To obtain a self-applicable instrument that makes it possible to evaluate binge eating episodes and the risk of BED in children, the self-applied version of the C-BEDS was translated into Spanish, adapted, and administered to Mexican children ages eight to twelve. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were also obtained.
The SA-C-BEDS provides a new tool in the field of study of eating disorders in children. It is a self-applied instrument that enables cross-cultural research, as well as evaluations for epidemiological studies, which make it possible to determine the prevalence and impact of BED-related behaviors in the child population and consequently develop timely interventions. It is also necessary to have specific instruments for behavior related to loss of control over eating and other behaviors associated with eating disorders, since to date, studies have reported inconsistent prevalence depending on the evaluation instruments used [14]. The SA-C-BEDS has the advantage of being brief. It does not have recall questions that might be difficult to answer in some cases, nor does it have open questions, which can be complicated for children. According to the research conducted, these elements should be considered when evaluating the child population [16]. In addition, a question should be included on loss of control over eating, which is key in the diagnosis of eating disorders, unlike other instruments that do not include it [12,13]. Likewise, adapting it to a self-applied instrument, avoids the limitation observed by Franklin (2019), of causing discomfort in subjects when answering an interview [19].
When evaluating eating behaviors with the SA-C-BEDS, in keeping with the study by Shapiro et al. (2007), which found that 44% of children eat without being hungry, the present study discovered that 44.8% of the girls and 33.7% of the boys claimed to engage in this behavior. However, when other behaviors were evaluated, the percentages were lower than those of the study by Shapiro et al. (2007). When asked whether they ate because they were in a particular mood, 63% of the subjects in the study by Shapiro answered affirmatively, whereas in the present study, 25.0% of the girls and 21.8% of the boys did so. Forty-eight per cent of the respondents in that study wanted food as a reward, as opposed to 26.0% of the girls and 23.8% of the boys in this one. Fifty-two per cent of those in the Shapiro study reported being unable to stop eating, as opposed to 15.6% of the girls and 15.8% of the boys in our sample. Twenty-eight per cent of those in that study reported hiding food, compared with 18.8% of the girls and 12.9% of the boys in this one. In the study by Dmitrzak-Weglarz et al. (2019) of 550 subjects aged between six and twelve, based on the answers to the C-BEDS items, the authors concluded that 12% of the subjects had a substantial risk of presenting an ED, which differs significantly from the original authors’ study, which found that 29% of subjects were at high risk [18]. A comparison with the results of the meta-analysis conducted by He et al. (2017) shows that the global prevalence of binge eating is 22.2% [11] compared with 39.1% in our study, while loss of control over eating was 31.2% as opposed to 15.7% in our study.
Discrepancies are likely due to sample sizes and differences in sample selection. For example, the study by Shapiro et al. (2007) involved children interested in participating in a program designed to improve eating habits and physical activity, the majority of whom were overweight and the offspring of obese parents. The studies included in He et al. (2017) comprised both community and clinical samples. One explanation for the discrepancies found is that according to Franco et al. (2017) and Gowey et al. (2014), disordered eating behaviors occur more frequently in overweight or obese children, which may be the case in some of the studies reviewed by these authors.
Nationwide, the data provided by ENSANUT, which evaluates DEB including loss of control while eating, show that in 2006, 18.3% of the population aged 10 to 19 presented the problem. In 2012, 7% of boys and 5.8% of girls aged between 10 and 13 stated that they were in this situation [5,7]. In the present study, this behavior was present in 15.8% of the boys and 15.6% of the girls. These differences may be related to the type of sampling and sample size, since this is a nationwide survey with multistage sampling and face-to-face data collection rather than a study with convenience sampling conducted online.
One of the criteria proposed by Marcus and Kalarchian (2003) for BED is that eating should not be associated with the regular use of inappropriate compensatory behaviors [16]. In the C-BEDS, this criterion is reflected in question seven (getting rid of food). However, when internal consistency was evaluated, it was decided to remove it from the scale since its item-total correlation was less than .28. The scale displays excellent internal consistency. The five remaining items obtained an ordinal alpha of .90, distributed in a single factor while the confirmatory validity analysis also showed a single factor with adequate factor loads for the five proposed items, and the model fit the data, proving that it is valid.
Although the measurement instruments available to date have made it possible to study the risk of BED in children, further studies are required in both clinical and population contexts to determine their incidence and acquire a deeper understanding of their characteristics and the circumstances surrounding them and undertake preventive actions and intervention programs in several types of population. Achieving this requires having more instruments to assess the risk of BED in children, especially through self-applied instruments. The present study therefore contributes to the area of study with an instrument with adequate psychometric properties for use in the child population.
Strength and limits
The SA-C-BEDS in Spanish is a valid, reliable instrument to measure specific eating behaviors of BED in children. It is brief, and easy to understand and apply. It also provides key information for identifying cases in a timely manner and is useful in the prevention of subsequent BED, as well as related complications. Limitations of the study include the fact that, since it is a self-reported instrument, it is not sufficient to establish a clinical diagnosis of BED. The anthropometric measurements (which would have been useful for characterizing the sample by body weight categories), were based on parents’ reports, which decreases reliability. No other instrument was applied that measured this, as there was no previously validated instrument to enable one to establish concurrent validity. Validations of the scale should be undertaken on its self-reported version in other contexts, which would shed more light on the risk of BED in the child population.
What is already known on this subject?
There is currently greater clarity regarding the diagnostic criteria for BED in children. There are also instruments enabling one to determine eating patterns and the existence of eating symptoms, such as the Kids’ Eating Disorders Survey (KEDS), the Eating Symptoms Inventory (ESI), the Children’s Eating Disorders Examination (ChEDE), and the version for adolescents of the Questionnaire on Eating Patterns and Weight (QEWP-A), although these are not designed to assess BED in children. In this respect, the brief interview developed by Shapiro et al.,17 the Children’s Binge Eating Disorder Scale (C-BEDS), makes a significant contribution to the evaluation of the risk of childhood BED.
What this study adds
The Spanish version of the SA-C-BEDS is a valid, reliable self-applied instrument that is brief and easy to answer, and specifically designed to detect BED risk behaviors in children.