A longitudinal follow-up of continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test scores in athletes

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2221678/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

A longitudinal follow-up of continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test scores in athletes

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2221678/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 14 Jul, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) is diagnosed by the continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE). Whether or how much CLE test scores vary over time is unknown. This study aimed to compare CLE test scores in athletes over time, irrespective of respiratory symptoms and grade of laryngeal obstruction.

Methods

Ninety-eight athletes previously screened for EILO were invited for a follow-up CLE irrespective of CLE scores and respiratory symptoms. Twenty-nine athletes aged 16–27 did a follow-up CLE 3–23 months after the baseline test. Laryngeal obstruction at the glottic and supraglottic levels was graded by the observer during exercise, at baseline and follow-up, using a visual grade score (0–3 points).

Results

At baseline, 11 (38%) of the 29 athletes had moderate laryngeal obstruction and received advice on breathing technique; among them, 8 (73%) reported exercise-induced dyspnea during the last 12 months. At follow-up, 8 (73%) of the athletes receiving advice on breathing technique had an unchanged supraglottic score. Three (17%) of the 18 athletes with no or mild laryngeal obstruction at baseline had moderate supraglottic obstruction at follow-up, and none of the 3 reported exercise-induced dyspnea.

Conclusions

In athletes with repeated testing, CLE scores remain mostly stable over 3–24 months even with advice on breathing technique to those with EILO. However, there is some intraindividual variability in CLE scores over time.

Trial Registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN60543467, 2020/08/23, retrospectively registered, ISRCTN - ISRCTN60543467: Investigating conditions causing breathlessness in athletes

EILO

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction

Vocal cord dysfunction

CLE test

Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) is an important and possibly treatable cause of exertional dyspnea, affecting about 5.7–7.6% of a general population and 8.1–27% of athletic populations[1–4]. EILO is an umbrella term, encompassing glottic obstruction—previously described by a variety of terms including vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) and paradoxical vocal fold movement disorder (PVFMD)—as well as supraglottic obstruction[5]. EILO causes respiratory symptoms of especially inspiratory character during high-intensity effort[6, 7]. It is important to test for EILO in patients with exercise-induced dyspnea, because EILO is often mistaken for asthma and the two conditions often co-exist[1, 2, 8]. Because symptoms of EILO abate quickly upon exercise cessation, diagnosis requires visualizing the larynx during, or in close association to, exercise or heavy breathing[6, 9, 10]. Examination post-exercise likely has low sensitivity[10]. A common test used in the clinical and research setting is the continuous laryngoscopy during exercise (CLE) test[11]. The test involves the use of a flexible nasolaryngoscope during a maximal effort exercise bout, usually on a treadmill or bicycle[12, 13]. Other exercise-modalities have been tested[14, 15]. The laryngeal obstruction at the glottic (i.e., vocal cord) and supraglottic levels is then graded, usually by an observer using a 0–3-point visual grade score[13, 16].

Only one study has described the natural course of CLE-based EILO in teenagers given advice on breathing techniques and having predominantly supraglottic EILO. Obstruction and respiratory symptom decreased to some extent over a period of 2–5 years[17]. Non-surgical treatment of EILO may be most effective in glottic EILO, as indicated in two recent small studies focusing on inspiratory muscle training and on breathing techniques combined with cognitive behavioral therapy[18, 19]. Nonetheless, advice on breathing techniques during exercise is recommended to patients with mild EILO regardless of the location of obstruction, whereas surgical treatment is an option in selected highly motivated patients with severe supraglottic EILO[10, 17, 20, 21]. Other interventions such as biofeedback, speech therapy, and laryngeal control therapy may also have an effect on EILO[9, 10, 22–24]. However, the few longitudinal studies on EILO patients have not included asymptomatic controls. Indeed, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding treatment of EILO, and no randomized controlled trials of treatment have been published.

The assessment of laryngeal obstruction using the CLE test with the visual grade score is observer-reliant and therefore somewhat subjective. Between-rater agreement regarding visual grade scores varies from slight to identical[16, 25, 26]. Intra-rater agreement ranges from fair to identical, when observers repeat the visual scoring 3 weeks to 2 months after the first scoring[16, 26]. When the CLE test was repeated during a 3-week period in subjects who mainly had EILO, there were changes in the grading of laryngeal obstruction resulting in diagnostic implications[26]. A recent review on EILO in highlighted our scarce knowledge on the natural history and prognosis of EILO [27].

