Efficient Electrospray Deposition of Surfaces Smaller than the Spray Plume

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2239602/v1

Download PDF

Article

Efficient Electrospray Deposition of Surfaces Smaller than the Spray Plume

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2239602/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 14 Aug, 2023

Read the published version in Nature Communications →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Electrospray deposition (ESD) is a promising technique for depositing micro- and nano-scale droplets and particles with high quality and uniformity. It is a particularly attractive solution for surface coating of costly and delicate biomaterials and bioactive compounds. While high efficiency of ESD has only been successfully demonstrated for spraying surfaces larger than the spray plume, this work extends its utility to smaller surfaces. It is shown that by architecting the local “charge landscape”, ESD coatings of surfaces smaller than plume size can be achieved. Efficiency approaching 100% is demonstrated with multiple model materials, including biocompatible polymers, proteins, and bioactive small molecules, on both flat and microneedle array targets. UV-visible spectroscopy and HPLC measurements validate the high efficiency and quality of the sprayed material. This protocol for ESD can be considered an efficient and more competitive alternative to other conformal coating mechanisms, such as dip coating or inkjet printing, for micro-engineered applications.

Physical sciences/Materials science/Techniques and instrumentation/Design, synthesis and processing

Physical sciences/Materials science/Soft materials/Polymers

Physical sciences/Materials science/Biomaterials/Biomaterials – vaccines

Physical sciences/Materials science/Biomaterials/Drug delivery

Efficient surface deposition of chemical and biological materials is a process of broad significance in many applications including transdermal drug delivery, biosensing, tissue engineering, cell stimulation, and wound healing, among others^1–4. Similar to the electrostatic spray technique used in the automotive and agricultural industries to coat large surfaces⁵, electrospray deposition (ESD) has emerged as a promising contender in the manufacturing space of bio-functional surfaces⁶. In this technique, a high electric field drives surface instabilities from a solution reservoir to produce monodispersed, charged droplets which emerge from a needle tip and move toward a grounded target (Fig. 1a)^7–9. Highly controllable droplets as small as 100 nm in diameter can be quickly produced via ESD which makes the technique particularly attractive where micro- and nano-scale coatings and particles are needed. However, for templates and targets smaller than the characteristic spray plume, the deposition efficiencies reported for these sprays still indicate significant materials loss^10,11,12. In this work, we demonstrate that by manipulating the collective “charge landscape” made up of the external field and accumulated charges, we can achieve ESD with 100% efficiency using near-field techniques on targets that are significantly smaller than the plume. In addition to highly targeted and efficient coatings, our small therapeutics molecule demonstrated no decomposition post-processing via high performance liquid chromatography measurements. Using microneedle arrays as a model target for this study, we anticipate our work using ESD coatings to expand towards therapeutics delivery methods for costly bioactive materials and scale-up in manufacturing.

ESD has been utilized to process nanoparticles (NPs) in biomedical applications, examples of which include ESD of chitosan and collagen as drug-delivery carriers^13,14, polycaprolactone NPs layers to control alignment and pattern growth for cell culture¹⁵, and glass coatings onto metallic implants for bonding with native bone and osseointegration^16,17. In addition, ESD can safely deposit protein NPs that maintain bioactivity after spraying^12,18,19. In these and other applications, ESD demonstrates high efficiency in a regime where the template size is in general greater than the plume size which is commensurate to the spray distance of 4 cm in this study (Fig. 1b). This is due to the fact that the non-inertial droplets follow the field lines to their grounded target^8,20, eliminating almost all droplets missing the target, termed “over-spray.”

The regime where the template/target size is smaller than the plume is much less explored and yet is of great importance and relevance to emerging applications, such as microneedle array (MNA)-based drug delivery and the creation of functionalized sensor electrodes^21,22. Such sprays reduce the mechanical precision required of near-field techniques (e.g., inkjet printing or dip coating), but efficiency in these sprays has been studied only limitedly. Morozov and Morozova reported up to 80% efficiency and 55% protein activity of alkaline phosphatase sprayed at a distance of 10 mm at a 20 mm² target through a 3 mm² insulating, non-contacting mask¹². Work of Kingsley et al. showed deposition efficiency to be less than 5% at a distance of 55 or 65 mm onto a 36 mm² target¹⁰. All additional material ostensibly found other grounded targets in their spray chamber. In another study, Angkawinitwong et al. experimented with the coating of MNAs on a 1 cm² electrode located 10 cm from the deposition needle. Deposition efficiencies of less than 30% were reported for these samples.¹¹ To overcome this challenge, the electric field will have to be engineered, e.g., with a guide ring to focus the field lines on the small target^19,23−27. Charge accumulation from the arriving spray on either the target or the insulated areas modifies field distribution, thus further limiting spray^28,29. While this limiting can be exploited to conformally coat complex surfaces in the self-limiting electrospray deposition (SLED) mode^30–32, the charge buildup may eventually compromise the stable cone-jet mode necessary for ESD²⁰.

