DNA mismatch repair genes correct base mismatch. The MMR system comprises four genes and their encoded proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2), which identify and repair base mismatch, insertion, and deletion in the DNA damage response signal network and maintain the structural integrity and stability of DNA.[7] Mutations in the MMR system genes occur mainly in Lynch syndrome (also called hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer)[8] and endometrial carcinoma and gastric cancers. However, lung cancer patients have an MMR gene mutation only 4–5%[9]. MMR leads to mismatch accumulation during DNA base replication and consequently MSI-H. DeMarchiP et al.[10] showed that the morbidity rate of MSI-H lung cancer was only 0.8% (4 cases) among 480 cases of lung adenocarcinoma, and there was only one mismatch repair defect (MLH1, PMS2) in 4 cases of highly microsatellite unstable lung cancer (MLH1, PMS2)[10]. Furthermore, there was only 1 case of MSI-H (0.19%) among 524 cases of NSCLC[11]. We report a rare case of a patient with dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H squamous cell lung cancer who maintained SD during 33 months of toripalimab treatment. Therefore, dMMR/MSI-H NSCLC can benefit from immunotherapy, and dMMR/MSI-H may serve as a predictor of the response to immunotherapy for patients with dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H NSCLC.
DMMR/MSI-H cancers are characterized by a strong mutator phenotype, high somatic mutation load, lymphocyte infiltration, and high expression of immune checkpoint markers.[12] These cancers often produce new antigens to promote immune cell infiltration and upregulation of immune checkpoint molecules to promote tumor immune escape. PD-1 receptor inhibitors are used for immunotherapy and antagonize the aforementioned effects. The production of new antigens by MSI tumor underlies their increased immune activity. Because of the enhanced anti-tumor efficicy, patients with MSI tumors show a better prognosis and higher survival rate compared with non-MSI tumors.
Several large-scale clinical studies have demonstrated a role of dMMR/MSI-H in immunotherapy. In the KEYNOTE-177 study, patients with dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer were randomized to treatment with pembrolizumab or chemotherapy[13]. The median survival times in the chemotherapy and pembrolizumab groups were 8.2 and 16.5 months, respectively. In the KEYNOTE-016 study, the objective response rate in the pembrolizumab group reached 36% in dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer and 46% in other cancers. As a result, pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA for the treatment of MSI-H/dMMR cancer that are unresectable and have metastasized.[14] In the CheckMate-142 study,[15] nivolumab alone and nivolunmab plus ipilimumab were used to treat dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer; the patients were followed up for a median of 21 and 25.4 months, respectively, and demonstrated objective response rates of 34% and 58%, respectively. Furthermore, the nivolunmab plus ipilimumab group had a disease control rate of 81%, 12-month progression-free survival(PFS) rate of 71%, and 12-month overall survival rate of 85%. [16] As a result, Nivolumab was approved by the FDA for the treatment of dMMR or MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer patients aged ≥ 12 years who exhibit disease progression after treatment with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.
Few studies have evaluated the relationship between MMR gene mutations and immunotherapy response in NSCLC patients. Mendez et al,[17] revealed that the PFS of patients with loss of MMR expression (8 months) was two-fold longer than that of patients who with retained MMR expression (4 months)[17].
Previous studies have shown that the TMB is associated with a good response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.[17] This may be due to changes in the microsatellite sequence of patients with dMMR and a large number of tumor cell mutations, resulting in TMB-H and consequently the production of new antigens and lymphocyte mobilization. As a result, tumor growth and tumor lymphocyte infiltration, may be inhibited, leading toa good effect of immunotherapy.[18] Huang et al,[19] found that the median PFS was longer in patients with TMB-H lung cancer versus low TMB lung cancer (10.6 months vs. 3.9 months). This suggests that TMB is a potential biomarker of the response to the PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC. Additionally, Rizvi et al.[20] revealed that a higher non-synonymous TMB in NSCLC is associated with a good long-term response to pembrolizumab treatment.
The FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC treatment include pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab. In the KEYNOTE-024 study, pembrolizumab was used for untreated NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. The pembrolizumab group had a two-fold greater 5-year survival rate compared with the chemotherapy group (31.9% vs 16.3%).[22] in the CheckMate078 trial, nivolumab treatment had greater efficacy and fewer side effects compared with docetaxel treatment for stage IIIb/IV NSCLC that progressed after platinum-containing dual-drug treatment.[23] A growing number of immune medicines, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of NSCLC based on the positive results of clinical trials.
The PD-1 inhibitor toripalinab was approved by the National Drug Administration in China, for the treatment of advanced or metastatic melanoma that had previously failed systemic therapy. In the CHOICE-01 study, the PFS of patients with EGFR- and ALK-negative stage Ⅲb/IV NSCLC was considerably longer in the toripalinab group with the placebo group (median PFS: 8.4 vs. 5.6 months).[24] Furthermore, in the PD-L1 positive and negative subgroups, the risk of disease progression or death was decreased by 48% and 51%, respectively. The TMB-H (≥ 10mutations/Mbp) subgroup showed a better response to combination chemotherapy containing triplizumab and a lower risk of progressive disease or mortality compared with TMB-L group(median PFS: 13.1 vs.5.5 months, HR = 0.34). Our patient treated with toripalinab maintained SD over the 33-month follow-up.
In conclusion, our patient with a rare dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H squamous cell lung cancer showed a good response to toripalinab treatment and achieved SD. The good treatment outment may be because of the benefit of conventional treatment on dMMR/MSI-H tumors and the longer PFS achieved by toripalinab resistance in TMB-H lung cancer. Studies on dMMR lung cancer are scarce, and there is no unified standard for the selection of immunosuppressants. Toripalinab may be useful for the treatment of such cases. Additionally, dMMR/MSI-H can be used to predict the treatment response of lung cancer to immune checkpoint inhibitors.