We need more understanding of the validity of the CLE test, the natural history of EILO and effects of treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to examine the variability of CLE scores in athletes, irrespective of EILO diagnosis, treatment, and respiratory symptoms.

Study design and study population

The study population consisted of 16 to 27-year-old competitive athletes. Information about the study was distributed to coaches and medical personnel of the Swedish Ski Association, Swedish Biathlon Federation, and Swedish National Elite Sports Schools in the county of Jämtland Härjedalen. Information about the study was also distributed via advertisement at suitable facilities.

A total of 98 athletes (including 89 cross-country skiers or biathletes) participated and were screened for EILO, allergy, and asthma [28]. The aim was to re-examine these 98 athletes after 6 months irrespective of airway symptoms and diagnoses. Twenty-nine of the 98 participated in the follow-up. Due to the competition calendar and logistics, the mean duration between first visit and follow-up was 8.4 (min 3, max 23) months.

Setting

The study was carried out at Östersund Hospital, Sweden, in 2015–2017. Both visits included a medical history, clinical examination, dynamic spirometry, eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) test, CLE test, and questionnaires.

Study procedures

Spirometry and EVH test

Dynamic spirometry was performed using a Spirare 3 (Diagnostics, Norway) or Jaeger Vyntus IOS (CareFusion, Germany) device[29]. EVH testing was conducted using the AILOS Asthma Test (Ailos Medical AB, Sweden) or Eucapsys (SMTEC, Switzerland). Participants were instructed to hyperventilate dry air with 5% CO₂ (Carboair, Air Liquid GAS, Sweden) for 6 minutes with a target minute ventilation set at 85% of maximum voluntary hyperventilation (30 ´ FEV₁ [Forced Expiratory Volume] in 1 second)[30]. FEV₁ was measured before and at 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes post EVH, with the highest FEV₁ of two approved maneuvers recorded. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction was defined as a ≥ 10% decrease in FEV₁ after EVH[31]. Participants were instructed to avoid vigorous exercise, heavy meals, caffeine, and nicotine for 8 hours before the EVH test. They also were instructed to refrain from using asthma medication before the test, within the following time frames: short-acting β2-agonists for 8 hours, inhaled corticosteroids for 12 hours, long-acting β2-agonists for 24 hours, and leukotriene receptor agonists for 3 days. Participants had to be free from respiratory infection for at least 6 weeks before the test.

Questionnaire

The questionnaire was based on the European Community Respiratory Health Survey II (ECHRS II) and covered training background, medications, airway symptoms, allergies, asthma, and family history [32]. Key variables were defined as:

Physician-diagnosed asthma

“Yes” to “Have you ever had asthma?” and “Was it diagnosed by a medical doctor?”.

Asthma medication last 12 months

“Yes” to “Have you used any asthma medication

(including inhalers, aerosols, or tablets) in the last 12 months?

Current asthma

Having physician-diagnosed asthma and use of asthma medication in the last 12 months.

Exercise-induced dyspnea (EID): “Yes” to the question “Have you had any shortness of breath following exercise, during the last 12 months?”.

Continuous Laryngoscopy During Exercise Test

The CLE test was performed according to Heimdal et. al[11]. The larynx was continuously visualized with a nasal fiber-optic nasolaryngoscope (FNL − 7RP3, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) and video-recorded during exercise on a treadmill (Intelligent Suspension 3, Cybex, US). Naphazoline-lidocaine was used for local anesthesia and dilatation of the nasal cavity pre insertion of the nasolaryngoscope. Speed or inclination of the treadmill was increased at every minute after a 3-minute warm-up, to reach maximal effort at 6–9 minutes of incremental exercise. Speed increased by 1 km/h up to a maximum of 15 km/h, and inclination by 2% up to a maximum of 8%. The intention was to exercise the athletes to exhaustion, but we set the lowest acceptable target to > 90% of estimated maximal heart rate. Heart rate was monitored using a chest strap (Polar, Finland).

