Assessment of radiographic and prognostic characteristics of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in high- grade gliomas

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2081170/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Assessment of radiographic and prognostic characteristics of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in high- grade gliomas

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2081170/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose

Gliomas are characterized by immunosuppressive features. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is overexpressed and plays an important role in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments of gliomas. However, the radiographical and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression remain unclear.

Methods

Using tissue microarrays, we evaluated PD-L1 expression and the presence of tumor-infiltrating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and CD204 + macrophages using immunohistochemical analysis. Contrast enhancement area and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity area were evaluated by two-dimensional analysis. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the overall survival time in 44 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma.

Results

We evaluated 71 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas who were treated between October 1998 and April 2012. PD-L1 expression was observed in 15 patients (21.1%). A significant association of PD-L1 expression with the CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities, but not with CD204 + macrophage density, was observed (p = 0.025, p = 0.0098, and p = 0.19, respectively). The FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio was significantly higher in PD-L1 + tumors than in PD-L1- tumors (p = 0.0037). PD-L1 expression did not show a significant association with the median survival time (PD-L1 + vs. PD-L1-: 19.2 vs. 14.9 months; p = 0.39).

Conclusion

PD-L1 expression was associated with CD4 + and CD8 + T cell infiltration, indicating a significant interplay between PD-L1 and immune cells. The positive correlation of PD-L1 expression with an increased FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio suggested that radiographical characteristics could reflect the immunological status. Our results did not support the prognostic impact of PD-L1 in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas.

Programmed death-ligand 1

High-grade glioma

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte

FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio

IDH-wildtype glioblastoma

Glioma is the most common type of primary brain tumor, and glioblastoma is the most aggressive type of glioma. The standard management of glioblastomas include maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, temozolomide (TMZ) therapy, and tumor-treating fields. Patients with glioblastomas have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 15% in Japan [1]. Patient age, performance status, extent of resection, neurological function, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 mutations, and O-6-methylguanine deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation are the most consistently reported prognostic factors for such patients [2–4].

Glioma is characterized as having an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [5]. This microenvironment is mediated by a complex immune network of tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), such as tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Effector cells, including CD8 + T cells, attack the tumor cells and exert an anti-tumor activity. Conversely, suppressor cells, including regulatory T cells (Treg), M2 macrophages, and MDSCs, inhibit the antitumor activity, thereby allowing tumor progression and attenuating drug efficacy. The balance between the effector and suppressor cells could be a determinant of clinical outcomes [6, 7].

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint molecule and a co-inhibitory ligand expressed in many types of tumor cells. Its incidence in glioblastomas is 19–61% [2, 8–12]. Binding of PD-L1 to its receptor, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), induces T cell dysfunction and apoptosis by increasing cytokine production; this results in immune escape of diffuse gliomas [13]. Furthermore, PD-L1 is associated with immunosuppressive cells, including Treg and M2 macrophages, and causes strong immune suppression [14–16]. Thus, the PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays an important role in facilitating immune escape of gliomas [17]. The prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression has been explored in patients with gliomas; however, the results have been heterogeneous and the prognostic value of PD-L1 remains controversial [17].

Immune checkpoint inhibitors elicit durable responses in a variety of solid malignancies; however, they have not shown significant efficacy against gliomas [18, 19]. The Checkmate-143 trial showed that nivolumab did not show survival benefit over bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastomas, with an objective response rate of 7.8% [19]. This indicates the need to identify factors that predict the response to immune therapy.

Radiographic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are widely used in the noninvasive diagnosis of gliomas. MRI is very useful for visualizing anatomical abnormalities and evaluating the pathological characteristics of tumors; however, whether radiographical assessment can determine the immune status remains unclear [20–22].

In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship of PD-L1 expression with TIICs and genetic alterations in 71 patients with high-grade gliomas and investigate imaging features reflective of PD-L1 expression and TIIC infiltration in 62 patients who showed a single enhanced lesion. We also determined the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in 44 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas.

Patients and clinical data collection

We used a tissue microarray (TMA) constructed from 100 high-grade gliomas in patients who were treated between October 1998 and April 2012 at our institute. Among these, 24 and 5 patients with recurrent tumors and tumors with poor immunohistochemical staining results were excluded, respectively. The remaining 71 patients with newly diagnosed tumors were included in this retrospective observational study. All tumors were diagnosed by neuropathologists at our hospital and were reclassified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 classification [23]. The patients’ charts were reviewed for clinical history, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), date of initial surgery, date of tumor recurrence, date of death, and last hospital visit.

