2.1. Animals
The animal experiment procedures were implemented according to the China’s animal welfare legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and supervised by the Ethics Committee of the Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) for the use of laboratory animals (approval no. AMUWEC20210017). A total of 20 P0–P1 Wistar rats and 78 adult female (200–250 g, 10–12 weeks, 118 rats used for experiments and 8 rats died during experiments) Wistar rats were used for establishing spinal cord injury (SCI) in the present study. All rats were housed in a constant condition (12-h light/dark cycle, 22–25°C, 55–60% moisture) and given free access to food and water before and after surgery.
2.2. The establishment of rat spinal cord injury (SCI) model
The rat SCI model was established as previously described [1, 26]. Briefly, a stereotaxic frame was applied to fixed the rats after they were anaesthetized with 2% isoflurane/air mixture (2–3 l/min). Then, a 4-cm-long skin incision was made in the midline of the back over the spinal cord, and the thoracic 9–11 (T9-11) spinal segments was exposed by performing a laminectomy, leaving the dura intact. Afterward, spinal contusion was implemented using a 20-g weight rod (diameter 4 mm) dropping from a height of 30 mm onto the exposed T10 segment. Subsequently, the muscles, subcutaneous tissue and skin were separately sutured. During surgery, rat body temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.3°C using a feedback-controlled heating pad system (Zhongshi, inc., Beijing, China). After surgery, rats were received manual bladder empty twice a day until they could do themselves. The dehydration, weight loss, autophagia and discomfort were recorded per day, even with appropriate veterinary care if needed.
2.3. Experimental groups
After surgery, rats were randomly divided into the following groups using the random number table method:
-
Sham group. Rats, received laminectomy without contusion, were intra-spinally microinjected the same volume of 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), equivalently to the volume of hepcidin solution in SCI + hepcidin group, using the same method.
-
SCI group. Rats, received laminectomy with contusion, were intra-spinally microinjected the same volume 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4), equivalently to the volume of hepcidin solution in SCI + hepcidin group, using the same method.
-
SCI + hepcidin group. Rats, received laminectomy with contusion, were intra-spinally microinjected recombinant mouse hepcidin (cat no. RPB979Mu01, 0.7 mg/kg, Cloud-Clone Corp., Katy, TX, USA) four hours after surgery. Hepcidin was diluted in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4), and microinjected into the dorsal spinal cord 2 mm rostrally and 2 mm caudally to the injury site at a depth of 1.2 mm and 0.75 mm laterally from midline at a rate of 1 µl/min. Afterward, the needle was left in position for a further 2 min before being slowly withdrawn. A total volume of 10 µl hepcidin was injected. The second dosage was performed on the second day after SCI.
2.4. The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating score
The BBB locomotor rating score is a 21-point scale that is universally applied to determine the behavioral outcomes after SCI in rats [27]. The rating score ranges from 0 to 21: 0 exhibits no locomotor function and 21 shows normal performance. In short, rats were placed in a 90-cm2 field and allowed them to walk around freely for 5 min, and the movements of hind limb were closely observed and recorded using a camera. Subsequently, the BBB locomotor rating score was assessed by two independent examiners blinded to the experimental groups on days 7, 35 and 56.
2.5. Primary oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) culture
Primary OPCs were isolated from P0–P1 Wistar rats as previously described [1]. In brief, the spinal cord tissues were dissected under a stereomicroscope (SZ61, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) after the dura mater and blood vessels were removed. Thereafter, the samples were triturated using a fire-polished Pasteur pipette and the cell suspensions were passed through a 40-µm Nylon cell strainer (Nest, Wuxi, China). Afterward, the cell suspensions were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Hyclone, Logan, Utah, USA) supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum after centrifugation at 1000 rpm. The culture medium was replaced every 2–3 days.
After 10–12 days, immature oligodendrocytes were collected by shaking overnight at 230 rpm. Then, the cell suspensions were pre-seeded for 30 min at 37°C under 5% CO2 to remove contaminating astrocytes and microglia. Afterward, floating cells were plated on poly-L-ornithine-coated (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) cover slips or culture plates (1 × 105 cells/ml) and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% B27 (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and 10 ng/ml plated derived growth factor (PDGF, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Thereafter, the purity of cells was determined by co-labelling of NG2 and PDGFαR using immunostaining.
