3.1 Network Pharmacology
Protein–protein interaction network (Fig. 1a) showed 45 targets of hyperoside in the treatment of AD. Targets closer to the center of the network were more closely associated with treatment, including PIK3CA, AKT1, ESR1, EGFR. To further determine the pathways involved, KEGG and GO databases were used for enrichment analysis. The results based on KEGG analysis were shown in Fig. 1b, such as protactin, estrogen, AGE-RAGE, PI3K-Akt, apoptosis signaling pathway. The higher the ranking of pathways may show a better effect for the treatment of AD with hyperoside. The results based on GO analysis (p ≤ 0.01) were shown in Fig. 1c. GO enrichment analysis were grouped into three categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). Obviously, hyperoside treatment are mainly regulated by BP. Figure 1d shows the targets-signaling pathway network diagram of hyperoside. Red lable for hyperoside. PIK3CA, AKT1, MAPK10, and MAPK1 are crucial targets. Apoptosis, alzheimer disease, PI3K-Akt, and MAPK signaling pathway are crucial pathways. These results suggest possible mechanisms for hyperoside to treat AD.
3.2 Aβ-induced cytotoxicity in C. elegans
Aβ protein increases oxidative stress and ROS levels, which are closely related to the etiology of AD [22]. CL4176 worms, expressing Aβ gene, exposed in different concentrations (40, 80, and 120 µM) of hyperoside for subsequent experiments. Figure 2a-b show that hyperoside treatment reduced the content of ROS in CL4176 worms. As shown in Fig. 2c, the mean paralyzed time was increased by 3.40%, 9.40% and 17.16% in 40, 80, and 120 µM hyperoside groups than the untreated worms, respectively. The mean time duration at which 50% worms (PT50) was increased by 9.86%, 12.49%, and 25.52% in 40, 80, and 120 µM hyperoside groups verse the control group, respectively (Fig. 2b).
The behavioral phenotype of CL2355 worms that express Aβ42 protein in neurons has been usually used to study the protective effect of drugs against Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity in the chemotaxis assay. CL2122 worms do not express Aβ42 protein were selected as the vector control group, and showed no obvious difference in CI between the hyperoside treated and untreated groups. Compared with the control CL2122 worms, the CI of the untreated CL2355 worms were significantly lower, which illustrated that Aβ protein leaded to defects of chemotaxis behavior (Fig. 2c). However, hyperoside feeding at different concentrations (40, 80, and 120 µM) of CL2355 increased the CI to 0.19 ± 0.02, 0.22 ± 0.01 and 0.23 ± 0.02, respectively, compared with the CL2355 control group (0.13 ± 0.01). In addition, butanone-induced learning ability assay further confirmed the above results. As shown in Fig. 2C, no significant difference was found between the CL2122 worm groups. The LI of CL2355 was increased to 0.13 ± 0.01, 0.16 ± 0.02 and 0.19 ± 0.02 in 40, 80 and 120 µM hyperoside group than the control group (0.12 ± 0.01), respectively (Fig. 2c). These results suggested that hyperoside improved defective chemotaxis behavior of CL2355 worms by attenuating Aβ42-induced toxicity. This study confirmed that hyperoside attenuate Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity in a transgenic C. elegans in vivo.
3.3 Cell viability
The effects of Aβ42 and hyperoside on cell viability of PC12 cells were detected by MTT assay. The cell viability of Aβ42-induced PC12 cells compared to the control suppressed dramatically with different concentrations (1.25, 2.50, 5.00, and 10.00 µM for 24 h) (Fig. 3a). This experiment selected the Aβ42 concentration (2.5 µM) corresponding to approximate 67% cell viability as the PC12 cell injury modeling condition for further study. The different concentrations of hyperoside had no toxicity on PC12 cells (Fig. 3b). Hyperoside (10, 20 and 30 µM) improved Aβ42-induced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3c), which is consistent with the results of concentration-dependent alleviation the Aβ-induced cytotoxicity in C. elegans. Additionally, LDH levels were dramatically raised, while hyperoside inhibited the LDH release (Fig. 3d).
3.4 Intracellular oxidative stress
The ROS played essential roles in Aβ42-induced neuron toxicity and AD pathogenesis [23, 24]. To further explore the effects of hyperoside on Aβ42-stimulated PC12 cells, the ROS contents were determined in PC12 cells. As in Fig. 4a, it was found that the ROS levels were increased dramatically in PC12 cells exposed to 2.5 µM Aβ42 compared with control cells. However, treatment with hyperoside (10, 20, and 30 µM) significantly reduced the ROS accumulation in Aβ42-stimulated PC12 cells verse the control cells. Furthermore, the ΔΨm was further observed. These results illustrated that hyperoside treatment dramatically decreased the green fluorescence, compared with the Aβ42 group (Fig. 4b), indicating that hyperoside alleviated the mitochondrial dysfunction induced by Aβ42 in PC12 cells.
