Cell morphology was observed under a light microscope (BH-2, Olympus, Japan) and by scanning electron microscopy (SU 8010, Hitachi, Japan) after incubation on Reinforced Clostridium Medium (RCM) [23] plates for 72 h [24] (Fig. 1). Gram staining was performed as described by Gerhardt et al. [25] in parallel with the KOH lysis method. In order to determine the optimal growth conditions, cultures of WLY-B-L2T were inoculated in RCM for 7 days at following temperature: 4, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 37, 40, 45, and 50 ℃. The pH was varied between 3.0–10.0 at 1.0 pH unit intervals and NaCl concentration (w/v) was varied from 0–5% with increments of 1% and the growth was measured at 37℃. The different pH values were adjusted with sodium acetate buffer (pH 3.0–6.0), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0–8.0), Tris/HCl buffer (pH 8.0–9.0), and carbonate buffer (pH 9.0–10.0). Ethanol tolerance was measured at 0–10% ranges with 2% intervals. Growth at varied conditions such as temperature, pH, NaCl and ethanol was detected after 72 h, when the strain was in the exponential growth phase. The result showed that WLY-B-L2T formed convex and round colonies with entire boundaries on RCM agar plates, like C. luticellarii FW 431T. Colonies were yellow in color and had a diameter of 0.5–1.0 mm. The cells were mixed with 3% KOH (P816399-500g, Xilong Chemical) thoroughly on a glass slide (Cat No.7105, Mingzhu) and no gelling was observed within 5 to 60 s. The strain was strictly anaerobic, Gram-positive with straight or somewhat rod shaped cells which were 0.5–0.7 µm wide and 1.7–3.1 µm long, arranged singly or in pairs. It produced spores. The strain was able to grow at 15–45 ℃ and pH 5.0–8.0, with optimal growth at 37 ℃ and optimal pH 7.0. This is similar to C. luticellarii FW 431T optimal growth temperature and pH. The two strains showed the same range of tolerance to NaCl. Optimal growth was at 1% (w/v) NaCl, and WLY-B-L2T did not grow at NaCl concentration (w/v) greater than 4.0%. The two strains showed the same range of tolerance to ethanol as well and the ranges were 0–6%.
The Biolog Microbial Identification system (MicroStation, USA) was used to determine the dominant carbon sources that could be metabolized by WLY-B-L2T and C. luticellarii FW 431T. After 72 h of incubation in RCM broth, cells were centrifuged and washed twice with carbon-free Biolog buffer. The samples were suspended using the same buffer and adjusted to a turbidity of 65%. Then, a 100 ml aliquot of the cell suspension was added to each well of the Biolog AN MicroPlate panel as described by Ivanova et al. [26]. The AN plate was cultivated at 37 ℃ for 72 h in an anaerobic system filled with an anaerobic bag (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co. Inc., Japan). The results showed that, of the 95 tested carbon sources, the dominant compounds that could be metabolized by WLY-B-L2T were D- galacturonic acid, methyl pyruvate, L-lactamine, L-alanyl-L-glutamine, L-alanyl-L-histidine, glycerol, pyruvate, L-alanyl-L-threonine, L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, L-valine + L- aspartic acid, L-serine, L-valine and thymidine. It was different in C. luticellarii FW431T where the predominant carbon sources were D-galacturonic acid, DL-α-glycerophosphate, D-malate, methyl pyruvate, L-lactamine, D- fructose, etc. The other carbon sources that could be utilized by the two strains are mentioned in Table 1.
Table 1
Phenotypic characteristics of strain WLY-B-L2T and a closely related phylogenetic neighbor in the genus Clostridium. Strains: 1, WLY-B-L2T; 2, C. luticellarii FW431T. Data are from the present study, except where indicated. +, Positive; −, negative; +w, weakly positive.
