Effect of L-tyrosine, glucose, glutamic acid, L-DOPA, and copper sulfate on melanin production
According to the results obtained in the central composite design (CCD) (Table 1), the amount of melanin produced ranged from 14.26 up to 125.26 mg.g− 1 (a milligram of melanin per gram of dry biomass), and the replicates at the center point resulted in short range of variation in melanin production, indicating that the response variation observed in the CCD experiment was due to different concentration of the factors in each experiment (Table 1).
Table 1
Central composite design \({2}^{5}\) matrix and experimental data for melanin production by MEL1 mutant (Continue at the next page).
Experiment
|
Levels
|
Melanin (mg.g− 1)
|
X1
|
X2
|
X3
|
X4
|
X5
|
1
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
56.832
|
2
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
58.755
|
3
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
38.771
|
4
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
32.218
|
5
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
48.704
|
6
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
60.044
|
7
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
37.603
|
8
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
28.043
|
9
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
125.267
|
10
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
63.841
|
11
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1..8 (+ 1)
|
3..5 (-1)
|
3..4 (+ 1)
|
7..5 (-1)
|
91..267
|
12
|
3..4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
57.005
|
13
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
115.757
|
14
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
91.309
|
15
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
104.646
|
16
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (-1)
|
110.355
|
17
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
45.948
|
18
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
89.603
|
19
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
37.776
|
20
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
24.962
|
21
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
57.741
|
22
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
53.941
|
23
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
22.534
|
24
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
1.4 (-1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
27.003
|
25
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
103.018
|
26
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
98.555
|
27
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
66.071
|
28
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
3.5 (-1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
45.563
|
29
|
1.4 (-1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
70.81
|
30
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
0.8 (-1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
61.692
|
31
|
1.4 (-1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
33.84
|
32
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
1.8 (+ 1)
|
7.5 (+ 1)
|
3.4 (+ 1)
|
18 (+ 1)
|
81.784
|
33
|
0.02 (-2.38)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
33.694
|
34
|
4.78 (+ 2.38)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
47.708
|
35
|
2.4 (0)
|
0.11 (-2.38)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
78.86
|
36
|
2.4 (0)
|
2.49 (+ 2.38)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
29.821
|
37
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
0.74 (-2.38)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
26.691
|
38
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
10.26 (+ 2.38)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
51.922
|
39
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
0.02 (-2.38)
|
12.75 (0)
|
14.266
|
40
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
6.85 (+ 2.38)
|
12.75 (0)
|
78.688
|
41
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
0.27 (-2.38)
|
52.806
|
42
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
25.23 (+ 2.38)
|
43.573
|
43
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
70.588
|
44
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
84.072
|
45
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
66.512
|
46
|
2.4 (0)
|
1.3 (0)
|
5.5 (0)
|
2.4 (0)
|
12.75 (0)
|
79.893
|
The effects of the factors on the response and the significant levels (p < 0.05) can be explained by the Pareto chart (Fig. 1). It shows the estimated effects of each factor and the interactions between them. When considered in linear terms, L-DOPA, glucose, and copper sulfate showed the greatest influence on pigment production.
As can be observed in Fig. 1, L-DOPA had the most significant effect (p < 0.05) on melanin production by MEL1 mutant. Interestingly, L-DOPA was the only factor that exhibited a significant effect in the higher level on the response, indicating that in the presence of high concentrations of L-DOPA there was a greater melanin production. Glucose and copper sulfate also significantly influenced melanin production (p < 0.05); however, their effect was significant in the lower level, i.e., higher pigment production was obtained at lower concentrations of these compounds. Was also observed a significant interactive effect between copper sulfate and glucose (p < 0.05) where the lower-level value indicates that an increase in the concentration of any of these factors will decrease the pigment yield. When considered in linear terms, L-tyrosine and glutamic acid had no significant influence (p < 0.05) on the production of melanin.
Applying multiple regression analysis to the experimental data, the quadratic effects of the independent variables on the production of melanin were calculated and the following second-order polynomial equation was proposed to predict the optimal levels of the factors:
$$y= - 63.40+10.84{x}_{1}-5.45{x}_{1}^{2}-10.77{x}_{2}-12.14{x}_{2}^{2}+10.21{x}_{3}-1.43{x}_{3}^{2}+49.24{x}_{4}-3.99{x}_{4}^{2}+8.10{x}_{5}-0.5{x}_{5}^{2}+1.3{x}_{1}{x}_{2}+1.83{x}_{1}{x}_{3}-4.04{x}_{1}{x}_{4}+5.2{x}_{2}{x}_{4}-1.45{x}_{2}{x}_{5}+1.08{x}_{3}{x}_{4}-0.52{x}_{3}{x}_{5}-1.2{x}_{4}{x}_{5}$$
Where \(y\) is the response of melanin production (mg. g − 1) and \({x}_{1}\), \({x}_{2}\), \({x}_{3}\), \({x}_{4}\) and \({x}_{5}\) are the coded values of the factors (L-tyrosine, glucose, glutamic acid, L-DOPA, and copper sulfate, respectively).