In this work, we will examine three model geometries: MNAs with a surface area of approximately 0.2 mm² per needle, a silicon chip, and an electrode test pattern printed on Borofloat glass. The total surface area of the MNA, silicon chip, and test pattern are approximately 3 mm², 1 cm², and 0.9 cm², respectively. The former represents a general 3D surface and is a platform that demonstrated great advantages in transdermal drug and vaccine delivery^33–37, including dose-sparing effects and room-temperature stability to eliminate cold-chain requirements³⁸; whereas the latter is a generic 2D example representing any small and flat substrate. We will focus on biologically relevant materials, including trehalose, GLS-1027 (a therapeutic small molecule), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP), poly [3-(potassium-6-hexanotate) thiophene-2,5-diyl] (P3KT), GLS-6150 (a hepatitis C virus DNA vaccine)³⁹, and trehalose-stabilized horse radish peroxidase (HRP, a protein complex). In addition to efficiency, we will also validate functional activity of the last two sprayed molecules. Our work will establish ESD as a viable alternative to dip coating, which requires a standing reservoir of unused material, and inkjet printing, which is a serial process requiring expensive positioning equipment.

3.1 Engineering the Charge Landscape

As mentioned, for targets smaller than the characteristic spray plume, the charge landscape can be modified in such a way that can optimize the material deposition efficiency. The general hypothesis (shown schematically in Fig. 1c) is that efficient sprays should: (1) start from a relatively “blank state” and not be affected by previous sprays; (2) be free from alternative targets; (3) employ a focus ring; and (4) have a large extractor ground placed behind the target from the perspective of the spray. In addition, to maximize the effects of the deposited charge and minimize any effects that occurred after deposition, humidity was kept low for all sprays which has previously been shown to amplify self-limiting effects in ESD⁴⁰. Experimental parameters for all sprays are listed in Table S1. We systematically investigated five distinct enhancements to optimize the charge landscape of electrospray for deposition efficiency on an MNA (Target 1; T1), as well as a flat silicon chip (T2) and an electrode test pattern on borofloat glass (T3): negative-polarity ethanol pre-spray to eliminate residual charges (E1); a large, grounded extractor beneath the sample (E2); insulating tape on all non-target metal surfaces (E3); an insulating mask on unwanted regions of the target (E4); and a focus ring to narrow the plume (E5) (see Table S1 for spray conditions). Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis) efficiency results of trehalose ESD coatings deposited with and without the specific efficiency enhancement strategies for MNAs are shown in Fig. 2a where rhodamine B was used as a tracer molecule (see Fig. S1 for calibration curve). Results with all enhancements for the flat silicon chip and test pattern are also shown, with both geometries used as a target to demonstrate that ESD is not target-specific and can be generalized. While T2 achieved a deposition efficiency of 110 ± 25%, T3 achieved a deposition efficiency statistically similar (P-value = 0.9934), but slightly less than that at 96 ± 18%. For T3, the sample was grounded such that the ground was in the spray path. Thus, the decrease in efficiency was likely caused by the ground both collecting and removing sprayed material from the sample. Since trehalose is not a self-limiting material, deposition on T3 occurred as a mounded spot, albeit one that did not over-spray the surrounding substrate, and would not be ideal for electronic coatings. In contrast, Fig. S2 demonstrates how a self-limiting material, PVP, can achieve a qualitatively more uniform thickness. Regions that were damaged in the pattern and thus did not have a conductive path also led to no deposition in both materials, illustrating the high selectivity of ESD. Further optimization of the in-plane coating uniformity will be left to future work. All targets and materials were sprayed at a constant spray time of 30 min, but Fig. S3 demonstrates that achieving high deposition efficiencies can be done at various dosages for both self-limiting and non-self-limiting materials. This additionally illustrates the facile means of controlling needle dose in MNAs via ESD, which can be accomplished continuously through deposition time.

With all enhancements, the deposition efficiency of trehalose sprays coating on both MNAs and the silicon chip was essentially 100%. We hypothesize that the slightly greater than 100% apparent efficiency of the coating on individual sprays is due to the combined effects of uncertainties due to the small amounts of material and the accumulation of some dried material on the tip of the needle between samples and stabilization of the spray. From an ultimate system-design standpoint, automated sample motion and spray stabilization, such as recently shown by Toth et al.⁴¹, would likely improve the precision of the technique. Although we anticipate employing a similar design in the future to control spray stabilization, our work has shown that are still significant differences between the enhanced and unenhanced results without the use of such system design.

