Transverse cervical malformations have been classified into cervical agenesis and cervical dysgenesis[5]. Cervical agenesis is complete absence of the cervix. Cervical dysgenesis is further categorized into cervical fragmentation, cervical fibrous cord and cervical obstruction[5]. Cervical malformations are also described as a spectrum. At one end of this spectrum are patients with a normal uterine body, hypoplastic cervix without a canal and a normal vagina. At the other end of the spectrum are patients with a uterine body, cervical agenesis but without vagina[6]. Conservative surgical management of such challenging conditions has three main goals ; relief of the obstructive symptoms, achievement of satisfactory sexual function and preservation of the uterus for future fertility[1]. Assessment of these three goals requires long term follow-up data which is lacking in literature.
In this study we present long term results of conservative surgical management of nine cases of cervical malformations. Seven patients (78%) had cervical agenesis associated with either complete or upper vaginal aplasia while two patients had cervical dysgenesis in form of cervical obstruction with normal vaginal length. This agrees with what was mentioned in literature that cervical agenesis is associated with upper or complete vaginal aplasia in 72% of cases, while in cases of cervical dysgenesis, vaginal aplasia is an unusual finding (3%)[7].
Although all patients had relief of the obstructive symptoms and experienced regular menstrual flow, most of them (78%) experienced progressive stenosis at the site of anastomosis as a result of the natural healing process. This stenosis resulted in recurrence of hematometra which necessitated surgical intervention mainly by dilatation under anaesthesia or reoperation. We reported that the need for first dilatation occurs mainly after 12 months postoperatively in cases who had McIndoe’s vaginoplasty and UVA. Whereas the first dilatation was needed after longer duration (24 and 36 months) in cases who had UVA directly without vaginoplasty. From this observation we recommend performing regular dilatation of the anastomosis site starting from 12 months after the operation and at regular intervals individualized according to the clinical evidence of stenosis. Dilatation should be done by Hegar dilators after diagnostic hysteroscopy which paves the way by hydro-dissection and decreases the risk of false tracking. This agrees with Mikos et al. who recommended performing regular follow-up observation with hysteroscopy to confirm the accessibility of the cervical/ neocervical conduit[1].
Regarding fertility, the results are somehow frustrating as all the seven sexually active patients suffered from primary infertility. Five of them sought help by ART. Clinical pregnancy was achieved only in two patients (28.5%) out of seven. Both patients had cervical obstruction with normal vagina while in the three patients of cervical agenesis the results were inferior. Two were not allowed to start IVF protocol due extremely stenosed anastomosis site that hindered mock examination by embryo transfer catheter while the third patient had repeated 2 ICSI failures.
In all ICSI trials done for the three patients, hysteroscopic examination and dilatation were performed immediately before starting the medication of the chosen protocol. No difficulty in ovum pick up was reported in all trials but embryo transfer was challenging due to the stenosed curved track in the patient who had UVA with McIndoe’s vaginoplasty. However, despite the adequate response to induction protocols and good quality of the transferred embryos, implantation failed repeatedly. The justification for this failure could be the impaired endometrial receptivity due to recurrent hematometra and increased intrauterine pressure during the obstruction periods. This agrees with Mikos et al. who suggested that uterine function is not always normal in these patients because in many cases the diagnosis is delayed, and the uterine function is impaired either because of the hematometra or because of the severe pelvic adhesions already formed[1].
In a review article published in 2021, it is reported that 249 cases of cervical malformations were managed by different techniques of conservative surgeries and resulted in successful outcome by achieving menstruation in 228/249 patients (91.6%). Regarding fertility ,30 pregnancies (12.0%) were reported: seventeen of 155 patients with cervical agenesis (11.0%) and 13 of 71 patients with cervical obstruction (18.3%)[8]. Unfortunately, in this review article there was no information whether pregnancies occurred naturally or not and no information about the difficulties of the ART if used.
The limitation of our study is the small number of patients included because of the rarity of the condition.
From our study we conclude that conservative surgical management of cervical malformations is a promising choice that can be offered with a main aim of relieving the obstructive symptoms and preserving the uterus for future fertility. Yet, the patients should be ready for a long journey of follow-up and regular dilatation of the anastomosis site starting from one year after the primary surgery. Primary infertility is expected while pregnancy is a remote hope that is hindered by many challenges. The results are worse in patients of cervical malformation associated with vaginal aplasia than in patient who had isolated cervical obstruction with normal vaginal length.