Characteristics
|
1
|
2
|
Growth temperature range (℃)
|
15–45
|
15–45
|
Optimal temperature (℃)
|
37
|
37
|
Growth pH range
|
5–8
|
5–8
|
Optimal pH
|
7
|
7
|
Growth NaCl concentration range (%)
|
0–3
|
0–3
|
Optimal NaCl concentration (%)
|
1
|
1
|
Growth ethanol range (%)
|
0–6
|
0–6
|
G + C content (mol%)
|
34.2
|
44.4
|
Major fatty acids
|
C16:0, anteiso-C15:0, iso-C15:0, C14:0
|
C16:0, C14:0, C15:0, C18:0
|
Organic acid(s) in fermentation
|
Butyric acid
|
Butyric acid
|
Dominant carbon sources (Biolog AN system)
|
|
|
D-Galacturonic acid
|
+
|
+
|
DL-α-Glycerophosphate
|
+w
|
+
|
D-Malate
|
-
|
+
|
Methyl Pyruvate
|
+
|
+
|
L-Lactamine
|
+
|
+
|
D-Fructose
|
+w
|
+
|
Poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid
|
-
|
+
|
L-Malate
|
-
|
+
|
L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine
|
+
|
-
|
L-Fucose
|
+w
|
+w
|
Glucose-6-Phosphates
|
-
|
+w
|
3-Methyl-D-Glucose
|
-
|
+w
|
L-Alanyl-L-Histidine
|
+
|
+
|
Glycyl-L-Proline
|
-
|
+w
|
Dulcitol
|
-
|
+
|
Glycerol
|
+
|
+
|
Methyl-α-D-Galactoside
|
+w
|
+
|
Isomaltulose
|
+w
|
+w
|
D-Glucitol
|
+w
|
+
|
Turanose
|
+w
|
+
|
D-Methyl lactate
|
+w
|
+
|
Pyruvate
|
+
|
+
|
L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine
|
+
|
+w
|
L-Alanyl-L-Threonine
|
+
|
-
|
L-Methionine
|
+
|
+
|
L-Phenylalanine
|
+
|
+
|
L- Valine + L- Aspartic Acid
|
+
|
+w
|
Uridine
|
+w
|
+w
|
L-Serine
|
+
|
+
|
2′-Deoxyadenosine
|
+w
|
-
|
L-Threonine
|
-
|
+
|
L-Valine
|
+
|
-
|
Thymidine
|
+
|
+w
|
The analysis of the organic acids and the metabolites produced by the strains in the RCM cultures were determined using HPLC (Agelent Venusil ASB) according to the previously described protocol [27]. The results showed that butyric acid was the major organic acid (588 mg/L) produced during fermentation by WLY-B-L2T. It could also produce acetic acid. Similar results were obtained for C. luticellarii FW431T. For these experiments, the cells were incubated at 37°C for 72 h on RCM under anaerobic condition using a anaerobic atmosphere generation bag. The growth curve of WLY-B-L2T is shown in Fig. 4.
The cells were grown on RCM at 37 ℃ for 72 h for fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) identification. Cellular fatty acids were extracted, methylated and analyzed using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIDI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results (Table 2) showed that the major FAMEs in WLY-B-L2T were C16: 0 (24.6%), anteiso-C15: 0 (16.5%), iso-C15: 0 (14.1%), and C14: 0 (8.3%). This profile is significantly different from that of C. luticellarii FW 431T which predominantly comprised C16:0 (37.0%), C14:0 (10.0%), C15:0 (7.4%), and C18:0 (6.5%).
Table 2
Comparative FAME profiles: Strains: 1, WLY-B-L2T; 2, C. luticellarii FW431T. −, negative. Data are from the present study.
FAME profiles
|
1
|
2
|
9:0 FAME
|
-
|
3.08
|
14:0 FAME
|
8.33
|
9.99
|
14:0 DMA
|
2.72
|
3.78
|
15:0 iso FAME
|
14.09
|
-
|
15:0 anteiso FAME
|
16.50
|
0.57
|
15:0 FAME
|
4.22
|
7.41
|
16:0 iso FAME
|
1.11
|
0.72
|
16:1 cis 9 FAME
|
1.97
|
-
|
16:0 FAME
|
24.61
|
37.03
|
16:0 DMA
|
1.73
|
0.54
|
17:0 iso FAME
|
3.04
|
-
|
17:0 anteiso FAME
|
4.19
|
0.88
|
17:0 cyc FAME
|
0.95
|
1.18
|
17:0 FAME
|
3.21
|
1.55
|
17:0 cyc DMA
|
2.58
|
4.45
|
18:2 cis 9,12 FAME
|
0.58
|
4.73
|
18:0 FAME
|
3.50
|
6.46
|
19 cyc 9,10/:1 FAME
|
-
|
3.04
|
19 cyc 11,12/:1FAME
|
1.59
|
4.00
|
19:0 cyc 9,10 DMA
|
0.26
|
5.52
|
Therefore, based on phenotypic, genotypic, and chemotaxonomic characteristics and phylogenetic analysis, the strain WLY-B-L2T (CICC 25133T = JCM 35127T) is suggested to represent a novel species of the genus Clostridium, for which the name Clostridium aromatiproducens sp. nov. is proposed.