Laryngeal obstruction at the glottic and supraglottic levels was assessed at 1 minute after warm-up and at maximal effort, using an ordinal visual grade score (0–3 points; none, mild, moderate, severe) according to Maat et. Al [16, 33]. CLE tests were performed and EILO was diagnosed at the discretion of the study physician (M.R) consultant in otorhinolaryngology, and a physiotherapist (C.B.). M.R. graded the laryngeal obstruction, blinded to results from other parts of the study and to whether the participant had reported any airway symptoms. To calculate the inter-rater agreement of the CLE score, a second blinded grading of the video laryngoscopies, without access to sound or external video recording, was done by resident physician in pediatrics T.I. A final CLE score was set by M.R. in case of disagreement.

Respiratory distress during CLE was graded by the observer ordinally as: “none”, “mild, with audible respiration”, “moderate, with stridor”, and “collapse or panic attack”. Any disagreement between the observers was solved by consensus. Immediately after cessation of the exercise, participants rated their perceived physical exertion according to the Borg rating of perceived exertion scale (RPE Scale), ranging from 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion)[34].

Clinical treatment of study participants

All athletes participating in the study were cared for in the same manner as practiced in the clinical setting, and any recommendations were at the discretion of the study physicians. For participants with significant laryngeal obstruction, this included a review of laryngeal findings on video and self-care advice on breathing techniques, for instance diaphragmatic breathing, to use during exercise. There was no follow-up between visits, such as a check on adherence to recommendations. No participant with EILO received speech therapy or surgery.

Statistics

Data analyses were conducted using R Statistical Software (version 3.6.1). Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa with linear weights [35]. Level of agreement was classified according to Landis and Koch [36]. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare non-parametric data at baseline versus follow-up. Results were considered statistically significant at a P-value of < 0.05.

Population characteristics

Of the 29 athletes (15 females) who completed baseline and follow-up visits, 27 were skiers (cross-country skiers or biathletes), one was an elite orienteer, and one was an elite track-and-field athlete. Prior to the baseline visit, none of the athletes had been diagnosed with EILO, and none had ever smoked regularly. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The 29 athletes did not differ from the 69 that did not participate in the follow-up regarding age or the proportion of females, physician-diagnosed asthma, current asthma, EID, or EILO (≥ 2 points at the supraglottic or glottic level at maximal effort) (Table 2).

Table 1

Study population, n = 29, at baseline.
Age, years, mean (min-max)	19 (16–27)
Training hours/week, mean (min-max)	12 (8–18)
FEV₁% of predicted, mean (SD)	104 (12.5)
FVC % of predicted, mean (SD)	100 (11.0)
BMI, mean (SD)	21.8 (1.7)

FEV₁ = forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC = forced vital capacity; BMI = body mass index

Table 2

A comparison between the athletes that participated in the follow-up and those that did not.
	Follow-up, n = 29	No follow-up, n = 69	P-value
Males	14 (48%)	33 (47%)	0.918
Age, median (quartile 1-quartile 3)	18 (17–19)	18 (17–21)	0.568
EID	11 (38%)	20 (29%)	0.361
Physician-diagnosed asthma	12 (41%)	28 (40%)	0.899
Current use of asthma medication	10 (34%)	22 (31%)	0.767
EILO	11 (38%)	17 (24%)	0.170

EID = exercise-induced dyspnea at baseline

EILO = ≥ 2 points at the supraglottic or glottic level at maximal effort at baseline

Baseline

Of the 29 athletes, 11 (38%) athletes (ten females) had moderate supraglottic obstruction, visual grade score of 2, at maximal effort during the baseline CLE test. These were provided self-care advice on breathing techniques. Three (27%) out of the 11 athletes with moderate obstruction did not report any exercise-induced dyspnea in the previous 12 months. Two athletes had, mild, glottic obstruction.

Exercise-induced dyspnea was more common in the athletes with moderate obstruction compared to those without (73% vs. 17%, P = 0.003). Only three of 29 athletes had observer-rated respiratory distress during the baseline CLE. Their respiratory distress was rated as “mild, with audible respiration” and all three had EILO. No athlete had respiratory distress of “moderate, with stridor” or “collapse or panic attack” character.

