CD7 is Expressed in R/R-AML Patients with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD), but not on Normal Cells
We examined CD7 expression in T cells, B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils from normal cell subsets from healthy donors, where CD7 was highly expressed in T cell subsets and low in other myeloid subsets or Expression absent, which is similar from that reported by Diogo Gomes-Silva et al (21). CD7 expression was further determined in normal cell subsets from R/R AML patients and showed similar expression to healthy donors (Fig. 1A-E). A previous study reported that the CD7-positive percentage of acute myeloid leukemia cells detected by flow cytometry was approximately 30–35% (16, 18, 36). We summarized the expression of CD7 in the MRD-positive reports of R/R-AML patients from July 1, 2022, to January 1, 2021, in the Department of Hematology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, and the results suggested that 5 of the 16 MRD-positive patients (31.25%) had different proportions of CD7 expression, which was also demonstrated by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1F-G) (Table 1). These results also justify CD7 as a therapeutic target.
Table 1
characteristics of R/R AML
Sample ID
|
Age
|
Sex
|
CD7+
|
Cytogenetics
|
1
|
42
|
F
|
Neg
|
46, XX
|
2
|
57
|
M
|
Neg
|
46, XY
|
3
|
73
|
F
|
79.78%
|
46, XX
|
4
|
67
|
M
|
31.38%
|
46, XY
|
5
|
32
|
F
|
Neg
|
46, XX
|
6
|
64
|
F
|
Neg
|
46, XX
|
7
|
73
|
M
|
79.96%
|
46, XY, del (9) (q22; q34)
|
8
|
30
|
M
|
Neg
|
46, XY, t (8;21) (q22; q22)
|
9
|
16
|
M
|
Neg
|
45, X, -Y, t (8;21) (q22; q22)
|
10
|
71
|
F
|
Neg
|
46, XX
|
11
|
34
|
F
|
60.75%
|
46, XX
|
12
|
41
|
M
|
Neg
|
47, XY, +8
|
13
|
59
|
M
|
5.00%
|
46, XY
|
14
|
66
|
M
|
Neg
|
46, XY
|
15
|
65
|
F
|
Neg
|
Complex
|
16
|
37
|
M
|
Neg
|
Complex
|
CD7 CAR-T has High CAR and Negative CD7 Expression in vitro Assays
To determine whether normal T cells can redirect, specifically recognize and attack CD7-expressing AML malignant cells upon loading CD7 CAR. We designed a CAR structure including CD7-specific single-chain variable fragments from CD7 hybridoma antibody TH-69, CD28 transmembrane region, 4-1BB, CD3ζ, and T2A autocleavage sequences as well as endodomain-deleted EGFR (tEGFR) as a CAR expression detection marker for CD7 CAR-T (37, 38)(Fig. 2A).We measured the expansion rate of CD7 CAR-T at a variety of time points in vitro and found that CD7 CAR-T had a lower proliferation ratio than NTR group, which was similar to the previous study (12, 21) (Fig. 2B). The viability of CD7 CAR-T cells was lower compared to non-transduced T cells, but the lowest once recorded was higher than 78.3% in post-transduction day7 and 80.7% in day12 (Fig. 2C). We used lentivirus-loaded CD7 CARs to infest normal human T cells and assayed the percentage of CD7 CAR + T cells by flow cytometry on post-transduction days 4 and 12 with the use of tEGFR, a marker carried on the CAR architecture. The results indicated that CD7 CAR + T cells had a high proportion of CD3 + T cells, with the lowest once recorded at 83.6% in post-transduction day4 and 90.8% in day 12, much higher than the control group (Fig. 2D-F). To continuously monitor the CD7 expression of CAR-T cells, we measured the percentage of CD7 by flow cytometry on day 4 and day 12 after transduction, respectively, and the results showed that CD7 CAR-T was mainly dominated by the CD7- T cell subpopulation either day4 or day12 after transduction (Fig. 2G-I). As described in previous studies, this may imply specific binding of CD7 CAR-T to the CD7 + cell population, eliminating the CD7 + T cell subpopulation from the CD7 CAR + T cell population(31).
Expression of CD7 CAR-T Cells Exhaustion Markers and Cell Subpopulation Analysis in vitro
Memory phenotype of T cells is critical for CAR-T anti-tumor efficacy and persistence(39, 40). According to previous researches, TCM cells were defined by CD45RO and CCR7 double positivity (41, 42). We analyzed the CD8 + and CD4 + CD7 CAR-T cell populations separately and concluded that although there were no differences between the CD4 + CAR + T cell subpopulation and the CD8 + CAR + T cell subpopulation, both were dominated by the memory phenotype, either the central (TCM CD45RO + CCR7+) or an effector (TEM CD45RO + CCR7-) memory phenotype (Fig. 3A-D). Finally, detection of programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) to evaluate CAR-T cell exhaustion and the result shows mean = 0.56% (Fig. 3E).
Evidence of Anti-Tumor Function of CD7 CAR-T in vitro
To verify the anti-leukemic effect of CD7 CAR-T in vitro, we used AML cell line MOLM-13 as target cells and set different efficacy target ratios (E: T = 0:1, 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1), and found that CD7 CAR-T cells could rapidly eliminate leukemia cells at various dose ratios. As shown in Fig. 4A-D, E: T = 0.5: 1, NTR vs CD7 CAR (mean ± SD = 8.10%±3.76% vs 70.07%±14.69%); E: T = 1:1, NTR vs CD7 CAR (mean ± SD = 9.70%±6.50% vs 89.81%±7.57%); E: T = 2:1, NTR vs CD7 CAR (mean ± SD = 11.60%±8.31% vs 94.12%±2.93%).
CD7 CAR-T Cells Demonstrated Excellent Anti-Leukemic Properties in vivo
Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated the potent anti-tumor ability of CD7 CAR-T cells. To further validate the clearance of CD7 CAR-T cells against acute myeloid leukemia in vivo. We injected 5×105 of MOLM-13-GFP-Luc cell line into the tail vein of each nonobese diabetic (NOD)–Prkdcscid-Il2rgem1 (NTG) mouse to build a xenograft model and injected 1×106 of CD7 CAR-T cells or NTR cells after 5 days, while the vehicle group was injected with an equal dose of DPBS buffer (Fig. 5A, B). No mice died during the 34 days monitoring period, and no evidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was observed. Using Bioluminescence imaging (BLI), the data indicated that compared to the NTR group, the leukemic cells in the CD7 CAR-T group were suppressed at day 7 after injection, followed by a rapid decrease in tumor burden, which could not be detected in all individual mice of the CD7 CAR-T group at 22 days (Fig. 5B, C).