Study subjects
Lung tissues and BALF from study subjects were obtained from the biobank of Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Korea (Schbc-biobank-18101601-14-01). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Soonchunhyang University Hospital (Schbc-medicine-2018-10). Informed written consent for study participation was obtained from the subjects, and a sample donation was obtained from each subject. All subjects were examined by physicians and underwent a chest X-ray, high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT), and pulmonary function tests. There was no evidence of any underlying collagen vascular diseases in IPF patients according to their laboratory results and clinical symptoms. The diagnostic criteria for IPF, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), NSIP, and sarcoidosis were established based on an international consensus statement [20–23]. IPF was diagnosed by the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patterns in the pathological specimens (surgical IPF) and/or by HRCT in patients who did not undergo surgical lung biopsy (clinical IPF). Two pathologists examined each slide independently after being informed of the subjects’ sex, age, and HCRT results. Pathological recognition of the NSIP pattern included two major aspects: (1) exclusion of other patterns of interstitial lung diseases, and (2) categorization of the histological features according to the ATS/ERS 2002 classification [23, 24] and the modified histological definition of the NSIP pattern [25]. HP was diagnosed by the presence of clinical symptoms compatible with non-necrotizing granulomatous bronchiolocentric pneumonitis [20]. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis was based on histological evidence of non-caseating granuloma and compatible clinical images [22]. HP and sarcoidosis were diagnosed after excluding other diseases with similar histological profiles. Biopsy tissues were subjected to acid-fast bacillus and Gömöri methenamine silver staining to verify the absence of microorganisms and fungi. The serial diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured, and the annual rate of decline was estimated as follows: (last FVC [or DLCO] − baseline FVC [or DLCO])/baseline FVC [or DLCO]/follow-up years. Normal controls (NC) exhibited no respiratory symptoms as determined by a screening questionnaire and had a predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) and FVC > 80% and normal chest radiograms.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids procedure
The bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) procedure was performed in lung segments that were not under immunosuppressive therapy, were in the right middle lobe of the NCs, and exhibited the greatest disease involvement when HRCT was done, as described previously [26]. A cytocentrifuge was used to prepare the cells, which were then mounted on slides and stained with Diff-Quik stain. A hemocytometer was used to differentially count the cells to a total count of 500 cells. The supernatants were isolated using centrifugation (500 × g, 5 min) and stored at − 80 °C.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of S100A9 in BALF
The S100A9 level in the supernatants was measured using an ELISA (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The lower limit of detection was 0.1 ng/mL, and values below this limit were set to 0. The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were below 15%.
Immunofluorescence stain of S100A9 in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid cells and lung tissues
Tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrolyzed, and BALF cell slides were fixed with 0.4% cold paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with macrophage markers, including monoclonal anti-human S100A9 monoclonal mouse antibody (1:200 dilution; Novus Biological, Littleton, CA, USA), polyclonal anti-human α-SMA antibody (1:200 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and monoclonal goat anti-CD163 antibody (1:200 dilution, Hycult Biotech, Uden, PB, Netherlands). The sections were also incubated with monoclonal rabbit anti-neutrophil elastase antibody (1:100 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK) as a neutrophil marker. Tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrolyzed, and BALF cell slides were fixed with 0.4% cold paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature. The sections were incubated for 1 hour in an Fc receptor blocking agent (FC blocker, Innovex Biosciences, Richmond, CA, USA) containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to block non-specific binding. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with macrophage markers, including monoclonal anti-human S100A9 monoclonal mouse antibody (1:200 dilution; Novus Biological, Littleton, CA, USA), polyclonal anti-human α-SMA antibody (1:200 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and monoclonal goat anti-CD163 antibody (1:200 dilution, Hycult Biotech, Uden, PB, Netherlands). The sections were also incubated with monoclonal rabbit anti-neutrophil elastase antibody (1:100 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK) as a neutrophil marker. Additional details are provided in the on-line supplement. After washing three times with Tris Buffered Saline (TBS), the slides were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with the following fluorescent secondary antibodies: anti-rabbit IgG H&L (FITC) (1:1,000 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK), anti-mouse IgG H&L (PE) (1:1,000 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK), and anti-goat IgG H&L (PE) (1:1,000 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK). After washing in TBS, the slides were incubated for 3 minutes at room temperature with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 510 META, Zeiss, Jena, Germany).