In this study, 42 of 134 (31.3%) patients showed significant weight loss during the follow-up period. There were no differences in the usage and dosage of pirfenidone between the groups with and without significant weight loss. Significant weight loss had an independent effect on mortality even after adjusting for lung function and exercise capacity, and the subgroup analysis according to the pirfenidone dose showed similar results.
Although the exact mechanism of these findings needs to be clarified, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, physical inactivity, and poor general condition are proposed causes of weight loss in patients with IPF [5, 6, 21, 22]. In this study, proportion of patients who had significant weight loss (31.3%) was higher than that of previous studies [3, 10]. Nakatsuka et al. reported that the prevalence of significant weight loss in patients with IPF was 21.8% (27 of 124) in the Japanese cohort and 15.1% (13 of 86) in the English cohort [3]. Similarly, a retrospective cohort study by Jouneau et al. showed that 20.1% (85 of 423) of patients with IPF who took a placebo rather than nintedanib showed significant weight loss [10].
The following factors likely contributed to a higher proportion of patients having significant weight loss in our study compared with previous studies: first, in the general population, Asians have a lower body weight than Caucasians [23]; second, the number of patients who took anti-fibrotic drugs in our study was higher than that of the previous study (96.3% of patients in our study took pirfenidone; 28.2% and 23.3% took pirfenidone in the Japanese and English cohorts by Nakatsuka et al., respectively; and 60.1% took nintedanib in the study by Jouneau et al.); and finally, the exclusion of patients who followed-up for \(\le\) 1 year from the study design might have affected the prevalence. Among patients with IPF, Asians also have a higher proportion of underweight patients than do Caucasians, suggesting regional and racial differences in the clinical course of IPF [10, 24].
Several previous studies have shown that weight loss might be associated with poor prognosis in patients with IPF. In Nakatsuka et al.’s retrospective cohort study of 210 patients, a weight loss of \(\ge\)5% was a significant risk factor for mortality (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.01–6.23, p = 0.047). Weight loss suggested a worse outcome even when FVC was normal [3]. Pugashetti et al., in a study with 225 patients with interstitial lung disease, reported that every 1% yearly decrease in BMI was associated with a 5% increase in mortality risk [4]. Furthermore, a recent report revealed that malnutrition is common in patients with IPF and associated with hospitalization and mortality, supporting the inference that weight loss adversely affects the prognosis of patients with IPF [25]. Similar to the previous findings, significant weight loss was associated with poor outcomes in our study. It was associated with a poor prognosis even after adjusting for well-known prognostic factors such as 6MWD, baseline albumin levels, and lung function [1, 26, 27]. Therefore, it can be suggested that careful monitoring of weight loss is necessary when treating patients with IPF.
Although anorexia and weight loss are known side effects of pirfenidone [7], there was no significant difference in the pirfenidone dose and the frequency of side effects between the significant and non-significant weight loss groups in our study. Moreover, in both the full and low dose pirfenidone groups, significant weight loss was associated with increased mortality, suggesting that weight loss is still an important prognostic factor in patients with IPF using anti-fibrotic drugs. Similarly, Jouneau et al. conducted a post hoc analysis of previous pirfenidone-related studies and suggested that patients whose BMI is \(\le\) 25\(\text{k}\text{g}/{\text{m}}^{2}\) or who experienced weight loss in the placebo group showed a faster rate of FVC decline and worse prognosis [28]. Similarly, in the pirfenidone-treated group, patients with significant weight loss showed a worse prognosis than did those without significant weight loss [28]. However, nintedanib, another anti-fibrotic agent, showed different results in a previous study [10]. Although in the placebo group, the rate of FVC decline was faster in patients with a baseline BMI \(\le\) 25 \(\text{k}\text{g}/{\text{m}}^{2}\) than in patients with a BMI of 25\(\text{k}\text{g}/{\text{m}}^{2}\) or more, FVC changes between each BMI group were similar in the nintedanib group [10]. Likewise, patients with significant weight loss suffered a relevantly faster decrease in FVC in the placebo group; however, the rate of FVC decline was not significantly different depending on significant weight loss in the nintedanib group [10]. Although some conflicting results have been reported between the two anti-fibrotic agents, weight loss might be an important composite outcome in patients with IPF who receive anti-fibrotic agents.
This study had several limitations. First, this was a single-center and retrospective study. Due to the retrospective design, we could not include all variables that could potentially affect mortality. Second, we could not specifically investigate the nutritional status and quality of life of the patients. However, we measured serum albumin level and used it as a surrogate for nutrition status. Third, in Korea, nintedanib is rarely used because it is not covered by health insurance; therefore, a detailed analysis of nintedanib could not be conducted in this study. Lastly, most of the patients included in this study took pirfenidone; therefore, we could not analyze the effect of weight loss on patients with IPF who did not take pirfenidone.