See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research in practice
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding is the most effective intervention to prevent child morbidity and mortality in all contexts. During Palestine-Israel conflict that started in the middle of the 20 th century, healthcare services are understaffed and lack basic resources, with frequent power cuts and stock-outs of essential drugs and equipment. This case study seeks to answer the questions: (1) How does the protracted crisis in Gaza affect the breastfeeding practices of the most vulnerable population; and (2) What is the role that midwives can play in improving breastfeeding practices? A mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) study was used to collect data. A total of 1044 respondents had a child less than 24 months at the time of the study. A total of 62.75 percent practice early initiation of breastfeeding and 42 percent confirmed that their new-borns were given liquids other than breast milk during the first three days of life. Fifty percent of mothers addressed breast milk insufficiency by drinking additional fluids and 40 percent by using infant formula.
Discussion: This study confirms the need to a) implement the IYCF-E operational guidance in the Gaza strip and b) review the pre-service and in-service training for midwives. For vulnerable populations in humanitarian contexts, the impact of this cannot be underestimated. Conducting research in humanitarian settings is particularly challenging. Our experience included integration and linkage with international organizations security officers on the ground, co-ordination of activities with authorities and communities, regular supportive supervision during data collection, allocation of buffer days and geographical areas and in-country and remote assistance to data collection teams
Conclusions: This research focuses on a protracted emergency in insecure populated areas. The unpredictable security situation meant that the team adopted a flexible approach during data collection. Lessons learned throughout this process include the importance of a) allocating additional research time, to account for potential interruption b) daily coordination with security officers to ensure safe access to localities c) identification of extra sites, in case escalation of conflict d) training of additional enumerators in case conflict escalation e) negotiation with authorities to ensure compliance with requirements.
Keywords
Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding in emergencies, IYCF, IYCF-E, New-born care, Early initiation of breastfeeding, Infant feeding in emergencies, Midwife, Counselling, BFHI
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Version 3
Posted 07 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 03 Feb, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 20 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 19 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 13 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 03 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 22 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 22 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 22 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 15 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Nov, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 13 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 11 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 02 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 01 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 24 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 24 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 22 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 20 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 13 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research in practice
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Version 3
Posted 07 Jan, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 03 Feb, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 26 Jan, 2021
Review #2 received
Received 20 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 19 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 13 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 03 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 22 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 22 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 22 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 15 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Nov, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 13 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 11 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 06 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Oct, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 02 Sep, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 01 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 24 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 14 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 24 Jun, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 22 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 20 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 16 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 13 May, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Background: The protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding is the most effective intervention to prevent child morbidity and mortality in all contexts. During Palestine-Israel conflict that started in the middle of the 20 th century, healthcare services are understaffed and lack basic resources, with frequent power cuts and stock-outs of essential drugs and equipment. This case study seeks to answer the questions: (1) How does the protracted crisis in Gaza affect the breastfeeding practices of the most vulnerable population; and (2) What is the role that midwives can play in improving breastfeeding practices? A mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) study was used to collect data. A total of 1044 respondents had a child less than 24 months at the time of the study. A total of 62.75 percent practice early initiation of breastfeeding and 42 percent confirmed that their new-borns were given liquids other than breast milk during the first three days of life. Fifty percent of mothers addressed breast milk insufficiency by drinking additional fluids and 40 percent by using infant formula.
Discussion: This study confirms the need to a) implement the IYCF-E operational guidance in the Gaza strip and b) review the pre-service and in-service training for midwives. For vulnerable populations in humanitarian contexts, the impact of this cannot be underestimated. Conducting research in humanitarian settings is particularly challenging. Our experience included integration and linkage with international organizations security officers on the ground, co-ordination of activities with authorities and communities, regular supportive supervision during data collection, allocation of buffer days and geographical areas and in-country and remote assistance to data collection teams
Conclusions: This research focuses on a protracted emergency in insecure populated areas. The unpredictable security situation meant that the team adopted a flexible approach during data collection. Lessons learned throughout this process include the importance of a) allocating additional research time, to account for potential interruption b) daily coordination with security officers to ensure safe access to localities c) identification of extra sites, in case escalation of conflict d) training of additional enumerators in case conflict escalation e) negotiation with authorities to ensure compliance with requirements.
Loading...