• Infectiousness and survival
Mice inoculated with 2x106 culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes (CMT) of the Y strain of T. cruzi (TcII) presented 100% of infectivity rate (%INF), when infected by either the GI or IP routes (data not shown). During the acute phase of the infection, the survival rate of infected animals, both GI and IP, and not treated with BZ, was 50%. However, as can be seen in the Kaplan-Meier graph, the deaths of animals inoculated by the GI route occurred later, indicating lower virulence by this inoculation route (p = 0.007) (Fig. 1). Treatment with BZ avoided lethality in animals inoculated by both routes, during the period of the experiments.
• Parasitological And Molecular Parameters
The mean parasitemia curves of animals inoculated by both routes (GI and IP) are shown in Fig. 2a. The untreated (NT) animals, inoculated via the GI route, had parasitemia levels three times lower than those inoculated via the IP route, in addition to a later day of maximum parasitemia peak (Dpmax, 13th day of infection), when compared to the IP-inoculated animals, whose maximum peak (Pmax) occurred on the 8th day of infection (d.i.) (Fig. 2a).
Regarding the other parasitological parameters derived from the parasitemia curve and obtained from the fresh blood examination (FBE) [pre-patent period (PPP), patent period (PP), Pmax, and the percentage of animals with a positive FBE (%+FBE)], and molecular parameters [percentage of mice with positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (%+qPCR) and the mean parasite load], in the comparison between NT animals inoculated via the GI and via the IP routes, significant differences were observed in three parameters (Table 1 and Fig. 2a). In animals inoculated via the GI route, only the PPP was higher than in the IP-inoculated animals, indicating lower virulence of the infection via the GI route, since the higher the PPP, the lower the virulence.
Table 1
Statistical comparisons (mean and standard deviation) of the parasitological and molecular parameters of mice inoculated via the gastrointestinal (GI) and intraperitoneal (IP) routes with 2x106 culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes of the Y strain (TcII) of Trypanosoma cruzi, treated with benznidazole (BZ 100 mg/kg/day, 20X) from the 5th day of infection, and in untreated controls (NT).
| GI | | | IP | |
Parameter | NT | BZ | p | | NT | BZ | p |
PPPA (days) | 9.5 ± 1.4* | APG | < 0.001 | | 4.1 ± 0.6* | 3.6 ± 0.5 | NS |
PPB (days) | 11.6 ± 2.0** | AP | < 0.001 | | 14.3 ± 3.3** | 2.6 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
PmaxC (x10³) | 75.7 ± 26.4* | AP | < 0.001 | | 250.9 ± 154.7* | 5.7 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
DpmaxD | 13.2 ± 2.3 | AP | < 0.001 | | 10.3 ± 3.1 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 |
%+FBEE | 100.0 (10/10) | AP | ≤ 0.05 | | 100.0 (10/10) | 20.0 (2/10) | ≤ 0.05 |
%+qPCRF | 100.0 (5/5) | 100.0 (6/6) | NSH | | 100.0 (3/3) | 100.0 (5/5) | NS |
Number of significant reductions | | | 5/6 | | | | 4/6 |
A Pre-patent period; B Patent period; C Number of trypomastigotes / 0.1 mL of blood at parasitemia peak; D day of the maximum peak; E Percentage of animals with positive fresh blood examination; F Percentage of animals with positive qPCR; G Absent parasitemia; H Not significant. When comparing the inoculation routes of NT animals, values with * (p < 0.001) and ** (p ≤ 0.05) on the same line are significantly different. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used. |
The %+FBE and %+qPCR were 100% for animals infected by both routes and not treated (Table 1). In untreated animals, the parasite load was 0.6 equivalent parasites (par. eq.) per mL of blood for those inoculated via the GI route and 2.3 par. eq./mL for those inoculated via IP route, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (Fig. 2b).
• Impact Of Etiological Treatment On Parasitological And Molecular Parameters
The parasitemia of animals inoculated both by the GI and IP routes was suppressed by the treatment with BZ from the first day of treatment (Fig. 2a). In animals inoculated via the GI route, BZ treatment promoted a significant reduction in 5/6 parasitological parameters (PPP, PP, Pmax, Dpmax, and %+FBE), while in those inoculated via the IP route, the reduction occurred in 4/6 (PP, Pmax, Dpmax, and %+FBE) (Table 1).
The qPCR was positive in all animals inoculated via both the GI and IP routes, and in both the treated and untreated groups (Table 1), with the BZ treatment not significantly altering the parasite load of animals (Fig. 2b).