The negative pre-spray (-E1) establishes the “blank slate” condition, without which the charge gradually builds up in the chamber to the point of influencing and destabilizing the spray. Allowing the charge to accumulate in the spray chamber resulted in a more variable spray efficiency of 60 ± 46%. Removing the extractor ground (-E2) decreased efficiency to 55 ± 32% which arises from charge screening and an eventual destabilization of the spray, as will be discussed further below. Most significant—and intuitive—is the effect of providing additional conductive surfaces for the spray to target. This is shown here in two ways. The first is to remove the masking tape from the extractor ground and focus ring (-E3, Fig. 2d). Upon doing so, the extractor ground and focus ring provide for a much larger conductive surface for the spray to deposit. The role of the masking tape is to initially build charge during the first few moments of spray which redirect the field lines towards the unmasked portions of the target. The apparent deposition efficiency is 9 ± 2%, indicating that approximately 90% of the spray is diverted to these large alternative targets, particularly the ring, which does not have a field of its own strong enough to repel the spray and requires a slight build-up of charge. The second is removing the silicone target mask (-E4, Fig. 2c) which allows for 55 ± 35% of the coating to be deposited on unwanted portions of the sample, consistent with the quantity of non-desired conductive surface. The addition of the focus ring homogenizes the electrostatic field in the interelectrode space to redirect the spray to the desired grounded substrate. Removal of the focus ring (-E5) allows droplets to follow a wider range of field paths and reduces efficiency to 21 ± 15%. As previously noted, implementing all these enhancements (Fig. 2e) leads to 104 ± 10% of the spray arriving at the needle tips. Movie S1 of an enhanced spray shows that no excess deposition or spray instability. Shifting to a silicon chip (Fig. 2f) maintains the essentially 100% efficiency (110 ± 25%).

While all these results are relatively intuitive, the role of the extractor ground is perhaps the most subtle. As shown when the tape is removed (-E3), the spray is initially directed to all conductive surfaces in the chamber, including the positively-biased focus ring. Early in the spray, charge is therefore deposited on all of the accessible conductive surfaces, even if they are coated with insulating tape or masked, as has been observed in near-field ESD templating²⁷. These charges create their own field which opposes the ESD field. If this counter field is too strong, spray will be completely destabilized. Even barring this outcome, if the charge on the insulated surfaces is too large, it will screen the relatively small target ground surface. This hypothesis was tested through a simplified finite element method (FEM) model. In this model, the geometry was reduced to 2D axisymmetric with the target and extracting ground represented as cylinders (see details in Fig. S4). The spray was conceptualized as following field lines emitting from the tip of the needle. If the field line terminated at the target, we may consider that any spray that atomizes onto the path of that specific field line will also arrive at the target, with the density of field lines proportional to the deposition rate. To simulate the spray escaping into the chamber, the outer boundary was also modeled as grounded. Charge was then added to all insulated surfaces for two cases: (1) the extractor grounded, similar to T1, and (2) the extractor floating, similar to -E2. At low charge, the floating ground case has more field lines terminating at the target than the grounded case, due to spray being directed to the large ground (Fig. 3a). However, when the charge on the surfaces is increased, the target is rapidly screened in the floating case, redirecting spray to the ring and other target while the target receives more of the field lines in the grounded case. The fraction of field lines that terminate at the target as a function of surface charge is shown in Fig. 3b. While this illustrates the difference observed between the T1 and -E2 cases in Fig. 2a, it underestimates the effect due to assumptions in the simplified model. This simulation is oversimplified in that in actuality, the charge is not uniformly distributed. Indeed, the local density of field lines may be expected to be proportional to the instantaneous charge-deposition rate. While future work will develop a more sophisticated model that captures this behavior, this result still qualitatively supports the role of the extractor ground in stabilizing the field and directing it towards the grounded target.

3.2 Spray Efficiency of Model Materials

To demonstrate effectiveness with a wide range of biologically-relevant materials, we have selected trehalose, a small molecule used as a matrix material; PEGDA, a hydrogel precursor material; PVP, a biocompatible glassy polymer; P3KT, a water-soluble conductive polymer; and three biologically-active substances, GLS-1027, an immunomodulating small molecule⁴², GLS-6150, a plasmid DNA vaccine, and a trehalose-HRP protein complex as model materials. These are used to demonstrate examples of materials that could be employed and are not exhaustive of either materials or categories of materials that can be applied using this technique. It should be noted that of these, the PVP, as a glassy monomer, is expected to satisfy the conditions for SLED³² and, thereby, should rapidly accumulate repulsive charge. UV-vis efficiency results for the selected materials are shown in Fig. 4a. With the exception P3KT, all materials have mean apparent efficiencies greater than 98%. In all cases, we assume that the composition of the spray remains constant from the syringe to the target. This assumption can be justified by (1) the use of relatively dilute solutions such that precipitation at the spray needle tip is unlikely, and (2) based on the commensurate molecular weight of the tracer and the lightest payload (479 g mol^− 1 for rhodamine as compared to 205 g mol^− 1 for GLS-1027), there is roughly equal likelihood of atomization and diffusive or convective removal of material and tracer. In addition to apparent deposition efficiencies nearing 100%, the sprayed materials maintain functionality post-spray. When sprayed with 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA), a photoinitiator, the PEGDA coating can then be cured to form a hydrogel. This hydrogel coating can be seen in Fig. 5a, where the preservation of the rhodamine fluorescence also demonstrates function post-processing.

