Effects of low-nitrogen stress on yellowhorn growth and development
The growth status of yellowhorn under different N conditions was evaluated to assess its phenotypic change under low-nitrogen stress. After 15 days of treatment, compared to those in CK, plant heights of yellowhorn decreased by 5.7% and 14.66% in the LN and NN treatment groups (Table 1), respectively, and fresh weights also decreased by 4.38% and 14.93%, respectively. Contrastingly, yellowhorn root growth and development under N deficiency conditions were stronger than those in CK (Table 1) (Fig. 1). Root lengths were 21.86% and 38.89% higher than that in CK under LN and NN treatments, respectively, and the number of lateral roots also significantly increased by 52.36% and 50.07%, respectively, compared to that of CK. N is the main component of proteins and nucleotides, and is related to plant nutrition accumulation and metabolism, so that N deficiency will hinder plant growth and development (Liu et al. 2020). Soluble proteins are important osmotic regulatory substances and nutrients, whose content increase and accumulation can improve the cell water retention ability and play a protective role on cell life material and membrane. In this experiment, the content of soluble protein was increased in yellowhorn after low-nitrogen treatment, indicating that plant cells had been destroyed, which affected the osmotic regulation of yellowhorn (Fig. 2).
Sequencing Quality
Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 was used to sequence the yellowhorn leaves. More than 95% of the reads were obtained in the nine libraries, reaching 5.90 Gb in each sample, which indicated that sequencing data were suitable for gene expression analysis.
Identification Of Tfs
To identify all the TFs in yellowhorn that respond to low-N stress, we performed RNA-seq analysis of the leaf tissue after low-N treatment. In total, 178,376 CDS sequences were uploaded to Plant TFDB v4.0 for comparison and 1,873 TFs were obtained, composed of 56 families harboring 1–334 TFs, are shown in Table 2 (Table S1). For convenience, the identified TFs were named Xs followed by the transcript number and the family name (e.g., Xs_72802_ c4_g3_WRKY) (Nath et al. 2019). The families marked with * are the next eight families to be deeply excavated. Nitrogen deficiency is known to for affect various biological and metabolic pathways, in which the activation and inhibition of transcription are complex multi-dimensional processes (Deng et al. 2019; Ueda et al. 2020). The expression profile of yellowhorn TFs could provide important clues for further gene function research so that we examined the differentially expressed TF genes in yellowhorn under low-N treatments using the threshold criteria based on P-values and the TPM ratio (P ≤ 0.05 and |log2ratio| ≥ 1). A total of 871 TFs are differentially expressed, comprising 53 families. However, the number of DEGs in each TF family is induced to different degrees (Fig. 3). For up-regulated TFs in NN vs. CK, the largest members of TFs belonged to the C2H2 and ERF families (33 members were up-regulated in each family), followed by NAC (29), and GRAS (25). Meanwhile, for down-regulated TFs, members of the C2H2 family were most prevalent (171), followed by GRAS (38), and C3H (33). For up-regulated TFs in LN vs. CK, ERF (32), NAC (28), and C2H2 (25) family members were differentially regulated. For those down-regulated, C2H2 (205), C3H (42), GRF, and bHLH (41) families were identified. Subsequently, eight families were selected for further analysis, including bHLH, Dof, ERF, LBD, MYB, MYB-related, NAC and WRKY, with a total of 593 members. These families were selected based on previous studies reporting their association with low-N stress (Lea et al. 2007; Zebarth et al. 2012; Pal et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018; Joshi 2020). Using the clustering normalization method, a heat map of the expression of each family member was drawn, as showed in Fig. 4. Among up-regulated TFs, Xs_73870_c1_g1_MYB was significant with both N treatments compared to the CK group (FC values in NN, 4.523046804; LN, 4.351006543, P ≤ 0.05), in addition to Xs_73319_c0_g1_ERF and Xs_69533_c0_g2_ERF in the NN treatment. Among down-regulated TFs, two TFs were strongly regulated, namely Xs_71944_c0_g4_MYB-related (NN) and Xs_64172_c0_g1_bHLH (LN), both of which were changed more than 10-fold (P ≤ 0.05). Based on these analyses, although differentially expressed TFs in yellowhorn were strongly differentially expressed in NN and LN, there were no significant differences in the number or expression values between the two treatments.