At the baseline CLE, median (interquartile range [IQR]) peak heart rate was 96 (94–98) % of estimated maximum heart rate. Self-rated perceived exertion during first CLE was mean (min-max) 16.5 (15–18), corresponding to “hard” to “very hard” on the RPE scale.

Follow-up

In the 11 athletes with moderate obstruction at first visit, 8 (73%) had the same supraglottic score at follow-up, and three athletes were graded with mild obstruction (Table 3). Seven out of 11 athletes with moderate obstruction at follow-up did not report any EID in the previous 12 months. In the 18 athletes with none or mild obstruction at first visit, three athletes had moderate obstruction at follow-up (Table 4).

Table 3

Athletes with moderate laryngeal obstruction receiving advice on breathing techniques at baseline and follow-up.
	Baseline						Follow-up
Sex	Age	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID	Months between visits	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID
Female	16	No	5.4	1 + 2	No	5	No	-2.0	0 + 2	Yes
Female	18	No	4.2	0 + 2	No	9	No	-12.1	0 + 2	Yes
Female	16	No	-7.7	0 + 2	Yes	6	No	-1.8	0 + 2	No
Female	17	Yes	-5.7	0 + 2	Yes	5	Yes	-10.3	0 + 1	Yes
Male	19	Yes	0.3	0 + 2	Yes	12	No	-1.9	0 + 2	No
Female	26	Yes	-3.6	0 + 2	Yes	3	Yes	-6.1	0 + 2	Yes
Female	16	No	-7.8	0 + 2	Yes	11	No	-0.6	0 + 2	No
Female	16	No	-13.8	0 + 2	No	23	No	-8.1	0 + 2	No
Female	18	No	-2.0	0 + 2	Yes	6	No	-3.5	0 + 1	Yes
Female	20	Yes	-4.0	0 + 2	Yes	11	Yes	0.5	0 + 1	Yes
Female	20	Yes	-9.3	0 + 2	Yes	11	Yes	-9.3	0 + 2	Yes
^aMaximal % change compared with baseline. Current asthma = physician-diagnosed asthma and asthma medication use in the last 12 months. FEV₁ = forced expiratory volume during the first second. EVH = eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation test. CLE = continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test; glottic and supraglottic scores at maximal effort. EID = exercise-induced dyspnea.

Table 4

Athletes with no-to-mild laryngeal obstruction at baseline, and their results at the follow-up visit.
	Baseline						Follow-up
Sex	Age	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID	Months between visits	Current asthma	FEV₁ post EVH^a	CLE score glottic + supraglottic	EID
Male	17	Yes	-2.7	1 + 1	No	3	Yes	-2.6	1 + 1	No
Female	16	No	-8.3	0 + 1	No	9	No	-8.4	0 + 1	No
Female	18	No	-3.4	0 + 1	No	9	No	-3.7	0 + 1	No
Male	17	No	-3.6	0 + 1	No	4	No	0.0	0 + 2	No
Female	23	Yes	-6.0	0 + 1	No	10	Yes	-5.9	0 + 0	No
Female	19	No	-3.4	0 + 1	No	8	No	-2.4	0 + 2	No
Female	24	No	-7.0	0 + 1	Yes	11	No	-5.3	0 + 1	No
Male	19	No	-3.4	0 + 1	No	6	No	-3.4	0 + 1	No
Male	19	Yes	-12.7	0 + 1	No	6	Yes	-2.2	0 + 1	Yes
Male	16	No	-9.2	0 + 1	Yes	6	No	<-10.0^b	0 + 1	No
Male	17	Yes	-1.6	0 + 1	No	8	Yes	-2.9	0 + 1	No
Male	27	No	-5.6	0 + 1	No	21	No	-12.1	0 + 2	No
Male	18	No	-13.0	0 + 1	No	6	Yes	-10.5	0 + 0	No
Male	16	No	-3.1	0 + 0	No	8	no	-7.0	0 + 1	No
Male	19	No	-4.4	0 + 0	No	5	No	<-10.0 ^b	0 + 0	No
Male	18	Yes	-3.4	0 + 0	Yes	3	Yes	<-10.0 ^b	0 + 0	Yes
Male	18	No	-9.5	0 + 0	No	7	No	-6.5	0 + 1	No
Male	20	No	-3.3	0 + 0	No	13	No	1.4	0 + 0	No
^aMaximal % change compared to baseline. ^b Absolute values missing due to equipment failure, EVH tests negative according to study protocols. Current asthma = physician-diagnosed asthma and asthma medication use in the last 12 months. FEV₁ = forced expiratory volume during one second. EVH = eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation test. CLE = continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test; glottic and supraglottic scores include scores only as maximal effort. EID = exercise-induced dyspnea.

