3.1 NaMLP can be strongly induced by A. alternata while it is not essential for A. alternata resistance in N. attenuata
A miraculin-like protein gene (NaMLP, XM_019373761), which shared 34.18% amino acid identity to miraculin in Synsepalum dulcificum, was found highly up-regulated in N. attenuata after A. alternata inoculation. Transcriptome analysis (Song, et al. 2019) indicated that this gene was strongly up-regulated in N. attenuata leaves at 1 day post inoculation (dpi). To confirm this result, we also quantified NaMLP expression by real-time PCR. Compared with mock control, the expression of NaMLP was increased to 10.9-fold at 1 dpi, and nearly 388-fold at 3 dpi (Fig. 1a). Interestingly, A. alternata-elicited NaMLP was dramatically reduced in JA-deficient irAOC and ethylene-insensitive Ov-etr1 plants, suggesting that A. alternata-induced NaMLP is regulated by both JA and ethylene (Fig. 1b).
We studied the subcellular location of NaMLP by transient over-expression of NaMLP fused with GFP in N. benthamiana leaves. Our results showed that most of the signals were from cell membranes (Fig. 1c). To rule out the possibility of cell wall localization, we also transformed NaMLP::GFP to the protoplasts of N. attenuata. Indeed, strong signals were detected in cell membranes again (Fig. 1c), indicating NaMLP is a cell membrane protein.
To investigate the role of NaMLP during A. alternata infection, we generated plants stably silenced with NaMLP (irNaMLP line 11 and 12). Real-time PCR indicated that A. alternata-induced NaMLP expression was reduced by 94% in irNaMLP line 11, and 89% in irNaMLP line 12 at 1 dpi (Fig. 2a). When the source-sink transition leaves (0 leaves) of irNaMLP and wild-type (WT) were collected and inoculated with A. alternata for 7 d. No significant difference of lesion diameter were observed in two independent experiments (Fig. 2b), suggesting that NaMLP does not play an essential role in N. attenuata against A. alternata.
3.2 NaMLP can be specifically induced by oral secretion (OS) of S. litura and is required for the resistance of S. litura in N. attenuata
Previously, JA signaling has been demonstrated to be an essential signal for both A. alternata and herbivore resistance (Paschold, et al. 2008; Sun, et al. 2014). As A. alternata-induced NaMLP was dependent on JA signaling, but we found that it was not required for this pathogen resistance, we thus speculated that it might be involved in herbivore resistance.
To test whether the saliva of S. litura can specifically induce the expression of NaMLP, we detected its expression in the 0 leaves of rosette-staged plants, by wounding with a fabric pattern wheel and immediately applying with diluted OS of S. litura (Wounding + OS; W + OS) to simulate herbivory, or water (Wounding + Water; W + W) as a control. The expression of NaMLP was gradually but significantly increased after time with W + W treatments at all the time points from 0.5 h to 6 h (Fig. 3a). However, NaMLP transcripts were strongly amplified by W + OS treatments at all these time points (Fig. 3a). These results suggested that NaMLP could be specifically induced by the OS of S. litura.
Next, we tested whether NaMLP is required for herbivore resistance by growing S. litura larvae on WT and NaMLP-silenced plants generated via VIGS. Our results showed that larvae gained significantly more mass on VIGS NaMLP plants indicating that NaMLP is required for the resistant to S. litura (Fig. 3b).
We also tested caterpillar performance in plants stably silenced with NaMLP and plants over-expressed with NaMLP (OvNaMLP line 2 and 3). Compared with WT, Os-elicited NaMLP expression were significantly increased to 4.5-fold in Ov-NaMLP line 2, and 5-fold in OvNaMLP line 3 after W + OS 6 h treatments (Fig. 3c). Our results showed that NaMLP was required for N. attenuata resistance to S. litura, as the insect larvae performed better in NaMLP-silenced plants (irNaMLP line 11 and 12) while performed the worst in both lines over-expressed with NaMLP (Fig. 3d; Supplementary Figure). These results strongly suggest that NaMLP can be specifically induced by OS and confers N. attenuata resistance to S. litura larva.