3.5 Activities of antioxidant enzymes and the content of MDA
Aβ42 significantly lessened the activity of SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT and increased the content of MDA versus the control group. However, hyperoside treatment remarkably enhanced the activities of downregulated antioxidant enzymes in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4d-f). Meanwhile, MDA content was obviously increased (Fig. 5g). These results illustrated that hyperoside protected against Aβ42-induced oxidative damage.
3.6 Apoptosis analysis
Two methods were used to analyze the anti-apoptotic effects of hyperoside: (i) morphology of nucleus by Hoechst 33342 staining, (ii) gene expression of bax, bcl-2, caspase-3 and caspase-9. Aβ42 leaded to an enhancement in apoptosis and the Aβ42 group exhibited more bright fluorescence compared to control group. However, this phenomenon could be inhibited by hyperoside (Fig. 5a). The expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes were measured by RT-PCR, as presented in Fig. 5b-e. The expression of caspase-3, caspase-9 and bax elevated dramatically, whereas Aβ42 inhibited expression of bcl-2 versus the control group. The mRNA expression of caspase-3, caspase-9 and bax elevated dramatically, whereas Aβ42 inhibited mRNA expression of bcl-2 versus the control group. In the high-dose group (30 µM), a significant suppression in the mRNA contents of caspase-3, caspase-9 and bax was presented versus the Aβ42 group (p < 0.001). Moreover, cells cultured with high concentrations of hyperoside significantly increased in the expression of bcl 2 in compared to Aβ42 group (p < 0.001).
3.7 The critical effects of the PI3K/AKT and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway
Accumulating research confirm that PI3K/AKT and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways are the vital pathways associated with oxidative stress [25]. Therefore, we measured the protein expression of p-PI3K, PI3K, p-Akt, Akt, nuclear Nrf2 and HO-1 by Western blot. Figure 6a shows that the protein levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, nuclear Nrf2 and HO-1 were markedly suppressed after stimulation with Aβ42, compared to the control group. However, pretreatment with hyperoside (10, 20, and 30 µM) obviously elevated the p-PI3K, p-AKT, nuclear Nrf2 and HO-1 proteins in PC12 cells, compared to the Aβ42 group. These results indicated that hyperoside may exerts protective effects on Aβ42-induced PC12 cells via the PI3K/AKT/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.
To further study whether the PI3K/AKT pathways play a key role in the protective effect of hyperoside and thus PI3K inhibitor LY294002 was used for the next step. Figure 6f shows that LY294002 (10 µM) significantly decreased the protective properties of hyperoside. Meanwhile, Fig. 6g shows that LY294002 group dramatically enhanced fluorescence compared to co-treatment of Aβ42 and hyperoside (30 µM). These results showed that PI3K/AKT pathways were essential, at least partially, in the protective effects of hyperoside on Aβ42-induced PC12 cells.
3.8 Molecular simulation analysis
The molecular docking results showed that ligand interacted at sites such as LYS264, GLU849, ASN170, LEU755, HIS670, and SER629, and exhibited strong binding ability to the related amino acid residues and PI3K-binding through hydrogen bonds (Fig. 7a). Moreover, the binding energy between hyperoside and PI3K protein was − 73.216 kcal/mol.
MD simulation was further investigated the dynamic behavior and binding properties of PI3K protein and hyperoside [26]. The Rg value represents the tightness of the protein structure [27]. The Rg value of hyperoside-PI3K complex stabilized at about 3.27 nm after 1000 ps, while the Rg value of free PI3K fluctuated widely during the first 5000 ps and then about 3.32 nm (Fig. 7b). The decrease in the Rg value of the complex indicated that the combination of hyperoside and PI3K make the protein structure tighter. RMSD value assesses complex conformational stability changes [28]. The RMSD values of hyperoside-PI3K complex and free PI3K continued to rise until 7000 ps and then the average RMSD value was about 0.32 nm, which shown that hyperoside bound protein does not cause a large fluctuation (Fig. 7c). RMSF value reflects the flexibility of individual amino acids in protein structure. As shown in Fig. 7d, the amino acid fluctuations of complex and free PI3K were relatively stable. This result was consistent with that of RMSD value. The SASA values of hyperoside-PI3K complex and free PI3K fluctuated within 5000 ps and leveled off after 5000 ps, reflecting that the binding of hyperoside enhanced the ability of protein-molecular interactions (Fig. 7e).