In vitro antimicrobial study
Three of the compounds, CARON, NOPON and BOPON was assessed for antimicrobial activity against two gram-positive bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC No. 87) & Bacillus cereus (MTCC No. 430), two gram-negative bacterial strains Escherichia coli (MTCC No. 443), and Klebsiella pneumonia (MTCC No. 3384) as well as two fungal strains Aspergillus niger (MTCC No. 872) & Candida albicans (MTCC No. 227) by Agar well diffusion method. Antimicrobial activity of these compounds was then determined in terms of mean diameter of the inhibition zone (in mm, known as the zone of inhibition). Zone of inhibition delivers a mean to classify the compounds according to the following classes [39] as shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Classification of compounds based on the value of their zone of inhibition
Zone of inhibition (in mm)
|
Activity of the compound
|
> 15
|
Strongly inhibitory compound
|
11-15
|
Moderately inhibitory compound
|
< 10
|
Poorly inhibitory compound
|
The results of preliminary antimicrobial activities of the studied compounds are summarized in Figure 1 and their zone of inhibition values are collated in Table 2.
Table 2: The zone of inhibition exhibited by the studied compounds against the bacterial and fungal strains
Compounds
|
Microorganism and Inhibition zone (mm)
|
Antibacterial
|
Antifungal
|
Gram positive
|
Gram Negative
|
Sa.
|
Bc.
|
Ec.
|
Kp.
|
An.
|
Ca.
|
CARON
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
15
|
12
|
-
|
NOPON
|
11
|
10
|
11
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
BOPOB
|
11
|
-
|
11
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
Sa: Staphylococcus aureus, Bc: Bacillus cereus, Ec: E. Coli, Kp: Klebsiella pneumonia, An: Aspergillus Niger, Ca: Candida albicans
The target compounds presented varying zone of inhibition (Figure 2) against before mentioned bacteria. CARON displayed the highest zone of inhibition among the tested compounds against all the studied bacterial strains. The compound was strongly inhibitory against the bacterial strain Klebsiella pneumonia and moderately inhibitory against the other bacterial strains. Moreover, it was the only compound among the three which displayed an inhibitory action against antifungal strain, Aspergillus niger. Similarly, NOPON also presented consistently moderate antimicrobial activity against all the bacterial strains under investigation and was more active against Klebsiella pneumonia. Nevertheless, it displayed no activity against both the studied fungal strains. On the other hand, BOPOB was moderately active against only one of the gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and displayed moderate and poor activity against the gram-negative bacteria, E. Coli and Klebsiella pneumonia respectively. Analogous to NOPON, BOPON also displayed no activity against both the studied fungal strains. The highest activity of CARON may be attributed to the presence of an electron withdrawing moiety present in the compound, viz. cyanoacrylic acid group.
CARON that was identified as the most active among the tested compounds was subjected to the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against all the studied microbial strains and the results are collated in Table 3.
Table 3: Minimum inhibitory concentration of CARON
MIC (mg/mL)
|
Compound
|
E. coli
|
K. pneumonia
|
B. cereus
|
S. aureus
|
A. niger
|
CARON
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
0.8
|
0.8
|
In-vitro antituberculosis study
Positive results on antimicrobial activity of the target compounds and the fact that the compounds incorporating 1,3,4-oxadiazole and phenothiazine core display excellent anti-tuberculosis activity[40], encouraged us to investigate the anti-tuberculosis activity of these compounds. Thus, all the three target compounds were screened for their inhibitory activity against the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTCC No:6) strain by a method described in literature.[41] with LB broth as negative control. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and the activity of the compounds are expressed in terms of their Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values as shown in Table 4. MIC values obtained were in the range of 800-1200 μg/mL, with NOPON exhibiting the highest activity.
