Older age, internal carotid artery stenosis, and female sex as factors correlated with twisted carotid bifurcation based on 457 angiographic studies and a literature review

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2215054/v2

Download PDF

Article

Older age, internal carotid artery stenosis, and female sex as factors correlated with twisted carotid bifurcation based on 457 angiographic studies and a literature review

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2215054/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 2

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Twisted carotid bifurcation (TCB) is a well-known anatomical variation of the carotid bifurcation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. However, few investigations of TCB have focused on patients without internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. This study was performed to analyze the characteristics of TCB in patients with ICA stenosis and other diverse pathologies. All conventional cerebral angiographies performed in our institute for any reason from January 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups, the TCB group and the anatomically normal non-TCB group, and the basic characteristics of the groups were analyzed. Both sides of the carotid bifurcation were clearly visualized in 457 patients. TCB was found in 89 of 457 patients (19.5%); among these 89 patients, 74 (83.1%) had TCB only on the right side, 8 (9.0%) only on the left side, and 7 (7.9%) bilaterally. TCB was found more frequently on the right than left [81 (17.7%) and 15 (3.3%), respectively, on each of the 457 sides (p < 0.0001)]. TCB was significantly more frequent in older patients (p = 0.02), female patients (p < 0.001), and patients with ICA stenosis or occlusion at the bifurcation (p = 0.005). The prevalence of TCB was 19.5%, and 84.4% of cases were on the right side in patients with diverse pathologies. In conclusion, older patients, female patients, and patients with ICA stenosis or occlusion are more prone to have TCB.

Health sciences/Anatomy

Health sciences/Cardiology/Cardiovascular biology

Health sciences/Risk factors

Twisted carotid bifurcation

Carotid artery disease

Stroke

Angiography

Anatomy

The internal carotid artery (ICA) usually runs dorsolateral to the external carotid artery (ECA) at the carotid bifurcation in the neck. However, the ICA is sometimes positioned dorsal, dorsomedial, or even medial to the ECA, resulting in a so-called twisted carotid bifurcation (TCB) [1] as shown in Fig. 1. TCB is also called twisted ICA [2], retropharyngeal ICA [3–5], lateral ECA [6], lateral position of the ECA [7–10], dorsomedial origin of the ICA [11], or side-by-side positioning [12]. Most previous reports of this anatomical variation were based on case series of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for ICA stenosis, and TCB showed overwhelming right-side dominance in all studies [1, 2, 8, 13–16]. The present study was performed to investigate not only the side dominance but also the prevalence and other characteristics of TCB in patients with ICA stenosis and other diverse pathologies.

This retrospective observational clinical study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, and patient consent was not required. The data were appropriately deidentified. The study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. We reviewed all conventional cerebral angiography examinations performed at our institute (Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan) for any reason from January 2012 to December 2018. The anteroposterior view of the carotid bifurcation, if available, was evaluated by two certified neurosurgeons at our institute. TCB was defined as the center of the ICA located medially to the center of the ECA in the anteroposterior view, as adopted in previous reports [1, 15]. If the relationship between the ICA and ECA was unclear, other modalities such as three-dimensional computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, if available, were also utilized. The patient’s status was reviewed on each individual medical chart. We estimated a binominal logistic regression model using the presence or absence of TCB as the dependent variable. The predictor variables were age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and pathology requiring angiography. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics Version 27 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

We reviewed 1335 consecutive conventional cerebral angiography examinations but excluded 878 studies because the bilateral carotid bifurcations were not available for various reasons (e.g., carotid bifurcation not visualized, unilateral study, or poor image quality). Only the latest study was included if repeated in a single patient. Finally, 457 studies including 914 sides were evaluated. In the patient-based analysis, TCB was found in 89 (19.5%) of 457 patients; among these 89 patients, 74 (83.1%) had TCB only on the right side, 8 (9.0%) only on the left side, and 7 (7.9%) bilaterally. In the side-based analysis, TCB was found more frequently on the right than left [81 (17.7%) and 15 (3.3%), respectively, on each of the 457 sides] (Pearson’s chi-square = 50.7, p < 0.0001). The patients were divided into two groups, namely those with TCB (TCB group) and those with a normal anatomical carotid bifurcation (non-TCB group), and the demographic differences were compared between the two groups using logistic regression (Table 1). The analysis demonstrated that the patients in the TCB group was significantly older (p = 0.02), more frequently had ICA stenosis at the bifurcation (p = 0.005), and were more often female (p < 0.001).

