The theoretical framework that guided the project was Ida Jean Orlando’s Nursing Process Theory. This theory was developed to focus on the unconscious and conscious mental and emotional forces that determine personality and motivation between the nurse and patient, with the nurse responding to the patient's future needs. Orlando’s nursing theory stressed the reciprocal relationship between patient and nurse and emphasized the importance of nurse-patient interaction. This theory helped educators and school staff members recognize adolescents at risk for suicide (Alligood, 2018; Orlando, 2016).
This project's decision-making was guided by components of Orlando’s Nursing Process theory. It included five interrelated concepts: professional nursing function, patient's presenting behavior, the immediate reaction by the nurse, deliberative nursing process, and improvement. Orlando conceptualized the nurse's unique function as finding and meeting the patient's immediate needs for help, where the patient was the focal point of the nurse’s function (Alligood, 2015).
Orlando’s original work suggested that the nurse and client's verbal and nonverbal interactions helped the nurse understand and plan for a specific situation (Orlando, 1961). The patient’s presenting behavior may not have been reliable for determining the help needed; however, the presenting behavior may have been a plea for help. The nurse-patient situation was a dynamic process where a patient’s behavior stimulated the nurse’s immediate reaction and became the starting point of the assessment (Alligood, 2015).
The nurse's immediate reaction may differ for each situation due to the nurse's thoughts or feelings and evoke perceptions that the nurse uses to assess the patient's behavior. The nurse might display a unique reaction because of past experiences and knowledge combined with an understanding of the current situation. The nurse must be aware of his or her perceptions, not assuming they are correct until a thorough assessment of the patient and situation has been completed (Alligood, 2015).
Orlando discussed the importance of involving the patient in decisions to ensure a deliberative process of inquiring was utilized to prevent automatic responses, causing the patient's care to be ineffective, even if it was the correct action to take (Orlando, 1961). The resolution component of Orlando's framework focused on whether the patient’s verbal and nonverbal behavior had changed, with the nurse reevaluating the process until there was an improvement (Alligood, 2015).
According to Orlando (1961), persons became patients who required nursing care when they had needs for help that could not be met independently. Patients experience distress or feelings of helplessness as a result of unmet needs. Orlando's theory visually represents nursing faculty members' experiences supporting psychologically distressed students. Orlando's Nursing Process Theory guided the project of integrating an evidence-based program for educators identifying adolescents at risk for suicide in a rural high school. The theory focused on the importance of a thorough assessment of the student’s immediate needs, an equal relationship between the student and educator, treating the student as a whole, and successfully assisting the student in returning to his or her optimal state of well-being (Alligood, 2015; Orlando, 1961).
Goals, Objectives, And Expected Outcomes
School educators and staff members are in constant contact with students and are well-positioned to observe students’ behavior and act when they suspect self-harm (Suicide Prevention Resource Center, 2019). This project aimed to increase referrals to school counselors by integrating an evidence-based program for educators identifying adolescents at risk for suicide in a rural high school.
The objectives of this project were to (a) increase 75 percent of educators and staff member's knowledge of the warning signs for suicide and how to connect students in crisis with assistance and care; (b) integrate school-based suicide prevention into the values, culture, leadership, and work of the local school system to support suicide prevention activities; (c) encourage school-based settings to implement a suicide awareness program and provide yearly education that promotes wellness and prevents suicide and related behaviors, and (d) instruct educators and staff members at a rural high school on how to intervene to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors in adolescents with suicide risk. The project's primary objectives were to implement a suicide awareness program in a local school system, educate teachers and staff on identifying adolescents at risk for suicide, and refer those students to the school counselor, increasing the number of adolescent students referred to the counselor.
Project Design
The methodology chosen for this project was based on the assumption that implementing a suicide awareness professional development program to help educators and staff identify and intervene early with students experiencing psychological distress would increase referrals to school guidance counselors. Therefore, this evidence-based quality improvement project's primary purpose was to implement the best clinical practices for suicide intervention in a rural high school and measure the relationship between a suicide awareness program and referrals.