• Histopathological Parameters In Cardiac Tissue
Amastigote nests were not observed in the histological sections of cardiac tissue of infected animals in any of the groups, which were submitted to euthanasia on the 47th d.i. Except for the animals in the uninfected and untreated (NI) (Fig. 3a) group, inflammatory processes were observed in all other experimental groups, including the animals of the uninfected group that were treated with BZ (NI + BZ) (Fig. 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e and 3f).
No animal in the NI group had cardiac tissue damage (Fig. 3a and 3g). A moderate inflammatory process was observed in 83.33% (5/6) of the animals in the infected via GI route and untreated (GINT) group (Fig. 3g), with focal epicarditis and myocarditis (Fig. 3b), while an intense inflammatory process was observed in 100% (2/2) of the surviving animals in the infected via IP route and untreated (IPNT) group (Fig. 3g), with diffuse myocarditis, necrotic cardiac fibers, areas of myocardial fibrosis, and connective tissue deposition as the initial form of the healing process (Fig. 3c). The animals in the GINT group presented mild (50%; 3/6) to moderate necrosis (33.3%; 2/6), while the two survivors (100%) in the IPNT group presented intense necrotic tissue. Five (83.3%) animals in the GINT group had mild fibrotic tissue, while the other (16.6%) had moderate fibrotic tissue, whereas the two surviving animals in the IPNT group had intense fibrotic tissue (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3g). Although these changes were observed in animals infected by both routes and not treated, they were more intense (+++) in animals from the surviving IPNT group (Fig. 3g).
• Histopathological Parameters Of Liver Tissue
Histological analysis of the liver of NI animals showed normal morphology with hepatocytes organized in well-defined cell strands, as expected (Fig. 4a).
In the liver of animals infected both by the GI and IP routes and not treated, amastigote forms were also not detected. However, focal inflammatory processes were observed in the liver parenchyma and the periphery of the portal triad region (Fig. 4b) and, in some cases, of the central vein (Fig. 4c). Animals of the GINT group displayed a focus of hepatitis with intensity ranging from mild (4/6; 66.6%) to moderate (2/6; 33.3%), while in those of the IPNT group, focal hepatitis was classified as intense in the two surviving animals (100%) (Fig. 4g). Although no statistical differences were observed between untreated animals inoculated via the GI and IP routes, in the animals of the GINT group, necrotic tissue was not observed, and 100% (6/6) of them had mild fibrotic tissue. On the other hand, the two surviving animals in the IPNT group had moderate necrotic tissue (100%) and fibrotic tissue ranging from moderate (1/2; 50%) to intense (1/2; 50%).
• Impact Of Etiological Treatment On Histopathological Lesions
The animals in the uninfected but BZ-treated group had a mild inflammatory process in the heart (Fig. 3d), with a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the animals in the NI group (Fig. 3g).
When comparing the hearts of animals in the infected and BZ-treated groups with their respective untreated controls, for each inoculation route, significant differences were observed only between the GI-inoculated animals, regarding inflammatory process and necrotic tissue (Fig. 3g). Treatment with BZ promoted a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the intensity of the inflammatory process with 6/6 (100%) of the infected via GI route and treated (GI + BZ) animals presenting a mild inflammatory process (Fig. 3e), against 5/6 (83.3%) and 1/6 (16.6%) of the GINT group that presented a moderate or an intense inflammatory process, respectively (Fig. 3g). The treatment of GI-inoculated animals also promoted a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the number of animals with necrotic tissue and the intensity of these lesions, with no animal in the GI + BZ group presenting necrotic tissue against 3/6 (50.0%) with moderate and 2/6 (33.3%) with mild necrotic tissue in the untreated group (GINT) (Fig. 3g). Therefore, treatment with BZ promoted benefits in animals that had been infected via the GI route. On the other hand, due to the high mortality caused by IP infection route, the number of animals remaining for evaluation in both IP groups was reduced, infected via IP route and treated (IP + BZ) (n = 4) and IPNT (n = 2). Thus, no significant differences were observed regarding heart lesions, between treated and untreated animals, inoculated by the IP route (Fig. 3g).
The liver tissue of uninfected animals that had been submitted to treatment with BZ presented a mild inflammatory process (Fig. 4d- red arrow) in 3/5 (60%) animals and moderate inflammatory process in 1/5 (20%) of the animals evaluated, with a significant difference (p < 0.05) in relation to the NI group, indicating that there was tissue damage in the liver caused by BZ (Fig. 4g), with greater intensity than that observed in the cardiac tissue.
