Patterns, prevalence and determinants of stunting among children aged 1-15 years

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2140794/v1

Abstract

Stunting increases morbidity and mortality, hindering mental development and influencing cognitive capacity of children. This study aimed to examine the trends and determinants of stunting from infancy to middle adolescence in four countries: Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. A 15-year longitudinal data on the prevalence of stunting were obtained from the Young Lives cohort study. The study includes 38361 observations from 4 countries in between 2002 and 2016. A generalized mixed-effects model was adopted to estimate the determinant of stunting. The patterns of stunting in children from 2002 to 2016 have declined from an estimated 30% in 2002 to 20% in 2016. Stunting prevalence varied among four low- and middle-income countries with children in Ethiopia, India, and Peru being more stunted compared to children in Vietnam. The highest stunted was recorded in India and the lower was recorded in Vietnam. In all four countries, the highest prevalence of severe stunting was observed in 2002 and moderate stunting was observed in 2006. Parents' education level played a significance role in determining child stunting. Children of uneducated parents were shown to be at a higher risk of stunting. The pattern of stunting was reduced in four low- and middle-income countries from 2002 to 2016. Disparities of stunting were observed between- and within-country of low- and middle-income with the highest prevalence recorded in low-income country. Child stunting is caused by factors related to child's age, household wealth, household size, the mother's and father's education level, residence area and access to save drinking water.

Introduction

The Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development both call for reducing disparities in health and leaving no one behind1,2. Health disparities are linked to social disparities in nutrition via complex pathways that include policies addressing health and nutrition; the quality and quantity of food available and consumed; access to and affordability of nutritious foods of high quality; and individuals' and populations' living conditions and circumstances. To effectively plan, create, and implement public health nutrition policies, strategies, and programs, the evidence base on health disparities in nutrition must be expanded3.

Stunting, wasting, and underweight have often been used to measure the prevalence of under-nutrition in children. Stunting is the delayed growth and development that children endure as a result of poor nutrition, frequent infection, and insufficient psychosocial stimulation4. Children are considered stunted if their height-for-age is more than two standard deviations below the WHO Child Growth Standards median5,6. Stunting raises morbidity and mortality risks in children, and also hinders mental development, and influence the cognitive ability of children5,7−9. It is a physical sign of persistent childhood malnutrition that is clearly visible and quantified6.

In recent decades, there has been significant success in lowering child stunting prevalence3,6,9,10. However, between-country disparities in the prevalence of stunting reduction are widely observed. Africa and Asia suffer the greatest burden of a child stunting11. Stunting prevalence, for example, has decreased by two-thirds in upper-middle-income nations since 2000, whereas it remains high in low and lower-middle-income nations10,12,13.

The Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations have identified stunting, along with other nutrition indicators, as the primary focal areas for eradicating global malnutrition14. The disparity in worldwide progress in child stunting provides an appropriate scenario for testing the hypothesis in child stunting trends. In this regard, it is critical to investigate the major causes and trends of stunting so that individual nations may learn what works and develop customized policies and initiatives.

The objective of this study was, therefore, to investigate the patterns and determinants of stunting from infancy to middle adolescence in four countries: Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam.

Materials And Methods

Data sources and settings

Longitudinal data on the prevalence of stunting were obtained from the Young Lives cohort study. The Young Lives study is a 15-year longitudinal study that looks at the changing nature of childhood poverty in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. The Young Lives cohort study thus collects data from these countries at both child-level and household-level to understand the causal effect of childhood poverty. Children from poor household were purposively over-sampled15.

For sample selection, a multistage sampling approach was adopted, with the first stage including the selection of 20 sentinel stations from each nation. Following the selection of 20 sentinel sites, households with children, on average, one-year age groups were chosen at random. Finally, 100 households with, on average, a one-year-old child were selected randomly from each sentinel site16. A longitudinal anthropometric measurements of children were collected at the years 2002, 2006, 2009, 2013, and 201617. The sample and sampling procedures adopted in the Young Lives cohort study were addressed in detail elsewhere1823.

