawn participants. The codes were broken immediately before data analysis began and after the last participant had completed their follow-up by a person who conducted the analysis.
Interventions. Preparation of the base/placebo: Frozen mulberries (Queen Sirikit Sericulture Center, Nan, Thailand) were boiled with water (1:1 w/v) and then filtered to produce mulberry juice. A liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) chromatogram and contents has been published60 (Fig. 6). Constituents that might have pharmacological actions relevant to the current study were cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-rutinoside, pelagonidin3-O-rutinoside, rutin, and murusimic acid.
Extract of B. monnieri (eBM) and the investigational product: The aerial part of BM was collected from Phetchaburi province, Thailand, and identified by Associate Professor Wongsatit Chuakul, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand. The voucher specimen (Phrompittayarat 001) was kept in the Pharmaceutical Botany Mahidol Herbarium, Mahidol University, Thailand. BM was extracted using 95% ethanol that contained bacoside A3 (2.22%), bacopaside I (3.54%), bacopaside II (4.68%) bacopaside X (3.25%), and bacopasaponin C (2.34%), i.e., 16.0% total saponins, determined by high pressure liquid chromatography (Fig. 6) as previously reported61,62.
The interventions were produced as 2 liquid formulations for oral administration:
-
Placebo: 39.6 ml was aliquoted into sterile dark glass bottles, sucralose solution (0.4 ml of 4% w/v) added, and the capped bottles pasteurised at 75oC.
-
Test product: 194 mg of Brahmi extract containing 31mg of total saponins was dissolved into 40 ml of mulberry juice/sucralose mix and then pasteurised as for the placebo.
Taste, odour, and visual discrimination between interventions: To test whether the two interventions could distinguish, a panel of 12 staff and students visually compared, and when blind-folded, smelled, tasted and drank the products in random order. None were able to distinguish the preparations.
Participants were asked to drink the intervention directly from the bottle about 30 min after breakfast at one time, replace the cap and return to the tray.
Outcomes and measurements. The primary outcome was improved working memory. Secondary outcomes were: increased carotid blood flow, post-ischemic cutaneous hyperaemia, and blood levels of endothelial cytokines. Additionally, AEs were observed.
Working memory. The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) protocol is widely used to test a variety of drug classes on cognitive functions using subjects of varying ages, with varying health conditions and disabilities, in varying testing environments, and validated in dementias63. CDR has been adapted by us for Thai participants40 as a battery of tests outlined in Fig. 1.
Participants sat in front of a laptop running Microsoft windows 10 system and no other application running, with a touch-sensitive screen in a quiet room throughout the ~ 20 min duration of the experiment. Participants responded to visual stimuli as quickly as possible by ‘pressing’ on either the “YES” or “NO” buttons. Recorded latency times were average for all trials in each test. For choice tests, each correct response incremented the score beginning from ‘0’. The final scores were corrected for random inputs.
Task1: Word recognition: Participants were sequentially presented with 15 on screen Thai ‘memory’ words for 1sec at 2sec intervals to remember. Immediately after, a randomly selected memory or novel word was displayed to which the participant pressed “YES” for a memory word or “NO” for a novel word. A correct response (“YES” or “NO” as appropriate) incremented the score. This sequence was run 15-fold and the final score expressed as a percentage (range 0-100%) and the average response latency updated (ms).
Task2: Picture recognition: This used a similar protocol and scoring but displayed 20 ‘memory’ photographs each for 1sec every 3sec in succession.
Task3: Spatial recognition: A 3x3 matrix of 5 red squares and 4 random yellow ‘memory’ squares were displayed for 1sec. Three sec later, the panel was redisplayed showing one randomly positioned yellow square and 8 red squares. If its position corresponded to one of the 4 ‘memory’ yellow squares, the participants would respond “YES”, otherwise respond with “NO”. This sequence was run 36 times. Response latencies (ms) were averaged. Correct response scores (“YES” or “NO” as appropriate) were incremented and on completion of the series, the score was corrected for random inputs.
Task4: Numeric working memory: Five digits (0–9) were randomly selected, and each displayed sequentially (1sec at 2sec intervals) for participants to memorise. Then, a random succession of 30 randomly generated single digits that invited “YES” or “NO” button presses depending on whether they were ‘memory’ or novel digits. This protocol was repeated twice more using new 5 digit sets. Mean latencies and correct responses were accumulated as above.
Simple response latency: The word “YES” was displayed 50-times at 1.0 to 3.5sec intervals and participants pressed the “YES” button as quickly as possible. Premature presses were ignored and accumulated response latencies were expressed in ms.
Choice reaction time: The words either “YES” or “NO” were randomly displayed at 1.0-3.5sec intervals and the participants had to press the corresponding “YES” or “NO” button for 50 trials. The response time (ms) and an accuracy score incremented if the response was correct.
These six raw parameters were used to create four memory domains:
-
emory latency sums immediate response times (ms) of the 4 tasks: words, images, shapes, and numeric stimuli totalling 101 tests.
-
Quality of memory summed accuracy scores of the same 4 tasks (maximum of 100 points in the absence of any errors for each task – 400 total).
-
Power of attention measures of attention and psychomotor information processing sum of simple (response time to appearance of stimulus) and choice response times (response time to decide between ‘yes’ or ‘no’ choice).
-
Continuity of attention sums accuracy score of attention by calculating the combined percentage to the maximum full score of 100 from the choice reaction time.