While P3KT efficiencies are higher than the studies reported above at 66 ± 10%, its deposition efficiency was likely reduced by solution compatibility. For the spray setup, P3KT was eluted in 1:4 water:ethanol, similar to the other materials used. The rhodamine tracer was not included, as P3KT has a quantifiable absorption peak. Although P3KT is somewhat water-soluble, it is not soluble in ethanol, and modifiers, such as ammonium hydroxide, have been shown to be necessary to enhance its aqueous solubility^43,44. The relatively low solubility may have resulted in some agglomerates or condensation at the Taylor cone, impeding flow and introducing instabilities at the needle tip, resulting in lower deposition onto the target. A more favorable solvent may improve the stability of the spray cone to achieve a higher deposition efficiency.

3.3 HPLC Results of Sprayed GLS-1027

HPLC was used with the immunomodulator, GLS-1027, to validate the UV-vis efficiency measurement approach. HPLC results demonstrated that GLS-1027 did not experience any significant molecular or chemical changes after being subjected to ESD. Retention times for sprayed samples were the same as the control (Fig. 5b). The profile of the samples indicates one and only one peak is present which follows the results of the control. Thus, no decomposition occurs to the immunomodulator when deposited using ESD. No significant differences were observed between peak area measurements from control and sprayed samples as the sprayed samples reported 104 ± 12% recovery of the material. Finally, the efficiency results for GLS-1027 from HPLC were nearly identical to those measured with UV-vis (99 ± 18%) which confirms the appropriate use of UV-vis for efficiency measurements (see Fig. S5).

3.4 Gel EP Results of GLS-6150

Agarose gel EP was performed on the DNA vaccine samples. GLS-6150 contains 4 different plasmids of sizes 3.6, 3.8, 4.4, and 5.1 kb. In Fig. 5c, the GLS-6150 control is seen in lane 1 with the 4 plasmids present in both the open-circular conformation (5–8 kb) and the supercoiled conformation (2-3.5 kb). In lane 3, the sprayed sample is seen showing similar locations to the control in addition to maintaining both circular conformations post-processing. This indicates that through ESD, the DNA plasmid structures are not interrupted in the process of achieving high deposition efficiencies. However, future work is necessary to determine if ESD affects the ratios of the open-circular and supercoiled forms.

3.5 ELISA Results of HRP

Unlike GLS-1027 and DNA plasmid, electrospraying HRP dramatically decreased the functional activity of the enzyme. ELISA results showed activity less than 4 ± 0.06% of the expected activity for the mass of protein sprayed. We suspect that the physical shear of the protein in the selected solvent blend via ESD decreased the HRP activity. As discussed above, Morozov and Morozova demonstrated that it is indeed possible for proteins, specifically alkaline phosphatase, to be electrosprayed and still maintain high activity through an optimized protocol dependent on solvent formulation and the spray voltage and current used¹⁹. Stabilization approaches are particular to the specific biomolecule; however, the fact that proteins can retain activity in electrospray suggest that it may be possible to achieve ESD of active protein coatings that have a more targeted, higher efficiency with further optimization.

3.6 Comparison to Other Coating Methods

It is important to consider the above results in the context of the dominant existing methods for precision soft coatings, specifically, dip coating, spin coating, and printing. Dip coating is currently ubiquitous approach for coating MNAs and other surfaces for medical coatings in the range of 0.01-10 µm. To achieve quality dip coating deposition, several process parameters need to be considered⁴⁵. Most relevantly, the capillary number of the coating fluid determines the fluid entrainment, with more viscous solutions and higher dipping rates leading to thicker films^34,46. Thus, accurate dip coating requires a high degree of both mechanical and fluid formulation accuracy. Further, it is important to consider that thick films, particularly arising from, high viscosity solutions require more time for the coating to dry and may lead to drainage effects where the material may accumulate at the bottom of the substrate⁴⁵. There is also inherent waste in dip coating from unutilized bath material, and the frequent insertion and removal increases the chances for fouling. Efficient ESD, by contrast, works exclusively with low viscosity solutions and can utilize nearly all of the spray solution, with the thickness controlled by spray time. Two advantages of dip coating over ESD, however, are that dip coating does not have the activity concerns reported here and the rate of dip coating deposition increases with surface area while ESD is directly proportional to spray time. This said, ESD, especially when using self-limiting materials, can be employed for geometries that are much more complex than those that would be compatible with dip-coating, such as foams³¹. Spin coating is by far the most precise method available for the deposition of micro-/nano-scopic thin films ranging from 1-200 µm film thickness⁴⁷; however is inherently wasteful, removing greater than 90% of the utilized material. This waste becomes even greater when spatial control is desired, necessitating lift-off that removes any unpatterned surface and requires several lithographic processing steps. Further, spin coating is impractical on surfaces with anything beyond limited roughness (feature aspect ratio of approximately 0.1). However, it has the highest potential for uniformity, and further development of self-limiting ESD will be necessary to target specific application areas where materials waste is a prime concern. Ink or electrohydrodynamic jet printing can target specific portions of a target with sub-micron spatial resolution through the use of piezoelectric stages; however, this accuracy comes at the cost of it being a serial process requiring precision positioning equipment, which cannot match the deposition rate of either dip or ESD coating. Further, geometries above “2.5-D” complexities cannot be targeted by the line-of-sight nature of the jet, and capillary and gravity flow effects can lead to coating unwanted portions of the sample³⁴. Jet printing additionally requires careful formulation of the print solutions and their evaporative/wetting properties to avoid nozzle clogging and to achieve a uniform printed spot/line. Indeed, much as with the electrode templating shown in the T3 result, there is a large potential for ESD and jet printing to be used together with an optimal, conductive jet ink serving as the template for ESD.

