Phosphorus is a key element in the constitution of fundamental molecules for living beings, such as nucleic acids and phospholipids in cell membranes. Furthermore, it is involved in production of energy molecules such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which are essential for the entire cell metabolism. Taking these characteristics into account, phosphorus is a limiting mineral for the growth of all living beings. However, each organism has specific requirements regarding phosphorus levels. While phosphorus deficiency can cause serious metabolic problems related to growth, its excess can be excreted and eutrophicate the adjacent water bodies with negative consequences from an environmental point of view. It is known that only approximately 40% of the phosphorus available in feed is absorbed by farmed aquatic organisms, while the surplus is secreted and released into the water (Sugiura 2018). Thus, the rational use of phosphorus is a balance point between animal production and environmental protection.
Due to the low concentration of phosphorus in natural waters, aquatic organisms need to obtain this essential element from food (Coloso et al. 2001). In the case of cultured aquatic organisms, phosphorus must be present in the feed in its bioavailable form. However, this mineral is among the most expensive feed supplements used in aquaculture (Fox et al. 2006), and the phosphorus present in plant matter is not bioavailable to monogastric animals because it is in the form of phytate, which is considered an antinutritional factor. The addition of phytases can alleviate the problem, as these enzymes degrade phytate and release inorganic phosphorus for assimilation by the body. However, the addition of phytase to the feed represents a significant addition to its final cost. In the present study, the hypothesis that the addition of a probiotic strain of B. subtilis capable of secreting a fungal phytase (KM0-Phy) in L. vannamei feed could degrade the phytate present in plant matter and increase the bioavailability of phosphorus for the shrimp. Additionally, the impact of KM0-Phy strain on growth, survival, proximate muscle composition, lipid vacuoles in hepatopancreas and expression of genes related to digestion, amino acid metabolism and antioxidant defenses were evaluated.
After 45 days of experimentation, it was observed that the addition of the strain KM0-Phy to the shrimp diet did not change any parameters of growth or survival. The lack of growth induction observed here can be explained by the fact that probiotics may have a greater impact on the early stages of shrimp development, as suggested by Toledo et al. (2019). On the other hand, chemical composition analysis showed a significant increase of 39% in phosphorus content of muscle tissue of shrimp that had the probiotic KM0-Phy added to the feed, even if the feed used is already supplemented with 1.5% phosphorus. Interestingly, shrimp fed diet with KM0 strain also had an increase in muscle phosphorus at an intermediate level between CON and KM0-Phy groups. It is known that Bacillus species can produce Ca2+-dependent beta-propeller type phytases, which have high thermal stability, optimal catalytic activity at neutral pH and high specificity for the calcium-phytate complex (Fu et al. 2008). Thus, it would be expected that the presence of B. subtilis in the feed could have some effect on the bioavailability of phosphorus for shrimp. However, genetic manipulation for expression and secretion of a fungal phytase performed in KM0-Phy strain significantly enhanced this characteristic.
The increase observed in the phosphorus concentration in muscle tissue of shrimp fed diet with B. subtilis KM0-Phy additive suggests that the phytate was degraded by fungal phytase secreted by the genetically modified probiotic. Thus, it is reasonable to expect that the decrease in phytate could make more nutrients available and modulate expression of genes related to digestion in shrimp hepatopancreas. Quantification of digestion-related gene expression demonstrated a significant downregulation of proteases (chymo and tryp) and lipase (lip) transcription in both KM0 and KM0-Phy treatments. It is known that Bacillus species are capable of producing and secreting proteases and lipases. Priest (1977) already described numerous digestive exoenzymes produced by Bacillus species, especially carbohydrates, proteases and lipases. Some Bacillus proteases stand out for their high stability under adverse environmental conditions such as temperature and pH extremes, presence of organic solvents, detergents, and oxidizing agents (Contesini et al. 2018). Also, according to Eggert et al. (2003), B. subtilis can produce and secrete two types of lipases (lipA and lipB) from genes that are differentially expressed according to growth conditions. In addition, the counting of lipid vacuoles in the hepatopancreas showed that B. subtilis KM0-Phy used in the present study increased the concentration of lipids in that tissue in comparison to control group. The addition of phytases to the fish diet has been linked to an increase in lipids in the body (reviewed by Zheng et al. 2020). However, this relationship has not, to our knowledge, been established in crustaceans. Thus, the presence of a probiotic bacterium in the intestine capable of producing and secreting digestive enzymes decreases the need for the host to produce and secrete its own enzymes. This directly reflects on the regulation of genes as a way of saving the energy that is invested in the processes of absorption of nutrients from food. In fact, it has often been reported that dietary probiotic supplementation increases the activity of digestive enzymes in shrimp intestine. Recently, Wang et al. (2020) showed that probiotics such as B. subtilis and B. licheniformis can induce the activity of digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract of tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Also, Zokaeifar et al. (2012) showed that the addition of B. subtilis strains to L. vannamei feed significantly increased digestive enzyme activity in shrimp. These studies, which only analyze the activity of digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract, cannot differentiate between the action of shrimp enzymes and those secreted by probiotics.
In the present study, genes related to amino acid metabolism (gdh and gs) were also analyzed. The only difference observed was a downregulation of gdh in the group of shrimps treated with the KM0 strain. Apparently, genetic manipulation in the KM0 strain to express a fungal phytase increased the transcription of gdh to the same levels observed for the control group. The gdh gene encodes the enzyme glutamate dehydrogenase, which catalyzes the oxidative deamination of glutamate to form α-ketoglutarate in the mitochondrial matrix. This chemical reaction results in the production of a Krebs cycle intermediary and can accelerate ATP production by oxidative phosphorylation in the electron transport chain (Dawson and Storey, 2012). It is possible that the greater availability of phosphorus in the shrimp treated with the KM0-Phy strain is favoring a higher glutamate dehydrogenase expression compared to the shrimp treated with the KM0 strain. In the case of genes related to oxidative stress (gpx and sod) analyzed in muscle tissue, no difference was observed among treatments. This result shows that the increase in phosphorus availability did not imply a change in the shrimp muscle's oxidative status.
In conclusion, the use of a genetically modified strain of B. subtilis expressing a fungal phytase was able to increase the availability of phosphorus for shrimp. Although the increased availability of this mineral was not reflected in growth, it was possible to observe a downregulation in expression of genes related to digestion. Also, it is possible that the action of the phytase produced by the probiotic enables a decrease in phosphorus additives in the feed, with an impact on its cost. In addition, the greater efficiency in the use of phosphorus present in the feed will certainly imply a decrease in the excretion of this element by shrimp, with a consequent reduction in the impact of shrimp farms on adjacent ecosystems.