The Study Variables

The stunting status of children was a categorical outcome variable. It was measured longitudinally on five measurement occasions from 2002 to 2016. Children with height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) greater than or equal to -2 were categorized as not stunted, moderately stunted if their HAZ were between − 3 and − 2, and severely stunted if their HAZ were less than − 33,15,24,25. The Independent variables considered as determinants of stunting were gender, age, residence area (rural and urban), father's level of education, father's age, mother's level of education, mother's age, household size, wealth index, and access to safe drinking water. In the Young Lives study, the wealth index is the major measure of households' socioeconomic status19. It is the average of housing quality, access to services, and consumer durable ownership. This average yields a number between 0 and 1, with a higher wealth index reflecting a better socioeconomic status15.

Data Analysis Methods

Generalized linear mixed-effect model (GLMM)

In a current longitudinal data, individuals in the study are followed over a period of time and, for each individual, data are collected at five time points from aged 1 to 15 years. One of the mixed-effects classes commonly used for analyzing longitudinal binary data is the generalized linear mixed model. Consider a binary longitudinal outcome of stunting (\({y}_{ij}\), \(i,\dots ,n;j=1,\dots ,{n}_{i}\)) taking only two possible values (not stunted coded as 0 and stunted coded as 1). In this regard, a general GLMM for binary longitudinal outcome can be written as26

$$\text{log}\left(\frac{{\mu }_{ij}}{1-{\mu }_{ij}}\right)={{x}}_{ij}^{T}\beta +{{z}}_{ij}^{T}{{b}}_{i}$$

where \({\mu }_{ij}=E\left({y}_{ij}|\beta ,{b}_{i}\right)\), \({{b}}_{i} \tilde N(0, D)\), \({{x}}_{i}\) and \({{z}}_{i}\) are vectors containing fixed and random covariates, respectively, \(\beta\) is a vector of fixed effect and D is a covariance matrix. A GLMM is typically based on the likelihood method of statistical inference26,27.

The data were analyzed using Statistical Analysis Systems SAS 9.4 version. Modeling categorical response variables with random effects is a major use of the PROC GLIMMIX in SAS statistical procedure. The PROC GLIMMIX provides the capability to model binary (not-stunted/stunted, 0/1) outcome, including random effects and correlated errors.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

Table 1 shows the background characteristics of the children, their parents, and the countries from which the children were chosen. In all, 38361 observations were available from 4 countries. Of these observations, 9378, 9632, 9641, and 9710 were conducted in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam, respectively. The percentage of observations (children chosen) from each country was nearly identical, the minimum was 9378(24.45%) from Ethiopia and the maximum was 9710(25.31%) from Vietnam (Fig. 1). The majority of the children in the sample were from rural areas, and more than half of them were males. In 2002, the majority of children's mothers (40.3%) were uneducated. However, the percentage of uneducated mothers has decreased over time from 40.3% in 2002 to 24.6% in 2016. Similarly, the percentage of uneducated fathers fell from 32.6% in 2002 to 12.6% in 2016 (Table 1).

Table 1

Background Characteristics of children in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam from 2002 to 2016

