1. CSO treatment significantly attenuated cerebral ischemic injury.
First, we used neurological scores and TTC staining to measure brain injury in the four groups. As shown in Figures 1A and 1B, the infarct volume in the MCAO-Con group was 32.5% ± 9.4% (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group). CSO treatment significantly decreased the infarct volume to 12.9% ± 3.9% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group). Additionally, as shown in Figure 1C, no significant difference was noted in the neurological scores of the rats between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. Compared with the Sham-Con group, the MCAO-Con group had significantly higher neurological scores, reflecting a worse neurological condition (##p<0.01). Interestingly, the neurological scores of the rats in the MCAO-CSO group was dramatically reduced compared with that of the MCAO-Con group (*p<0.05).
2. CSO treatment significantly alleviated neuronal injury in the ischemia penumbra.
HE, Nissl, Tunel, and Neun staining were performed to assess the neuronal damage and survival in the ischemic penumbra following MCAO-R injury (Figure 2). As shown in Figures 2A (a) and 2B, cells that were positive following HE staining (HE+) had a clear outline, compact structure, and intact nucleolus. The proportion of HE+ cells was 96.4% ± 3.5% in the Sham-Con group and 95.4% ± 2.8% in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The proportion of HE+ cells was 39.6% ± 1.2% in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO treatment significantly increased the proportion of HE+ cells to 75.1% ± 5.0% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
As shown in Figures 2A (b) and 2B, cells that were positive following Nissl staining (Nissl+) had intact neurons with flush cell bodies, while injured neurons had shrunken cell bodies accompanied by shrunken and pyknotic nuclei. The proportion of Nissl+ cells was 95.9% ± 1.9% in the Sham-Con group and 95.5% ± 1.8% in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The proportion of Nissl+ cells was 35.6% ± 5.2% in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly increased the proportion of Nissl+ cells to 63.6% ± 3.3% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
As shown in Figures 2A (c) and 2B, cells that were positive following Tunel staining (Tunel+) represented apoptotic nerve cells. The proportion of Tunel+ cells was 2.6% ± 0.5% in the Sham-Con group and 2.9% ± 0.6% in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The proportion of Tunel+ cells was 66.8% ± 3.1% in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the proportion of Tunel+ cells to 31.2% ± 3.1% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
Finally, as shown in Figures 2A (d) and 2B, cells that were positive following Neun staining (Neun+) represented surviving neurons. The proportion of Neun+ cells was 96.7% ± 1.9% in the Sham-Con group and 95.0% ± 4.2% in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The proportion of Neun+ cells was 38.2% ± 3.1% in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly increased the proportion of Neun+ cells to 65.5% ± 3.2% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
3. CSO treatment alleviated brain edema induced by ischemic stroke.
In order to determine the extent of brain edema 24 h after reperfusion, we measured brain water content and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. As shown in Figure 3A, the brain water content was 75.0% ± 1.4% in the Sham-Con group and 76.0% ± 1.7% in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The brain water content was 83.1% ± 0.8% in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the brain water content to 79.4% ± 0.6% (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
As shown in Figures 3B and 3C, the content of Evans blue was 2.7 μg/ml ± 0.5 μg/ml in the Sham-Con group and 2.5 μg/ml ± 0.6 μg/ml in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The content of Evans blue was 19.8 μg/ml ± 1.1 μg/ml in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the content of Evans blue to 13.9 μg/ml ± 2.8 μg/ml (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
We next evaluated cerebral edema markers in the ischemia penumbra 24 h after reperfusion. In particular we focused on VE-cadherin, an important component of the BBB, and AQP4 and Claudin-1, which are strongly expressed by leaky brain microvessels. As shown in Figure 4A (a, b), western blot analysis indicated no significant differences in the expression of VE-cadherin, AQP4, or Claudin-1 between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. Twenty-four hours after reperfusion, the MCAO-Con group demonstrated significantly decreased expression of VE-cadherin and increased expression of AQP4 and Claudin-1 (###p<0.001, ##p<0.01, #p<0.05 vs. Sham-Con group). However, compared with the MCAO-Con group, the MCAO-CSO group had significantly higher expression of VE-cadherin and decreased expression of AQP4 and Claudin-1(**p<0.01, *p<0.05).
BBB disruption is the main pathological mechanism leading to ischemic brain edema, so we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to measure the BBB ultrastructure in the four groups of rats. As shown in Figure 4B, no obvious difference in the BBB ultrastructure was observed between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups under physiological conditions. However, striking effects emerged in the MCAO groups, 24 h after reperfusion. Swollen astrocyte end-feet were clearly evident in the ischemic penumbra of the MCAO-Con and the MCAO-CSO groups, and the effect was exacerbated in the MCAO-Con group, which exhibited elevated astrocyte swelling, discontinuous plasma membranes, disturbed gap junctions, broken organelles, swollen endothelial cytoplasm and rough basal membranes. Finally, pretreatment with CSO significantly reduced the ultrastructure damage in MCAO-CSO group observed with TEM.
4. CSO treatment significantly inhibited TLR4/NF-κB mediated activation of microglia and astrocytes in the ischemia penumbra.
