Characterization of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101
The morphology of HPA@MIL-101, CDNS, and CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 were evaluated with FE-SEM. Figure 1a depicts an uniform polyhedron morphology for HPA@MIL-101 with average diameter of 2 ± 0.4 µm that is similar to the reported value of MIL-101 31. This data indicates that incorporation of low content of HPA during MIL-101 synthesis did not change the morphology of the final product. As shown in Fig. 1b, the as-prepared CDNS exhibited amorphous morphology. This observation is in good agreement with previous report 32. FE-SEM images of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 (Figs. 1c and d), showed formation of beads with average diameter of 2 ± 0.5 mm. Additionally, FE-SEM images with high magnitude confirmed that the surface of the formed beads was rough and porous.
EDS and elemental mapping analyses were also carried out and demonstrated the presences of N, O, Fe, Mo, P and C atoms in the CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 (Figure S2a). Among the detected atoms, P, O and Mo atoms are indicative of HPA, while C, O and N atoms are representative of CS. Furthermore, C and O atoms can be assigned to CDNS structure. Observation of Fe atom as well as O and C, is a proof for the presence of MIL-101 in the structure of the catalyst. Elemental mapping analysis, Figure S2b, confirmed homogeneous dispersion of all atoms in CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, indicating that both CDNS and HPA@MIL-101 are well-dispersed in the structure of the formed beads. The as-prepared CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 consist of CS, CDNS and HPA@MIL-101. It is well-reported that CS and CDNS prepared through melt-method are amorphous and their XRD patterns consist of a broad peak at 2θ = 15–25° 30,33. XRD pattern of HPA@MIL-101, Fig. 2, is identical to that of MIL-101 31 and showed the characteristic peaks at 2θ = 9.3°, 9.9°, 13.0°,16.6°, 18.6°, 21.6°, 25.8° and 28.1° 34. In fact, as a result of low content of HPA as well as its high dispersion, HPA characteristic peaks were not observed in the XRD pattern of HPA@MIL-101 35. As shown in Fig. 2, in the XRD pattern of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, a broad peak in the range of 2θ = 14–25° was discerned and the characteristic peaks of HPA@MIL-101 were not detected. This issue is in good agreement with previous reports, in which the XRD patterns of carbohydrates and MIL-101 showed only a broad peaks and MIL-101 characteristic peaks were not detectable 36.
To confirm formation of HPA@MIL-101 and the catalyst, their FTIR spectrum was recorded and compared with that of CS and CDNS (Fig. 2). The characteristic bands of CS appeared at 3446 cm− 1 (-OH), 2868 cm− 1 (-CH2), 1388 cm− 1 and 1649 cm− 1 (-C-O). The FTIR spectrum of the as-prepared CDNS (Fig. 2) is in good agreement with the literature and exhibited the absorbance bands at 3378 cm− 1 (-OH), 2930 cm− 1 (-CH2), 1649 cm− 1 (-C-O) and 1739 cm− 1 (-C = O) 18. The absorbance bands of HPA@MIL-101 appeared at 1413, 1595 and 1660 cm− 1 that are correspondent to the asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching modes of the O-C = O and 1388 cm− 1 that is assigned to the aromatic carbon C-C vibrational mode 31. It is worth mentioning that the characteristic bands observed at 1058 ν(P-Oa), 948 ν(Mo-Od), 885 ν(Mo-Ob-Mo), and 750 cm− 1 ν(Mo-Oc-Mo) can be attributed to HPA, which is reported previously 37. In the FTIR spectrum of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, all characteristic bands of the composite components were discerned, while some of them overlapped together.
The thermal behavior of HPA@MIL-101 and CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, was evaluated using TGA analysis and compared with that of CS and CDNS (Fig. 3). The thermogram of CS exhibited two weight losses at around 100 ºC, dehydration, and 300 ºC, CS backbone degradation. CDNS thermogram showed two weight losses due to dehydration at ~ 100 ºC and CDNS degradation at 350°C, which are in good agreement with the literature 29. In the HPA@MIL-101 thermogram, loss of water (at ~ 100 ºC) and degradation of HPA (at ~ 300 ºC) were observed. Moreover, decomposition of MIL-(101) occurred at 650 ºC. Figure 3 shows several weight loss steps in the thermogram of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 that are related to the loss of water (at ~ 100 ºC), degradation of organic moiety, i.e., CS, CDNS, and HPA (at 200–350 ºC) and decomposition of MIL-101 (at ~ 600 ºC).
Catalytic activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101
Optimization of the reaction parameters
The aim of this study was designing of a heterogeneous composite that could act as a multi-task catalyst and promote both alcohol oxidation and cascade alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction in aqueous media. First, alcohol oxidation was targeted and the reaction variables, including the amount of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 catalyst, oxidant content, reaction temperature and the nature of the solvent were optimized to achieve the highest conversion and yield. In this context, oxidation of benzyl alcohol was selected as a model oxidation reaction for performing optimization experiments.