Table 4: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of CARON, NOPON and BOPOB against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Samples
|
Concentration (in μg/mL)
|
Inference
|
MIC (in μg/mL)
|
CARON
|
1000
1200
|
Absence of Turbidity
Absence of Turbidity
|
1000
|
NOPON
|
800
1000
1200
|
Absence of Turbidity
Absence of Turbidity
Absence of Turbidity
|
800
|
BOPOB
|
1200
|
Absence of Turbidity
|
1200
|
Validation of antituberculosis study by molecular docking study
Molecular docking serves as an enormously valuable method for structure-based drug designing methods to find out targets for different ligands as well as the associated thermodynamic interactions with the target enzyme, particularly during the non-availability of resources to perform the experimental studies. Likewise, CYP121 was found to be exclusive to M. tuberculosis by phylogenetic analysis where it catalyzes an infrequent intramolecular C–C bond-forming reaction between the two tyrosine residues of the cYY (cyclodityrosine) substrate.[42] Moreover, it could be considered as a probable target for the development of new drugs for TB since it is established to be essential for viability of the bacterium. Hence docking studies were performed with the cytochrome P450 cyp 121 enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 3G5H to identify the binding mode of the target compounds into the active site of this enzyme.
Various binding interactions of CARON with the amino acid residues present in the active site of the enzyme are depicted in Figure 3(a). CARON showed van der Waals interaction with almost 20 amino acid residues present in the binding cavity of the studied enzyme. A couple of conventional hydrogen bonding interaction was obtained between the N atom of cyanide moiety and hydrogen atom of the carboxylic acid side chain of the cyanoacryllic group present in the compound with the donor atoms of the amino acid residues, ARG A 286 and PHE A 338 respectively. The π electron cloud of the aromatic rings of the phenothiazine moiety and 1,3,4 oxadiazole interacts with the PHE A 168 amino acid residue of the receptor molecule via π-π stacking interaction. Similarly, the π electron cloud of the naphthyl moiety exhibits a π-σ interaction with the amino acid residues, TRP A 182 and ALA A 167. Also, the π electrons of the 1,3,4 oxadiazole moiety and the phenyl group of the naphthyl side chain is also involved in π alkyl contact with the VAL A 78 and VAL A 228 amino acid residues respectively. The octyl side chain of the compound is associated with the MET A 62 and VAL A 83 amino acid residues via an alkyl interaction. The binding score obtained for CARON was -11.3 kcal mol-1 (Table).
Likewise, Figure 3(b) portrays the different binding interactions of NOPON with the amino acid residues present in the active site of the enzyme. To begin with, the compound shows van der Waals interaction with about 23 amino acid residues of the receptor. The π electron cloud of the one of the naphthyl moiety is involved in a π donor hydrogen bonding interaction with the donor atom of CYS A 35 amino acid residue. Whereas the π electrons of the other naphthyl moiety and the phenothiazine ring are engaged in π-σ interaction with the TRP A 182 and ALA A 167 as well as ALA A 233 amino acid residues respectively. Additionally, the π electron cloud of the naphthyl moiety is also involved in a π sulfur interaction with the S atom of the CYS A 345 amino acid residue. Similar to CARON, the octyl side chain of the NOPON is also associated with the ASN A 85 and CYS A 345 amino acid residues via alkyl interactions. Finally, to end with, the π electron cloud of the phenothiazine moiety is involved in π alkyl interaction with ALA A 233 and CYS A 345 amino acid residues. Hence the presence of naphthyl moiety in NOPON is responsible for most of the interaction of the same with enzyme. This may be attributed to the highest docking score of NOPON (-14.4 kcal mol-1) among all the three target compounds.
BOPOB portrays the following binding interactions with the amino acid residues present in the active site of the enzyme as displayed in Figure 3(c). The compound shows van der Waals interaction with various amino acid residues of the receptor. The π electron cloud of the phenyl moieties is involved in a π donor hydrogen bonding interaction with the donor atom of CYS A 37 and ALA A 218 amino acid residues respectively. Additionally, the π electron cloud of the naphthyl moiety is also involved in a π sulfur interaction with the S atom of the CYS A 343 amino acid residue. Similar to CARON and NOPON the octyl side chain of the BOPOB is also associated with the ASN A 85 and CYS A 345 amino acid residues via alkyl interactions. Finally, the π electron cloud of the phenothiazine moiety is involved in π alkyl interaction with ALA A 213 and CYS A 343 amino acid residues. The docking scores of all the three target compounds are tabulated in Table 5.