Characteristics

Year of survey

2002

2006

2009

2013

2016

Child's sex

Male

n

4091

4040

3990

3935

3900

%

51.8

52.1

52.0

52.1

52.1

Female

n

3814

3711

3682

3619

3579

%

48.2

47.9

48.0

47.9

47.9

Area of residence

Urban

n

2976

2925

2940

3015

3044

%

37.6

37.7

38.3

39.9

40.7

Rural

n

4929

4826

4715

4539

4434

%

62.4

62.3

61.5

60.1

59.3

Access to safe drinking water

No

n

3999

3340

2771

2569

2198

%

50.6

43.1

36.2

34.0

29.5

Yes

n

3901

4411

4892

4981

5257

%

49.4

56.9

63.8

66.0

70.5

Father's education level

Uneducated

n

2295

1464

1232

870

809

%

32.6

21.0

18.4

13.2

12.6

Primary school

n

2462

3013

2998

3010

2713

%

34.9

43.2

44.7

45.8

42.3

Secondary school

n

1749

1765

1734

1750

1849

%

24.8

25.3

25.9

26.6

28.8

Diploma and above

n

521

553

547

617

676

%

7.4

7.9

8.2

9.4

10.5

Adult and Religious education

n

21

176

189

324

364

%

0.3

2.5

2.8

4.9

5.7

Mother's education level

Uneducated

n

3115

2357

2004

1844

1757

%

40.3

31.1

27.2

25.4

24.6

Primary school

n

2660

3113

3212

3133

2924

%

34.4

41.1

43.6

43.1

41.0

Secondary school

n

1522

1524

1510

1538

1628

%

19.7

20.1

20.5

21.2

22.8

Diploma and above

n

414

412

432

462

525

%

5.4

5.4

5.9

6.4

7.4

Adult and Religious education

n

19

163

215

287

300

%

0.2

2.2

2.9

4.0

4.2

The four Low- and middle-income countries

Ethiopia

n

1917

1908

1877

1871

1805

%

24.3

24.6

24.5

24.8

24.1

India

n

1970

1937

1924

1907

1894

%

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

Peru

n

2035

1950

1937

1876

1843

%

25.7

25.2

25.2

24.8

24.6

Vietnam

n

1983

1956

1934

1900

1937

%

25.1

25.2

25.2

25.2

25.9

Figure 2 depicts the graphical exploration of the characteristics of numeric variables such as father's age, mother's age, wealth index, and household size. From Fig. 2, it can be seen that Vietnam had the highest wealth index and the lowest household size throughout all the study periods. In contrast, Ethiopia had the lowest wealth index and the largest household size from 2002 and 2016. In all study periods from 2002 to 2016, the parents (father and mother) of Indian children had the lowest average ages, while the parents of Ethiopian children had the highest average ages.

Height-for-age

From 2002 to 2016, height-for-age z-score (HAZ) values were computed for each child in four study countries to assess the trends and prevalence of stunting. Figure 3 shows trends in the mean HAZ of children in the four study countries. The minimum (-1.72) and maximum (-0.98) estimated mean HAZ were recorded in Ethiopian males and females, respectively. Children in Vietnam had approximately the highest mean HAZ in both genders, except in 2016, where Ethiopian females had the highest estimated mean HAZ (-0.89).

Between-country Patterns Of Stunting Prevalence From 2002 To 2016

The within- and between-country status of stunting prevalence was presented in Table 2 and Fig. 4, respectively. From the visual inspection of the between-country trends of stunting prevalence displayed in Fig. 4, the trends of stunting in children from 2002 to 2016 have declined from an estimated 30% in 2002 to 20% in 2016. In fact, the four countries have observed reductions in stunting prevalence. However, the greatest decline occurred in Vietnam to 2.6% in moderately stunted and to 0.5% in severely stunted (Fig. 6).

From the results of within-county prevalence of stunting status presented in Table 2, for all four countries, the highest prevalence of severe stunting was observed in 2002 and moderate stunting was observed in 2006. For instance, the prevalence of severe stunting in 2002 was 20.9%, 10.8%, 9.1%, and 5.7% in Ethiopia 23, India, Peru, and Vietnam, respectively. On the other hand, the highest prevalence of moderate stunting observed in 2006 was 23.2%, 28.7%, 24.5%, and 20.4% in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam, respectively (Table 2). Accordingly, the lowest prevalence of severe stunting was observed in 2009 for both Ethiopia and India (5.7% and 5.5%, respectively) and in 2016 for Peru and Vietnam (both 2%).

Table 2

Within-country (Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam) prevalence of stunting status from 2002 to 2016

Country

Stunting

Prevalence, n(%)