Two of the three athletes with observer-graded respiratory distress persisted as “mild, with audible respiration” at the second CLE test. No other athlete was observed with respiratory distress at follow-up.

At follow-up, median (IQR) peak heart rate was 94 (93–97) % of estimated maximum heart rate, which did not significantly differ (P = 0.112) from peak heart rate at baseline. Self-rated perceived exertion during the CLE test at follow-up was mean 16.3 (min 14, max 18), corresponding to “somewhat hard” to “very hard” on the RPE scale, which did not significantly differ from self-rated perceived exertion at baseline (P = 0.402).

The inter-rater agreements for supraglottic CLE scores during maximal effort at baseline and follow-up were moderate, 0.50 (95% CI 0.24–0.76), and fair, 0.37 (95% CI 0.11–0.62), respectively. Glottic scores were too low to analyze.

Asthma

Among the 10 athletes with current asthma at baseline, one had EIB according to the EVH test, and six reported having had an asthma attack during the last 12 months. At follow-up, two out of nine athletes with current asthma had EIB. In total, six (21%) athletes had EIB at baseline or follow-up. Three out of five athletes with both current asthma and EILO at baseline had stopped using asthma medication at follow-up. These five athletes had negative EVH tests at both visits.

Main summary

This prospective study assessed the variability in CLE scores over time in athletes irrespective of grade of laryngeal obstruction, respiratory symptoms, and intervention. We found that the CLE scores mainly remained stable over time. However, 27% of those with moderate supraglottic obstruction at baseline and given advice on breathing techniques had mild obstruction at follow-up, and 17% of those with no-to-mild supraglottic obstruction at baseline had moderate obstruction at follow-up. Glottic scores remain stable irrespective of EILO diagnosis and symptoms.

CLE scores remain mostly stable in athletes treated for EILO

In the present study, participants with moderate supraglottic obstruction were given advice on breathing techniques to use during exercise, at the discretion of the study physician. The change in laryngeal obstruction between visits in those with moderate obstruction in the present study is similar to that in 14 teenage patients given advice on breathing techniques for supraglottic EILO, among whom 21% (n = 3) had normalized laryngeal function after 2–5 years[17]. Two recent studies using CLE scores to assess treatment outcome found that inspiratory muscle training and physiotherapy may have an effect, especially on glottic EILO[18, 19]. However, many studies employ methods other than the CLE test to evaluate laryngeal obstruction, often only assessing the glottic level of obstruction post exercise, making comparisons with the present findings difficult[9, 37]. Also, while subjective improvement is important, more objective data related to laryngeal obstruction is needed to give us a better understanding of EILO. To what extent different factors contribute to the remission or incidence of EILO is unknown, and this underlines the need for randomized controlled trials of treatments in these populations.

Repeated CLE may detect incident asymptomatic supraglottic obstruction

A strength and novelty of the present study is the prospective follow-up of athletes without EID or EILO. In most (83%) of the subjects with no-to-mild laryngeal obstruction, the baseline CLE scores persisted at follow-up. However, three of these athletes had moderate supraglottic obstruction at follow-up. Interestingly, all three did not have EID in the previous 12 months and did not have respiratory distress as graded by the observer during the CLE test.

Respiratory symptoms

In this study, some of the athletes with moderate laryngeal obstruction did not report EID. Asymptomatic subjects with EILO are not uncommon[1–3]. Self-reported respiratory symptoms are poor at predicting EILO and also of limited value in discerning EILO from asthma[1–3, 8, 38]. However, subjects with EILO have increased work of breathing[39]. Thus, it remains to be established whether mild laryngeal obstruction in an asymptomatic subject constitutes a pathological or normal laryngeal response to high-intensity exercise.

