Arrhythmias are common in RHD patients at JKCI, according to this study. Arrhythmias were identified in 276/390 (70.77%) of patients, with 193/390 (49.5%) having arrhythmias on the resting ECG. A 24 hours holter was performed on 197/390 (50.5%) of the patients, and it was discovered that 88/197 (44.7%) of them experienced arrhythmias. This is in contrast with a study done by Behra S et al found that out of 268 patients with RHD 45.5% had arrhythmias (6). Another study by Pourafkari L et al on factors associated with arrhythmias in rheumatic mitral stenosis, they found that arrhythmias was present in 33% of patients however in this study they only assessed for atrial fibrillation (9).
In a meta-analysis done globally among 75,637 patients with RHD it was found that 32.8% patients had arrhythmias, however this study did not assess for paroxysmal arrhythmias (10).
Bouleti C et al found the prevalence to be 38%, however this study only involved patients who had undergone percutaneous mitral valve repair (11). The Soweto Heart Study found the prevalence of arrhythmias to be 46.8% (8).
Types of arrhythmias in this study were AF (57%), atrial flutter (15.5%), PAC (8.8%), junctional rhythm (7.8%), sinus arrhythmia (7.3), PVC (3.1%) and multifocal atrial tachycardia (0.5%). Similarly, Behra S et al found that AF was present in 37.2% of patients followed by ventricular ectopic beats in 8.9% patients, multifocal atrial tachycardia in 1.8% patients. (6) Holter monitoring in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm in a study done by Ramsdale DR et al showed that supraventricular ectopic was in 93.6% patients, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was present in 22.2% patients, atrial flutter was in 7.9% patients, ventricular ectopic was in 87.3% and 1 patient had non sustained supraventricular tachycardia. Overall, our findings and findings from previous studies suggest that supraventricular arrythmias are the most common arrhythmias in RHD. The variation in prevalence and types of arrhythmias is due to the use of different definitions when diagnosing arrhythmias, and the device used to detect arrhythmias.
This study found that increase NYHA functional class was significantly associated with arrhythmias in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Higher NYHA functional class occurs in patients with severe valve disease and chamber dilatation which is the cornerstone for arrhythmias. Alam et al found that association of arrhythmias with increasing NYHA class was significant for pauses, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, AF, couplets, bigeminy and trigeminy (4)
In this study we found that mitral stenosis, tricuspid regurgitation, left ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, and LA diameter were significantly associated with arrhythmias in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis, only LA dilatation was significantly associated with arrythmias. This observation is similar to that of Diker E et al (12). In contrast, a Meta-analysis of correlates of AF in RHD by Noubiap et al found that mitral valve disease and tricuspid valve involvement (OR:4 95% CI 3.0-5.3) and LA dilatation (MD:8.1mm 95% CI 5.5–10.7) was associated with AF (10). The observed difference could be due to different methodology, study population and sample size.
In a study done in India on VHD they found that LVIDd and LVIDs was significantly associated with arrhythmias however, this finding was only for mitral regurgitation, aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis lesions, when the parameters where compared to multivalvular involvement it appeared not to be significantly associated with arrhythmias (6). Diker E et al found that LVIDd and LVIDs were not statically significant associated with arrhythmias, this finding is similar to the finding in our study.
In receiver operating curve we found that the critical point beyond which arrhythmias develop was LA diameter > 48mm. This is not similar to that of S Behra et al, they found that the critical point for LA dilatation of > 43mm. This could be due different ethnicity among the two studies.
In our study mitral valve area and mean gradient was not significantly associated with arrhythmias this contrasts with S Behra et al, they found that mitral valve area and mean gradient to be significant associated with arrhythmias in univariate model, however in their multivariate analysis it was not significant. Our finding was like that of Diker E et al., MVA did not show any correlation as a predictor for AF.
The recentness of this study is that no current data is available in Tanzania that characterizes arrhythmias among RHD patients, this study shows that LA dilatation is a good predictor of arrhythmias and thus can be used in risk stratification among these patients. Holter ECG has shown to be an important tool in detecting arrhythmias among patients with normal sinus rhythm in resting ECG.