In the next set of analyses, we measured microglial and astrocytic activation in the ischemia penumbra across the four groups. As shown in Figure 5A (a, b), there were no obvious differences in microglial and astrocytic activation between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups under physiological conditions. Compared with the Sham-Con group, the astrocytes (GFAP-positive) and microglia (Iba1-posittive) in the MCAO-Con group were more activated (##p<0.01), as evident from large soma and short, coarse cytoplasmic and hypertophic processes. However, CSO significantly attenuated the microglial and astrocytic activation induced by MCAO-R injury (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group). Additionally, we found that the activated microglia were close to the activated astrocytes in the ischemia penumbra in both the MCAO-Con and MCAO-CSO groups, indicating possible co-activation of microglia and astrocytes following ischemic stroke. In keeping with this conclusion, CSO significantly inhibited co-activation of microglia and astrocytes in the MCA-CSO group compared with the MCAO-Con group (Figure 5B).
In addition, we measured the protein expression of Iba1 and GFAP using western blot 24 h after reperfusion in the ischemia penumbra, representing the activation of microglia and astrocytes respectively. As shown in Figure 5C (a, b), there was no significant difference in expression of Iba1 or GFAP between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. The expression of Iba1 and GFAP in the MCAO-Con group was significantly higher than in the Sham-Con group (##p<0.01). Remarkably, CSO treatment significantly decreased the expression of Iba1 and GFAP compared with the MCAO-Con group (*p<0.05).
Finally, in order to further investigate whether microglia and astrocyte activation was mediated by TLR4 and NF-κB, we measured TLR4 and NF-κB expression levels in the ischemia penumbra. As shown in Figure 5C (a, b), no significant difference in TLR4 and NF-κB expression was found between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. TLR4 and NF-κB protein levels were significantly increased in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01, #p<0.05 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly inhibited the expression of TLR4 and NF-κB compared with the MCAO-Con group (*p<0.05).
5. CSO treatment significantly inhibited inflammation in the ischemia penumbra.
We measured the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α) in the ischemia penumbra 24 h after reperfusion. As shown in Figure 6A (a), the level of IL-1β was 52.3 pg/mg protein ± 2.1 pg/mg protein in the Sham-Con group and 57.0 pg/mg protein ± 3.6 pg/mg protein in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The level of IL-1β was 107.3 pg/mg protein ± 11.0 pg/mg protein in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the level of IL-1β to 69.3 pg/mg protein ± 4.0 pg/mg protein (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group). As shown in Figure 6A (b), the level of IL-6 was 80.3 pg/mg protein ± 5.5 pg/mg protein in the Sham-Con group and 85.0 pg/mg protein ± 7.2 pg/mg protein in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The level of IL-6 was 275.7 pg/mg protein ± 15.3 pg/mg protein in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the level of IL-6 to 123.3 pg/mg protein ± 10.1 pg/mg protein (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group). As shown in Figure 6A (c), the level of TNF-α was 58.7 pg/mg protein ± 6.2 pg/mg protein in the Sham-Con group and 63.3 pg/mg protein ± 4.6 pg/mg protein in the Sham-CSO group, with no significant difference between the groups. The level of TNF-α was 121.9 pg/mg protein ± 7.7 pg/mg protein in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group), and CSO significantly decreased the level of TNF-α to 85.0 pg/mg protein ± 7.6 pg/mg protein (*p<0.05 vs. MCAO-Con group).
In order to provide additional evidence of the effect of CSO on inflammation following ischemic stroke, we used immunofluorescence staining to detect the expression of the microglia marker IBA1 and pro-inflammatory factor TNF-α in the ischemia penumbra 24 h after reperfusion. As shown in Figure 6B, there was no significant difference in the expression level of IBA1 and TNF-α between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. The expression of IBA1 and TNF-α significantly increased in the MCAO-Con group compared with the Sham-Con group. Additionally, the levels of IBA1 and TNF-α in the MCAO-CSO group were markedly decreased compared to the MCAO-Con group. We also measured the expression of the astrocyte marker GFAP and pro-inflammatory factor TNF-α in the ischemia penumbra 24 h after reperfusion. As shown in Figure 6C, no significant difference in the expression of GFAP and TNF-α was noted between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. The expression of GFAP and TNF-α significantly increased in the MCAO-Con group compared to the Sham-Con group. Finally, rats in the MCAO-CSO group had significantly lower levels of GFAP and TNF-α than those in the MCAO-Con group.
6. CSO treatment inhibited A1 type reactive astrocytes and promoted A2 type reactive astrocytes in the ischemia penumbra.
We investigated the presence of A1 type astrocytes (labeled by C3d/GFAP) and A2 type astrocytes (labeled by S100A10/GFAP) in the ischemia penumbra across the four groups, and subsequently assessed the influence of CSO on the number of peri-infarct C3d/GFAP-positive cells and S100A10/GFAP-positive cells by performing immunofluorescence staining. As shown in Figure 7A (a, b, c), there was no significant difference in the number of C3d/GFAP-positive cells and S100A10/GFAP-positive cells between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. Additionally, C3d/GFAP-positive cells were significantly increased and S100A10/GFAP-positive cells were significantly decreased in MCAO-Con group compared with the Sham-Con group (##p<0.01). The CSO-treated MCAO rats had significantly fewer C3d/GFAP-positive cells than did the rats in the MCAO-Con group (*p<0.05), and the number of S100A10/GFAP-positive cells in the MCAO-CSO group was significantly greater than in the MCAO-Con group (*p<0.05).
Next, we used western blot analysis to measure the protein expression of the A1 type astrocyte marker C3d in the ischemia penumbra. As shown in Figure 7B (a, b), there was no significant difference in C3d expression between the Sham-Con and Sham-CSO groups. The C3d protein level was markedly increased in the MCAO-Con group (##p<0.01 vs. Sham-Con group) and this effect was reduced by CSO treatment (*p<0.05).