Since Hüscher et al. [21] described the first endoscopic thyroidectomy in 1997, endoscopic techniques were increasingly applied to thyroid surgeries, such as axillary [22], breast [23], retroauricular [24], and robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) [25], which transferred the neck incision to inconspicuous areas but were hardly “minimally invasive” because of the dissection of more tissue [10]. Therefore, as a minimally invasive and scar-free approach, TOTEVA catered for higher cosmetic requirement of patients and gained rapid popularity [26]. In spite of many advantages, TOETVA had still some limitations such as a notable learning curve caused by the opposite perspective (craniocaudal view), surgical instruments interference, and unique complications including mental injuries and dangerous carbon dioxide embolism, among others [27]. In this study, we will explore the safety and feasibility of total thyroidectomy performing TOETVA.
In our study, TOETVA was commonly used by younger and females, who were more concerned about neck scars. A study reported that young patients were willing to pay over USD 2000 and travel up to 700 miles to avoid a neck incision [28]. Because of the rare threat to survival by papillary thyroid carcinoma, an increasing number of patients, including elderly people, attach more importance to cosmetic outcomes and postoperative quality of life. Nonetheless, a visible scar negatively impacts the satisfaction and quality of life of patients, especially in the Asian population [29], which is a disadvantage of open surgeries. In our research, TOETVA possesses the advantages of enhancing cosmetic satisfaction and lowering self-consciousness due to scars, further improving the long-term quality of life.
After PSM, the population characteristics were matched between the 2 groups and the surgical and follow-up outcomes were analysed. Compared to the matched OT group, patients in the TOETVA group had a longer operative time, greater blood loss, and more postoperative total drainage amount, which was in line with the report of Luna-Ortiz et al. [13]. The establishment of surgical space and reduplicative replacement of endoscopic equipment required more time, which led to the separation of the larger flap. For total thyroidectomy, endoscopic equipment was replaced frequently to avoid bilateral RLN injuries. Moreover, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis was connected with the firmness and adhesion to the adjacent structure of the thyroid gland; thus, improving the difficulty of operation [30]. This was perhaps more serious for endoscopic surgeries, thus leading to higher operative time and blood loss. Nevertheless, the 10 mL increase in blood loss is acceptable, and luckily, the increase in operative time and flap separation did not increase postoperative pain.
In line with the report of our previous study [31], postoperative WBC and CRP were higher in the TOETVA group, which may be attributed to the increase in the operative time and the non-sterile environment of the mouth. Fortunately, none of the patients in the TOETVA group were infected, possibly due to the use of antibiotics and routine postoperative drainage. However, it was not clear whether bilateral thyroidectomy led to further elevation of WBC, CRP, or other inflammatory markers compared to unilateral thyroidectomy, and it needs further investigation.
According to the 2016 Chinese Guidelines for the Treatment of PTC [32], ipsilateral central lymph nodes of patients with PTC should be prophylactically dissected. Therefore, bilateral or unilateral lymph node dissection was performed for all patients, and the two groups showed similar results for the number of total or positive lymph nodes, suggesting that TOETVA permitted the same feasibility compared to OT. We believe that the unique symmetrical perspective (craniocaudal view) provided superb visibility for the bilateral VI and VII lymph node area. Permanent RLN palsy and hypoparathyroidism are severe complications and receive more attention compared to unilateral thyroidectomy. In our study, eight patients had RLN signal attenuation or disappearance, however, only two developed hoarseness because the momentary reduction of signal forced the surgeons to explore and protect the RLN more carefully. Although it is unclear if the IONM technique plays a decisive role in the lower rates of transient and permanent RLN palsy [33], real-time detection and feedback reduce the difficulty of operation, especially for total thyroidectomy, to prevent irreversible outcomes [34].
For the TOETVA group in our study, 45.5% patients’ postoperative PTH were below the normal range while half of them suffered limbs numbness, which related to our high proportion of parathyroid auto-transplantation.For ischemic parathyroid glands and inferior parathyroid glands mixed with enlarged lymph nodes, we chose the treatment of auto-transplantation rather than preservation in situ, which will increase the number of patients with short-term calcium deficiency [35] but lower the incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism and recurrence of central lymph node [36], which is important for patients with total thyroidectomy. In this study, despite the lack of significant differences, the rate of auto-transplantation was higher in the TOETVA group (46.5%). Compared with OT, we indicate it is more difficult to retain parathyroid in situ through TOETVA, especially the classified A1 parathyroid glands [37]. The occurrences of other common complications were not significantly different between the two groups and rarely occurred. We believe it is safe to perform the total removal of the thyroid using TOETVA. However, few patients complained that the pulling sensation lasted 3 to 6 months or even longer after TOETVA, which probably resulted from subplatysmal fibrosis or scarring [38].
The duration of hospital stay in the two groups was similar, and two days in the hospital following operation was enough, which highlighted the safety and minimally invasive nature of TOETVA. It was general agreed, for total thyroidectomy, that the number of dissected central lymph nodes and postoperative serum Tg level represent the oncological safety of thyroid cancer [39]. The results in our study suggested the feasibility in harvesting central lymph nodes by TOETVA. Moreover, the postoperative serum Tg level without TSH stimulation confirmed that complete removal of the bilateral thyroid tissue could be achieved by TOETVA, despite its limited access to the upper pole or pyramidal lobe of the thyroid [40]. The proportion of patients receiving RAI, the mean serum stimulated Tg (sTg) level before RAI and the proportion of sTg of < 1.0 µg/L had no difference between TOETVA and OT, showing the surgical completeness of TOETVA. During the following period, 1 patient in the OT group found enlarge lymph node in the left cervical III area at 51 months after operation without increasing Tg level, which was confirmed as metastatic PTC by fine needle aspiration. A secondary surgery was performed and no evidence of recurrence or persistent in the subsequence follow-up period.
In February 2017, because of the invasion of tracheal cartilage, one patient in the TOETVA group with a tumor of 2 cm was transited to open ensuring the complete removal. We followed this patient every 3 or 6 months, whose Tg level maintained of < 0.04 µg/L and no evidence of recurrence by ultrasound. Previous study indicated that the initial learning curve of TOETVA was 15–20 cases [41, 42], and the operative time gradually decreased with improvement in proficiency. However, for less experienced surgeons, it is inappropriate to perform total thyroidectomy via TOETVA unless they accumulated more than 50 cases in benign nodules and unilateral thyroidectomy [42].
This article is a single-center retrospective study reporting the compared results of patients undergoing total thyroidectomy between TOTEVA and OT. The limitations are the small sample size, short follow-up time, and selection bias of surgical methods. Besides, some new problems also need consideration. For example, in the case of total thyroidectomy by TOETVA, it is not yet clear which indication is safe enough for avoiding conversion to open to protect contralateral RLN when unilateral RLN is damaged.