Tissue microarray

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks and the corresponding hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides were overlaid for TMA sampling. A 2.0 mm cylindrical core was obtained for each case. Microarray blocks were sectioned to obtain 4 µm thick sections.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using TMA with autostainers (Ventana BenchMark ULTRA platform [Ventana] and Autostainer Link 48 [Dako]) [24]. We assessed cell surface markers for TIICs (including CD4, CD8, and CD204) and PD-L1 expression in the tumor cells. The primary antibodies used were as follows: 4B12 (1:50; for CD4), 4B11 (1:50, for CD8; Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK), SRA-C6 (1:200, for CD204; Trans Genic Inc., Kumamoto, Japan), and E1L3N (1:800, for PD-L1; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) [24, 25].

Immunohistochemical evaluation

The microscopic images were scanned and digitized using a NanoZoomer Digital Pathology system (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). The H&E-stained slides were viewed at 40× magnification, and tumor areas were selected as the area of interest; non-neoplastic brain tissue, necrotic areas, and empty spaces were manually excluded from the analyses.

The numbers of CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and CD204 + macrophages were counted within the area of interest using a Patholoscope (Mitani Corp). The cellular density was calculated as the number of stained cells divided by the area of the area of interest (1.512 mm²).

PD-L1 staining was evaluated by two neuropathologists (A.Y. and K.S.) and classified as diffuse, focal, or absent; PD-L1 + tumors were defined as either focally or diffusely stained, while PD-L1- tumors were defined as unstained.

For CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities and CD204 + macrophage densities, cut-off values were arbitrarily defined as > 75% percentile positive cells/mm²; for the CD8/CD204 ratio, the cut-off value was defined as > 75% percentile of the ratio. These cut-off values for CD4 + T cell densities, CD8 + T cell densities, and CD204 + macrophage densities corresponded to 20, 20, and 600 cells/mm², respectively; for the CD8/CD204 ratio, the cut-off value corresponded to 0.02.

Tumors were classified into four groups based on PD-L1 positivity/negativity and CD8 + T cells densities above/below the cut-off value (i.e., a combined PD-L1/CD8 classification).

IDH1/2 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation analysis

IDH1/2 mutation status and MGMT promoter methylation status were evaluated in 50 and 55 tumors, respectively. Briefly, tumor DNA was extracted from frozen tumor tissues is all cases using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). The presence of hotspot and other known mutations in IDH1 (R132) and IDH2 (R172) was assessed by pyrosequencing, as described previously [26]. The MGMT promoter methylation status was analyzed using bisulfite modification of the tumor genomic DNA, followed by pyrosequencing, as described previously [27]; the status was defined as methylated and unmethylated when its mean levels at 16 CpG sites were ≥ 16% and < 16%, respectively [27, 28].

Imaging assessment

Contrast enhancement area was calculated as the product of perpendicular diameters of contrast-enhanced lesions on T1-weighted images [29]. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity area was calculated as the product of the perpendicular diameters of hyperintensity areas on FLAIR or T2-weighted images [30]. The ratio of the FLAIR hyperintensity area to the contrast enhancement area (i.e., the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio) was obtained by dividing the FLAIR hyperintensity area by the contrast enhancement area.

Statistical analysis

The differences between PD-L + and PD-L1- tumors with respect to CD4 + T-cell, CD8 + T-cell, and CD204 + macrophage densities were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test. The differences between PD-L + and PD-L1- tumors with respect to IDH1/2 mutation status, and MGMT promoter methylation status were evaluated using the χ² test. The differences in imaging parameters among tumors categorized by their PD-L1 expression, CD4 + T-cell, CD8 + T-cell, and CD204 + macrophage densities were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine an optimal cutoff value of the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio to provide the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity for differentiating PD-L1 expression. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the initial surgery to the date of death or the last follow up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of initial surgery to the date of progression, death, or last follow up. OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical tests were performed using JMP® ver. 16.2.0 for Mac (SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan), and GraphPad Prism® ver. 9.4.1 for Mac (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Patient characteristics

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The population comprised 31 men (43.7%) and 40 women (56.3%); the overall median age was 64 years (range, 29–86 years). The tumors in our cohort comprised 44 glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4 (62.0%), 4 astrocytomas, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 4 (5.6%), 20 glioblastomas, not otherwise specified (NOS; 28.2%), 2 oligodendrogliomas, IDH-mutant and 1p19q co-deleted, WHO grade 3 (2.8%); and 1 high-grade astrocytoma, NOS (1.4%). In 20 (28.2%) and 35 (49.3%) tumors, the MGMT promoter status was hypermethylated and hypomethylated, respectively.