By altering the charge landscape of the spray region, we show that ESD is a viable technology to coat MNAs and, more generally, for coating micro-scaled objects that are smaller than the spray plume. Various materials, ranging from sugar molecules to bioactive molecules, were sprayed onto MNAs, achieving deposition efficiencies at or around 100%. Our work demonstrates that, in addition to high deposition efficiencies, materials can be sprayed without disturbing the quality of or decomposing the sprayed material for small molecules. This study shows that the capabilities of ESD are not limited to coating large targets and can be implemented for micro- and nano-fabrication applications where materials cost is a concern. We anticipate that future work will expand the range of compatible materials and the delivery rate of this high-efficiency approach.

5.1. Materials

D-(+)-trehalose dihydrate, PEGDA (Mn = 4,000), HRP Type VI, rhodamine B, MilliQ water, ethanol, and 1-step Ultra TMB-ELISA substrate solution were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Kollidon 12 (PVP) was obtained from BASF. P3KT was obtained from Rieke Metals. GLS-6150 (Lot VGX-6150.13A001) and GLS-1027 (Lot 19AK0183A) were obtained from GeneOne Life Science, Inc. Sulfuric acid was obtained from Fisher Scientific. AZ400K developer (potassium-based buffered alkali solution) was obtained from MicroChemicals. PicoPure water was obtained from Hydro Service and Supplies.

5.1 Solution Preparation

P3KT solutions were prepared by mixing 100 µL of 5 mg mL^− 1 solutions in water with 400 µL of pure ethanol. All other solutions were prepared by mixing 100 µL of 10 mg mL^− 1 solutions in water (or 200 proof ethanol in the case of GLS-1027), 10 µL of 25 µg mL^− 1 rhodamine B, and 450 µL of pure ethanol.

5.3 Microelectronic Pattern Fabrication

Parylene-C (5 µm thick) was deposited via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) using the SCS Labcoter®2 Parylene Deposition System PDS 2010 onto an A174 silane adhesion-promoter pre-treated 4 inch borofloat 33 glass wafer (University Wafer). The wafer was then treated for 60 s in an O₂ plasma treatment system (March PX-250) using 100 W at 80 mTorr to roughen the parylene layer. The patterning of the titanium/platinum (Ti/Pt) traces were achieved via photolithographic definition of the chip geometry. Briefly, a 3 µm photoresist (Kayaku Advanced Materials, Shipley S1818) layer was spun and exposed to define the patterns on the parylene-C coated wafer using the EVG620 UV Lithography System. The wafer was then treated again for 60 s with O₂ plasma using 100 W at 80 mTorr). A 200 nm thick Ti/Pt layer was deposited using physical vapor deposition (Kurt J. Lesker PVD75) and released by lift-off in acetone bath.

5.4 Electrospray Setup

The electrospray setup involves a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus 11 Plus), one negative high voltage power supply (Acopian Power Supply, N012HA5), two positive high voltage power supplies (Acopian Power Supply, P012HA5), a stainless-steel needle (SAI Infusion, 20 gauge, 0.5”), a steel guard ring (4 cm outer diameter, 2 cm inner diameter), 2 mm long stainless-steel microneedles in a 4 x 4 array, and a humidity and temperature-control environmental chamber (Electro-Tech Systems, Inc.). The chamber had a controlled humidity ranging from 15–25%RH, and the temperature ranged from 24–27 ℃. The spray solution was loaded into 1 mL Luer Lock syringes with an inner diameter of 4.78 mm. The microneedles were placed on an aluminum holding block where the microneedle array and the holding block were grounded. A positive voltage was applied and adjusted as needed on the syringe needle and the guard ring. A negative pre-spray using 200 proof ethanol was sprayed before each sample. All conductive material within the chamber was insulated with 1 layer of 2 mil Kapton tape, including the guard ring and the holding block. Microneedle arrays were sonicated with detergent and water for cleaning.

5.5 Experimental Parameters

Sprays were stabilized using the primary voltage with a range of 6-8.5 kV at a constant spray distance of 2 cm to the ring and 4 cm to the target. The ring voltage was held at 0.41 kV. Ambient humidity was regulated between 15–25%RH. All sprays occurred at a flow rate of 0.1 mL h^− 1, corresponding to a mass delivery rate of 180 µg h^− 1 of the payload material and 45 ng h^− 1 of tracer. For efficiency calculations, sprays were collected for 30 min, resulting in 90 µg of material and 45 ng of tracer.

