Systemic sclerosis is a complex multi-systemic disease. Due to the different definitions used in previous studies, the incidence of myocardial involvement ranges widely from 15–66.7% [6, 7] with most cases exhibiting insidious progression. A literature review and meta-analysis on the survival of patients with SSc showed that 19% of deaths were caused by heart disease, thus significantly increasing the risk of death [8]. The pathogenesis of MI in SSc remains unclear although multiple factors have been described previously, including repeated ischemia-reperfusion injury of the heart, vascular microcirculation disorders (referred to as the "myocardial Raynaud's phenomenon") and inflammatory reactions. Irreversible focal fibrosis is known to lead to heart failure and arrhythmias [8–13]. Myocardial involvement is more common and more severe in dcSSc [14]. In some autopsy studies, myocardial fibrosis was found to be very common in SSc patients, with an incidence of up to 81% [8, 15]. Focal injury of the myocardium, necrosis of the myocardial contractile zone and fibrous scarring have all been reported but unrelated to the corresponding area supplied by the coronary artery [8, 16, 17].
A previous retrospective study carried out in a single center in Spain showed that SSc patients with heart involvement had an older onset age for SSc [18]; lcSSc patients were more common [19]. Our study only focused on MI, and showed that, similar to cardiac involvement, patients with MI seem were older at the onset of SSc, but in contrast, dcSSc (71.4% vs. 49.2%, P = 0.076) was more common. In a study evaluating SSc subclinical cardiac involvement [20], fibrosis of the heart was correlated with a higher modified rodnan skin score (mRSS). On the other hand, our study also showed a greater extent of positivity to anti-scl70 antibody, consistent with the fact that dcSSc is more common. Therefore, we should remain vigilant for MI in patients with positivity to anti-SCL70 antibody and wide skin sclerosis. The correlation between scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) and cardiac or myocardial involvement has been reported in previous studies [21, 22]; severe myocardial damage resulted in reduced blood supply to the kidneys, thus aggravating renal ischemia.
Familiarity with key clinical features (including the established risk factors of MI) may prove useful in raising our awareness to the possibility of SSc-MI in relevant patients. Our study showed that patients with MI commonly exhibited CK elevation and myositis. Myositis mainly involves the skeletal muscle but can occasionally involve the myocardium. SSc patients with myositis were more likely to develop issues with the. Aggressive immunosuppressive treatment may control myocardial inflammation and improve cardiac function in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Therefore, it is very important to identify myocardial inflammation as early as possible if we are to improve outcomes. A recent study found that subclinical cardiac fibrosis in SSc was associated with highly sensitive troponin I (cTNI) and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP) [20]. In the present study, 14/19 patients showed elevated levels of cTnI and 17/21 patients showed elevated levels of NT-proBNP, thus suggesting the importance of these two biomarkers in predicting MI in patients with SSc. However, 10.5% of patients with MI had normal levels of cTNI and NT-proBNP; thus, it would be difficult to identify MI in such patients in the early stages.
Echocardiography is used widely to evaluate cardiac structure but is associated with low sensitivity for detecting myocardial fibrosis in the early stages. Recently, it has been reported that the calculation of stress by the echocardiographic spot tracking method can identify impaired systolic function of both ventricles in patients with no obvious cardiac symptoms and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, as indicated by conventional echocardiography [23]. However, this method is not routinely used in clinical practice; our patients did not receive this diagnostic test. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR is considered to be the non-invasive gold standard for imaging macroscopic myocardial fibrosis. A previous study showed that CMR can identify early cardiac injury in SSc patients earlier than echocardiography and could identify abnormalities prior to the onset of clinical symptoms [24, 25]. In a prospective study of 201 patients with SSc [26], late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with negative T2-weighted images was detected in 27.9% patients without known SSc-related cardiac involvement by CMR. However, this technique is not widely used in SSc patients due to limitations imposed by high costs, long appointment times, long scan times, allergies and the deterioration of renal function arising from the use of contrast agents. Positron emission tomography (PET) testing of the heart is now being investigated as a potential diagnostic option. One patient in our study underwent both CMR and PET examination (including fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) and TATE); CMR suggested myocardial fibrosis while PET (FAPI) did not. FAPI labels fibroblast activating protein, which appears in the early stages of myocardial fibrosis. Thus, FAPI is not a sensitive test for myocardial fibrosis during the middle and late stages; thus, this test may generate negative result in these populations. On the other hand, it was also possible that subendocardial fibrosis was not extensive enough to be recognized by PET. Similarly, it was still not known whether inflammation presented with an increased uptake of TATE or had the same clinical meanings as that presented with positive T2-weighted images in CMR. The true clinical value of FAPI and TATE examinations still need to be validated in larger studies. In conclusion, echocardiography is recommended for all patients with SSc for diagnosis and regular annual monitoring while CMR is recommended for those suspected of having myocardial involvement. Our data indicate that SSc patients with elevated CTnI or NT-proBNP should be examined for myocardial involvement.
There is still no effective treatment for MI in SSc patients. Furthermore, it is unknown as to whether immunosuppressive therapy could prevent or cure myocardial lesions in this population. Four patients in our study were treated with steroid pulse therapy; no significant improvement in LVEF was observed on follow-up in these patients. The follow-up of 6 patients by CMR found no evidence of an improvement in fibrosis or EF following treatment. These results suggested that immunotherapy did not improve myocardial fibrosis although further studies are needed to confirm whether this treatment could prevent the progression of myocardial fibrosis. Theoretically, immunotherapy should help to control myocardial inflammation although it is still difficult to accurately determine the presence of myocardial inflammation. The role and consistency of CMR, TATE or myocardial biopsy for the evaluation of myocardial inflammation still need to be confirmed in larger studies. Considering the inflammatory process of the myocardium before the progression of myocardial fibrosis and the key role of IL-1 in the process of myocardial inflammation, De Luca et al. proposed the concept of targeted treatment with an interleukin-1 antagonist; however, this strategy has not been described further in the existing literature [27]. In addition to immunotherapy, symptomatic treatment of the heart is also very important, including controlling the ventricular rate to reduce cardiac load, diuresis, vasodilation and improving ventricular remodeling. A previous study showed that some drugs with potent vasodilator activity on small coronary arteries, such as dipyridamole, may be beneficial in the treatment of SSc patients with myocardial perfusion abnormalities [28]. One patient in our study showed a gradual decrease of LVEF (58% down to 47%) 4 months after the discontinuation of Sakobactral valsartan although this improved again (60%) in 2 months after re-treatment with Sakobactral valsartan without the adjustment of other treatments. The results of the DeSScipher cohort study also showed that vasodilators calcium channel blocker (CCB), and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), and/or angiotension II receptor blockers (ARB) and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid reduced the occurrence of different types of myocardial involvement [29].
In summary, myocardial involvement in SSc is not uncommon. Almost half of the patients with MI wee subclinical and likely to have myositis and SRC. Regular monitoring of CTnI and NT-proBNP levels, along with echocardiography, can facilitate the early diagnosis of myocardial involvement. For SSc patients with a high suspicion of MI, further CMR testing will be helpful in confirming the diagnosis and assessing myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in order to identify therapeutic options.