Asthma and EIB

Very few (one out of ten) athletes with current asthma had EIB, indicating a possible overdiagnosis of asthma in the study population [40]. Cross-country skiers are known to have a high prevalence of asthma, probably because of prolonged inhalation of cold dry air leading to airway hyperreactivity [41, 42]. However, the high prevalence of EILO in our study population, indicates that objective testing for both asthma and EILO is important in athletes with exercise-induced symptoms. Also in Norway many athletes diagnosed with EILO use asthma medication and many without objective evidence of variable broncho-obstruction according to retrospective reviews [43].

Limitations

The CLE test protocol used may have led to false low visual-grade scores. Firstly, the target heart rate during CLE of 90% of the estimated maximum may simply have been too low to induce EILO in the present study population including athletes competing at the highest national or international level [27]. If the participants had exerted even harder we might have detected more glottic EILO, which tends to develop after supraglottic obstruction[16]. Secondly, the visual grade score might underestimate glottic obstruction[44].

There was a risk of participation bias at both baseline and follow-up. Our study had a high proportion of cross-country skiers with EID at baseline. Recruitment via open invitation possibly attracted athletes with respiratory symptoms, inducing a risk of overestimating the prevalence of EILO and asthma[40]. Furthermore, among the athletes participating in the follow-up, a higher proportion had EID compared with the whole population of cross-country skiers at baseline, indicating that athletes with respiratory symptoms may have been more prone to participate in the follow-up.

The CLE scoring system has received criticism for not being a robust method of assessing laryngeal obstruction, which if true could have affected our results. Studies assessing its validity and reliability have come to different conclusions[16, 26]. In our study, the inter-rater agreement for supraglottic scores was fair to moderate. The discrepancy between the raters may have been influenced by differences in their experience administering CLE tests. One study has found that the CLE test has poor test-retest reliability.[26] The extent to which the variability of graded laryngeal obstruction in the present study is affected by the test reliability is unknown. The CLE test score has been found to be comparable to EILOMEA, a more objective method of assessing laryngeal obstruction that uses software to estimate the grade of obstruction from a still frame of the larynx taken during a CLE test[45]. Taken together, there is a need for objective methods with which to assess laryngeal obstruction for use during the CLE test.

One study has shown that athletes in subsequent CLE tests could exercise for a longer time before exhaustion[26]. Our results do not indicate any learning effect. The athletes’ CLE test performance, in terms of self-perceived exertion and peak heart rate percent of estimated maximum heart rate, was similar at baseline and follow-up.

In athletes performing repeated diagnostic tests for EILO, the CLE test score is mostly stable over time, but there is some intra-individual variability in scores. In the present study, the incident cases of moderate supraglottic laryngeal obstruction did not have exercise-related respiratory symptoms, indicating a need to establish what constitutes a normal laryngeal response to exercise in athletes. This study also highlights the need for randomized controlled trials that objectively assess factors associated with treatment effects in patients with EILO.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board at Umeå University, Umeå (Dnr 2015-43-31M).

Consent for publication

Participants gave consent for publication as part of the written informed consent.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was funded by School of Sport Sciences, Umeå University, the Visare Norr Fund, Northern County Councils’ Federation, and the Research & Development Unit, Region Jämtland Härjedalen

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization: NS, MR

Data collection: TI, CB, MR, NS

Data curation and analysis: TI

Writing – original draft: TI, NS

Writing – review and editing: TI, CB, EN, MR, NS

Acknowledgements

We thank Kristina Nordebo for data cleaning and Anna Lindam for statistical support.