Effect of catalyst amount
To study the effect of the catalyst loading, the model reaction was repeated in the presence of various dosages of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 and the progress of each reaction was monitored precisely, Figure S3. Comparison of the conversions of the reactions implied that increase of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 content from 20 to 30 mg, led to slight increase of the reaction conversion. However, further increase of the catalyst content to 40 mg resulted in more pronounced increment of the reaction conversion. This trend was followed upon increase of this parameter to 60 mg and the reaction conversion reached to 90% after 75 min. Further increase of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 loading to 70 mg, however, had insignificant effect on the reaction conversion. More precisely, at the start of the reaction, conversion in the presence of 70 mg catalysts was ~ 2% higher than that of 60 mg catalyst, however, after 60 min, similar conversions were observed for the reactions in the presence of 60 and 70 mg CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101. Considering these results, the optimum amount of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 loading was selected as 60 mg per 1 mmol of the substrate.
Effect of oxidant content
Next, the amount of the oxidant, H2O2, was optimized by studying the effect of different amounts of the oxidant (0.5-3 mmol) on the conversion of the catalyst, Figure S4. As displayed, use of low content of the oxidant (0.5 mmol) led to low conversion. Upon increase of the oxidant amount from 0.5 to 2 mmol, the reaction conversion improved gradually to reach 90% after 75 min. It is worth noting that further increase of this value to 3 mmol had a detrimental effect on the reaction conversion. Actually, use of high content of oxidant promoted oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzoic acid. According to these experiments, the optimum value for the oxidant amount was 2 mmol per each mmol of the substrate.
Effect of reaction temperature
The reaction temperature is another important parameter that is optimized in this work. Figure S5 shows the conversions of the model reactions at different temperatures, ambient temperature to 70°C. These data indicated that increase of the reaction temperature from ambient temperature to 55°C increased the reaction conversion remarkably. However, as further increase of this parameter led to the oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzoic acid, lower yield of benzaldehyde was observed. In fact, the results confirmed that both reaction temperature and the amount of the oxidant could affect the selectivity of alcohol oxidation and their optimization is imperative to reach high conversion towards formation of aldehyde.
Effect of reaction solvent
As mentioned, with the goal of designing a catalyst that could promote alcohol oxidation and alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation in aqueous media, CDNS was incorporated in the structure of the catalyst to serve as a phase transfer agent. Hence, the activity of the model reaction was first examined in water as solvent. The result showed that in the aqueous media and using 60 mg CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 catalyst and H2O2 (2 mmol), at 55°C, 90% conversion of the desired product was obtained. Notably, using EtOH that is a protic solvent, similar results were observed. The performance of the catalyst was also studied in THF and CH3CN and it was found that in those aprotic solvents, lower conversions and yields were achieved, Table S1.
Generality study
The optimization experiments confirmed that CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 could efficiently promote the model alcohol oxidation reaction under the optimum reaction conditions. To confirm the generality of the developed protocol, examining of other substrates with different properties was imperative. As listed in Table S2, various alcohols with different electronic and steric properties could undergo oxidation reaction under the optimum reaction conditions to furnish the corresponding aldehydes in high to excellent yields. Comparison of the yields of the substrates, indicated that oxidation of aliphatic substrates was less efficient than benzyl alcohol derivatives. Moreover, it was observed that the presence of the electron-windrowing functional groups on the aromatic ring was beneficiary and higher yields were achieved in the cases of substrates with less electronic density.
Alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation
Confirming high catalytic activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 for alcohol oxidation reaction, its performance for the cascade oxidation–Knoevenagel condensation reaction was also studied. In fact, it was assumed that the redox potential of the catalyst could promote alcohol oxidation reaction, while the presence of CS and CDNS as well as the acidic characteristic of HPA@MIL-101 could catalyze Knoevenagel condensation reaction. To validate this assumption, cascade oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction of benzyl alcohol and malononitrile was first conducted under the aforesaid optimum conditions. Gratifyingly, it was found that under the so-called conditions, the desired product was achieved in 90% yield. Motivated by this result, cascade oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction of various alcohols was carried out to assay the generality of this protocol, Table S3. As tabulated, various alcohols with different steric and electronic characteristic tolerated this cascade reaction to give the corresponding product in high to excellent yields. Similar to the alcohol oxidation reaction, the presence of aromatic ring on the backbone of the substrate led to the higher yields of the products.