2002

2006

2009

2013

2016

Ethiopia

Not stunted

n

1112

1310

1474

1329

1345

%

58

68.7

78.5

71

74.5

Moderately stunted

n

405

442

296

431

324

%

21.1

23.2

15.8

23

18

Severely stunted

n

400

156

107

111

136

%

20.9

8.2

5.7

5.9

7.5

India

Not stunted

n

1365

1246

1368

1350

1368

%

69.3

64.3

71.1

70.8

72.2

Moderately stunted

n

392

556

450

444

415

%

19.9

28.7

23.4

23.3

21.9

Severely stunted

n

213

135

106

113

111

%

10.8

7

5.5

5.9

5.9

Peru

Not stunted

n

1458

1303

1537

1520

1547

%

71.6

66.8

79.3

81

83.9

Moderately stunted

n

392

478

317

289

259

%

19.3

24.5

16.4

15.4

14.1

Severely stunted

n

185

169

83

67

37

%

9.1

8.7

4.3

3.6

2

Vietnam

Not stunted

n

1570

1461

1547

1528

1700

%

79.2%

74.7

80

80.4

87.8

Moderately stunted

n

300

399

326

288

198

%

15.1

20.4

16.9

15.2

10.2

Severely stunted

n

113

96

61

84

39

%

5.7

4.9

3.2

4.4

2

Figures 5 and 6 depict the prevalence and patterns of stunting status from 2002 to 2016. The percentages of between-country prevalence were derived using the sum of children numbers affected in each country divided by the total children in four countries. The percentages of within-country prevalence, on the other hand, were calculated by dividing the total number of children exposed in each country by the total number of children in the corresponding country.

Results of Generalized linear mixed-effects model

Stunting determinants were chosen by first including all considered factors into the model and then evaluating their significance. Subsequently, those factors that were statistically significant in determining a child stunting were considered and interpreted. In this regard, factors such as a child’s country, a child’s age, household size, wealth index, child’s sex, residence area, father's education level, and mother's education level were statistically significant determinants of stunting. However, father's age and mother's age were not statistically significant determinants of stunting. The significance tests of variables are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

The fixed effects significance tests in determinants of stunting

Effect

Num DF

Den DF

F Value

Pr > F

Country

3

32616

30.64

< .0001

Child's age

4

32616

46.21

< .0001

Mother’s age

2

32616

0.72

0.4859

Father’s age

2

32616

0.07

0.9349

Household size

1

32616

8.59

0.0034

Wealth index

2

32616

52.11

< .0001

Child's sex

1

32616

36.00

< .0001

Residence area

1

32616

50.83

< .0001

Father’s education level

4

32616

11.59

< .0001

Mother’s education level

4

32616

25.16

< .0001

Table 4 depicts the estimated odds ratios of factors related to parents’ and children’s characteristics in determining a child’s stunting. The findings of the study revealed that there were disparities in stunting prevalence in four low- and middle-income countries; Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. Compared to children in Vietnam, children in Ethiopia, India, and Peru were more stunted (Ethiopia: OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21–1.93, p = 0.0003, India: OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.89–2.88, p < 0.0001, Peru: OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 2.04–3.24, p < 0.0001). In terms of ages, children were more stunted at five years old (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14–1.42, p < 0.0001) and less stunted at eight (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53–0.69, p < 0.0001), twelve (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65–0.89, p = 0.0006), and fifteen (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.46–0.66, p < 0.0001) years old.

Girls and boys are not equally likely to be stunted in these four low- and middle-income countries, but in these countries, stunting afflicts fewer girls (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56–0.75, p < 0.0001) than boys. This suggests that girls had a 35% lesser odds of stunting compared to boys. Children in rural households were more than 1.82 times (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.54–2.15, p < 0.0001) as likely to be stunted as children in urban households.

Regarding parents-related factors, children from educated parents (mother and father), children from high wealth index households, and children from low household sizes were associated with lower odds of stunting. For instance, children born to mothers with a primary school, secondary school, and diploma and above education level had 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62–0.84, p < 0.0001), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.28–0.4, p < 0.0001), and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.11–0.27, p < 0.0001) times less likely to be stunted than children from uneducated mothers, respectively. Similarly, children born to fathers with a secondary school, and diploma and above education level had 0.53 (95% CI: 0.43–0.66, p < 0.0001), 0.499 (95% CI: 0.357–0.699, p < 0.0001), and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.11–0.27) times less likely to be stunted than children from uneducated mothers, respectively. Children from the medium and high wealth index households were less than 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61–0.76, p < 0.0001) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.36–0.50, p < 0.0001) times as likely to be stunted as children from the low wealth index households, respectively.