Among the 44 patients with glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4 , 34 patients (77.3%) received combined radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemotherapy, 7 (15.9%) received combined radiotherapy and nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU)-based chemotherapy, and 3 (6.8%) received radiotherapy alone. Furthermore, 29 patients (65.9%) underwent total or subtotal resection, while 15 patients (34.1%) underwent biopsy or partial resection. Finally, 27 (61.4%) and 17 (38.6%) patients had a postoperative KPS score of ≥70 and <70, respectively.

Correlation of PD-L1 expression with TIICs densities, IDH1/2 mutation, and MGMT promoter methylation status

PD-L1 staining was diffusely and focally positive in eight (Fig. 1A) and seven (Fig. 1B) tumors, respectively. Therefore, these 15 tumors (21.1%) were defined as PD-L1+ tumors; the remaining 56 tumors (78.9%) that showed no PD-L1 staining (Fig. 1C) were defined as PD-L1- tumors.

Immunohistochemical findings for CD4, CD8, and CD204 are shown in Fig. 2A, B, C, and D, respectively. The median number of CD4+ and CD8+ cell densities was significantly higher in PD-L1+ tumors than in PD-L1- tumors (PD-L1+ vs. PD-LI-: 24.5 vs. 5.3 cells/mm²forCD4+ cells [p = 0.025, Fig. 2A]; 19.8 vs. 6.3 cells/mm²forCD8+ cell densities [p = 0.0098, Fig. 2B]). There was no significant difference in the median number of CD204+ cell densities between PD-L1+ and PD-L1- tumors (332.7 vs. 512.6 cells/mm²; p = 0.19; Fig. 2C). The frequencies of PD-L1+ tumors were 16.7% and 27.3% in IDH-mutant tumors (n =6) and IDH-wildtype tumors (n =44), respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.58; Fig. 2D). Furthermore, 30.0% and 20.0% of the PD-L1+ tumors were MGMT hypermethylated (n = 20) and hypomethylated (n =35), respectively; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.40; Fig. 2E).

Imaging characteristics

We evaluated the imaging characteristics of 62 patients who showed a single enhanced lesion. The contrast enhancement and FLAIR hyperintensity areas did not differ between the PD-L1- and PD-L1+ tumors (p = 0.18 and p = 0.84, respectively) and among tumors with low and high of CD4+ T cell densities (p = 1.00 and p = 0.86, respectively), CD8+ T cell densities (p = 0.33, and p = 0.17, respectively), and CD204+ macrophage densities (p = 0.23, and p = 0.39, respectively). The FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio was significantly higher in PD-L1+ tumors than in PD-L1- tumors (p = 0.0037), but not in tumors with low and high tumors of CD4+ T cell densities, CD8+ T cell densities, and CD204+ macrophage densities (p = 0.14, 0.44, and 0.85, respectively; Table 2).

The optimal cutoff value of the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio for differentiating between tumors with and without PD-L1 expression was 1.83, as calculated by an ROC curve (area under the curve: 0.75). Tumors with FLAIR to enhancement ratio above the cutoff value were observed in 78.6% (11/14) of PD-L1+ tumors, whereas those with FLAIR to enhancement ratio below the cutoff value were in 27.1% (13/48) of PD-L1- tumors (p = 0.0011) (Fig. 3B).

Prognostic impact in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas

Next, we focused on the 44 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas to evaluate the prognostic impact of PD-L1 and TIICs. Kaplan–Meier analysis did not show a significant association of PD-L1 expression with the OS or PFS (median survival time [MST]: PD-L1+ vs. PD-LI-, 19.2 vs. 14.9 months [p = 0.39]; median PFS (mPFS): PD-L1+ vs. PD-L1-1-, 9.6 vs. 8.1 months [p = 0.46]). Tumor-infiltrating CD4, CD8, and CD204 cells densities and the ratio of CD8/CD204 cells densities were not significantly associated with patient outcomes (Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, 44 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas were categorized into the PD-L1+/CD8 high (five patients, 11.4%), PD-L1+/CD8 low (seven patients, 15.9%), PD-L1–/CD8 high (five patients, 11.4%), and PD-L1–/CD8 low (27 patients, 61.4%) groups. The MST and mPFS did not differ significantly among these groups (Supplementary Table 1).