Hepcidin was firstly dissolved in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) and then diluted with culture medium with the final concentration of 0.5 µM for in vitro experiments. The control or vehicle group was added the same volume of 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) as the hepcidin group.
2.6. Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining
HE staining was performed to assess the injury and necrosis status of spinal cord after SCI [28]. Briefly, spinal cord sections were sliced using a freezing microtome, washed with distilled water, incubated in hematoxylin staining solution for 10 min, then rinsed with distilled water 3 times, differentiated in 0.1% hydrochloric acid-ethanol for 25 sec, blued in 0.01M PBS for 45 min followed by 95% alcohol washing for 5 sec, thereafter immersed in eosin staining solution for 1 min, dehydrated with 95% alcohol, cleared with xylene, and finally mounted on glass slides. Images were captured using a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany), and analyzed by individual investigators blinded to group assignment using an Image J software (ImageJ 1.8, NIH, USA).
2.7. Perl’s blue staining
Perl’s blue staining was applied to exhibit iron deposition as previously described [1]. The T10 spinal cord segments containing the injured epicenter and surrounding uninjured tissues (6 mm = 3 mm either side from the injury epicenter) were collected for preparing paraffin sections according to the standard procedures. Paraffin sections (5 µm) were deal with a graded ethanol series, immersed in xylene, and rehydrated in PBS. Afterward, specimens were incubated in Perls’ staining solution (comprising equal parts of potassium ferrocyanide and HCL) for 20 min. Subsequently, the samples were rinsed with Milli-Q water and stained cell nuclei with Fast Red solution for 5–10 min, dehydrated, cleared in xylem and mounted on glass slides. Images were photographed by a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany), and analyzed by individual investigators blinded to group assignment using an Image J software (ImageJ 1.8, NIH, USA).
2.8. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement
ROS levels were measured by a ROS assay kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction (cat. no. S0033S, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Primary OPCs were collected and homogenized on ice. Then, each sample was loaded with 500 µl 10 µM DCFH-DA and incubated in the dark at 37°C for 20 min. Afterward, the loading buffer was replaced and washed to eliminate residual DCFH-DA. Subsequently, the samples were immediately measured using a flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with an argon laser (488 nm).
2.9. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
For immunostaining, sections were incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton-X 100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in PBS. Then, samples were incubated in the following primary antibodies overnight at 4°C after being blocked with 5% bovine serum album (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), anti-CC1 (cat. no. OP44, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), anti-DMT1 (cat. no. PA5-35136, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-TfR1 (cat. no. PA5-116065, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-NG2 (cat. no. MAB5384-I, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), and anti-PDGFαR (cat. no. ab32570, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). On the second day, the samples were immersed in Alexa Fluor® 555 or 488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:100; cat. nos. A0453 and A0423; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China) for 2 hours at room temperature. The cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 10 min at room temperature. Thereafter, the specimens were mounted onto glass slides, and images were captured using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM780, Weimar, Germany) and examined by individual investigators blinded to group assignment using a Zen 2011 software (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany).
For immunohistochemistry, slices were dewaxed and antigen-repaired according to the standard procedures [29]. Then, samples were immersed in endogenous peroxidase for 10 min. Afterward, the specimens were immersed in anti-CC-1 (cat. no. SAB4501438, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) primary antibody overnight at 4°C after being blocked with 5% BSA dissolved in 0.3% Triton-X 100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After being washed, they were incubated in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). Then, the 3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit was employed to show the positive cells in brown color. Afterward, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and dehydrated with ethanol and xylene to mount onto glass slides. Images were photographed by a light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Weimar, Germany), and analyzed by individual investigators blinded to group assignment using an Image J software (ImageJ 1.8, NIH, USA). For each sample, six sections were stained, analyzed, calculated and reported as the average of four independent measurements.