Table 4

The fixed effects factors related to parents’ and children’s characteristics

Effect

Estimate

SE

OR

95% CI

P-value

Country (ref. = Vietnam)

Ethiopia

0.4261

0.1183

1.531

1.214–1.931

0.0003

India

0.8468

0.1069

2.332

1.891–2.876

< .0001

Peru

0.9445

0.1181

2.572

2.04–3.241

< .0001

Child's age in year (ref. = age one)

Age five

0.2384

0.0554

1.269

1.139–1.415

< .0001

Age eight

-0.503

0.0661

0.605

0.531–0.688

< .0001

Age twelve

-0.276

0.0799

0.759

0.649–0.887

0.0006

Age fifteen

-0.591

0.0915

0.554

0.463–0.663

< .0001

Mother’s age in year (ref. = \(\le 29\) age)

\(30\le age \le 36\)

0.07984

0.0665

1.083

0.951–1.234

0.2301

\(\ge 37\) age

0.09663

0.1016

1.101

0.903–1.344

0.3413

Father’s age in year (ref. = \(\le 34\) age)

\(35\le age \le 41\)

0.00028

0.0654

1

0.88–1.137

0.9966

\(>41\) age

0.02459

0.0969

1.025

0.848–1.239

0.7996

Household size in number (\({r}{e}{f}. = \le 5 {h}{o}{u}{s}{e}{h}{o}{l}{d} {s}{i}{z}{e}\))

\(>5\) household size

0.1478

0.0504

1.159

1.05–1.28

0.0034

Wealth index (ref. = low)

Medium

-0.3833

0.0575

0.682

0.609–0.763

< .0001

High

-0.8559

0.0839

0.425

0.36–0.501

< .0001

Child's sex (ref. = Boy)

Girl

-0.4372

0.0729

0.646

0.56–0.745

< .0001

Residence area (ref. = Urban)

Rural

0.5994

0.0841

1.821

1.544–2.147

< .0001

Father education level (ref. = uneducated)

Adult and religious education

0.1172

0.1465

1.124

0.844–1.498

0.4235

Primary school

-0.0896

0.0781

0.914

0.785–1.065

0.2512

Secondary school

-0.6365

0.1092

0.529

0.427–0.655

< .0001

Diploma and above

-0.6942

0.1718

0.499

0.357–0.699

< .0001

Mother education level (ref. = uneducated)

Adult and religious education

-0.0921

0.1661

0.912

0.659–1.263

0.5793

Primary school

-0.3241

0.0784

0.723

0.62–0.843

< .0001

Secondary school

-1.0428

0.1206

0.352

0.278-0.4

< .0001

Diploma and above

-1.75

0.2174

0.174

0.113–0.266

< .0001

Discussion

This study covered four low- and middle-income countries of the Young Lives study area; namely Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. The Young Lives data are well-suited for studying the longitudinal dynamics of child-related variables as well as the influence of children's early-life situations on their later outcomes. As a result, the data derived from the Young Lives study and used in this study contained both country-specific and statistically sound information.

The current study covered only four low- and middle-income countries and reported on the patterns, prevalence, and determinants of stunting from 2002 to 2016. Countries are expected to identify their contributions and set their own objectives in order for the global stunting target to be met. The ability to translate the global aim into individual national targets is reliant on nutrition profiles, risk factor trends, demographic changes and executing nutrition policies, and the level of health system development11. Therefore, the findings of this study insight into the stunting prevalence in these countries that are used to show the countries' contribution to the global stunting target.

In this study, the within- and between-country status of stunting prevalence was examined. The trends of stunting prevalence among children aged 1 to 15 years in four low- and middle-income countries were declined from 30–20% (Fig. 4). According to Onis et al.28 study on the prevalence and trends of stunting among preschool children in developing countries, stunting prevalence declined from 47% in 1980 to 33% in 2000 (by 40 million). Despite the overall decrease in stunting, progress was heterogeneous across countries. The highest moderate stunted was recorded in India during all the study periods, whereas Vietnam had the lowest prevalence except in 2009. Ethiopia recorded the highest percentage of severe stunting (5.1%) in 2002 and the lowest percentage of moderate stunting (3.9%) in 2009 compared with that of India, Peru, and Vietnam. This result is similar to the findings of Astatkie23, who utilized the same dataset to investigate dynamics of stunting in Ethiopia using both younger and older cohort data. He noted that the highest cross-sectional prevalence of severe stunting in younger children was observed in Round 1 (2002).