The statistical significance of the model was checked using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The ANOVA analysis of the second-order regression model demonstrated that the above-mentioned equation was highly significant. The calculated F value (4.93) was higher than the critical F value (2.01) and p < 0.05 (Table 2) and the lack-of-fit value for regression was not significant (p > 0.05), indicating that the model equation can be considered adequate to predict the melanin production by MEL1 within the range of the factors evaluated. Moreover, the coefficient of determination obtained by analysis (R2 = 0.7976) indicates that around 80% of the variability in the observed response values could be explained by the model, confirming a satisfactory adjustment of the proposed model to the experimental data.
Table 2
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the second-order model for the experimental data from the CCD design.
Source of variation
|
Sum of squares
|
Degrees of freedom
|
Mean square
|
F-calc
|
F-tab
|
p-value
|
Regression
|
27195.818
|
20
|
1359.79092
|
4.93
|
2.01
|
0.000127**
|
Residual
|
6899.4605
|
25
|
275.978418
|
Lack of fit
|
6701.99
|
22
|
304.635714
|
4.63
|
8.66
|
0.11582
|
Pure terror
|
197.47
|
3
|
65.8249178
|
Total
|
34095.28
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
R2 = 0.7976 ** Significant p < 0.05
Response surface analysis
The response surface curves described by the regression model were drawn to illustrate the melanin production by MEL1 mutant in response to the interaction among tested factors, as well as to determine the optimum level of each factor for maximum pigment production (Fig. 2). In each plot, two factors varied within their experimental range, while the other three factors remained constant at the central point.
Analyzing the glucose and L-DOPA interaction on melanin production (Fig. 2A), it is possible to verify that melanin yields increased with increasing L-DOPA concentration and greater production was achieved at the highest concentration of L-DOPA and glucose (7 mmol. L− 1 and 2 mmol.L− 1, respectively).
Concerning the interaction between L-DOPA and L-tyrosine, the Fig. 2B shows that greater production of melanin was also obtained at the higher concentration of L-DOPA (7 mmol. L− 1), but with the L-tyrosine concentration at its lowest level (< 1 mmol.L− 1). Increasing L-tyrosine concentration decreased melanin yield even in the high concentration of L-DOPA. Figure 2C reveals that the interaction of L-DOPA with glutamic acid resulted in maximum melanin production when L-DOPA and glutamic acid were set at their highest level (7 mmol. L− 1 and 12 mmol.L− 1, respectively). The interaction between L-DOPA and copper sulfate, shown in Fig. 2D, confirms that melanin production increases in the high concentration of L-DOPA (7 mmol. L− 1), whereas copper sulfate must be at its lowest concentration. From these analyses, the following optimal values of the factors tested were obtained through desirability function: 0.02 mmol.L− 1 L-tyrosine, 1.8% (v/v) glucose, 10.26 mmol.L− 1 glutamic acid, 6.85 mmol.L− 1 L-DOPA and 0.27 µmol.L− 1 copper sulfate.
Experimental validation of the model
To experimentally validate the model, the MEL1 mutant was grown in a minimal culture medium supplemented with each factor at its optimal concentration, and melanin production of 145 mg.g− 1 was obtained, representing an increase of 640% compared to the non-optimized condition (Fig. 3A). The melanin yield predicted by the model (143.02 mg.g− 1) differs from the experimental one by only 1.5% (Fig. 3A), demonstrating a high degree of accuracy of the model, which indicates the reliability and validity of the proposed model. This result also indicates that the parameters optimized by the RSM are reliable and that the model is adequate for estimating the experimental value of the response in future observations.
To assess the relationship between melanin production and the synthesis pathway of this pigment in the MEL1 mutant, the activity of tyrosinase and laccase was evaluated under optimized and non-optimized conditions (Fig. 3B). The enzyme activities in optimized conditions were higher compared to control. Laccase activity enhanced from 0.35 to 0.69 U.L− 1 whereas the tyrosinase activity showed a greater increase from 1.2 to 5.1 U.L− 1. These results may indicate that tyrosinase is the main enzyme involved in melanin synthesis by MEL1 mutant. Also, the correlation between melanin production and biomass yield was analyzed using Spearman's rank-order correlation (Fig. 3C). It is possible to verify that melanin yield is weakly correlated to biomass production (\(R=-0.29 and p>0.05\)). This result reveals that the melanin production could not be explained as a response to higher biomass production, confirming the role the key factors optimized by the CCD experiment had on melanin production.