Ersson K, Mallmin E, Malinovschi A, Norlander K, Johansson H, Nordang L. Prevalence of exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction and laryngeal obstruction in adolescent athletes. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25104.
Johansson H, Norlander K, Berglund L, Janson C, Malinovschi A, Nordvall L, et al. Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in a general adolescent population. Thorax. 2015,70(1):57-63. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205738.
Christensen PM, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N, Backer V. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions: prevalence and symptoms in the general public. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011,268(9):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1612-0.
Irewall T, Söderström L, Lindberg A, Stenfors N. High incidence rate of asthma among elite endurance athletes: a prospective 4-year survey. Journal of Asthma. 2020:1-7. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1728769.
Christensen PM, Heimdal JH, Christopher KL, Bucca C, Cantarella G, Friedrich G, et al. ERS/ELS/ACCP 2013 international consensus conference nomenclature on inducible laryngeal obstructions. Eur Respir Rev. 2015,24(137):445-50. doi: 10.1183/16000617.00006513.
Shay EO, Sayad E, Milstein CF. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in children and young adults: From referral to diagnosis. Laryngoscope. 2019. doi: 10.1002/lary.28276.
Hall A, Thomas M, Sandhu G, Hull JH. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: a common and overlooked cause of exertional breathlessness. Br J Gen Pract. 2016,66(650):e683-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687001.
Nielsen EW, Hull JH, Backer V. High prevalence of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013,45(11):2030-5. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318298b19a.
Marcinow AM, Thompson J, Chiang T, Forrest LA, Desilva BW. Paradoxical vocal fold motion disorder in the elite athlete: Experience at a large division I university. The Laryngoscope. 2014,124(6):1425-30. doi: 10.1002/lary.24486.
Roksund OD, Heimdal JH, Clemm H, Vollsaeter M, Halvorsen T. Exercise inducible laryngeal obstruction: diagnostics and management. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2017,21:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2016.07.003.
Heimdal JH, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Olofsson J. Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: a method for visualizing laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. Laryngoscope. 2006,116(1):52-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000184528.16229.ba.
Tervonen H, Niskanen MM, Sovijärvi AR, Hakulinen AS, Vilkman EA, Aaltonen LM. Fiberoptic videolaryngoscopy during bicycle ergometry: a diagnostic tool for exercise-induced vocal cord dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2009,119(9):1776-80. doi: 10.1002/lary.20558.
Halvorsen T, Walsted E S, Bucca C, Bush A, Cantarella G, Friedrich G, et al. Inducible laryngeal obstruction: an official joint European Respiratory Society and European Laryngological Society statement. Eur Respir J. 2017,50(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02221-2016.
Panchasara B, Nelson C, Niven R, Ward S, Hull JH. Lesson of the month: Rowing-induced laryngeal obstruction: a novel cause of exertional dyspnoea: characterised by direct laryngoscopy. Thorax. 2015,70(1):95-7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205773.
Hull JH, Walsted ES, Orton CM, Williams P, Ward S, Pavitt MJ. Feasibility of portable continuous laryngoscopy during exercise testing. ERJ Open Res. 2019,5(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00219-2018.
Maat RC, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T, Skadberg BT, Olofsson J, Ellingsen TA, et al. Audiovisual assessment of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: reliability and validity of observations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009,266(12):1929-36. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1030-8.
Maat RC, Hilland M, Røksund OD, Halvorsen T, Olofsson J, Aarstad HJ, et al. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: natural history and effect of surgical treatment. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2011,268(10):1485-92. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1656-1.
Sandnes A, Andersen T, Clemm HH, Hilland M, Vollsaeter M, Heimdal JH, et al. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in athletes treated with inspiratory muscle training. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019,5(1):e000436. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000436.
Kolnes LJ, Vollsaeter M, Roksund OD, Stensrud T. Physiotherapy improves symptoms of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in young elite athletes: a case series. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019,5(1):e000487. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000487.
Siewers K, Backer V, Walsted ES. A systematic review of surgical treatment for supraglottic exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019,4(2):227-33. doi: 10.1002/lio2.257.
Famokunwa B, Sandhu G, Hull JH. Surgical intervention for exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: A UK perspective. Laryngoscope. 2020,130(11):E667-E73. doi: 10.1002/lary.28497.
Olin JT, Deardorff EH, Fan EM, Johnston KL, Keever VL, Moore CM, et al. Therapeutic laryngoscopy during exercise: A novel non-surgical therapy for refractory EILO. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017,52(6):813-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23634.
Shaffer M, Litts JK, Nauman E, Haines J. Speech-Language Pathology as a Primary Treatment for Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2018,38(2):293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2018.01.003.
