We analyzed databases from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) that were generated from post-marketing spontaneous pharmacovigilance databases. Data were extracted from FAERS and JADER between the first quarter of 2018 and the fourth quarter of 2021 in this study. FAERS includes ˃14,000,000 cases of adverse events reported after April 2004 worldwide [5]. JADER includes ˃440,000 cases of adverse events that occurred specifically in Japan after April 2004 [5]. FAERS database consists of seven data tables: patient demographic and administrative information, drug and biologic information, adverse events, patient outcomes, report sources, start end dates of drug therapy, and indications for use/diagnosis. JADER consists of four data tables: patient demographic information, drug information, adverse events, and primary disease. In JADER, age and body weight are categorized (e.g., 20s, 30s, and 40s); we converted each value to its median (e.g., 20s to 25 years old). The source of the databases complies with the guidelines set by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and the databases adhere to ICH-standardized adverse event information guidelines [6]. For this analysis, adverse event reports were downloaded from FDA websites (https://www.fda.gov/, accessed on May 4th, 2022) and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (http://www.pmda.go.jp/, accessed on May 4th, 2022). Further, FAERS reports were only extracted from data reported from Japan and were defined as FAERS-Japan [7]. Reports with the same case number were identified as duplicate reports and we used the most recent report as recommended by the FDA [8].
Collected data included case id, drug name, adverse event name, the start date of administration, the end date of administration, date of occurrence of adverse event, sex, age, body weight, reporting country, and daily olaparib dose, and the daily olaparib dose per body weight (DPBW) was calculated. We also collected concomitant medications known to reduce folic acid (i.e., trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, methotrexate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, primidone, valproate, gabapentin, phenytoin, and sulphasalazine) [9–11], vitamin B12 levels (i.e., proton pump inhibitor, histamine 2 receptor antagonist, metformin, phenobarbital, pregabalin, primidone, and topiramate) [11–12] to clarify the association between these medications and macrocytic anemia, which is the main type of olaparib-related anemia [13]. Further, we collected strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors (i.e., clarithromycin, erythromycin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and voriconazole), moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors (i.e., aprepitant, cimetidine, cyclosporin, fluconazole, fluvoxamine, imatinib, posaconazole, and verapamil), and CYP3A4 inducers (i.e., bosentan, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and rifampicin) [14], since olaparib is primarily metabolism via CYP3A4/5 (84% of total clearance) [15]. Although the elevated olaparib plasma exposure was observed in patients with hepatic/renal impairment [16], FAERS and JADER did not include clinical laboratory data such as serum creatinine level and alanine aminotransferase. Therefore, we defined the reports of concomitant use of phosphate binders as CKD since an increase in hyperphosphatemia (serum phosphate level ≥ 4.5 mg/dL) is notable at an eGFR of about 60 mL/min/1.73m2 [17]. Further, we defined the reports of concomitant use of rifaximin and branched chain amino acids as severe liver disease history [18]. Since olaparib is one of the therapeutic options available for maintenance therapy of ovarian and pancreatic cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy [19–20], a previous platinum treatment history was also collected.
Adverse Events Detection
Adverse events are coded according to preferred terms (anemia; 10002034) derived from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Event reports are identified using the standardized MedDRA ver. 25.0 query. Anemia occurrence during olaparib administration was defined as ‘anemia’ and other adverse events were defined as ‘no anemia’.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using R software version 4.1.3 (R Core Team, 2022) [21]. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p-value < 0.05. Categorical and continuous variables on patients’ backgrounds were summarized as median [interquartile range (IQR)] and frequency (in percentage), respectively. Signal detection was evaluated using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using univariate logistic regression analysis, similar to previously reported results [22]. Adjusted ROR (aROR) for anemia was calculated by adjusting gender since female is more likely to develop anemia in adulthood [23–25]. The present study categorized age, body weight, and DPBW as binary variables based on the findings of previous reports and median value: age (≥ 60 years or < 60 years, and ≥ 80 years or < 80 years), body weight (≥ 50 kg or < 50 kg), and DPBW (≥ 12 mg/kg or < 12 mg/kg) [26]. A statistically significant ROR was formally defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI exceeding 1.0. In anemia occurrence groups, patients’ characteristics with and without anemia from Japan and the other countries were compared using Fisher's exact test.