Control catalysts
HPA in the structure of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 possesses redox potential and was utilized for catalyzing alcohol oxidation. To render HPA heterogeneous, it was encapsulated in MIL-101 and the resultant HPA@MIL-101 was then included in the CS-CDNS bead structure. In fact, it was postulated that interactions between HPA@MIL-101 and the functional groups on CS and CDNS can contribute to embed HPA@MIL-101 in the bead structure. In catalyst design, two roles were perceived for CDNS, as a phase transfer agent and as a bio-based catalyst for promoting Knoevenagel condensation. In more detail, encapsulation of hydrophobic substrates in the CDNS pores can facilitate their transferring to aqueous media and consequently enhance the reaction yield. On the other hand, the multiple –OH functionalities on CDNS can activate the substrate and promote Knoevenagel condensation. Another reason for incorporation of HPA@MIL-101 in CS-CDNS bead was the catalytic nature of CS and its potential for promoting Knoevenagel condensation. Furthermore, the cross-linked CS-CDNS beads were robust and could be easily separated from the reaction media. Notably, it was assumed that possible synergistic effects among the composite components can improve the catalytic activity of the composite compared to individual components. To validate the aforementioned assumptions, several control catalysts (HPA@MIL-101, CS-HPA@MIL-101, CDNS-HPA, CS-HPA, CS-CDNS-HPA) have been prepared and their activity for the model alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction was examined under the optimum reaction conditions. The results, Table 1, designated that under the aforementioned conditions, CS-HPA and CDNS-HPA could catalyse the reaction to furnish the desired alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation product in 55% and 45% yield respectively. It is supposed that apart from HPA, the functionalities on CS and CDNS can participate in the catalysis. Next, to investigate the role of MIL-101 in the catalysis, a MIL-101-free control catalyst, CS-CDNS-HPA, was prepared and examined for the model alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction. As shown in Table 1, the catalytic activity of this sample was higher than the aforesaid control catalyst and lower than that of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, confirming the role of MIL-101 in the catalysis. To further affirm contribution of MIL-101 to the catalysis, HPA@MIL-101 control catalyst was prepared and its activity for the model reaction was appraised. As listed, using this control catalyst, moderate reaction yield (65%) was achieved that was higher compared to CS-HPA, CDNS-HPA and CS-CDNS-HPA. This observation showed that MIL-101 not only is a potent support, but also can contribute to the catalysis. To demonstrate the role of CDNS in the catalysis, a CDNS-free control catalyst, CS-HPA@MIL-101, was examined for the model reaction and the result showed that this catalyst led to the desired product in 70% yield. As the activity of this control catalyst was lower than that of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, it can be deduced that CDNS play an important role in the catalysis. As mentioned before, the main role of CDNS is shuttling the substrates in the aqueous media. Noteworthy, the catalytic activity of all of the aforementioned control catalysts was inferior to that of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, confirming that hybridization of CS, CDNS and HPA@MIL-101 is beneficiary for the catalysis.
Table 1
The activity of the control catalysts and CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 for the model alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction under optimum reaction conditions.
Entry | Catalyst | Yield (%) |
1 | CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 | 90 |
2 | CS-HPA | 55 |
3 | CDNS-HPA | 45 |
4 | CS-CDNS-HPA | 61 |
5 | HPA@MIL-101 | 65 |
6 | CS-HPA@MIL-101 | 70 |
Recyclability of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101
Recyclability of a heterogeneous catalyst is an important feature, determining its potential for commercial and large-scale uses. Considering high solubility of HPA in conventional solvents, some HPA-based heterogeneous catalyst showed poor recyclability. To appraise the recyclability of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, its performance for five consecutive runs for both model alcohol oxidation and cascade alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction under the optimum conditions was evaluated. As shown in Fig. 4, for both reactions, slight loss of the catalytic activity was observed upon each run of recycling and the reaction conversion decreased from 90 to 78% for benzyl alcohol oxidation reaction and 90 to 77% for cascade benzyl alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction.
To assay the origin of loss of the activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 upon recovery-reuse cycle, the recovered catalyst after the fifth run of alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation was analysed via FTIR spectroscopy. In the FTIR spectrum of the recycled CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, Figure S6, the distinguished absorbance bands of fresh CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 are detectable, confirming that CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 was stable upon several runs of recycling. It is worth mentioning that in the FTIR spectrum of the recycled catalyst, an additional band at 2212 cm− 1 can be discerned that is ascribed to the –CN functionality, indicating deposition of malononitrile and/or cascade reaction product on the catalyst. As the deposited chemicals can hinder the accessibility of the substrates to the active sites of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, it can play a role in deactivation of the catalyst. Another important factor that can affect the catalytic activity is leaching of HPA. To elucidate whether several runs of recycling can trigger HPA leaching, ICP analysis of the recycled CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 was conducted. Gratifyingly, the leaching of HPA after five runs of recycling was insignificant (only 1 wt.% of the initial loading), implying that incorporation of HAP in the composite could efficiently suppress its leaching.