Table 1

Analysis of clinical characteristics
	Overall	TCB group	Non-TCB group	p value
Patients	457	89	368
Age, years	68 (3–93)	71 (4–85)	67 (3–93)	0.026
Sex, male/female	229/228	35/54	194/174	< .001
Risk factors for arteriosclerosis
Hypertension		57	211	0.678
Diabetes mellitus		21	59	0.384
Dyslipidemia		41	132	0.724
Pathology for angiographic investigation
Aneurysm		30 (33.7)	141 (38.3)	0.572
ICA stenosis^a		31 (34.8)	74 (20.1)	0.010
SOD^b		14 (15.7)	61 (16.6)	0.276
Tumor		3 (3.4)	35 (9.5)	0.491
AVM/AVF		6 (6.7)	17 (4.6)	0.076
MMD		3 (3.4)	20 (5.4)	0.586
ICH		1 (1.1)	12 (3.3)	0.566
Trauma		0 (0.0)	3 (0.8)	0.999
Spine		0 (0.0)	3 (0.8)	0.999
Miscellaneous (reference)		1 (1.1)	2 (0.5)	N/A

Data are presented as n, n (%), or median (range)

TCB twisted carotid bifurcation, ICA internal carotid artery, SOD steno-occlusive disease, AVM arteriovenous malformation, AVF arteriovenous fistula, MMD moyamoya disease, ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, N/A not available

^aICA stenosis of > 50% at the carotid bifurcation

^bIncludes intracranial artery stenosis, cerebral infarction, transient ischemic attack, or acute mechanical thrombectomy

The etiology of TCB is unknown. Some previous studies have suggested that TCB is congenital [8] or that it is associated with hypertension and diabetes [1], whereas another study showed no correlation with risk factors for arteriosclerosis [11]. However, no study to date has clarified the etiology. The present study involving a wider spectrum of patients newly revealed that higher age, presence of ICA stenosis, and female sex are predisposing factors for TCB. The higher age and higher rate of ICA stenosis in the TCB group suggest that TCB is related to arteriosclerosis, which may have implications for the etiology of TCB. A previous investigation of carotid angiography examinations of 587 sides (336 right, 251 left) for various reasons such as head trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intracranial neoplasm concluded that TCB was more frequent in the higher age group [9]. Our study also demonstrated higher occurrence of TCB in older patients. We also observed that rotation of the ICA progressed over time in some patients (Fig. 2). This finding may support the association of TCB with aging and/or arteriosclerosis. However, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, all of which are risk factors for arteriosclerotic change, were not significantly associated with TCB in our study. This dissociation tells us that the etiology may not be merely arteriosclerosis. In fact, only one previous study of TCB showed a significant correlation with hypertension and diabetes mellitus; the remaining studies performed to date did not prove any correlation with these risk factors [1, 2, 8, 13–16] (Table 2). In addition, the statistical significance in women was extremely strong (p < 0.001). Only one case series of CEA produced results in agreement with these [1]. Men are more prone to undergo CEA than women with a ratio of 2.3:1.0 to 8.5:1.0 [1, 2, 8, 13–16]. This might explain the absence of female dominance in most of the CEA case series. The strong female dominance in the present study may be related to genetic or hormonal factors associated with the etiology of TCB.

