In this study, we have shown that overexpression of LFO transcription factors enabled the survival and neuronal specification of EBs-derived cells from the hESC-LFO line engrafted into SNpc, highlighting that the expression of LMX1A, FOXA2, and OTX2 transcription factors support differentiation toward TH-expressing cells in vivo. The hESC-LFO-derived EBs generated neural rosettes, a well-known developmental structure of human neural precursor cells in vitro [28, 29, 35]; they also expressed DCX, indicating neuroblast and immature neuron stages; and matured into neuron-like cells that expressed TH and produced neuromelanin [36].
The expression of the LFO transcription factors, individually and together, is necessary for the specification and maintenance of the dopaminergic mesencephalic phenotype in vitro [20] and in vivo, as they regulate several genes with a critical role in the mesencephalic dopaminergic lineage, such as Pitx3, Girk2, or Nurr1 [21]. Here, LFO factors were necessary to initiate neural development and TH-positive neuronal differentiation and, remarkably, for graft survival. Indeed, Domansky et al. [37] identified that FOXA2 is crucial for survival at the specification and maintenance stages. Similarly, it has been observed that LMX1A regulates the survival of adult midbrain dopaminergic neurons [38], whereas OTX2 inactivation results in midbrain dopaminergic cell death [39]. Our results may indicate that overexpression of LFO factors together generated a synergistic effect, favoring the survival of hESC-LFO-derived EBs. However, further investigation will be required to evaluate the effect generated by the overexpression of individual transcription factors.
The formation of neural rosettes in our grafts indicated the development of neuroepithelial tissue, with a trend for a higher prevalence of neural rosettes in the injured SNpc than in untreated SNpc. To our knowledge, this is the first report of differentiation via neural rosette formation in SNpc after transplantation of EBs derived from hESCs. As mentioned above, Hribková et al. [30] classified neural rosettes according to their shape and timing of neuronal development and proposed five stages of neural rosette formation [30]. In our experiments, neural rosettes in a single graft showed several of the described stages of differentiation, such as polarization, elongation, and lumen formation. Overall, we found that the lumen formation stage was significantly more prevalent at 7 and 15 dpt.
Furthermore, our 3D analysis confirmed that the neural rosettes were composed of a 3D structure with the lumen zone located at the center of the neural rosette, similar to the neural rosettes obtained with in vitro organoid experiments by Knight et al. [40]. It is essential to highlight that undifferentiated ESC grafts can generate noncancerous overgrowths that may be detrimental to brain function [41]. Nonetheless, we did not observe tumorigenic growths at the different times of EB transplantation analyzed. On the contrary, the morphology development from neural rosettes towards individual cells, and the positive labeling to DCX and TH with leading processes, suggest that the cells are in a progressive process of differentiation.
Indeed, our group has previously reported that untreated SNpc promotes neuronal differentiation of EBs derived from mESCs up to 30 dpt [19]. Interestingly, we recently observed that the SNpc of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats is a permissive niche for initiating dopaminergic differentiation of EBs derived from mESCs overexpressing LMX1A at six dpt [18]. Here, we observed a significant increase in the number of neural rosettes formed in the lesioned SNpc, indicating the development of the lumen-forming stage of neural rosettes in the 6-OHDA-lesioned group was favored as compared to the controls. This indicates that the lesioned SNpc may have relevant factors for the differentiation of engrafted cells, as observed in previous work [18, 41]. Therefore, further research is required to identify the correlation between the 6-OHDA lesion and the microenvironmental cues to facilitate cell differentiation in the SNpc.
In addition to LMX1A, OTX2, and TH expression, at 30 dpt, the neuromelanin found in the grafted area was a direct indication of dopamine oxidation and, consequently, an indirect suggestion of dopamine synthesis by the grafted cells, which is an indispensable feature for dopaminergic neurons, as has also been seen in organoids directed towards a dopaminergic phenotype [42, 43]. However, given that the transplant survived in only 16% (n = 18) of the rats at 30 dpt, there could be apoptotic signaling being triggered due to intrinsic characteristics of the cells (e.g., increased susceptibility to cell death as occurs in the dopaminergic phenotype), which could explain why at 7 and 15 dpt there was survival and differentiation as neural rosettes. In contrast, at 30 dpt the survival rate decreased considerably. Similarly, this difference between 7 and 30 dpt could mean that more potent immunosuppression is needed to overcome possible immune reactions that promote transplant cell death, as the rats used in this study were pharmacologically immunosuppressed [44]. Early immunosuppression, or a combination of cyclosporine A use with other immunosuppressors, could favor cell survival to improve it at longer time intervals [45].