A generalized linear mixed-effects model was adopted to estimate the determinant of stunting from 2002 to 2016. The basic model contained the factors country, child's age, mother’s age, father’s age, household size, wealth index, child's sex, residence area, father’s education level, and mother’s education level as fixed effects and children as a random effect.

Stunting prevalence varied among four low- and middle-income countries with children in Ethiopia, India, and Peru being more stunted compared to children in Vietnam. The study identified that a child's age was a significant factor in determining a child stunting. At ages 8, 12, and 15 years, children were less likely to be stunted than at age 1 year. However, Children were more likely to be stunted at five years of age than at one year of age. This result is consistent with the previous studies23,29−31.

The study showed that girls were at a lesser risk for stunting than boys. This was confirmed in several previous studies 23,29,32−37. In contrast, previous studies found no significant variation in stunting based on gender 38,39. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the mother's education level and the father's education level also played a role in determining child stunting. One likely reason is that more education implies literacy, which allows parents to obtain more health information. Better feeding patterns and nutrition status in Ugandan children have been linked to maternal literacy and education40. Children of uneducated parents were shown to be at a higher risk of stunting. This result is consistent with earlier findings31,33,34,41,42. Conversely, a study in Uganda noted that no significant effect of education level on stunting38, while other studies found an inverse relationship between education level and stunting43,44. Berhane et al. reported that more educated mothers provided a more diverse diet for their children. Furthermore, greater education opens the door to a higher income, enhancing household wealth32.

This study noted that children of households with a medium and high wealth index had a much lower risk for stunting than low wealth index households. Several previous studies found that children of a rich household were related to a lower risk of stunting33,34,42,45. A study of Ethiopian children demonstrated that low socioeconomic status may predispose children to stunting 46. Residence area is another environmental factor that impacts food security and thus could changes child stunting. Children in rural households were also found to be at a higher risk of stunting as compared to urban households. Furthermore, the study showed that households of several sizes living together increased the risk of stunting in those children. It is evident that the food available must be distributed to all household members, which raises the risk of under-nutrition in less resourceful households. Living many household sizes together puts a greater strain on caregivers and household resources as compared to a singleton37.

Several previous studies were used cross-sectional data to evaluate the nutrition status of children4750. It is rational that cross-sectional studies are restricted in quantifying individual changes over time. One of the strength of this study is that it utilized longitudinal data to examine the prevalence of stunting over time from 2002 to 2016 in Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam. Longitudinal studies are more successful and have higher statistical power than cross-sectional studies in evaluating changes over time51,52. There are also some limitations to the present analyses. This study was limited to four low- and middle-income countries; hence, the results present in this study may not reflect all children in low- and middle-income countries. Despite these limitations, the current findings provide a good foundation for monitoring stunting levels and changes.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the pattern of stunting among children aged 1 to 15 years has reduced in four low- and middle-income countries. Despite the overall decrease, progress of decrement was heterogeneous across countries. The highest stunted was recorded in India during all the study periods, and approximately the lower was recorded in Vietnam. Ethiopia recorded the highest percentage of severe stunting in 2002 and the lowest percentage of moderate stunting in 2009. Child stunting is caused by factors associated with child's age, household wealth, household size, the mother's and father's education level, residence area and access to save drinking water. Policies and interventions should focus on parents’ education and access to save drinking water, as these are the most powerful factors.

Declarations

Acknowledgments 

We thank Young Lives study for giving us access to the data files. Young Lives is a 15-year study of the changing nature of childhood poverty in low- and middle-income countries. 

Data availability 

 The Young Lives data are publicly available and can be accessed from http://www.younglives.org.uk/.

Authors’ contributions  

S.K.W analyzed and drafted this manuscript. T.Z designed, advised and supervised the start, the analysis, and the write-up of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. 

