2.1. HFD-induced hepatic steatosis in mice, accompanied by a reduction in the expression and function of TRPV2 in the liver tissue or hepatocytes.
At first, we established the NAFLD model in mice as described in the methods. We found the body weight increased significantly from the 8th week and lasted to the 12th week after the onset of HFD, compared with the control group (Fig. 1B, **<0.005, ***<0.001, two-way ANOVA, F (6, 84) = 7.442). Similarly, the liver weight (Fig. 1C, ****<0.0001, two-way ANOVA, F (1, 8) = 114.5) and the ratio of liver to body weight (Fig. 1D, ****<0.0001, two-way ANOVA, F (1, 8) = 91.88) were also elevated at the 12th week after the onset of HFD, comparing with the control group. We also tested the expression level of TG in the liver after the onset of HFD and found the amount of TG was enhanced at the 12th week (Fig. 1E, ****<0.0001, two-way ANOVA, F (1, 10) = 14.63), comparing with the control group. To determine the degree of NAFLD at the 12th week, we assessed the NAFLD score according to liver histology and the score in the HFD group was higher significantly than that in the control group (Fig. 1F, **<0.005, unpaired t-test).
It is very striking that the protein level of TRPV2 in the liver was dimmed at the 12th week after the onset of HFD (Fig. 1G-1H, *<0.05, two-way ANOVA, F (2, 8) = 6.258), by using western blot method. To verify this finding, we performed immunostaining in cultured hepatocytes from HFD-treated mice or control mice. Similarly, the immune response of anti-TRPV2 was decreased in HFD-treated mice vs control mice at the 12th week (Fig. 1I-J, **<0.005, unpaired t-test). Given TRPV2 displays high Ca2+ permeability, we screened the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in the Fura2-loaded hepatocytes from HFD-treated mice or control mice by perfusion 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB, 0.5mmol/L for 1 min), which is TRPV2 specific agonist14. 2-APB stimulated an increase in [Ca2+]i in cultured hepatocytes in both groups, but the response was higher in the HFD-treated group than that in the control group (Fig. 2A-2B, *<0.05, two-way ANOVA, F (30, 240) = 1.642).
2.2. Conditional knockout hepatic TRPV2 aggravated HFD-induced hepatic steatosis in mice
To investigate the roles of TRPV2 in hepatocytes, we specifically deleted Trpv2 from Albumin-Cre-expressing cells by breeding AlbCre+/− mice with TRPV2flox/flox mice (TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/−, Fig. 3A). As the control group, AlbCre−/− mice were crossed with TRPV2flox/flox mice (Fig. 3A). By immunostaining against TRPV2 in cultured hepatocytes from both groups, TRPV2 was not observed in the TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− group but expressed in the control group (TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/−, Fig. 3B). Next, we fed high fat and carbohydrate diet or a standard chow diet in each group. The increment in body weight in TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with HFD feeding was more serious than that in TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with chow feeding (Fig. 3C, ****<0.0001, two-way ANOVA, F (6, 60) = 41.25) or TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/− mice with HFD (Fig. 3C, ****<0.0001, two-way ANOVA, F (6, 60) = 11.51). Moreover, the increase in body weight was happened earlier in TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with HFD than that in other groups (Fig. 3D, ***<0.0005 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with Chow, **<0.001 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/− mice with HFD, one-way ANOVA, F (3, 20) = 12.35). However, there was no difference in body weight between TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/− mice with HFD and Chow group at the 4th week (Fig. 3D, P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (3, 20) = 12.35). In agreement with the findings in body weight, the amount of TG in liver (Fig. 3E, ***<0.0005 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with Chow, ***<0.0005 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/− mice with HFD, one-way ANOVA, F (3, 20) = 34.25) and NAFLD score (Fig. 3F-3G, ***<0.0005 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with Chow, **<0.001 vs TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre−/− mice with HFD, one-way ANOVA, F (3, 20) = 11.54) in TRPV2flox/flox;AlbCre+/− mice with HFD were also increased significantly at the 4th week after HFD feeding.
2.3. Activation of TRPV2 in HepG2 cells protect the cells against Palmitic Acids-induced lipid accumulation
To further investigate the roles of TRPV2 in lipid metabolisms, HepG2 cells were used to establish in vitro NALFD model, as described in the methods. Since TRPV2 agonist 2-APB and antagonist SKF were used to observe the effects of TRPV2 on lipid accumulation, the cytotoxicity of them in different doses (from 0.5 µM to 100 µM) on HepG2 cells was measured using a CCK-8 assay. We found that cell viability was not affected by up to 100 µM 2-APB (Fig. 4B, P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (6, 28) = 1.955) or SKF (Fig. 4B, P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (6, 28) = 3.121) in HepG2 cells for 24 hours. As shown in Fig. 4C, the Oil-red O staining assay revealed that PA in induced lipid droplet accumulation in HepG2 cells. However, 2-APB in 100 µM inhibited lipid accumulation significantly and this inhibitory effect was blocked in the presence of TRPV2 antagonist SKF (Fig. 4C-D, ***<0.0005, ****<0.0001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 49.94). Interestingly, we found that SKF exacerbated lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells with PA incubation (*<0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 49.94). Furthermore, we also tested the level of TG expression in HepG2 cells with PA incubation. As expected, 2-APB reduced TG expression and SKF blocked 2-APB effects (Fig. 4E, *<0.05, **<0.001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 12.33).
2.4. Activation of TRPV2 in HepG2 cells downregulated p21 signaling after Palmitic Acids treatment
Next, we measured the expression level of p21, CDK2 and p16 in HepG2 cells treated with PA only, PA & 2-APB and PA & 2-APB & SKF. By comparing to PA only group, we found p21 (Fig. 5B, ****<0.0001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 44.72) and p16 (Fig. 5D, *<0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 6.853) were decreased, and CDK2 (Fig. 5C, **<0.001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 12.80) was increased in the PA & 2-APB group. However, in the presence of SKF, which is TRPV2 antagonist, the reduction in p21 (Fig. 5B, ****<0.0001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 44.72) and p16 (Fig. 5D, *<0.05, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 6.853) and increase in CDK2 (Fig. 5C, **<0.001, one-way ANOVA, F (2, 12) = 12.80) were reversed.
2.5. Activation of TRPV2 in vivo attenuated HFD-induced lipid accumulation, and a reduction in the expression of p21 and p16 in the liver tissue
To verify the protective role of TRPV2 against lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, probenecid-treated water (containing 5% sucrose) was administered via bottles in the animals’ cages. The volume was measured before and after the consumption to determine the approximate dose. The calculated daily probenecid dose was 103.6 ± 2.1 mg/kg/day. We found that the HFD-induced increase in body weight was compromised after probenecid administration, compared to the vehicle group (Fig. 6B, **<0.001, two-way ANOVA, F (6, 84) = 3.990). Moreover, the liver weight (Fig. 6C, **<0.001, unpaired t-test) and the ratio of liver to body weight (Fig. 6D, *<0.05, unpaired t-test), in the probenecid and HFD administrated group, were lower than these at the 12th week after the onset of HFD with vehicle administration. Next, the NAFLD score in the above two groups was measured at the 12th week after HFD, and found that probenecid administration reduced the NAFLD score significantly, compared to the vehicle group (Fig. 6E, *<0.05, unpaired t-test). We tested the expression of p21 and p16 and found that both were inhibited in the probenecid and HFD administrated group, compared to the vehicle and HFD administrated group (Fig. 6F, ****<0.0001 and *<0.05, two-way ANOVA, F (1,8) = 6.015).