In this study, we showed a significant association of PD-L1 expression with CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities, but not with CD204 + macrophage density, IDH1/2 mutation status, and MGMT promoter methylation status. Our radiographical assessment revealed that PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression, CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities, CD204 + macrophage densities, the ratio of CD8+/CD204 + cell densities, and four groups categorized according to the combined PD-L1/CD8 classification were not associated with the PFS or OS.

We found a positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities, indicating a significant interplay between PD-L1 and the CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. Lee et al. also showed that PD-L1 expression was associated with CD3 + T cell infiltration [2]. PD-L1 is usually undetectable in most normal tissues, including the normal cortex and white matter [31, 32]. However, inflammatory cytokines, particularly interferons released by TIL, drive tumor PD-L1 expression; this in turn triggers TIL inhibition [32]. Therefore, the positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and CD4 + and CD8 + T cell densities could indicate an adaptive immune resistance mechanism in high-grade gliomas for suppressing the functions of the local effector T-cells and escaping immunosurveillance. We did not observe any association between CD204 + macrophage density and PD-L1 expression, but found an abundant CD204 + macrophage density; this abundant CD204 + macrophage infiltration in gliomas might contribute to immunosuppressive activities independent of PD-L1 [7].

Previous studies have reported that PD-L1 expression was significantly reduced in IDH1/2 mutant tumors than in IDH1/2 wildtype tumors [2, 31, 33]. We also found a lower PD-L1 expression in IDH1/2 mutant tumors than in IDH1/2 wildtype tumors; however our small sample area did not have enough statistical power to meet the significance. Few studies have investigated the relationship between PD-L1 expression and MGMT promoter methylation status [2, 31]; Holzl et al. showed no correlation between the two [31], which was similar to our results.

Few studies have shown that radiographical assessment can determine the immune status; however, their findings are inconsistent [20–22]. Narang et al. demonstrated the relationship between MRI-derived textural features and intratumoral CD3 + T-cell infiltration, indicating the potential value of radiological assessment of the immunological status [21]. Tamura et al. also reported cases of a broader FLAIR hyperintensity area, in which the CD163 + cells were more common in the peritumoral brain zone and tumor core, suggesting that infiltration of immunosuppressive cells could reflect the radiographical features [22]. Conversely, Dubinski et al. did not show that the edema-to-tumor ratio had no significant association with lymphocytic and/or myelocytic cells infiltration and suggested that the imaging analysis on extent of edema could not predict immune cell infiltration [20]. In our study, we showed the positive correlation of PD-L1 expression with an increased FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio, with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 72.9%. This is a key finding of this study, because it indicates that simple radiographic findings can reflect the immunological status (such as the PD-L1 expression).

Increased FLAIR-to-enhancement ratios indicate increased peritumoral edema relative to the tumor area. Glioma-associated edema is considered to be vasogenic and is caused by increased vascular permeability [34]. This vascular permeability is due to immature tumor vessels that are induced by an excessive secretion of angiogenetic factors, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [35]. VEGF expression is shown to be positively associated with PD-L1 expression in several cancers, including gliomas [36–38]. Thus, one possible mechanism underlying the association of the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio with PD-L1 expression is the induction of both peritumoral edema and PD-L1 expression by VEGF upregulation.

Previous studies have shown heterogeneous findings on the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with glioma [2, 8–11, 39]; some have revealed a negative correlation between PD-L1 expression and prognosis [9–11], while others have revealed that PD-L1 is not correlated with prognosis [2, 8, 39]. Our results did not support the prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression on the OS and PFS of patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. We also did not find prognostic differences among groups created using the combined PD-L1/CD8 classification. These observations indicate that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway might play a limited role in the prognosis of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas through a complex interplay of immunosuppressive mechanisms, including other checkpoint molecules and Treg and M2 macrophages. Furthermore, tumors in the PD-L1+/CD8 high subgroup are thought to be the most likely to benefit from single-agent anti–PD-1/L1 blockade [40]; however, we found that only 11.4% of the IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were categorized into this subtype. Collectively, the limited role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and the small subset of tumors in the PD-L1+/CD8 high subgroup might explain the previously reported low response rates to nivolumab treatment [19].