Funding 

None 

Ethics declarations 

Not applicable 

Competing interests  

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  

References

  1. United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Sustainable Development Goals. http://archive.unu.edu/unupress/food/V182e/ch05.htm (accessed Dec 24, 2022).
  2. United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed Dec 24, 2022).
  3. World Health Organization. Reducing stunting in children: equity considerations for achieving the Global Nutrition Targets 2025. 2018.
  4. UNICEF. State of the World’s Children Statistical Report. 2015.
  5. World Health Organization. utrition Landscape Information System (NLIS) country profile indicators: interpretation guide. 2019.
  6. Vaivada T, Akseer N, Akseer S, Somaskandan A, Stefopulos M, Bhutta ZA. Stunting in childhood: An overview of global burden, trends, determinants, and drivers of decline. Am J Clin Nutr 2020; 112: 777S-791S.
  7. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Improving Child Nutrition. The Achievable Imperative for Global Progress. 2013.
  8. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; 382: 427–51.
  9. Hoddinott J, Alderman H, Behrman JR, Haddad L, Horton S. The economic rationale for investing in stunting reduction. Matern Child Nutr 2013; 9: 69–82.
  10. Balla S, Goli S, Vedantam S, Rammohan A. Progress in child stunting across the world from 1990 to 2015: Testing the global convergence hypothesis. Public Health Nutr 2021; 24: 5598–607.
  11. Onis M De, Branca F. Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern Child Nutr 2016; 12: 12–26.
  12. World Health Organization. Levels and Trends in Child Malnutrition: Key Findings of the 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization., 2019.
  13. WHO. Nutrition Landscape Information System (NLIS) country profile indicators: interpretation guide. 2010 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44397.
  14. UN-DESA. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017. 2017.
  15. Briones K. A guide to Young Lives rounds 1 to 5 constructed files. Young Lives Tech Note 2018; 48: 1–31.
  16. Young Lives. Young Lives Survey Design and Sampling (Round 5): Ethiopia. Oxford: Young Lives 2018.
  17. Jeffery K, Chatterjee I, Lavin T, Li IW. Young lives and wealthy minds: The nexus between household consumption capacity and childhood cognitive ability. Econ Anal Policy 2020; 65: 89–104.
  18. Wake SK, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. Variations in physical growth trajectories among Children Aged 1–15 years in low and middle income countries: Piecewise model approach. Malaysian J Public Heal Med 2021; 21: 200–8.
  19. Wake SK, Baye BA, Gondol KB. Longitudinal Study of Growth Variation and Its Determinants in Body Weight of Children Aged 1–15 Years in Ethiopia. Iran J Pediatr 2022; 32: e122662.
  20. Wake SK, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. Growth Characteristics of Four Low-and Middle-Income Countries Children Born just After the Millennium Development Goals. J Biostat Epidemiol 2021; 7: 108–19.
  21. Wake SK, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. Studying latent change process in height growth of children in Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22: 1–9.
  22. Wake SK, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. Nonlinear Physical Growth of Children from Infancy to Middle Adolescence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Res Health Sci 2021; 21: e00533.
  23. Astatkie A. Dynamics of stunting from childhood to youthhood in Ethiopia: Evidence from the Young Lives panel data. PLoS One 2020; 15: 1–20.
  24. Onis M De, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Garza C. Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics / WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr 2006; 9: 942–7.
  25. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group &, de Onis M. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length / height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95: 76–85.
  26. Wu L. Mixed effects models for complex data. CRC Press, 2009.
  27. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
  28. Mercedes de O, Edward AF, Monika B ssner. Is malnutrition declining? An analysis of changes in levels of child malnutrition since 1980. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 78: 1222–1233.
  29. Takele K, Zewotir T, Ndanguza D. Understanding correlates of child stunting in Ethiopia using generalized linear mixed models. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 1–8.
  30. Fenske N, Burns J, Hothorn T, Rehfuess EA. Understanding child stunting in India: A comprehensive analysis of socio-economic, nutritional and environmental determinants using additive quantile regression. PLoS One 2013; 8.