5.6 Apparent Deposition Efficiency Calculation

Needles or chips were dipped into 600 µL of water, or AZ400K Developer for GLS-1027 and P3KT, for 2 min until all material is dissolved off the needles. The solution is then analyzed with a Jasco 770 UV-vis spectrophotometer. The results were then background subtracted using a Gaussian fit to extract the rhodamine peak, which was compared to a standard calibration curve generated in the same solvent.

5.7 HPLC Analysis

HPLC measurements were performed by MedChem 101, LLC (Plymouth Meeting, PA) using the Agilent 1260 Infinity II. The column used is a Porashell 120 C18 (EC C18 4 µm) 150 x 4.6 mm at 20 ˚C. The mobile phase consisted of 45 vol% acetonitrile + 0.05 vol% trifluoroacetic acid and 55 vol% deionized water + 0.05 vol% trifluoroacetic acid. The samples were flowed at 0.8 mL min^− 1 for 8 min using a sample volume of 4 µL. Samples were detected using UV at 254 nm.

GLS-1027 solutions were prepared by mixing 100 µL of 10 mg mL^− 1 solutions in 200 proof ethanol and diluted with 400 µL of 200 proof ethanol. The solution was sprayed for 90 min onto a 4 x 4 MNA. The needles were then eluted in 500 µL of 200 proof ethanol and given to MedChem 101, LLC, for HPLC analysis.

5.8 Hydrogel Preparation

Hydrogel solutions were made by mixing 100 µL of 10 mg mL^− 1 PEGDA in water with 3.6 µL of 10 mg mL^− 1 DMPA in 200 proof ethanol. 396.4 µL of 200 proof ethanol was added to this mixture for a total solution volume of 500 µL. The solution was then sprayed for 30 min onto a 1 x 4 MNA for ease of visual purposes. After spraying, the coating was densified using a humidifier. When the coating was densified and visually clear, the coating was cured for 5 min using a Dymax Light-Welder PC-3 UV Spot Lamp. The MNA was then dipped in water mixed with rhodamine B and imaged using a Dinolite USB Camera under a UV light.

5.9 Gel Electrophoresis

Samples were loaded onto Bio-Rad 1% TAE Mini ReadyAgarose Precast Gel 12-well. For the DNA ladder, New England Biolabs 1 kb DNA Ladder was used. 10 µL of stock GLS-6150 at 41.7 µg mL^− 1 was loaded. MNAs sprayed with GLS-6150 were eluted into 600 µL of water. 10 µL of this sample was loaded into the well. All samples used New England Biolabs Gel Loading Dye, Purple (6X). The gel was run for 80 min at 80 V in 1X TAE buffer. The gel was then stained for 40 min in 1:10,000 SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain:1X TAE buffer. Syngene PXi Gel Imaging system was used to image the gel after staining.

5.10 ELISA

HRP activity was measured using an ELISA reagent in 96-well polystyrene tissue culture plates (VWR, Radnor, PA). HRP Type IV was dissolved in molecular biology grade water at 1 wt% as a standard. HRP standard was diluted to 10 ng mL-1 (1:1,000,000) in PicoPure water, and a standard curve was generated from 0.31 ng mL-1 to 10 ng mL-1 using serial dilutions with PicoPure water. Two experimental HRP samples from collected electrospray were prepared at theoretical concentrations of 20 µg mL-1 and further diluted to 1:250 in water. HRP solutions were added to the plates with an equal volume of the 1-step Ultra TMB-ELISA substrate solution. Plates were incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and 50 µL of 2 M sulfuric acid was added to stop the reaction. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm and 540 nm on a Tecan Infinite M200 Pro plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland), and the background (540 nm) was subtracted from the 450 nm signal. Samples (n = 4) were averaged for each condition, and experimental active HRP concentrations were determined from the standard curve in the Supporting Information.

5.11 Finite Element Model

The FEM model was performed using COMSOL 6.0. Additional details of the simulation can be found in the Supporting Information.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding support from GeneOne Life Science.

Competing interests

JNM is an employee of GeneOne Life Science. As such, JNM receives salary and benefits, including ownership of stock and stock options. All other authors declare they have no competing interests.

Author contributions

JPS, LL, and SHP conceptualized the experimental design. SHP, LL, DD, EOL, MA, ETD, and RZ performed the experiments. JPS performed the finite element analysis. JPS and SHP wrote the paper. All other authors revised and reviewed the manuscript.