3.3 NaMLP is a new KTI exhibiting TPI activity
To understand the reason why NaMLP conferred the resistance to S. litura, we performed protein sequence blast in Gene Bank. Homologs were found in Solanaceae plants, with the highest similarity proteins (with 93–100% identity) in Nicotiana species. Interestingly, several conserved reaction sites of KTI were identified in NaMLP. Thus, NaKTI2 and NtKTI, two KTIs identified previously, were selected for sequence alignment with NaMLP. The protein sequences of NaKTI2 exhibited 53.55% similarities to NtKTI, while NaMLP only exhibited 33.16% similarities to NtKTI (Fig. 4). Yet, NaMLP had typical structural features of KTIs, including trypsin inhibitor domain (Kunitz legume family PF00197 in Pfam database), two disulphide bonds, a single reactive site and a number of β-trefoil folds (Fig. 4).
Although NaMLP showed lower sequence similarity to NaKTI2, the fact that NaMLP had conserved reaction sites of KTIs lead us hypothesized that NaMLP is a KTI with TPI activity. We transiently over-expressed NaMLP-eGFP under the control of CaMV 35S promoter in Ov-NahG leaves. Western blot analysis by using GFP antibody revealed that the NaMLP-eGFP protein was highly expressed in three Ov-NahG leaves independently transformed with 35S::NaMLP-eGFP, but was not present in leaves transformed with EV (Fig. 5a). Our results showed that the TPI activities of crude protein increased nearly 6.8-fold in Ov-NahG leaves over-expressed with NaMLP-eGFP when compared with those leaves transformed EV (Fig. 5a).
We next investigated the TPI activities in leaves of WT and NaMLP VIGS plants at 3 dpi of A. alternata. TPI activity were significantly reduced in 0 leaves of VIGS plants when NaMLP was successfully silenced (Fig. 5b).
We also investigated the OS-elicited TPI activities in leaves of irNaMLP and OvNaMLP plants. Our results showed that after treated with W + OS 3 d, significantly lower levels of TPI activity were detected in 0 leaves of both irNaMLP lines of 11 and 12, but higher levels were in OvNaMLP line 2 and 3 (Fig. 5c). Thus, our data showed that NaMLP has not only typical KTI structural features, but also confers N. attenuata resistance to S. litura larva through TPI activities.
3.4 Synergetic induction of NaMLP by JA and ethylene.
As A. alternate-induced NaMLP expression was significantly reduced in irAOC and Ov-etr1 plants (Fig. 1b), we speculate that Os-elicited NaMLP may also be regulated by JA and ethylene. Indeed, the induction of NaMLP expression by OS of S. litura was dramatically reduced in ethylene-reduced plants (irACO) and JA-deficient irAOC plants (Fig. 6a).
Since the induction of the NaMLP is dependent on the JA and ET signaling, we next investigated whether exogenously applied MeJA and ethephon could also induce the expression of the NaMLP. NaMLP transcripts were highly induced by MeJA or ethephon. The expression levels of NaMLP could reach to 886-fold that of the control after 3 h of MeJA treatment, and could reach nearly 26-fold after ethephon treatments (Fig. 7a). Interestingly, co-treatment with MeJA and ethephon for 3 h led to a much higher induction of NaMLP to 11235-fold (Fig. 7a).
Unlike NaMLP, Os-elicited NaPI was solely dependent on JA as it was only dramatically reduced in JA-deficient irAOC plants but not in ethylene-reduced irACO or WRKY3-silenced plants (Fig. 6b). When treated with MeJA or ethephon, NaPI could only respond to MeJA at both 1 and 3 h (Fig. 7b). In terms of NaKTI2, OS-elicited NaKTI2 was largely reduced in WRKY3-silenced plants, but only slightly reduced JA-deficient irAOC plants (Fig. 6c). When treated with MeJA or ethephon, neither treatment could induce NaKTI2 expression (Fig. 7c).
To further confirm the synergistic induction of the NaMLP by MeJA and ethephon is dependent on endogenous JA and ET signaling, 0 leaves of WT, irAOC, and irCOI1 plants were co-sprayed with MeJA and ethephon. NaMLP was significantly induced in WT and irAOC, but not in irCOI1 plants under the co-application of MeJA and ethephon (Fig. 8a), suggesting that endogenous JA perception is required for the synergistic induction of NaMLP. Similarly, in the presence of MeJA and ethephon, the NaMLP was significantly induced in WT and irACO, but not in Ov-etr1 plants (Fig. 8b), suggesting that endogenous ethylene signaling transduction is also required for the synergistic induction of NaMLP.
Thus, our data strongly indicates that N. attenuata plants accumulated different PIs through different signaling after herbivory, and NaMLP is synergistically induced by JA and ethylene signaling in N. attenuata plants when attacked by insect herbivores.