This study has some limitations. First, it was performed retrospectively and the sample size was small. Therefore, our results need to be confirmed in larger studies. Second, due to lack of standardization, the immunohistochemical evaluation method and parameters in our study differed from those in other studies, including the antibodies and criteria of positivity used. Due to these differences, our results need to be interpreted with caution. Third, the FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio was not evaluated by volumetric analysis. Although we acknowledged that compared to two-dimensional analysis, volumetric analysis could provide more detailed data and might detect smaller differences, we prioritize the easier application of the two-dimensional analysis in daily clinical practice.

In summary, we found a positive correlation of PD-L1 with CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell infiltration, indicating a significant interplay between PD-L1 and TILs. The positive correlation of PD-L1 expression with an increased FLAIR-to-enhancement ratio suggests that radiographical assessment could reflect the immunological status, such as PD-L1 expression. Our results did not support the prognostic impact of PD-L1 in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Further studies are needed to confirm the present observations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K10776.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [Grant Number JP16K10776].

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose

Author contributions

M.O., S.K., and Y.N. designed the study. M.O. and S.K. conducted the statistical analysis. A.Y. and K.S. contributed to tissue microarray preparation, diagnosis, and data acquisition. M.O., Y.M., M.T., S.Y., Y.T., and Y.N. contributed to the patients’ management. M.O., Y.M., M.T., S.Y., Y.T., K.I., and Y.N. contributed to sample collection, molecular analysis, data acquisition, and interpretation. M.O., K.S, and Y.N wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors edited it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical considerations

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center (2004-066 or 2007-086).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

No individual personal data is contained in this manuscript.