Participants voluntarily enrolled in the virtual professional development by Kognito. Kognito was the evidence-based program that was used for the professional development project. Kognito offered participants a virtual environment where they engaged in role-play conversations with emotionally responsive virtual humans. Through practice and personalized feedback, participants learned and assessed their competency to lead similar real-life conversations (Kognito, 2020). Once enrolled, the participant completed the two-hour program over four weeks. A pre-test and post-test designed by Kognito were collected on every participant. In addition, the number of referrals to school guidance counselors was recorded before and after implementing the program.
Project Site And Population
The project occurred in a rural high school that served students in a small city in the southeastern United States. According to the Census Bureau's Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTFAs), the community had a population of approximately 21,000 people, including the dense rural area within a 10-mile radius of the city. The median household income in 2018 was $35,449, and approximately 25.5% of the population were considered persons in poverty. The city had three manufacturing facilities and several other business enterprises, including two utility cooperatives, a city library, two large public venues in the area, and was 10 miles from a local community college (RainsvilleAlabama.com, 2019; United States Census Bureau, 2020). In addition, the city was home to a youth center that offered various services for children and adolescents, including but not limited to psychiatric and psychological evaluations, diagnosis, forensic evaluations, medication management, substance assessments, and counseling (SAM Foundation, 2020).
Participants in the program were teachers and staff members of the rural high school. The school was comprised of 1,239 students enrolled from pre-kindergarten to 12th grade and 125 staff members, including 46 kindergarten through sixth grade, 33 teachers, seventh through 12th-grade teachers, three administrators, three counselors, two librarians, instructional resources personnel, and support workers. The teachers ranged in age from 24 to 65 years of age. According to the National Center for Education Statistics [NCES] (2020), the student-to-teacher ratio was 17:1. The percentage of student enrollment by ethnicity was approximately 75% Caucasian, with the remaining groups being American Indian, Hispanic, African American, and Asian descent. This school received Title 1 funding, with around 60% of the population receiving free or reduced lunches in the Child Nutrition Program (Plainview High School, 2020).
Participation in the project implementation was voluntary. The administration agreed to give teachers and staff who participated in the program professional development hours. In addition, a letter was sent out via email to each potential participant explaining the importance of recognizing students at risk for suicide and referring them to the guidance counselor for additional resources. This letter served as an advertisement for the project and allowed teachers and staff to check their availability with their work schedules. This letter was sent by work email to all participants approximately one month before implementing the program. During the week of implementation, an email was sent to all faculty and staff with instructions, in the form of a flyer, showing the steps to register for their Kognito account. The registration process entailed creating a new account with the individuals’ first and last name, email address, password, and enrollment key.
Stakeholders in this project were teachers and staff members of the rural high school consisting of the high school principal, elementary school principal, one assistant principal, one school nurse, three guidance counselors, 46 kindergartens through sixth-grade teachers, 33 seventh through 12th-grade teachers, and 19 support staff personnel. Each stakeholder acted in a participatory role by participating in the mental health professional development program. Other stakeholders were students, the community, House Majority Leader Nathaniel Ledbetter, and Senator Steve Livingston, who provided funding for the Kognito licenses.
Setting Facilitators And Barriers
The project required operating systems/dates for the teacher and staff members to complete the Kognito simulation. The school provided the computers. Another resource needed was time for teachers and staff to complete the program at the school. The high school principal allowed teachers and staff four weeks to complete the program from November 9th through December 9th. Funding was needed to purchase the Kognito licenses for teachers and staff and was awarded by House Majority Leader Ledbetter and Senator Steve Livingston. The project's facilitators included the primary author and the high school principal. The high school principal agreed to provide 2 hours of professional development time to each teacher and staff member who completed the evidence-based program.