Olin JT, Westhoff Carlson E. Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction and Performance Psychology: Using the Mind as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2018,38(2):303-15. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2018.01.004.
Olin JT, Clary MS, Connors D, Abbott J, Brugman S, Deng Y, et al. Glottic configuration in patients with exercise-induced stridor: a new paradigm. Laryngoscope. 2014,124(11):2568-73. doi: 10.1002/lary.24812.
Walsted ES, Hull JH, Hvedstrup J, Maat RC, Backer V. Validity and reliability of grade scoring in the diagnosis of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. ERJ Open Res. 2017,3(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00070-2017.
Clemm HH, Olin JT, McIntosh C, Schwellnus M, Sewry N, Hull JH, et al. Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in athletes: a narrative review by a subgroup of the IOC Consensus on ‘acute respiratory illness in the athlete’. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022:bjsports-2021-104704. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104704.
Irewall T, BÄCklund C, Nordang L, Ryding M, Stenfors N. High Prevalence of Exercise-induced Laryngeal Obstruction in a Cohort of Elite Cross-country Skiers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2021,53(6):1134-41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002581.
Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005,26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.
Argyros GJ RJ, Hurwitz KM, Eliasson AH, Phillips YY. Eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation as a bronchoprovocation technique: development of a standarized dosing schedule in asthmatics. Chest. 1996,109(6). doi: 10.1378/chest.109.6.1520. .
Anderson SD AG, Magnussen H, Holzer K. Provocation by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea to identify exercise induced bronchoconstriction. Br J Sports Med. 2001,35.
European Community Respiratory Health Survey IISC. The European Community Respiratory Health Survey II. Eur Respir J. 2002,20(5):1071-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00046802.
Røksund OD, Maat RC, Heimdal JH, Olofsson J, Skadberg BT, Halvorsen T. Exercise induced dyspnea in the young. Larynx as the bottleneck of the airways. Respir Med. 2009,103(12):1911-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.05.024.
Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970,2(2):92-8.
Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968,70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977,33(1):159-74.
Gallena SK, Johnson AT, Vossoughi J. Short-Term Intensive Therapy and Outcomes for Athletes With Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion Disorder. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019,28(1):83-95. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0223.
Walsted ES, Hull JH, Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Backer V. Bronchial provocation testing does not detect exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. J Asthma. 2017,54(1):77-83. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1195843.
Walsted ES, Faisal A, Jolley CJ, Swanton LL, Pavitt MJ, Luo YM, et al. Increased respiratory neural drive and work of breathing in exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018,124(2):356-63. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00691.2017.
Irewall T. Prevalence and incidence of and risk factors for asthma and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in elite endurance athletes. Umeå University, 2021.
Larsson K, Ohlsen P, Larsson L, Malmberg P, Rydstrom PO, Ulriksen H. High prevalence of asthma in cross country skiers. BMJ. 1993,307(6915):1326-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1326.
Carlsen KH, Anderson SD, Bjermer L, Bonini S, Brusasco V, Canonica W, et al. Exercise-induced asthma, respiratory and allergic disorders in elite athletes: epidemiology, mechanisms and diagnosis: part I of the report from the Joint Task Force of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) in cooperation with GA2LEN. Allergy. 2008,63(4):387-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01662.x.
Jansrud Hammer I, Halvorsen T, Vollsæter M, Hilland M, Heimdal JH, Røksund OD, et al. Conundrums in the breathless athlete, exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction or asthma? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2022,32(6):1041-9. doi: 10.1111/sms.14137.
Norlander K, Johansson H, Emtner M, Janson C, Nordvall L, Nordang L. Differences in laryngeal movements during exercise in healthy and dyspnoeic adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020,129:109765. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109765.
Norlander K, Christensen PM, Maat RC, Halvorsen T, Heimdal JH, Morén S, et al. Comparison between two assessment methods for exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016,273(2):425-30. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3758-7.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 14 Jul, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation →

Reviewers agreed at journal
16 Jan, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
12 Jan, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
31 Oct, 2022
First submitted to journal
31 Oct, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

A longitudinal follow-up of continuous laryngoscopy during exercise test scores in athletes

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Materials And Methods

Study design and study population

Setting

Study procedures

Spirometry and EVH test

Questionnaire

Continuous Laryngoscopy During Exercise Test

Clinical treatment of study participants

Statistics

Results

Population characteristics

Baseline

Follow-up

Asthma

Discussion

Main summary

CLE scores remain mostly stable in athletes treated for EILO

Repeated CLE may detect incident asymptomatic supraglottic obstruction

Respiratory symptoms

Asthma and EIB

Limitations

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1