Hot filtration test
In the heterogeneous catalysis, two possible routes can be followed. In the first route, which is referred as true heterogeneous catalysis, the catalytic species are immobilized on the support in the course of the reaction. While in the second route, the stabilized catalytic species leaches in the reaction media during the reaction and then re-deposits on the support. Hence, to elucidate whether the catalysis is truly heterogeneous, Hot-filtration test is used 38, in which the reaction is halted after a short reaction time, the catalyst is removed from the reaction media and the progress of the reaction is monitored over the time. In the case of true heterogeneous catalysis, it is expected that the reaction does not proceed after separation of the catalyst. In this study, to elucidate the nature of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 catalysis, hot filtration test was performed for both CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101-catalysed benzyl alcohol oxidation and the cascade alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation under the optimum reaction conditions. Monitoring of the conversion of both reactions (Figure S7) indicated that in the presence of the catalyst, the reactions proceeded to furnish 52% aldehyde after 30 min and 49% benzylidene malononitrile after 15 min. Upon removal of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 from the reaction media, no noticeable change in the conversion of both reactions was observed over the time. These findings imply the true heterogeneous nature of catalysis.
Plausible mechanism for alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation
The selected cascade reaction in our study involves two consecutive steps, alcohol oxidation and Knoevenagel condensation, which is illustrated in Figure S8. According to the literature 39, in the first step, one proton of H2O2 is transferred to one of the oxygen atoms in the MoO2 unit in HPA and the formed HO2− is coordinated to the Lewis-acidic metal center to generate peroxo intermediate, which oxidizes alcohol to furnish the corresponding aldehyde and water. In the next step, the generated aldehyde takes part into the Knoevenagel condensation. In this regard, the catalyst activates malononitrile to form an activated methylene compound. Simultaneously, the catalytically active sites in the bead can activate the aldehyde to form an active intermediate, which then tolerates reaction with the as-prepared activated methylene compound to give the Knoevenagel condensation product as well as the catalyst (Figure S8) 40.
Comparative study
Alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction is an important cascade reaction that can be applied for the synthesis of more complicated organic compounds. To date various catalysts have been developed for promoting this reaction under different reaction conditions. Table 2 summarized the performance of the model reactions with some randomly selected catalysts to assay the catalytic activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 in comparison with the previously reported ones. Comparison of the yield of the model product as well as the reaction conditions affirms that some catalysts are inefficient and led to scant yield of the desired product (Table 2, entries 2, 4, and 7). Although some other catalysts, such as NH2-MIL-101(Fe) and Zr-MOF-NH2 resulted in moderate to high yields of the desired product, use of organic and toxic solvents as well as long reaction time rendered them less attractive. Taking the data in Table 2 into account, the catalytic activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 is superior to or equivalent to the reported catalysts so far. These data confirm that the designed catalyst can be considered as an efficient catalyst for promoting alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reactions. It is worth noting that there are defiantly some protocols that may led to the higher yields of the desired products in even milder conditions. In fact, our random comparison is just for indicating that the activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 is comparable with some reported catalysts.
Table 2
The activity of CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101, the designed catalyst in this work, for alcohol oxidation-Knoevenagel condensation reaction in comparison with the reported catalysts in literature.
Entry | Catalyst | Catalyst amount | Reaction conditions | Time (h) | Benzylidene malononitrile (yield %) | Ref. |
1 | Cu3TATAT-3a | 8 mol% | CH3CN/O2/75°C | 12 | 95 | 41 |
2 | NH2-MIL-125(Ti) | 20 mg | CH3CN/O2/70°C | 40 | 3.3 | 42 |
3 | NH2-MIL-101(Fe) | 20 mg | Trifluorotoluene/O2/light irradiation | 40 | 72 | 42 |
4 | NH2-MIL-101(Fe) | 100 mg | p-Xylene/O2/UV irradiation | 48 | 32 | 43 |
5 | Zr-MOF-NH2 | 100 mg | p-Xylene/ O2/UV irradiation | 48 | 91 | 43 |
6 | UoB-2b | 2 mol% | Solvent-free EtOH/TBHP | 1.5 | 94 | 44 |
7 | NH2-UiO-66(Zr) | 20 mg | CH3CN/O2/70°C | 40 | 4.6 | 42 |
8 | Fe3O4@SiO2@PEI@Ru(OH)X | 100 mg | O2/110°C for alcohol oxidation step | 22 | 90.2 | 45 |
9 | CS-CDNS-HPA@MIL-101 | 60 mg | H2O/H2O2/55°C | 1.5 | 90 | This work |
aH6TATAT= 5,5,5-(1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6 triyl)tris( azanediyl)triisophtalate |
bNi-based metal-organic framework |