3.1. Experimental study
3.1.1. 1HNMR and 13CNMR analysis
1HNMR of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine taken at the conditions (400 MHz, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6) solvent, δ in ppm) showed a chemical shift at 5.39 (s, 2H of NH2), 6.5814–7.0798 (m, 8H, of Aromatic), 7.3202–7.8765 (m, 3H, of thiophene), and 8.77 (d, 1H of CH = N). The presence of 14 protons at different chemical shifts indicated the formation of the Schiff base as expected. The absence of picks at around 9.0–10.0 ppm indicated that aldehyde hydrogen is replaced, instead of azomethine hydrogen appeared at 8.77 ppm. Figures S1 and S2 shows 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectrum of the Schiff base, respectively.
13C NMR analysis also confirmed the formation of the ligand, indicating the number of carbon atoms present at correspond chemical shifts. There were 17 carbons in the ligands. Different carbons appeared at different chemical shifts. Each carbon was indicated as follows:(C-8, 111 δ), (C-12,114 δ), (C-1,116 δ), (C-10, 118 δ), (C-17, 125.25 δ), (C-3,125.79 δ), (C-16, 126 δ), (C-4, 128 δ), (C-18,131.07 δ), (C-11, 131.75 δ), (C-5, 132 δ), (C-9, 133 δ), (C-2, 137 δ), (C-19,142 δ), (C-13, 147 δ), (C-21, 150 δ), and (C-6, 153 δ).
3.1.2. FTIR analysis of the ligands
From the FTIR spectrum of the ligand (Figure S3) at 3441 and 3326 cm− 1 for N-H stretching, 3055 cm− 1 for stretching of sp2 hybrid C-H,1607 cm− 1 for N = C stretching, 1462 cm− 1 for aromatic C-C stretching, and 713 cm− 1for C-S-C stretching. The results indicated the formation of azomethine bond.
3.1.3. Electronic spectroscopy analysis results
The UV–Vis spectra of the Schiff base were examined in the range of 200–800 nm in six organic solvent systems such as ethanol, methanol, DMSO, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), DMF/H2O, and acetonitrile/H2O. Among these solvent systems, DMF/H2O gave the best results, thereby being chosen for further spectroscopic studies. The UV–Vis spectra are shown in Fig. 1. The maximum absorptions observed in the range from 320 to 250 nm were attributed to πŠπ* transitions of π electrons within the structure. Absorption intensity of πŠπ* transitions decreased in an order: DMF/H2O > DMSO > CH3CN > ethanol > methanol > acetonitrile/H2O (hyper chromic effect). The absorption intensity at 220 nm belonged to nŠπ* transitions was observed in the DMF/H2O system. Absorption spectra for the complexes were also recorded in the DMF/H2O solution. In the spectra of the complexes, πŠπ* and nŠπ* transitions observed in the ligand was not affected by any kind of metal ions. The absorption at 280nm shifted to 320 nm by complexing with Hg2+ (bathochromic shift), indicating chelation of the Schiff base with Hg2+ ions. To further confirm sensitivity of the Schiff base to Hg2+, fluorescence studies were conducted.
3.1.4. Quantum yield
The fluorescence quantum yield (Φ) of Schiff base was noted as 0.21 in ethanol by taking anthracene as standard. The fluorescence excitation (310–365 nm) and fluorescence emission wavelength (370–450 nm) of anthracene corroborated with the excitation (310 nm) and emission wavelength (440 nm) of Schiff base. Anthracene displayed quantum yield of 0.27 in the ethanol.
3.1.5. Fluorescence spectral studies of the Schiff base and its metal complexes
The fluorescence spectra of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine (1× 10− 5 M) obtained in the DMF /H2O (7:3 v/v; pH = 8.0) system with metal ions such as Ag+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Al3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Fe2+, and Cr3+ (1.0 equiv.) are shown in Fig. 2. In free state, it was displayed a weak fluorescence emission band at 440 nm up on excitation at 310 nm. The emission intensity at 440 nm was increased with an addition of Hg2+, attributed to strong interactions between the Schiff base and Hg2+. However, no significant variation in the emission intensity was observed with additions of other metal cations. The high selectivity toward Hg2+ was likely due to a compatible ion size and a high binding affinity between the metal ions and the Schiff base. Therefore, the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene)benzenamine could serve as a highly selective “turn-on” fluorescent chemosensor for Hg2+.
