See the published version of this preprint at Geothermal Energy.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Michael Christian Drews
Technical University Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-5576
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The North Alpine Foreland Basin in SE Germany Germany’s most active deep geothermal province. However, in its southern and eastern part the basin is considerably overpressured, which is a significant challenge for drilling deep geothermal wells. In this study, we combine drilling data and velocity-based pore pressure analyses with 3D basin modelling to assess the predictability and controlling factors of overpressure in the sub-regional context (area of 80 km x 50 km) around the Geretsried GEN-1 well, a deep geothermal exploration well in the southern part of the North Alpine Foreland Basin in SE Germany. Drilling data and velocity-based pore pressure analyses indicate overpressure maxima in the Lower Oligocene (Rupelian and Schoeneck Formation) and up to mild overpressure in the Upper Oligocene (Chattian) and Upper Cretaceous, except for the hydrostatically pressured northwestern part of the study area. 3D basin modelling calibrated to four hydrocarbon wells surrounding the Geretsried GEN-1 well demonstrates the dominating role of disequilibrium compaction and low permeability units related to overpressure generation in the North Alpine Foreland Basin. However, secondary overpressure generation mechanisms are likely contributing. Also, the impact of Upper Cretaceous shales, which are eroded in the northwestern part of the study area, on overpressure maintenance is investigated. The calibrated basin model is tested against the drilling history and velocity (VSP) data-based pore pressure estimate of the Geretsried GEN-1 well and reveals that pore pressure prediction is generally possible using 3D basin modelling in the North Alpine Foreland Basin, but should be improved with more detailed analysis of lateral drainage systems and facies variations in the future. The results of the study are of relevance to future well planning and drilling as well as to geomechanical modelling of subsurface stresses and deep geothermal production in the North Alpine Foreland Basin.
Keywords
overpressure, geothermal wells, 3D modelling, drilling
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Geothermal Energy.
Version 3
Posted 06 Jul, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 06 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 01 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 30 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 30 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 26 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jun, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 18 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 26 May, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 29 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Apr, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 18 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 16 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 16 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 08 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at Geothermal Energy.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Michael Christian Drews
Technical University Munich (TUM), Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-5576
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Geothermal Energy.
Version 3
Posted 06 Jul, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 06 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 01 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 30 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 30 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jun, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 26 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 18 Jun, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 18 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Jun, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Jun, 2020
Editor assigned
On 16 Jun, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Jun, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Jun, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 26 May, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 29 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Apr, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 18 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 16 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 16 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 15 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 Apr, 2020
First submitted
On 08 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 Apr, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Geothermal Energy.
The North Alpine Foreland Basin in SE Germany Germany’s most active deep geothermal province. However, in its southern and eastern part the basin is considerably overpressured, which is a significant challenge for drilling deep geothermal wells. In this study, we combine drilling data and velocity-based pore pressure analyses with 3D basin modelling to assess the predictability and controlling factors of overpressure in the sub-regional context (area of 80 km x 50 km) around the Geretsried GEN-1 well, a deep geothermal exploration well in the southern part of the North Alpine Foreland Basin in SE Germany. Drilling data and velocity-based pore pressure analyses indicate overpressure maxima in the Lower Oligocene (Rupelian and Schoeneck Formation) and up to mild overpressure in the Upper Oligocene (Chattian) and Upper Cretaceous, except for the hydrostatically pressured northwestern part of the study area. 3D basin modelling calibrated to four hydrocarbon wells surrounding the Geretsried GEN-1 well demonstrates the dominating role of disequilibrium compaction and low permeability units related to overpressure generation in the North Alpine Foreland Basin. However, secondary overpressure generation mechanisms are likely contributing. Also, the impact of Upper Cretaceous shales, which are eroded in the northwestern part of the study area, on overpressure maintenance is investigated. The calibrated basin model is tested against the drilling history and velocity (VSP) data-based pore pressure estimate of the Geretsried GEN-1 well and reveals that pore pressure prediction is generally possible using 3D basin modelling in the North Alpine Foreland Basin, but should be improved with more detailed analysis of lateral drainage systems and facies variations in the future. The results of the study are of relevance to future well planning and drilling as well as to geomechanical modelling of subsurface stresses and deep geothermal production in the North Alpine Foreland Basin.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...