Constraints and barriers to implementing the project included a limited timeframe, teacher and staff workload, the ability to use the technology, budget, and teachers for project implementation. School closed early for Winter Break due to COVID-19. This early dismissal was a barrier because teachers and staff not being on campus to complete the program. Upon return, the high school principal allowed an additional two-week time frame for teachers and staff to complete the Kognito program during regular work hours. Teachers and staff may not have been willing to participate due to a heavy workload or limited free time. The Kognito license was $32 per person. This cost would have been a barrier without the granted funding.
Implementation Plan/procedures
The participants' initial contact was a letter drafted by the author and the high school principal sent by email to encourage participation in the project and inform the teachers and staff on the importance of early identification and intervention with students experiencing psychological distress that could lead to suicide. In addition, the letter notified teachers and staff that they would earn professional development hours upon completion. This letter was sent one month before the project was implemented. The school administration provided the email address of teachers and staff members to the author. An attachment was sent in an email that had directions on how to create a Kognito account, and the email included the product key to begin the simulation. There was a pre-test and post-test embedded in the simulation. It took the participants approximately one hour to complete the Kognito virtual simulation.
Participants included 39 teachers and staff members from the rural high school. Twenty-six participants completed the "At Risk for Elementary School Educators" simulation, and 13 participants completed the "At Risk for High School Educators” simulation.
Measurement Instruments
A variation of the Gatekeeper Behavior Scale (GBS) was used as a pre-survey and post-survey to measure project outcomes. A follow-up survey was sent out two months after the completion of the project. The number of referrals before the project was compared to the number three months after completing the project.
The GBS has high internal consistency using the 3-factor model based on the sub-scales of preparedness, likelihood, and self-efficacy (Timmons-Mitchell, Albright, McMillan, Shockley & Cho 2019). The effectiveness of training between pre-survey and post-survey scores was assessed on (a) participant preparedness to assist a student in psychological distress, (b) likelihood of engaging in helping behaviors, and (c) self-efficacy to engage in such behaviors. The pre-/post-test evaluated preparedness by viewing the average scores of two separate items; self-efficacy was evaluated by viewing the average scores of six separate items; likelihood was evaluated by viewing the average score of three different items (Timmons-Mitchell et al., 2019).
Two months following the implementation of the project, anonymous surveys were sent to all participants. Surveys included self-reflection questions regarding teachers' and staff's perceptions of improvements in their ability to recognize adolescents in psychological distress and refer those students to guidance counselors. The survey was created and distributed by Kognito through a SurveyMonkey™ link to the participants’ work email.
Data Collection Procedures
The first step of implementation was to collect data from a pre-and post-survey. A pre-survey and post-survey were embedded into the program for teachers and staff to complete in the Kognito simulation. A follow-up survey was sent to teachers and staff two months after implementing the project through their work email. The data from the follow-up survey was collected through the utilization of SurveyMonkey™. The data from the pre-survey, post-survey, and follow-up survey was uploaded in de-identified format by Kognito and was exported to a Comma-Separated Values (CSV) file and stored on a jump drive in a secure, locked location. The school guidance counselors provided the number of referrals in a de-identified format from teachers and staff starting August 10, 2020, through March 2021.
Data Analysis
The formative evaluation consisted of administering a pre-test survey embedded into the Kognito program that established a baseline level of preparedness to assist a student in psychological distress, the likelihood of engaging in helping behaviors, and the teachers' or staff members' self-efficacy to engage in such behaviors. The post-survey assessed any increase in preparedness, the likelihood of helping behaviors, and self-efficacy to engage in such behaviors. Pre- and post-test surveys were compared to evaluate the program's overall evaluation effectiveness.
The data are primarily descriptive. For example, in the pre-test, both elementary and high school teachers were asked about their preparedness to recognize students in distress and talk about them. Both groups reported being moderately prepared, and there was no statistical difference between the elementary and high school teachers.
Six items were asked in both the pre-and post-surveys related to teachers recognizing and helping students in psychological distress. In addition, the elementary survey included an additional item about talking to parents. Because the responses to the pre-and post-surveys were not matched, an unpaired t-test was used to determine whether the training seemed effective in helping teachers recognize and respond appropriately.