Table 2

Summary of previous carotid endarterectomy case series
Authors (year)	Cases, n	TCB, n (%)	Age	Female dominance	Hypertension	Diabetes mellitus	Dyslipidemia
Katano and Yamada (2010)	75	7 (9.3)	🞨	🞅	🞅	🞅	N/A
Marcucci et al. (2011)	360	11 (3.6)	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨
Kamide et al. (2016)	58	7 (12.4)	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨
Ito et al. (2016)	199	11 (5.5)	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨
Tokugawa et al. (2019)	73	11 (15.1)	🞨	🞨	N/A	N/A	N/A
Honda and Maeda (2020)	57	8 (14.2)	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨
Uno et al. (2020)	115	13 (11.3)	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨	🞨
TCB twisted carotid bifurcation, N/A not applicable

“🞅” indicates a positive correlation with TCB, and “🞨” indicates no correlation

The prevalence and the right-side dominance in our study show tendencies similar to those in previous studies. The prevalence of TCB in past CEA series ranged from 3.6–15.1% [1, 2, 8, 13–16], whereas that in the present study was 19.7%. Our prevalence was somewhat higher because the ratio of women was much higher in our study. The prevalence of TCB was also reported in a limited number of studies examining nonspecific objectives as follows: four cadaveric series [6, 17–19] showing a prevalence of 7.5–16.0%, and two angiographic series [9, 20] showing a prevalence of 12.3% and 13.0%, respectively. The right-side dominance in the previous CEA series [1, 2, 8, 13–16] as well as the cadaveric [17, 19] and angiographic [20] series ranged from 66.6–100%, whereas ours was 83.1%. In addition, most sporadic cases of TCB reportedly occur on the right [7, 10, 21–24]. Our study also showed overwhelming right-side dominance despite the wider spectrum of pathologies. However, the reason for this dominance remains unclear.

This study had two main limitations. First, an observational retrospective clinical study such as this cannot reflect the natural incidence of a phenomenon. Despite our wider range of patients, the cohort cannot be considered a normal population. Patients who undergo cerebral angiography must have an underlying abnormality, which may have introduced bias into the results. Second, only a limited number of younger patients were included. Younger patients rarely undergo angiography because of the low potential for vascular abnormalities. Moreover, angiography carries some risks in pediatric patients, such as the requirement for sedation or anesthesia as well as harm to the small and fragile vessels.

In conclusion, this is the first study to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of TCB in a wide spectrum of patients. TCB was found in almost 20% of the patients, and more than 80% of TCB was on the right side; these findings are consistent with previous CEA case series. Higher age, female sex, and incorporation with ICA stenosis were significant risk factors for TCB.

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. This manuscript has been edited by a native English editor with professional language editing experience of scientific writing.

Data Availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author contributions

Joji Tokugawa conducted the study and was the main contributor to all parts of the study and the writing of the manuscript. Kentaro Kudo equally contributed as first author. Takumi Mitsuhashi contributed to writing the manuscript and statistical analysis. Takashi Mitsuhashi did most of the angiographic study and contributed to writing the manuscript. Makoto Hishii oversaw the whole study and was a supervisor of the manuscript writing. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Joji Tokugawa and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

This retrospective observational clinical study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Acknowledgement

This manuscript has been edited by a native English editor with professional language editing experience of scientific writing.