Carotid blood velocity. The two carotids provide about 70% of cerebral blood flow and thus the common carotid blood velocity provides an approximation of total brain blood flow64. Carotid blood velocity was measured via a vascular Doppler probe (8MHz Nicolet Elite200, USA) connected to an in-house built ultrasound interface and digitiser. Signals were analysed with Matlab (v. 3.2) (Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 649–667, 2005). Before testing, subjects were supine and rested for 5 minutes in the quiet room at 25 oC. The transducer probe was placed over the internal carotid arteries at 60o to the vessel longitudinal axis. Ultrasonic Doppler blood flow waveforms were recorded during 5 sec breath-holds for both right and left internal carotid arteries in triplicate as peak systolic velocity (cm/s)65,66.
Reactive hyperaemia. Reactive hyperaemia describes the increased downstream blood flow when the upstream arterial occlusion is released67. Participants were seated in Fowler’s position in a quiet room at 23 ± 2°C, 50 ± 5% relative humidity with their right hand resting on a table with the palm facing upwards. Cutaneous microvascular blood velocity, an indicator of blood flow, was measured by laser Doppler perfusion using a Pericam PSI system (Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden) with a 1388 x 1038-pixel CCD camera and laser speckle contrast imaging and Perisoft software. Regions of interest were selected over the whole hand, the distal and intermediate phalanges, and palm. After 3min of baseline recording, a cuff around the upper arm was inflated to 50mmHg above systolic pressure for 2 min. Then the cuff was deflated and recording continued for another 3min. The peak of the PORH was measured as perfusion units and normalised by the participant’s mean arterial blood pressure, PU/mmHg68–70.
Blood biochemistries. Participants were asked to fast for 10-12hr before arrival. Venous blood (15 ml) was drawn to measure serum glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C), lipid profile, calcium, liver function markers: AST, alanine transaminase (ALT) and ALP, and renal function markers: BUN, creatinine and eGFR (see Supplementary Table S1 online). These were undertaken before and after the run-in period (week0) and at week12 (Fig. 7).
Endothelial inflammatory marker. Plasma fractions from week1 and week12 blood samples were used to measure the endothelial markers of inflammation using the commercial sandwich ELISAs for human soluble VCAM-1, cat. No. KHT0601, lot 201801002, Invitrogen, and competitive ELISA for ADMA, cat. no. E-EL-0042, lot nos. 1TR97MXU4I and GQ3LHPLMVW, Elabscience, Texas USA. Figure 7 shows at what stages of the trial these measurements and procedures were conducted.
Main outcome tests: Memory, carotid ultrasonography, reactive hyperaemia. Querying AEs: Participant debriefing and AE reports, body weight (BW), WHR and blood pressure measurements. Blood tests: 10–12 hr fasting, lipid profile, fasting blood sugar, renal & liver functions. Endothelial markers measured blood levels of VCAM-1 and ADMA. Collect intervention: When the participants were given their codified intervention for following 2/4 weeks. Values obtained at the beginning of the run-in are termed ‘baseline’ values
Clinical monitoring
Briefing. During the participant interview following enrolment, the researcher emphasised the importance of recording AEs however trivial. For more serious AEs they might experience due to any cause, they should firstly contact their own or the trial doctor. Responsible cohabitants were also to be made aware of the participant’s role in the trial.
Debriefings. A researcher asked the participants about any AEs and these were reported in their case report forms and into their diary. In their diaries, participants recorded symptoms, frequencies, symptom details, and the management of occurring AEs.
The participant diary. On enrolment, each participant was given a purpose-designed page-a-day diary. In this, participants entered the time they took the intervention, recorded their experiences of the study and their intervention product each day into a diary, and recorded any protocol variations. If they encounter an AE, they must enter all its details into the diary and contact a trial representative.
The diary also contained information about visit dates, times and venues, when to fast in preparation for a blood draw, and telephone numbers of a research team and the designated doctor for ‘24/7’ access or emergency use.
Adherence to treatment. Adherence was maximised by: verbally stressing the need to take the intervention in the manner described, assessing any variances in consuming the intervention material was stressed at every debriefing session, inspecting the diary entries, and visually inspecting the returned bottles for missing contents.
Clinical parameters. Blood chemistry was measured at 3 time points (see Supplementary Table S1 online), and blood pressure and cognitive function by the MMSE-Thai were measured at every visit (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online and Supplementary Fig. S2 online).
Routine home visits were deemed unnecessarily invasive because: (a) the intervention is commonly consumed as a food or a herbal medication, (b) eBM is a much researched supplement, and (c) most elderly in our catchment area cohabit (94%) and have family caregivers (99%)47.
Participant flow. Participants made 6 visits to the campus and entered into three phases of the trial: run-in, intervention, and follow-up (Fig. 5 and Fig. 7)
Run-in period: Placebo was consumed by all participants to: (i) ensure the participants could reliably take the intervention and cope with the testing throughout the trial, (ii) maintain their health status thus minimising dropouts, (iii) provide a practice session for memory testing, the primary endpoint, and (iv) provide two sets blood biochemistry baseline values some of which are notoriously variable.
Data analyses. Endpoint data was presented and analysed using data normalised to week 0 using the equation, D=((dt/d0)-1)*100% where dt are data at weeks 4 to 16 and d0 week 0. Unpaired t-test between eBM and placebo treatments at each measurement time and Tukey post hoc testing using GraphPad Prism for Windows version 5, (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Treatment groups (eBM v. placebo) were compared using 2-factor repeated measures ANOVA as time-indexed rows in Graphpad at time points 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Comparisons were made between groups and week 0 tests. Values are expressed as means ± SDs or means ± SEMs as appropriated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. ‘n’ refers to the number of participants relevant to test.