This study was designed to understand the long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with PTC with other organ invasions after adjuvant RAI. In this study, the excellent response rate was 42%, and the 7-year OS, LRRFS, and RFS rates were 100%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Metastatic lymph node size, resection margin status, and post-RAI suppressed Tg level were the independent prognostic factors for LRRFS.
Table 5 shows a literature review of studies that included adjuvant RAI for high-prognostic thyroid cancer [8-11]. Although the rate of T4 disease in this study was higher, and the follow-up period in this study was longer than that in previous studies. The response and recurrence rates were generally favorable compared with those in previous studies.
There was no evidence to recommend increasing the initial and total administered activities of RAI for patients with PTC with other organ invasions in this study. However, we found that surgical marginal status in high-risk thyroid cancer was related to treatment outcomes and increasing the administered activities of adjuvant RAI may be preferred for microscopically positive marginal cases. Watanabe et al. reported that patients with microscopically positive tumor margins could benefit from RAI at a dose of 100 mCi compared with RAI at a dose of 30 mCi [10]. In contrast, Jeong et al. reported that the recurrence rates in patients with complete resection did not differ between those who received 100 mCi and those who received 150 mCi [9]. These findings were associated with our results where resection margin status was an independent prognostic factor for the LRRFS.
Watanabe et al. reported that the most common relapse location was the lymph nodes, and no patients with microscopic positive margins relapsed [10]. A recent meta-analysis did not find a statistically significant association between microscopically positive surgical margins and local recurrence [17]. In this study, all local recurrences relapsed from areas considered as gross residual disease. Thus, adjuvant RAI alone may be insufficient for treating and preventing local recurrence from gross residual disease. Some retrospective studies showed evidence of long-term locoregional control using EBRT in patients with gross residual disease, and EBRT is recommended by the ATA and the American Head and Neck Society [2, 18-21].
Metastatic lymph node sizes > 3 cm are at a high risk of recurrence, and this fact is supported by the results of this study [2]. A few studies have reported that the recurrence rate was 27%–32% if any metastatic lymph node was > 3 cm [22, 23]. The 5-year LRRFS rate for metastatic lymph nodes > 3 cm in this study was worse at 52%, probably because of another prognostic factor, such as T4 disease.
The serum level of suppressed Tg as a marker of response to adjuvant RAI was found to be a strong predictor of eventual disease recurrence, and this was supported by a previous study [24]. The serum level of suppressed Tg may be a surrogate for patients with PTC with a longer time to event [25].
This study has limitations associated with its retrospective design. First, the number of patients who received RAI at doses of 100–120 mCi was small, and the follow-up period was short. These may have been the causes of the non-statistically significant differences compared with 60 mCi for adjuvant RAI. Long-term follow-up studies to evaluate the prognosis in patients treated with these two approaches are needed, and our group is also planning to conduct a long-term follow-up study. Second, the initial response to adjuvant RAI was evaluated in only half of the patients. The main reason for this was that the rate of receiving I-131 scintigraphy for diagnosis was low. Implementing a strict iodine-controlled diet is difficult in our country because of the excessive iodine intake from seafood, and the benefit of treatment outweighs the effort required to provide a strict iodine-controlled diet before I-131 scintigraphy for diagnosis. Therefore, we selected post-RAI suppressed Tg level as an independent variable for LRRFS rather than the initial response to RAI in this study.
In conclusion, we identified the long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for PTC with other organ invasions after adjuvant RAI directly related to patient prognosis and quality of life. Metastatic lymph node size, resection margin status, and post-RAI suppressed Tg level were independent prognostic factors for the LRRFS. Randomized trials and large-scale studies on potent treatments, such as EBRT, are desirable for these patients at a high risk of recurrence.