Table 5: The docking score of the target compounds with the active site of the 3GSH enzyme
S/No.
|
Compound
|
Docking score (kcal mol-1)
|
1
|
CARON
|
-11.3
|
2
|
NOPON
|
-14.4
|
3
|
BOPOB
|
-11.2
|
Cell staining studies
The excellent fluorescent emission properties exhibited by all five studied compounds under investigation prompted us to investigate the potential capability of these compounds as new fluorescent cell staining agents for live-cell imaging. Optical merit of the compounds alone is not sufficient for effective cell imaging, they should possess good cell compatibility as well. Therefore, before moving on to the imaging interrogations, the cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated based on two cell lines, U87 (Uppsala 87 Malignant Glioma), a human primary glioblastoma cell line, and N2a cell line, a fast-growing mouse neuroblastoma cell line by MTT assay.
As shown in Figure 4, on incubation of both the cell lines with different doses (10-500 ng) of the target compounds for 72 hours, almost 90% of the cells are alive and this shows that the compounds are non-toxic, hold good biocompatibility and have the potential for intracellular bio-imaging.
Now, to realize the probable capacity of the target compounds as visible bio-imaging probes, the cell imaging experiments was executed using the cancer N2a cell line by fluorescence microscopy. The cells were brightly illuminated retaining good morphologies after 6 hours of incubation with 50 ng/mL of each target compound (Figure 5). This may be attributed to the accumulation of these compounds inside the cell. CAROT, CAROP, CARON and BOPOB was found to selectively target the cell Cytoplasm, whereas NOPON seems to be targeting Endoplasmic Reticulum. Thus, the imaging study reveals that the target compounds are permeable to the cell.
In addition to this, the cells emit multicolor fluorescence (Figure 5), i.e., blue, red and green color under lasers of different wavelength range of 430-490, 602-655 and 512-555 nm respectively. This multicolor emission widens the opportunities of these target compounds over other tag reagents since the former can provide a considerable space to choose the wavelength of observation.
Consequently, the cell viability and imaging studies sum up the possibility of these biocompatible target compounds as promising candidate for cell staining or bio-imaging applications in near future.
CAROT as “Turn Off” Fluorometric sensor for cyanide ion
Selectivity and sensitivity of CAROT for cyanide ion
Exceptional selectivity and sensitivity are essential criterion for the practical application of any sensor. To perceive these matters, the fluorescence changes of the probe (3.3 μM) on addition of different anions (4.8 μM) was investigated. It was observed, the probe exhibited very high selectivity for cyanide ion compared to other anions. The cyanide ion portrayed a very noticeable quenching effect (Figure 6(a)) on the fluorescence spectra of the probe, while the other anions resulted in negligible response to the fluorescence intensity of the probe. This signifies the interaction of the probe with the cyanide ion. Moreover, the cyanide ion induced fluorescence change stated above was naked eye detectable (Figure 6(b)) under UV lamp (at 354 nm), which designates that CAROT can readily differentiate cyanide ion by remarkable fluorescence “turn-off” response.
Further insight into the sensitivity of the probe (CAROT) towards the analyte (CN) was deduced by the fluorescent titration experiment of the former (3.3 μM) with the latter (0.3-7.4 μM) in acetonitrile solution. Fluorescent intensity of CAROT was gradually quenched upon the addition of CN- from 0.3 to 7.4 μM (Figure 7(a)) and showed a very good linear relationship with CN- concentration with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.989 as portrayed in Figure 7(b). The high affinity of the sensor towards cyanide ion is confirmed from these observations.