Katano H, Yamada K (2010) Carotid endarterectomy for stenoses of twisted carotid bifurcations. World Neurosurg 73:147–154; discussion e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.02.015
Honda M, Maeda H (2020) Analysis of twisted internal carotid arteries in carotid endarterectomy. Surg Neurol Int 11:147. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_601_2019
Pfeiffer J, Becker C, Ridder GJ (2016) Aberrant extracranial internal carotid arteries: new insights, implications, and demand for a clinical grading system. Head Neck 38:E687-E693. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24071
Pfeiffer J, Ridder GJ (2008) A clinical classification system for aberrant internal carotid arteries. Laryngoscope 118:1931–1936. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318180213b
Srinivasan S, Ali SZ, Chwan LT (2013) Aberrant retropharyngeal (submucosal) internal carotid artery: an under-recognized, clinically significant variant. Surg Radiol Anat 35:449–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1047-3
Bailey MA, Scott DJA, Tunstall RG, Gough MJ (2007) Lateral external carotid artery: implications for the vascular surgeon. EJVES Extra 14:22–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsextra.2007.03.005
Handa J, Matsuda M, Handa H (1972) Lateral position of the external carotid artery. Report of a case. Radiology 102:361–362. https://doi.org/10.1148/102.2.361
Ito M, Niiya Y, Kojima M, Itosaka H, Iwasaki M, Kazumata K, Mabuchi S, Houkin K (2016) Lateral position of the external carotid artery: a rare variation to be recognized during carotid endarterectomy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 123:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29887-0_16
Teal JS, Rumbaugh CL, Bergeron RT, Segall HD (1973) Lateral position of the external carotid artery: a rare anomaly? Radiology 108:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/108.1.77
Ueda S, Kohyama Y, Takase K (1984) Peripheral hypoglossal nerve palsy caused by lateral position of the external carotid artery and an abnormally high position of bifurcation of the external and internal carotid arteries—a case report. Stroke 15:736–739. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.15.4.736
Sitzer M, Puac D, Buehler A, Steckel DA, von Kegler S, Markus HS, Steinmetz H (2003) Internal carotid artery angle of origin: a novel risk factor for early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 34:950–955. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000060895.38298.C4
Loftus CM (2006) Side by side. In: Carotid endarterectomy: principles and technique, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 66–68
Kamide T, Nomura M, Tamase A, Mori K, Seki S, Kitamura Y, Nakada M (2016) Simple classification of carotid bifurcation: is it possible to predict twisted carotid artery during carotid endarterectomy? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158:2393–2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2948-4
Marcucci G, Accrocca F, Gabrielli R, Antonelli R, Giordano AG, De Vivo G, Siani A (2011) Complete transposition of carotid bifurcation: can it be an additional risk factor of injury to the cranial nerves during carotid endarterectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 13:471–474. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2011.272914
Tokugawa J, Kudo K, Mitsuhashi T, Yanagisawa N, Nojiri S, Hishii M (2019) Surgical results of carotid endarterectomy for twisted carotid bifurcation. World Neurosurg 126:e153-e156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.282
Uno M, Yagi K, Takai H, Hara K, Oyama N, Yagita Y, Matsubara S (2020) Diagnosis and operative management of carotid endarterectomy in patients with twisted carotid bifurcation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 60:383–389. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0047
Arumugam S, Subbiah NK (2020) A cadaveric study on the course of the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery and its variations. Cureus 12:e7663. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7663
Lucev N, Bobinac D, Maric I, Drescik I (2000) Variations of the great arteries in the carotid triangle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:590–591. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2000.97982
Ozgur Z, Govsa F, Ozgur T (2008) Anatomic evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation in cadavers: implications for open and endovascular therapy. Surg Radiol Anat 30:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0351-4
Trigaux JP, Delchambre F, Van Beers B (1990) Anatomical variations of the carotid bifurcation: implications for digital subtraction angiography and ultrasonography. Br J Radiol 63:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-63-747-181
Garrido MB, Jagtap R, Hansen M (2020) Retropharyngeal internal carotid artery: a review of three cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00845-8
Majumdar S, Bhattacharya S, Kundu P, Bhattacharya K (2013) Unilateral variation in the position of internal and external carotid arteries. Ital J Anat Embryol 118:177–183.
Rusu MC, Vasilescu A, Nimigean V (2006) A rare anatomic variant: the lateral position of the external carotid artery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:1066–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.04.001
Vega J, Gervas C, Vega-Hazas G, Barrera C, Biurrun C (1999) Internal carotid artery transposition: another cause of widening of the retropharyngeal space. Eur Radiol 9:347–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050678

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 2

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Older age, internal carotid artery stenosis, and female sex as factors correlated with twisted carotid bifurcation based on 457 angiographic studies and a literature review

Status:

Version 2

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Declarations

Funding

Competing interests

Author contributions

Ethics approval

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 2