  31. Habyarimana F, Zewotir T, Ramroop S, Ayele DG. Spatial Distribution of Determinants of Malnutrition of Children under Five Years in Rwanda: SimultaneousMeasurement of Three Anthropometric Indices. J Hum Ecol 2016; 54: 138–49.
  32. Berhane HY, Jirström M, Abdelmenan S, Berhane Y. Social stratification, diet diversity and malnutrition among preschoolers: a survey of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Nutrients 2020; 12: 712.
  33. Nshimyiryo A, Hedt-Gauthier B, Mutaganzwa C, et al. Risk factors for stunting among children under five years: A cross-sectional population-based study in Rwanda using the 2015 Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 1–10.
  34. McKenna CG, Bartels SA, Pablo LA, Walker M. Women’s decision-making power and undernutrition in their children under age five in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0226041.
  35. Tariku EZ, Abebe GA, Melketsedik ZA, Gutema BT. Prevalence and factors associated with stunting and thinness among school-age children in Arba Minch Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Southern Ethiopia. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0206659.
  36. Bork KA, Diallo A. Boys are more stunted than girls from early infancy to 3 years of age in rural senegal. J Nutr 2017; 147: 940–7.
  37. Quamme SH, Iversen PO. Prevalence of child stunting in Sub-Saharan Africa and its risk factors. Clin Nutr Open Sci 2022.
  38. Habaasa G. An investigation on factors associated with malnutrition among underfive children in Nakaseke and Nakasongola districts, Uganda. BMC Pediatr 2015; 15: 1–7.
  39. Renzaho AMN. Mortality rates, prevalence of malnutrition, and prevalence of lost pregnancies among the drought-ravaged population of Tete Province, Mozambique. Prehosp Disaster Med 2007; 22: 26–34.
  40. Ickes SB, Hurst TE, Flax VL. Maternal literacy, facility birth, and education are positively associated with better infant and young child feeding practices and nutritional status among Ugandan children. J Nutr 2015; 145: 2578–86.
  41. Stewart CP, Iannotti L, Dewey KG, Michaelsen KF, Onyango AW. Contextualising complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Matern Child Nutr 2013; 9: 27–45.
  42. Ekholuenetale M, Tudeme G, Onikan A, Ekholuenetale CE. Socioeconomic inequalities in hidden hunger, undernutrition, and overweight among under-five children in 35 sub-Saharan Africa countries. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2020; 95: 1–15.
  43. Makoka D. The Impact of Maternal Education on Child Nutrition: Evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. DHS Working Papers No. 84. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF International, 2013..
  44. Eshete H, Abebe Y, Loha E, Gebru T, Tesheme T. Nutritional Status and Effect of Maternal Employment among Children Aged 6–59 Months in Wolayta Sodo Town, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-sectional Study. Ethiop J Health Sci 2017; 27: 155–62.
  45. Magadi MA. Social Science & Medicine Household and community HIV / AIDS status and child malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73: 436–46.
  46. Kassaw MW, Bitew AA, Gebremariam AD, Fentahun N, Açik M, Ayele TA. Low Economic Class Might Predispose Children under Five Years of Age to Stunting in Ethiopia: Updates of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Nutr Metab 2020; 2020. DOI:10.1155/2020/2169847.
  47. Fenta HM, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. Disparities in childhood composite index of anthropometric failure prevalence and determinants across Ethiopian administrative zones. PLoS One 2021; 16: 1–17.
  48. Kasaye HK, Bobo FT, Yilma MT, Woldie M. Poor nutrition for under-five children from poor households in Ethiopia: Evidence from 2016 Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One 2019; 14: 1–16.
  49. Al-Sadeeq AH, Bukair AZ, Al-Saqladi AWM. Assessment of undernutrition using composite index of anthropometric failure among children aged < 5 years in rural yemen. East Mediterr Heal J 2018; 24: 1119–26.
  50. Fenta HM, Workie DL, Zike DT, Taye BW, Swain PK. Determinants of stunting among under-five years children in Ethiopia from the 2016 Ethiopia demographic and Health Survey: Application of ordinal logistic regression model using complex sampling designs. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal 2020; 8: 404–13.
  51. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied longitudinal analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
  52. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Leger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002.