Regarding the histopathological lesions of the liver, there were no significant differences between the animals infected by both routes and treated with BZ (Fig. 4e and 4f) and their respective untreated controls (Fig. 4b and 4c). Although without a statistical difference, the BZ treatment of the animals inoculated via the GI route apparently promoted an increase in the intensity of the lesions compared to the untreated animals (Fig. 4e). The opposite occurred with the treatment of animals inoculated by the IP route (Fig. 4f). Since only two animals in the IPNT group survived, suggesting greater lethality of the CMT forms of the Y strain (TcII) when inoculated by the IP route, the small number (n) of animals in this group interfered in the result of the statistical analyses. In animals infected with the macrophagotropic Y strain, these data suggest that BZ may increase the intensity of lesions in the liver (Fig. 4g), the organ where it is metabolized, promoting fewer benefits for the GI infection compared to IP infection, and differently from what was observed in the heart (Fig. 3g).
• Biochemical Parameters
The results of the measurements of plasma liver enzymes and hepatic OS from the different experimental groups are shown in Table 2. In NT animals infected via the GI route, the enzymes AST and ALT, but not alkaline phosphatase (ALP), presented higher values (p ≤ 0.05) than the NI animals. In NT animals infected via the IP route, only the ALT enzyme showed a significant change (p ≤ 0.05) compared to NI animals (Table 2). These results show that infection, mainly via the GI route, promotes an increase in liver enzymes.
Table 2
Plasma markers and oxidative stress parameters of liver injury in mice inoculated via the gastrointestinal (GI) and intraperitoneal (IP) routes with 2x106 culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes/animal of the Y strain (TcII) of Trypanosoma cruzi, treated with benznidazole (BZ) (100 mg/kg/day, 20X), and untreated controls. Data are the mean ± standard error of 3–6 animals.
Experimental groups |
Parameters | NI | NI + BZ | GINT | GI + BZ | IPNT | IP + BZ |
Plasma parameters of liver damage (U·L− 1) |
AST | 70.9 ± 5.0 | 97.5 ± 7.6* | 140.0 ± 9.8* | 91.7 ± 8.3** | 93.7 ± 12.8 | 82.9 ± 4.7 |
ALT | 51.1 ± 4.4 | 94.7 ± 6.3* | 81.6 ± 5.3* | 61.1 ± 4.3** | 76.0 ± 9.1* | 43.2 ± 3.9** |
ALP | 143.7 ± 12.0 | 132.7 ± 12.5 | 124.4 ± 13.3 | 157.5 ± 13.4 | 212.8 ± 31.6 | 210.6 ± 27.8 |
Hepatic oxidative stress parameters |
GSH (nmol·mg− 1) | 8.24 ± 0.11* | 6.02 ± 0.65* | 3.47 ± 0.35** | 6.19 ± 0.72* | 6.12 ± 0.21* | 7.80 ± 0.63* |
Catalase (mmol·min− 1·mg− 1) | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.05 |
Carbonyl groups (nmol·mg− 1) | 2.60 ± 0.14* | 3.87 ± 0.20** | 3.46 ± 0.28** | 3.95 ± 0.1** | 3.98 ± 0.12** | 3.21 ± 0.09*,** |
NI, uninfected; NI + BZ, uninfected and treated; GINT, inoculated via the gastrointestinal (GI) route and untreated; GI + BZ, inoculated via the GI route and treated; IPNT, inoculated via the intraperitoneal (IP) route and untreated; IP + BZ, inoculated via the IP route and treated. GSH, Reduced glutathione. |
For plasma parameters of liver damage: values with * are different from NI; and ** are different from NT, within the same route (p ≤ 0.05). |
For hepatic OS parameters, values with different symbols (* and **), on the same row, are different (p ≤ 0.05). |
In the liver OS parameters of NT animals, only infection via the GI route resulted in decreased levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), which means an increase in tissue OS in this condition. Infection both by the GI and IP routes caused an increase in protein carbonyl groups, suggesting an increase in tissue injury (Table 2).
• Impact Of Etiological Treatment On Biochemical Parameters
In the plasma parameters of liver damage, treatment with BZ in uninfected animals (NI + BZ group) caused a significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in the levels of AST and ALT enzymes, showing that the drug, by itself, affects the liver (Table 2). Treatment with BZ, however, reduced the AST enzyme level in animals infected via the GI route, and ALT in animals infected by both routes, showing that the treatment reversed the effects of infection and promoted some benefits (Table 2). For the ALP enzyme, there was no significant alteration caused either by the infection or the drug.
In the analysis of the OS parameters, it was observed that BZ caused a significant increase only in the carbonyl groups of proteins for the animals in the NI + BZ group (Table 2). For animals infected via the GI route, a significant increase in GSH was observed in treated animals compared to GINT (Table 2). In the animals infected via the IP route, although BZ promoted a significant reduction in the carbonyl groups, the values of this parameter did not return to the level of NI animals.