Maximum compressive strength (MCS//g) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE)
The maximum compressive strength parallel to the grain (MCS//g) and Modulus of Elasticity of untreated and acetylated samples are presented in Table I. The MCS//g and MOE ranged from 19.26–20.07 N mm-2 and 855.26 -1085.1 N mm-2, respectively. The samples also acquired enhanced hydrophobicity. Reductions in moisture content of acetylated samples after chemical modification can also lead to improving its mechanical properties (Militz 1991; Akitsu et al. 1993). Yet, degradation of wood cell wall by modification may induce loss of strength. Some authors reported great strength loss of wood modified by dimethyloldihydroxyethylene urea (DMDHEU) due to acid degradation of the cell wall (Nicholas and Williams 1987; Hill 2006).
Table I. Maximum compressive strength parallel (MCS//g) to grain and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) of untreated and acetylated Obeche blocks.
|
Wood strength property (N mm− 2)
|
|
Acetylation time (Min)
|
MOE
|
MCS//g
|
Untreated
|
855.26 (79.56)a
|
19.26 (1.18)a
|
60
|
950.3 (274.23)a
|
20.06 (0.19)a
|
120
|
1085.1 (320.28)a
|
19.79 (0.56)a
|
180
|
1060.7 (58.06)a
|
20.07 (0.83)a
|
240
|
1061.6 (21.85)a
|
19.38 (0.87)a
|
300
|
991.4 (186.91)a
|
19.62 (0.73)a
|
Each value is a mean of ten replicates (standard deviation in parentheses)
However, ANOVA result as presented in Table I demonstrated that all MCS//g and MOE of the acetylated wood samples showed no significant difference when compared to the unmodified samples despite the slight increase in mean values.
The results are generally in line with previous findings reporting a negligible effect of acetylation on strength properties (Akitsu et al., 1993; Larsson and Tillman, 1989; Larsson and Simonson 1994; Liu et al. 1994; Rowell, 1991). However, a few studies have found slightly reduction in the mechanical properties. This may be due to reduction in the amount of fiber per volume as a result of lignocellulose hydrolysis. Yanjun et al. (2013) reported inconsistent changes in some mechanical properties of acetylated were depending on the type of wood, method of treatment and WPG. Sefc et al. (2012) mentioned the average increase of compression strength for beech wood due to wood modification was insignificant. On the contrary, Hamdan and Islam (2012) reported an increase in compressive modulus and decrease in modulus of rupture of modified five different tropical hardwoods- Jetulang (Dyera costulata), Terbulan (Endospermum diadenum), Batai (Paraserianthes moluccana), Rubberwood (Hevea brasillensis), Pulai (Astonia pnematophora) - after treatment.
Scanning Electron Microscopy of Acetylated wood
The acetylation treatments of Obeche showed no obvious defects and damage in the microstructure of the wood for all the acetylated wood (Fig. 1–6). However, slight alterations in color of the acetylated samples occurred when compared with the unmodified specimens. Also, the large pore sizes seen on the micrographs of the untreated samples reduced after acetylation. The highest reduction was seen in pore sizes in the 240 min and 300 min acetylated Obeche wood samples.
During acetylation, the use of elevated temperatures and acetic acid could lead to swelling of the cell wall which could have changed or damaged cell wall tissues resulting to changes in the mechanical properties of the wood (Sander et al. 2003). Uptake of water by the cell wall will continue until fiber saturation point is reached leading to bulking of the cell wall, but, repeated swelling and shrinking will possibly lead to structural deformation. Acetylation gives a lasting bulking effect contrary to reversible swelling that occur during water sorption (Rowell 1983). In the present study, SEM revealed no obvious damages in the microstructure of the acetylated Obeche wood; the cell walls remained intact with no visible defects or deformation, which are in line with the findings of (Sander et al. 2003) who reported that swelling of the cell wall tissue after acetylation did not expand beyond the fiber saturation point; thus, the treatment gave no changes to the ultrastructure of the wood. The likely reason is because acetylation reaction takes place at a single site with no occurrence of polymerization or cross-linking. The reduction in the acetylated wood samples pore sizes may be attributed to etherification at the hydroxyl groups by bulky acetyl groups, thereby reducing pore sizes. It has been found that wood species with large vessels and pores such as Obeche are usually light weight with coarse texture (Karl 1984). Furthermore, the kind of swelling that occurs in wood after fiber saturation point has been reached whereby the wood no longer absorb water is the same swelling that occurs during acetylation of wood. Hence, no obvious effect of acetylation on wood microstructure still after long periods at elevated temperatures.