Phylogenetic Analysis
In order to investigate the phylogenetic relationships, we used phylogenetic analysis to analyze the evolutionary relationships among TF families related to the low-N response between yellowhorn and those of A. thaliana (downloaded from PlantTFDB v4.0). As Fig. 5 shows, the TFs of yellowhorn were evenly distributed in each phylogenetic lineage. The bHLH family was divided into six representative classes. bHLH of yellowhorn is divided into 17 members of classes 1, 2, and 3, and 28, 14, and 33 members of classes 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The Dof family was divided into four representative classes, and the number of members in each class was 3, 7, 3, and 10, respectively. The ERF family was divided into five representative classes, with 20, 39, 21, 32, and 18 members, respectively. LBD family had four categories, with 2, 9, 14, and 8 members. MYB family comprised six categories, with 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, and 8 members, respectively. MYB-related family was divided into 72 members, which were divided into four categories, with 5, 6, 27, and 34 members, respectively. The 87 members of the NAC family were divided into six categories, one category had only one member, whereas the numbers of members of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th categories were 11, 8, and 31 respectively; the number of members in the 5th and 6th categories were 18. The 62 members of the WRKY family were divided into five categories, comprising 4, 6, 18, 13, and 21 TFs, respectively. These results indicate that all the yellowhorn TF proteins may be efficiently grouped into their respective families with subgroups based on phylogenetic affinity.
Conserved Domain Analysis
To study the structural diversity in the TFs of yellowhorn, a total of 10 conserved motifs in each family were captured using MEME software. Results showed that all the TF genes have highly conserved core domain characteristics (Fig. 6). For example, in the WRKY family, motif 1 (WRKYGQK domain) is confirmed to be a highly conserved region (Xu et al. 2018), which is widely distributed among members of the family. Some TF members of the same family have highly similar motifs, indicating that they play a key role in the specific functions of the protein group and reflecting the similarity in function. On the other hand, there were large structural differences within the same family. It is worth noting that although families had a highly conserved motif or DNA-binding domain characteristics. The sequence similarity of other regions was different in most TF genes.
Go Annotation
The yellowhorn GO annotations were divided into three main functional biological categories (Fig. S1): biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions. In the context of biological processes, a major proportion of TFs was involved in cellular, metabolic, and biosynthetic processes, and in hormone-mediated signaling pathways. TF activity and DNA binding accounted for the highest proportion of molecular functions. The analysis of the cellular components showed that the yellowhorn proteins were almost all nucleus-localized and the rest individually localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, cytoplasm, ribosome, and mitochondrion. TF nuclear localization and nucleoplasm transport are important checkpoints for the fine regulation of gene expression. The signals from the ribosome, mitochondrion, and endoplasmic reticulum play key roles in regulating the defense response against stress. In addition to basic transcriptional pathways, such as transcriptional regulation, the annotated biological pathways were mainly enriched in hormone conduction and metabolism, defense responses, and stress responses. The detailed GO annotations are provided in Table S2.
Protein Interaction Network
Protein interaction networks provide a comprehensive understanding of their role in different biological processes. Interactive networks show the interconnection of different TF families in response to biological stress. Using A. thaliana as the reference, key proteins performed hormone-mediated and defense responses (Fig. 7). In addition, different families had different functions with respect to the key genes in their interaction networks. For example, the interacting proteins of the bHLH family also included photoreceptors, flavonoid pathway and cell differentiation regulatory proteins (Table S3). The WRKY family included abiotic stress signals, oxidative stress responses and other family interaction networks, while key genes also included genes that regulate cell differentiation and rhythm. The key genes of the interaction network are detail in Table S3.