Binding ratio, binding constant and Limit of Detection (LOD)
Assuming a favorable coordination between CAROT and cyanide ion for the reason behind fluorescence quenching, MALDI studies were performed to determine the stoichiometry of the binding ratio between the sensor and the analyte. An ESI-MS peak of the sensor-analyte complex was observed at m/z = 583 (Figure 8(b)) which specified the probability of a 1:1 stoichiometry of CAROT (m/z = 557) to cyanide ion. The binding or association constant for the interaction of chemosensor CAROT with cyanide ion was estimated to be 2.75 × 106 M-1 from the data obtained from fluorescence titration studies described above and using the Benesi-Hildebrand (B-H) plot (Figure). The free energy change, (ΔG) was obtained as -45.98 kJ mol-1. Similarly, the fluorescence limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of CAROT for the selective detection of cyanide ion was obtained as 0.14 x 10-6 and 0.17 x 10-6 M respectively from the Stern-Volmer plot. Fortunately, the limit of detection so obtained was much lower than the permissible limit of cyanide ion in drinking water (1.9 μM) prescribed by WHO guideline and at the same order of magnitude as reported for most of the “turn off” fluorescence cyanide ion chemosensor.[43] The obtained limit of detection value is compared with some of the previousy reported results (Table 6). [44-46]
Table 6: Calculated Limit of Detection value compared with a few reported results
Chemosensor
|
Method of detection
|
Detection limit
|
Reference
|
3TBN
|
Colorimetric and fluorimetric sensor
|
0.46 μM
|
18
|
1b
|
fluorimetric sensor
|
0.32 μM
|
24
|
4O
|
Colorimetric sensor
|
0.74 μM
|
25
|
L
|
Colorimetric and fluorimetric sensor
|
0.28 μM
|
26
|
CAROT
|
Fluorimetric sensor
|
0.14 μM
|
Present study
|
Plausible mechanism of sensing
In view of the above results, Scheme 5.1 shows the conceivable mode of interaction between the probe (CAROT) and the analyte (CN-) inducing the fluorescence quenching. The sensor consists of a cyanoacrylic group as the side chain that is susceptible to a nucleophilic attack by cyanide ion. This binding could presumably suppress the Intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) that could occur from the phenothiazine-1,3,4-oxadiazole part of the sensor to the cyanoacrylic group contained in the same leading to the fluorescence turn off. The proposed mechanism is consistent with results obtained by the MALDI studies.
Interference studies of competitive anions
Selectivity of the sensor, CAROT to cyanide ion was revealed from the preliminary fluorescent response studies of the same against different anions. Nevertheless, the furthermost important criteria for a selective anion chemosensor lies in its capacity to detect a specific anion in the vicinity of other competing ions. With a view to understand this, the sensor CAROT was subjected to competition studies in presence of other interfering anions. For this, the fluorescence intensity of mixed solution of sensor in presence of other interfering anions in acetonitrile solution was measured which displayed no change fluorescence intensity. But when the above solution was treated with 10 μM cyanide ion, the fluorescence intensity was significantly quenched. Thus, it is established that the fluorescence intensity remains unchanged even in presence of 100 equivalents of the competing anions which makes CAROT a selective fluorescent “turn-off” chemosensor for the detection of cyanide ion in the presence of competing ions.
Recognition time on cyanide sensing
Rapid response and short response time is an indispensable criterion for a designed fluorescent chemosensor to be employed in practical applications. Henceforth, time dependent fluorescent intensity response of CAROT towards cyanide ion was inspected in acetonitrile solution and the result is portrayed in Figure 10. The study revealed that the addition of cyanide ion to the sensor solution quenched its fluorescence instantly and attained stability. This observation broadens the range of applicability of the present chemosensor regarding the rapid detection of cyanide ion in real samples.
Sensor CAROT-based test strips
When it comes to the case of practical applications, the strip platform provides numerous advantages over the solution-based platform. Hence, test strips were fabricated as mentioned in the experimental section for the detection of cyanide ion employing the sensor, CAROT. The test strip produced a visible change under the UV light only in presence of cyanide ion among the tested anions (Figure 9(b)) even though the concentration of the other anions were 10 times the concentration of cyanide ion. Moreover, the test strips are easy to read and the result is stable and consistent. Thus, CAROT can be used as a solid indicator to detect cyanide ion in aqueous solution.