Maver, T. et al. Cellulose based thin films as a platform for drug release studies to mimick wound dressing materials. Cellulose 22, 749-761, doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0515-9 (2014).
Hwang, G. T., Byun, M., Jeong, C. K. & Lee, K. J. Flexible piezoelectric thin-film energy harvesters and nanosensors for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater 4, 646-658, doi:10.1002/adhm.201400642 (2015).
Thanka Rajan, S., Bendavid, A. & Subramanian, B. Cytocompatibility assessment of Ti-Nb-Zr-Si thin film metallic glasses with enhanced osteoblast differentiation for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 173, 109-120, doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.09.041 (2019).
Pelaez-Vargas, A. et al. Effects of density of anisotropic microstamped silica thin films on guided bone tissue regeneration--in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101, 762-769, doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32879 (2013).
Morozov, V. N. Electrospray Deposition of Biomolecules. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 119, 115-162 (2009).
Jaworek, A. & Sobczyk, A. T. Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: An overview. J. Electrostatics 66, 197-219, doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 (2008).
Kovacevich, D. A. et al. Self-Limiting Electrospray Deposition for the Surface Modification of Additively Manufactured Parts. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12, 20901-20911, doi:10.1021/acsami.9b23544 (2020).
Jaworek, A. Electrospray droplet sources for thin film deposition. Journal of Materials Science 42, 266-297, doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0842-9 (2006).
Lei, L. et al. Obtaining Thickness-Limited Electrospray Deposition for 3D Coating. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10, 11175-11188, doi:10.1021/acsami.7b19812 (2018).
Kingsley, B. J., Pawliczak, E. E., Hurley, T. R. & Chiarot, P. R. Electrospray Printing of Polyimide Films Using Passive Material Focusing. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 3, 6274-6284, doi:10.1021/acsapm.1c01073 (2021).
Angkawinitwong, U. et al. A Novel Transdermal Protein Delivery Strategy via Electrohydrodynamic Coating of PLGA Microparticles onto Microneedles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12, 12478-12488, doi:10.1021/acsami.9b22425 (2020).
Morozov, V. N. & Morozova, T. Y. Electrospray Deposition as a Method To Fabricate Functionally Active Protein Films. Analytical Chemistry 71, 1415-1420, doi:10.1021/ac9808775 (1999).
Zhang, S. & Kawakami, K. One-step preparation of chitosan solid nanoparticles by electrospray deposition. Int J Pharm 397, 211-217, doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.07.007 (2010).
Nagarajan, U., Kawakami, K., Zhang, S., Chandrasekaran, B. & Nair, B. U. Fabrication of Solid Collagen Nanoparticles Using Electrospray Deposition. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 62, 422-428 (2014).
Lee, S. J., Park, S. M., Han, S. J. & Kim, D. S. Electrolyte solution-assisted electrospray deposition for direct coating and patterning of polymeric nanoparticles on non-conductive surfaces. Chemical Engineering Journal 379, doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122318 (2020).
de Jonge, L. T. et al. The osteogenic effect of electrosprayed nanoscale collagen/calcium phosphate coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 31, 2461-2469, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.114 (2010).
Müller, V., Jobbagy, M. & Djurado, E. Coupling sol-gel with electrospray deposition: Towards nanotextured bioactive glass coatings. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 41, 7288-7300, doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.041 (2021).
Gomez, A., Binghamd, D., de Juan, L. & Tang, K. Production of protein nanoparticles by electrospray drying. Journal of Aerosol Science 29, 561-574 (1998).
Morozov, V. N. & Morozov, T. Y. Electrospray Deposition as a Method To Fabricate Functionally Active Protein Films. Analytical Chemistry 71, 1415-1420 (1999).
Jaworek, A. & Sobczyk, A. T. Electrospraying route to nanotechnology: An overview. Journal of Electrostatics 66, 197-219, doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 (2007).
Demiryurek, Y. et al. Device and method for tissue electrotransfer using a microelectrode. (2021).
Stett, A. et al. Biological application of microelectrode arrays in drug discovery and basic research. Anal Bioanal Chem 377, 486-495, doi:10.1007/s00216-003-2149-x (2003).
Toth, K., Osuji, C. O., Yager, K. G. & Doerk, G. S. Comprehensive study on electrospray deposition in the single Taylor cone-jet mode by changing the spatial electric potential using a ring-shaped ternary electrode. Rev Sci Instrum 91, 013701, doi:10.1063/1.5129625 (2020).
Jaworek, A., Sobczyk, A. T. & Krupa, A. Electrospray application to powder production and surface coating. Journal of Aerosol Science 125, 57-92, doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.04.006 (2018).
Jaworek, A. & Krupa, A. Generation and characteristics of the precession mode of EHD spraying. Journal of Aerosol Science 27, 75-82 (1995).
Zhu, Y. & Chiarot, P. R. Directed assembly of nanomaterials using electrospray deposition and substrate-level patterning. Powder Technol. 364, 845-850, doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.066 (2020).
Lei, L. et al. Self-limiting electrospray deposition on polymer templates. Scientific Reports 10, 17290, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74146-1 (2020).