Thermal Analysis
Thermal analysis of wood specimens is presented in Fig. 7. Thermal analysis of all the wood specimens revealed three distinct regions. In the first region, the peak produced by the derivative curves between 20°C and 160°C, relates to water evaporation from the intercellular space and there was no material degradation up to 160°C. When the temperature exceeded 160°C, decomposition occurred, and thermal stability decreased progressively (Wielage et al. 1999; Ruxanda et al. 2012). In the second region, DTG curves is characterized by a peak just below 340°C and a shoulder below 300°C, which reflects the thermal degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose. In third thermogravimetric region, char formation and loss of gases took place. The untreated and acetylated wood samples show a main one-stage degradation within the range of 250–480°C, in which all the carbohydrates decomposed (Ruxanda et al. 2012). Due to rapid decomposition of cellulose, a narrow peak having a long tail is observed.
The thermal decomposition of untreated wood specimen began at temperatures between 200 and 250°C and increased until 335°C which is the maximum rate loss of the material. For all the acetylated counterparts, the thermal decomposition began to occur at temperatures above 260°C and increased with higher temperatures until 346°C for maximum rate loss of the wood.
Table II. Thermogravimetric analysis of untreated and acetylated wood of Triplochiton scleroxcylon.
Reaction Time (Min).
|
T5%
|
T10%
|
T30%
|
T50%
|
T70%
|
T80%
|
Max weight loss
|
Der. Temp (ºC)
|
Untreated
|
246.15
|
263.56
|
307.58
|
331.43
|
349.85
|
446.90
|
1.32
|
335.03
|
60
|
260.74
|
279.07
|
311.41
|
331.35
|
347.69
|
456.25
|
1.31
|
337.94
|
120
|
265.41
|
283.07
|
315.92
|
338.19
|
354.67
|
419.58
|
1.29
|
344.35
|
180
|
267.4
|
285.32
|
318.26
|
339.36
|
355.6
|
443.25
|
1.29
|
346.85
|
240
|
264.23
|
283.32
|
317.92
|
339.86
|
355.94
|
453.42
|
1.21
|
345.10
|
300
|
263.15
|
282.48
|
317.08
|
340.78
|
359.99
|
487.27
|
1.18
|
345.58
|
The maximum weight loss and derivative temperature of thermal decomposition of untreated and acetylated wood specimens are given in Table II. It could be seen that untreated wood samples have the highest weight loss of 1.32 of derivative temperature of 335.03°C while the lowest weight loss of 1.18 at derivative temperature of 345.58 was observed in the 5h-acetylated samples.
It can be seen that the acetylated samples showed distinct degradation stages from untreated samples. The decomposition temperature for the weight loss at 5% and 10% occurred at 246 and 264°C, respectively, for the untreated samples, whereas shifted to a higher temperature for the acetylated samples ranging from 260–267°C and 279–285°C, respectively. At 70% and 80% weight loss, the decomposition temperature for the untreated samples occurred at 350 and 447°C, respectively, while the acetylated samples at occurred within the range of 348–369°C and 420–487°C, respectively. It has been confirmed from previous studies (Adebawo et al. 2016) that modification of wood with anhydrides etherify hydroxyl groups with acetyl groups, leaving the surface more hydrophobic. The higher decomposition temperature of the acetylated samples as compared to the non-acetylated sample may be explained by the chemical changes in hemicellulose and (to a lesser extent) cellulose. In comparison, thermal stability of the 5h- acetylated wood was higher than other acetylated wood. This observation could be due to greater weight gain observed in the blocks after acetylation which may indicate decrease in hydroxyl groups as a result of etherification in the fiber walls (Adebawo et al. 2019; Hung et al. 2016).