3.1.6. Fluorescence titrations of the Schiff base with Hg2+
As shown in Fig. 3, an increase in fluorescence intensity was observed in the DMF/H2O (7:3 v/v) solution with increasing Hg2+concentration from 0.1 to 1.0 equi. The maximum concentration was 1.0 equi. of 1 ×10− 5 M Hg2+.
3.1.7. Determination of limit of detection and comparison with literature values
Limit of detection (LOD) of a fluorescence sensor was determined as shown in Fig. 4 which illustrates a plot of emission intensity vs. concentration of Hg2+ (LOD = 3σ/k, where δ standard deviation of the blank, k is slope and found to be 3.8 ×10− 8 M). The detection limit of the sensor developed in this study was compared to previously reported values (Table 1). According to the comparison (Table 1), the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine was effective to detect Hg2+ with a lower detection limit.
Table 1
The comparison LOD of (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine with other Schiff bases reported in previous literature.
Order
|
Schiff bases
|
Signal
|
LOD(M)
|
References
|
1
|
2-(Benzothiazol-2-yliminomethyl)-4-nitro-phenol,
|
Colorimetric
|
1.5 x 10− 7
|
[1]
|
2
|
2-(Pyridin-2-yl)benzothiazole
|
Fluorescent
|
15 x 10− 6
|
[18]
|
3
|
(2E,2’E)-2,2’-(4,4’-(Acenaphtho[1,2-b]quinoxaline-8,11-diyl)bis(4,1-phenylene))bis(methan-1-yl-1-ylidene)bis(hydrazine carbo thioamide)
|
Fluorescent
|
9.07 × 10− 7
|
[4]
|
4
|
2-((E)-((E)-3-(4-(Dimethyl amino)phenyl)allylidene)
amino)-2-phenyl ethanol
|
Fluorescenceand calorimetric
|
3.15 x 10− 6
|
[5]
|
5
|
N,N-Dimethyl-4-[(1E,3E)-3-{2-[4-(trifluoromethyl) pyrimidin-2-yl] hydrazinylidene}prop-1-en-1-yl]aniline
|
Colorimetric
|
3.9 X 10− 7
|
[19]
|
6
|
(E)-8-((2-(1H-Benzo[d] imidazol-2-yl)phenylimino) methyl)-7-hydroxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one
|
Fluorescent and colorimetric
|
1.202 × 10− 7
|
[20]
|
7
|
(E)-2-(2-Aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine
|
Fluorescence
|
3.8 x 10− 8
|
This- work
|
3.1.8. Determination of binding constant
Binding constant was calculated based on the fluorescence intensity data using the Benesi˗Hildebrand equation [12]. Figure 5 shows linear relationship between (Fmax- Fmin)/(F-Fmin) at 640 nm and 1/[Hg2+]. The binding constant of the complex of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine and Hg2+ was calculated as 1.5×104 M− 1.
3.1.9. Determination of stoichiometry of the complex
To identify stoichiometry between the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine and Hg2+, the fluorescence behavior was studied by using the Job’s method (Fig. 6). Their total concentrations were kept constant, and mole fraction of Hg2+ was varied from 0 to 1.0. The maximum intensity was achieved when the molar fraction of Hg2+ reached 0.5, indicating the stoichiometry of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine to Hg2+ be 1:1.
3.1.10. Selectivity study
Selectivity was assessed through competitive experiments. The changes in fluorescence of the Schiff base in the DMF/H2O (7:3 v/v) solution were measured by the treatment of Hg2+ (1.0 equiv.) in the presence of other interfering metal cations such as Ag+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Al3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Fe2+, and Cr3+ (1.0 equiv.) (Fig. 7). No obvious change in fluorescence was observed regardless of existence of other cations. Relative error (%) was calculated using the relation: Relative error %= (ΔF/F0× 100%) [13], where ΔF is the difference of fluorescence intensities before and after exposure to interferent cations. Note that the relative error less than ± 5% can be acceptable. The value of the relative error listed in Table 2, showing that the Schiff base had a high selectivity to Hg2+ despite the existence of the interferent ions.