Committee_of_Brain_Tumor_Registry_of_Japan (2017) Report of Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (2005-2008) 14th Edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57: 9-102
Lee KS, Lee K, Yun S, Moon S, Park Y, Han JH, Kim CY, Lee HS, Choe G (2018) Prognostic relevance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 136: 453-461 doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2675-6
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10: 459-466 doi:S1470-2045(09)70025-7 [pii] 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7
Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H, Friedman A, Reardon D, Herndon J, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Vogelstein B, Bigner DD (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360: 765-773 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0808710
Grabowski MM, Sankey EW, Ryan KJ, Chongsathidkiet P, Lorrey SJ, Wilkinson DS, Fecci PE (2021) Immune suppression in gliomas. J Neurooncol 151: 3-12 doi:10.1007/s11060-020-03483-y
Desland FA, Hormigo A (2020) The CNS and the Brain Tumor Microenvironment: Implications for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 21 doi:10.3390/ijms21197358
Lim M, Xia Y, Bettegowda C, Weller M (2018) Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15: 422-442 doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0003-5
Berghoff AS, Kiesel B, Widhalm G, Rajky O, Ricken G, Wohrer A, Dieckmann K, Filipits M, Brandstetter A, Weller M, Kurscheid S, Hegi ME, Zielinski CC, Marosi C, Hainfellner JA, Preusser M, Wick W (2015) Programmed death ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 17: 1064-1075 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou307
Han J, Hong Y, Lee YS (2017) PD-L1 Expression and Combined Status of PD-L1/PD-1-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Mononuclear Cell Density Predict Prognosis in Glioblastoma Patients. J Pathol Transl Med 51: 40-48 doi:10.4132/jptm.2016.08.31
Nduom EK, Wei J, Yaghi NK, Huang N, Kong LY, Gabrusiewicz K, Ling X, Zhou S, Ivan C, Chen JQ, Burks JK, Fuller GN, Calin GA, Conrad CA, Creasy C, Ritthipichai K, Radvanyi L, Heimberger AB (2016) PD-L1 expression and prognostic impact in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 18: 195-205 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov172
Pratt D, Dominah G, Lobel G, Obungu A, Lynes J, Sanchez V, Adamstein N, Wang X, Edwards NA, Wu T, Maric D, Giles AJ, Gilbert MR, Quezado M, Nduom EK (2019) Programmed Death Ligand 1 Is a Negative Prognostic Marker in Recurrent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 85: 280-289 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy268
Xiu J, Piccioni D, Juarez T, Pingle SC, Hu J, Rudnick J, Fink K, Spetzler DB, Maney T, Ghazalpour A, Bender R, Gatalica Z, Reddy S, Sanai N, Idbaih A, Glantz M, Kesari S (2016) Multi-platform molecular profiling of a large cohort of glioblastomas reveals potential therapeutic strategies. Oncotarget 7: 21556-21569 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7722
Wintterle S, Schreiner B, Mitsdoerffer M, Schneider D, Chen L, Meyermann R, Weller M, Wiendl H (2003) Expression of the B7-related molecule B7-H1 by glioma cells: a potential mechanism of immune paralysis. Cancer Res 63: 7462-7467
Antonios JP, Soto H, Everson RG, Moughon D, Orpilla JR, Shin NP, Sedighim S, Treger J, Odesa S, Tucker A, Yong WH, Li G, Cloughesy TF, Liau LM, Prins RM (2017) Immunosuppressive tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells mediate adaptive immune resistance via a PD-1/PD-L1 mechanism in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 19: 796-807 doi:10.1093/neuonc/now287
DiDomenico J, Lamano JB, Oyon D, Li Y, Veliceasa D, Kaur G, Ampie L, Choy W, Lamano JB, Bloch O (2018) The immune checkpoint protein PD-L1 induces and maintains regulatory T cells in glioblastoma. Oncoimmunology 7: e1448329 doi:10.1080/2162402X.2018.1448329
Zhu Z, Zhang H, Chen B, Liu X, Zhang S, Zong Z, Gao M (2020) PD-L1-Mediated Immunosuppression in Glioblastoma Is Associated With the Infiltration and M2-Polarization of Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Front Immunol 11: 588552 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.588552
Chen RQ, Liu F, Qiu XY, Chen XQ (2018) The Prognostic and Therapeutic Value of PD-L1 in Glioma. Front Pharmacol 9: 1503 doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01503
Marabelle A, Le DT, Ascierto PA, Di Giacomo AM, De Jesus-Acosta A, Delord JP, Geva R, Gottfried M, Penel N, Hansen AR, Piha-Paul SA, Doi T, Gao B, Chung HC, Lopez-Martin J, Bang YJ, Frommer RS, Shah M, Ghori R, Joe AK, Pruitt SK, Diaz LA, Jr. (2020) Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol 38: 1-10 doi:10.1200/JCO.19.02105
Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, Mulholland P, Lim M, Wick A, Baehring J, Ahluwalia MS, Roth P, Bahr O, Phuphanich S, Sepulveda JM, De Souza P, Sahebjam S, Carleton M, Tatsuoka K, Taitt C, Zwirtes R, Sampson J, Weller M (2020) Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024
Dubinski D, Won SY, Rauch M, Behmanesh B, Ngassam LDC, Baumgarten P, Senft C, Harter PN, Bernstock JD, Freiman TM, Seifert V, Gessler F (2021) Association of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Status With Edema to Tumor Ratio and Its Correlation With Immune Infiltration in Glioblastoma. Front Immunol 12: 627650 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.627650
Narang S, Kim D, Aithala S, Heimberger AB, Ahmed S, Rao D, Rao G, Rao A (2017) Tumor image-derived texture features are associated with CD3 T-cell infiltration status in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 8: 101244-101254 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.20643
Tamura R, Ohara K, Sasaki H, Morimoto Y, Kosugi K, Yoshida K, Toda M (2018) Difference in Immunosuppressive Cells Between Peritumoral Area and Tumor Core in Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 120: e601-e610 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.133
Board WCoTE (2021) Central Nervous System Tumours WHO classification of tumours, 5th edition. . Lyon: IARC Press