2.10. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
TEM was performed to visualized ultrastructural of myelin sheath and mitochondria status in each group, as previously described [1]. In brief, the samples containing the injured epicenter and surrounding uninjured tissues (2 mm = 1 mm either side from the epicenter) were firstly fixed in 1.25% glutaraldehyde overnight after perfusion. Then, the samples were post-fixed in 1.25% glutaraldehyde 3 days at 4℃. Thereafter, the specimens were washed and incubated in 1% citric acid (OsO4) for 2 h. Afterward, uranyl acetate was used for redyeing, and gradient acetone was used for dehydration. Then, an ultramicrotome (EM UC7, Leica, IL, USA) was used for slicing before the samples were infiltrated with propylene oxide, and embedded by epoxy. Images were photographed using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi HT7700, Tokyo, Japan). At least three independent samples per group were analyzed by individual investigators blinded to group assignment using an Image J software (ImageJ 1.8, NIH, USA) to exhibit the myelin sheath thickness.
2.11. Western blot
The T10 spinal cord segments containing the injured epicenter and surrounding uninjured tissues (0.5 cm = 0.25 cm either side from the epicenter) were immediately collected after decapitation on day 7 post-SCI. The tissues were collected after being homogenized and the protein content of each sample was measured by a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). A total of 50 µg proteins were separated by 8 or 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and electro-blotted to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Roche, Indianapolia, IN, USA) membranes. Then, the membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) in tris buffered saline (TBS) with Tween-20 (TBST) for 2 h at room temperature. Afterward, the samples were submerged in primary antibodies, anti-dMBP (cat. no. MBS618031, MybioSource, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-DMT1 (cat. no. PA5-35136, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), anti-APP antibody (cat. no. MAB348, Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), anti-TfR1 (cat. no. MA5-32500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), or anti-GAPDH (cat. no. AF0006; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) overnight at 4°C. On the next day, the membrane was submerged in corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies after being washed with TBST. All membranes were visualized by a ChemiDoc™ XRS+ imaging system (Bio-Rad, California, USA) using the WesternBright ECL Kits (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Densitometric density of each membrane was determined using an Image Lab™ software (Bio-Rad, California, USA), and analyzed by individual investigators blinded to group assignment.
2.12. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted using a TaKaRa MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (cat no. 9767, TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions after primary OPCs were gathered from each group. Then, a total of 1 µg RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (cat. no. RR0047A, TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, qPCR was performed using the CFX96 System (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) with SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (Tli RNaseH Plus) (cat. no. RR820A, TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) under the following condition: 95°C for 30 sec, 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. Relative mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH and analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCq method. Primer sequences used in the present study were listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
Target genes | Forward primer sequence (5’-3’) | Reverse primer sequence (5’-3’) |
DMT1 | TGATCCTGACCCGGTCTATC | CAATCCTCCAGCCTATTCCA- |
TfR | CTAGTATCTTGAGGTGGGAGGAAGAG | GAGAATCCCAGTGAGGGTCAGA |
GAPDH | GACAACTTTGGCATTGTGG | ATGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG |
2.13. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) releasing analysis
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) releasing level was evaluated using a LDH assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng bioengineering inc., Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to assess cytotoxicity. Briefly, the respective supernatants were firstly collected, then neurospheres were lysed with 2% Triton X-100 for 15 min on ice to release all LDH from the cytoplasm. LDH released from cell lysates was measured to be the maximal LDH release and was used as positive controls. LDH releasing level was detected by a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the wavelength of 450 nm, and data were presented as the content of LDH (U/L) released in the medium.
2.14. Cell viability assay
The cell viability was determined by a cell counting kit-8 (CCK8; Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan), which uses a water-soluble tetrazolium salt to quantify the number of live cells by producing an orange formazan dye upon bio-reduction in the presence of an electron carrier. Briefly, 100 µl of cell suspension (1×105 cells/well) was dispensed in a 96-well cell culture cluster, then incubated in 10% (v/v) CCK8 solution for at 37°C 2.5 h. Then, the absorbance of the culture medium at a test wavelength of 450 nm was determined using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a reference wavelength of 630 nm as well.
2.15. Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The statistical analyses were implemented using SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For statistical data collected at repeating time points were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Turkey’s post hoc test. For data with a single time point, multiple comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Turkey's post hoc test in case of the data with a normal distribution using a Shapiro–Wilk normality test. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistical difference.