Table 2
Effect of interferent cations on the fluorescence signal of the optical sensor.
Order
|
Interferent
|
Relative error %
|
1
|
Mn⁺²
|
1.05
|
2
|
Al⁺³
|
1.11
|
3
|
Fe⁺³
|
1.15
|
4
|
Fe⁺²
|
1.18
|
5
|
Cd⁺²
|
1.25
|
6
|
Ni⁺²
|
1.19
|
7
|
Zn⁺²
|
1.85
|
8
|
Cu⁺²
|
1.92
|
9
|
Co⁺²
|
1.27
|
10
|
Cr⁺³
|
2.70
|
11
|
Ag+
|
3.25
|
3.1.11. Effect of pH and solvent
Without Hg2+, the weak fluorescence intensity of the Schiff base solution could be observed from pH 1.0 to 12. With an addition of Hg2+ (1.0 equiv.), the fluorescence intensity was increased from 100 to 900 a.u. with an increase in pH from 6 to 8. A further increase in pH from 8 to 12 decreased the fluorescence intensity to 100 a.u (Figure S4). It was attributed to the Schiff base binding Hg2+ prevented at low pH value. At high pH values, weak fluorescence was presented. In addition, as showed in Figure S5, the optimum fluorescence enhancement occurred in the presence of the DMF/H2O solvent. Therefore, pH = 8.0 and the DMF/H2O solvent were selected for further studies.
3.2. Theoretical study
In this section, computational data of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl- methylene) benzenamine were compared with the experimental results discussed in section 3.1. Energy of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (ELUMO) indicates the tendency of a molecule to accept electrons from donor molecules. The lower this energy, the better the chance to accept electrons. A larger difference in energy between the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) means a higher stability of molecules and complexes. Hardness (ƞ) is the measure of resistance to charge transfer. This property can be calculated from half of the difference between EHOMO and ELUMO. Chemical softness (S) is the capacity of an atom or group of atoms to receive electrons, which is half of the hardness (ƞ) [14, 15]. The binding energy between the metal cation and ligands can be calculated using the following relation [16]:
ΔE = Ecomplex – (Ecation + Eligand)
where ΔE is the change in energy; Ecomplex is the total energy of the complex; Ecation is energy of cation; and Eligand is energy of the ligand. All the investigated parameters of theoretical studies including vibrational analysis, NMR spectra, thermodynamic parameters, mulliken charge distribution, natural bond orbital analysis, natural electron configuration are presented in the Section S1 of supplementary information.
3.2.1. Geometrical optimization and Frontier molecular orbitals (FMO)
The optimized geometries of Schiff base and Schiff base complex with Hg was obtained by using a basis set of LANL2DZ/B3LYP are shown in Fig. 8. Frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), HOMO, and LUMO play an important role in quantum chemistry. The FMO theory is useful to predict relative reactivity based on properties of the reactants [17]. The difference in energy between FMO of the (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine was calculated, and the results are shown in Fig. 9a(EHOMO = − 0.198 a.u. and ELUMO = − 0.067 a.u.; the change calculated as: ΔE = HOMO-LUMO, − 0.198− (− 0.0671) a.u. = −0.130 a.u.; Ƞ=1/2(HOMO-LUMO) = ½(0.130) = 0.065 a.u., S= ½(ƞ) = ½(0.065) = 0.0325 a.u.). When the Schiff base was complexed with Hg2+, the energy of the complex became lower (Fig. 9b). The energy for free (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzeneamine was found to be − 1561 hartree while that of the complex with Hg2+ was − 1615 hartree. The calculated change in energy of the Hg2+ complex was–12.58 hartree using following equation:
ΔE = Ecomplex – (Ecation + Eligand) = -1615 – (-41.42+ (–1561))) = − 12.58 hartree
By using the same basis set energy of different metal complexes of (E)-2-(2-aminophenylthio)-N-(thiophen-2-yl-methylene) benzenamine were studied and compared for the relative stability. The smallest energy was obtained for the complex between the Schiff base and Hg2+. This result indicated that the Schiff base forms more stable complexes with Hg2+ than the other metal ions tested in this study. This agreed with the fluorescence study for the selectivity of the Schiff base.