Altmann, K., Schulze, R. D., Hidde, G. & Friedrich, J. Electrospray ionization for deposition of ultra-thin polymer layers – principle, electrophoretic effect and applications. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 27, 988-1005, doi:10.1080/01694243.2012.727170 (2013).
Zhu, Y. & Chiarot, P. R. Surface charge accumulation and decay in electrospray printing. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54, 075301, doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abc449 (2020).
Lei, L. et al. Homogeneous gelation leads to nanowire forests in the transition between electrospray and electrospinning. Materials Horizons 7, 2643-2650, doi:10.1039/d0mh00872a (2020).
Kovacevich, D. A. et al. Self-Limiting Electrospray Deposition for the Surface Modification of Additively Manufactured Parts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12, 20901-20911, doi:10.1021/acsami.9b23544 (2020).
Lei, L. et al. Obtaining Thickness-Limited Electrospray Deposition for 3D Coating. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10, 11175-11188, doi:10.1021/acsami.7b19812 (2018).
Arya, J. & Prausnitz, M. R. Microneedle patches for vaccination in developing countries. J Control Release 240, 135-141, doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.019 (2016).
Gill, H. S. & Prausnitz, M. R. Coating formulations for microneedles. Pharm Res 24, 1369-1380, doi:10.1007/s11095-007-9286-4 (2007).
Roukens, A. H., Vossen, A. C., Bredenbeek, P. J., van Dissel, J. T. & Visser, L. G. Intradermally administered yellow fever vaccine at reduced dose induces a protective immune response: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS One 3, e1993, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001993 (2008).
Arnou, R. et al. Immunogenicity, large scale safety and lot consistency of an intradermal influenza vaccine in adults aged 18-60 years: Randomized, controlled, phase III trial. Hum Vaccin 6, 346-354, doi:10.4161/hv.6.4.10961 (2010).
Zehrung, D., Jarrahian, C. & Wales, A. Intradermal delivery for vaccine dose sparing: overview of current issues. Vaccine 31, 3392-3395, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.021 (2013).
Kim, Y. C., Quan, F. S., Compans, R. W., Kang, S. M. & Prausnitz, M. R. Stability kinetics of influenza vaccine coated onto microneedles during drying and storage. Pharm Res 28, 135-144, doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0134-6 (2011).
Lee, H. et al. Preclinical evaluation of multi antigenic HCV DNA vaccine for the prevention of Hepatitis C virus infection. Sci Rep 7, 43531, doi:10.1038/srep43531 (2017).
Bodnár, E. & Rosell-Llompart, J. Growth dynamics of granular films produced by electrospray. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 407, 536-545, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.013 (2013).
Toth, K., Osuji, C. O., Yager, K. G. & Doerk, G. S. Electrospray deposition tool: Creating compositionally gradient libraries of nanomaterials. Review of Scientific Instruments 91, 013701, doi:10.1063/1.5129625 (2020).
Stojanovic, I. et al. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo immunopharmacological activities of the isoxazoline compound VGX-1027: Modulation of cytokine synthesis and prevention of both organ-specific and systemic autoimmune diseases in murine models. Clin. Immunol. 123, 311-323, doi:10.1016/j.clim.2007.03.004 (2007).
Zeng, Q. et al. High-Efficiency Aqueous-Processed Polymer/CdTe Nanocrystals Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells with Optimized Band Alignment and Reduced Interfacial Charge Recombination. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 31345-31351, doi:10.1021/acsami.7b09901 (2017).
Liu, Z. et al. “Green” polymer solar cell based on water-soluble poly [3-(potassium-6-hexanoate) thiophene-2, 5-diyl] and aqueous-dispersible noncovalent functionalized graphene sheets. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 97, 28-33, doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.023 (2012).
Zhang, Z., Peng, F. & Kornev, K. G. The Thickness and Structure of Dip-Coated Polymer Films in the Liquid and Solid States. Micromachines (Basel) 13, doi:10.3390/mi13070982 (2022).
Jittavanich, K. et al. Modeling, simulation and fabrication of coated structures using the dip coating technique. Chemical Engineering Science 65, 6169-6180, doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.001 (2010).
Sahu, N., Parija, B. & Panigrahi, S. Fundamental understanding and modeling of spin coating process: A review. Indian J. Phys. 83, 493-502 (2009).

Yes there is potential Competing Interest. Author Joel N. Maslow is an employee of GeneOne Life Science. As such, JNM receives salary and benefits, including ownership of stock and stock options. All other authors declare they have no competing interests.

ESDEfficiencySI.pdf
MovieS1.mp4
Electrospray deposition demonstration
TableofContentsEntry.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 14 Aug, 2023

Read the published version in Nature Communications →

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Efficient Electrospray Deposition of Surfaces Smaller than the Spray Plume

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results And Discussion

3.1 Engineering the Charge Landscape

3.2 Spray Efficiency of Model Materials

3.3 HPLC Results of Sprayed GLS-1027

3.4 Gel EP Results of GLS-6150

3.5 ELISA Results of HRP

3.6 Comparison to Other Coating Methods

Conclusions

Methods

5.1. Materials

5.1 Solution Preparation

5.3 Microelectronic Pattern Fabrication

5.4 Electrospray Setup

5.5 Experimental Parameters

5.6 Apparent Deposition Efficiency Calculation

5.7 HPLC Analysis

5.8 Hydrogel Preparation

5.9 Gel Electrophoresis

5.10 ELISA

5.11 Finite Element Model

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1