Sato J, Kitano S, Motoi N, Ino Y, Yamamoto N, Watanabe S, Ohe Y, Hiraoka N (2020) CD20(+) tumor-infiltrating immune cells and CD204(+) M2 macrophages are associated with prognosis in thymic carcinoma. Cancer Sci 111: 1921-1932 doi:10.1111/cas.14409
Katsuya Y, Fujita Y, Horinouchi H, Ohe Y, Watanabe S, Tsuta K (2015) Immunohistochemical status of PD-L1 in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Lung Cancer 88: 154-159 doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.03.003
Arita H, Narita Y, Matsushita Y, Fukushima S, Yoshida A, Takami H, Miyakita Y, Ohno M, Shibui S, Ichimura K (2015) Development of a robust and sensitive pyrosequencing assay for the detection of IDH1/2 mutations in gliomas. Brain Tumor Pathol 32: 22-30 doi:10.1007/s10014-014-0186-0
Arita H, Narita Y, Fukushima S, Tateishi K, Matsushita Y, Yoshida A, Miyakita Y, Ohno M, Collins VP, Kawahara N, Shibui S, Ichimura K (2013) Upregulating mutations in the TERT promoter commonly occur in adult malignant gliomas and are strongly associated with total 1p19q loss. Acta Neuropathol 126: 267-276 doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1141-6
Ohno M, Miyakita Y, Takahashi M, Igaki H, Matsushita Y, Ichimura K, Narita Y (2019) Survival benefits of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or temozolomide plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with glioblastoma aged >/= 75 years. Radiat Oncol 14: 200 doi:10.1186/s13014-019-1389-7
Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, Tsien C, Mikkelsen T, Wong ET, Chamberlain MC, Stupp R, Lamborn KR, Vogelbaum MA, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28: 1963-1972 doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, Taphoorn MJ, Jaeckle K, Junck L, Armstrong T, Choucair A, Waldman AD, Gorlia T, Chamberlain M, Baumert BG, Vogelbaum MA, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Wen PY, Chang SM, Jacobs AH (2011) Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol 12: 583-593 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70057-2
Holzl D, Hutarew G, Zellinger B, Schlicker HU, Schwartz C, Winkler PA, Sotlar K, Kraus TFJ (2021) Integrated analysis of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression reveals increased levels in high-grade glioma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 147: 2271-2280 doi:10.1007/s00432-021-03656-w
Taube JM, Anders RA, Young GD, Xu H, Sharma R, McMiller TL, Chen S, Klein AP, Pardoll DM, Topalian SL, Chen L (2012) Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7-h1 expression in human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape. Sci Transl Med 4: 127ra137 doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003689
Berghoff AS, Kiesel B, Widhalm G, Wilhelm D, Rajky O, Kurscheid S, Kresl P, Wohrer A, Marosi C, Hegi ME, Preusser M (2017) Correlation of immune phenotype with IDH mutation in diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol 19: 1460-1468 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox054
Stummer W (2007) Mechanisms of tumor-related brain edema. Neurosurg Focus 22: E8 doi:10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.9
Zoccarato M, Nardetto L, Basile AM, Giometto B, Zagonel V, Lombardi G (2021) Seizures, Edema, Thrombosis, and Hemorrhages: An Update Review on the Medical Management of Gliomas. Front Oncol 11: 617966 doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.617966
Fujii T, Hirakata T, Kurozumi S, Tokuda S, Nakazawa Y, Obayashi S, Yajima R, Oyama T, Shirabe K (2020) VEGF-A Is Associated With the Degree of TILs and PD-L1 Expression in Primary Breast Cancer. In Vivo 34: 2641-2646 doi:10.21873/invivo.12082
Shin SJ, Jeon YK, Kim PJ, Cho YM, Koh J, Chung DH, Go H (2016) Clinicopathologic Analysis of PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Association with Oncogenic Proteins Status. Ann Surg Oncol 23: 694-702 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4903-7
Yue Q, Zhang X, Ye HX, Wang Y, Du ZG, Yao Y, Mao Y (2014) The prognostic value of Foxp3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 116: 251-259 doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1314-0
Zeng J, Zhang XK, Chen HD, Zhong ZH, Wu QL, Lin SX (2016) Expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 and its correlation with clinical outcomes in gliomas. Oncotarget 7: 8944-8955 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6884
Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ (2015) Classifying Cancers Based on T-cell Infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res 75: 2139-2145 doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0255

Table 1: Patient characteristics

Table 2: Correlation of imaging characteristics with PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating immune cell

No competing interests reported.

Supplementaryinformation.docx
Supplementary information Supplementary Table 1: Summary of the median progression-free survival time and the overall survival time in 44 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
03 Oct, 2022
Reviews received at journal
03 Oct, 2022
Reviews received at journal
01 Oct, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
26 Sep, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
26 Sep, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
20 Sep, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
20 Sep, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
20 Sep, 2022
First submitted to journal
19 Sep, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Assessment of radiographic and prognostic characteristics of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in high- grade gliomas

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Patients and clinical data collection

Tissue microarray

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical evaluation

IDH1/2 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation analysis

Imaging assessment

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Declarations

References

Tables

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1