In the observation period there were statistical differences (P < 0.05) only in the OPG and LogOPG counts, in the hematocrit count of the animals there was no significant difference (P = 0.3738), considering the dry and rainy seasons. The descriptive variation of the results was also considered, showing an amplitude in the results of the analyses, in which in both stations, as observed in the ECC variable, where it presented zero count. The high CV numbers are also justified by the large variation in the results, which is considered normal, and needs to be corrected by the logarithmic function (Table 1).
Table 1
– Hematocrit (HTC), egg count (ECC) and ECC logarithm (LogECC) of Canindé goats according to the season effect X = mean; SD = Standard deviation; CV = coefficient of variation; MIN = Minimum; MAX = maximum; 180 observations for the rainy season and 163 observations for the dry season.
Variant | Season | X | SD | CV | MIN | MAX | P-Value |
---|
HTC | Dry | 36.78ª | 5.16 | 14.02 | 23.70 | 58.66 | 0.3738 |
| Rainy | 36.35ª | 3.78 | 10.40 | 26.67 | 58.66 |
ECC | Dry | 205.64a | 322.73 | 156.94 | 0 | 2200.00 | 0.0019 |
| Rainy | 312.78b | 309.91 | 99.09 | 0 | 1925.00 |
LogECC | Dry | 1.50a | 1.13 | 75.07 | 0 | 3.34 | 0.0001 |
| Rainy | 2.18b | 0.75 | 34.40 | 0 | 3.28 |
X = mean; SD = Standard deviation; CV = coefficient of variation; MIN = Minimum; MAX = maximum; 180 observations for the rainy season and 163 observations for the dry season.
To clinically establish the anemic status of the animals, we used the F© score classification. However, the score variable F©, proved to be discrete, and as there is no mean classification in the Famacha© classification, it is impossible to make a correct comparison between the periods. The F©3 limit for anemia was established due to its position of transition between the anemic and non-anemic state, where according to Molento (2004), the animal shows a moderate degree of infection of gastrointestinal and anthelmintic parasites. Thus, we had a significant number of animals classified as clinically anemic in both seasons (Fig. 1).
In Tables 2 and 3, the values of animals within each Famacha© category were averaged during each season of the year, dry and rainy, respectively. And in all the variables observed, the means had no significant changes ( P. 0.05). Between F©3 and 4, the HTC value observed by Vatta et al. (2001) was 18%, and when the correlation between these values and the F© value observed, there was agreement to make the laboratory diagnosis of anemia in goats and sheep (KAPLAN et al., 2004; BURKE et al., 2007; SOTOMAIOR et al., 2012).
Table 2 Hematocrit (HTC), egg count (ECC) and ECC logarithm (LogECC) according to the Famacha© score (F©) classifications of Canindé goats in the dry season
Variant | Famacha© score | X | SD | p-Value |
---|
HTC | 1 | 43,54 | 5,13 | 0,2100 |
| 2 | 36,69 | 1,12 |
| 3 | 37,85 | 0,69 |
| 4 | 36,01 | 0,59 |
| 5 | 36,27 | 1,71 |
ECC | 1 | 100,00 | 308,49 | 0,0011 |
| 2 | 90,48 | 67,32 |
| 3 | 117,27 | 41,60 |
| 4 | 317,14 | 35,16 |
| 5 | 72,22 | 108,83 |
LogECC | 1 | 2,00 | 1,08 | 0,0010 |
| 2 | 1,07 | 0,24 |
| 3 | 1,19 | 0,15 |
| 4 | 1,89 | 0,12 |
| 5 | 1,08 | 0,36 |
X = mean; SD = Standard deviation |
Table 3
Hematocrit (HTC), egg count (ECC) and ECC logarithm (LogECC) according to the Famacha© score (F©) classifications of Canindé goats in the rainy season
Variant | Famacha© score | X | SD | p-Value |
---|
HTC | 1 | - | - | 0,0644 |
| 2 | 36,79 | 1,13 |
| 3 | 36,93 | 0,38 |
| 4 | 35,55 | 0,46 |
| 5 | 33,49 | 2,16 |
ECC | 1 | - | - | 0,6238 |
| 2 | 343,18 | 93,77 |
| 3 | 291,92 | 31,26 |
| 4 | 344,40 | 37,99 |
| 5 | 183,33 | 179,55 |
LogECC | 1 | - | - | 0,5619 |
| 2 | 2,45 | 0,23 |
| 3 | 2,13 | 0,08 |
| 4 | 2,22 | 0,09 |
| 5 | 2,24 | 0,43 |
X = mean; SD = Standard deviation |
In view of the above, we can say that regardless of the F© category, the hematocrit value in no animal was considered truly positive, and the values that have been considered as reference values for the goat species were not found even in animals classified F4© and F5© in the two seasons of the year.
Nunes et al. (2014) found that animals suffering heat stress and low water intake may have a higher rate of evapotranspiration which increases the hematocrit count, however, when performing the clinical examination to select clinically healthy animals to participate in the experiment, none showed changes in parameters that are also indicators of thermal stress (respiration rate and rectal temperature). Façanha et al. (2013) found that, in sheep of locally adapted breed, the respiratory thermolysis mechanism is the most used to maintain body homeotherm in the face of high ambient temperatures. In addition, the Canindé breed has a dark coat and skin, which facilitates the radiation of heat and reduces the impact of ultraviolet rays on the animal's thermal comfort, which gives this breed an adaptation to semiarid conditions (Ferreira et al. 2020; Ferreira et al. 2021)
Table 4 shows the number of correct classifications, where the F© classification was consistent with the hematocrit result, and among all the animals that participated in the research, only 2 were correctly classified. This indicates the inconsistency in the application of the Famacha© system for Canindé goats.
Table 4
– Number of correct classifications according to the Famacha© (F©) method used in the diagnosis of anemia in Canindé goats in the dry season
Famacha© score | % HTC* | Number of CR |
---|
| | Dry season | Rainy Season |
1 | > 28 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 23–27 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 18–22 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 13–17 | 0 | 0 |
5 | < 12 | 0 | 0 |
*Van Wyk e Bath (2002); CR = correct ratings |
With the limits currently established for laboratory diagnosis of anemia in goats, it was not possible to detect animals positive for anemia in this study. The animal's physiological state in relation to gestation, age and sex also does not influence the values obtained in HTC (OLIVEIRA et al., 2012). Souza Junior, (2019) found that for goats in general, the reference value should be readjusted for the species, as current values do not have a good sensitivity for clinical parameters.
Due to the absence of positive data for anemia it was not possible to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of F© against hematocrit. which would enable a sensitivity and specificity analysis of the test application in these animals.