Sampling. Artificially treated surface soils were collected at two points: along the Ai River in Osaka Prefecture at the major FP plant (Daikin)(Saito et al., 2004; Shiwaku et al., 2016) (OS, Fig. 1) (34.759645, 135.533303) and along the Kamo River, Kyoto Prefecture (KS, Fig. 1) (35.023752, 135.771872), on February 23 and March 20, 2016, respectively. Polyethylene bags and metal scoops were used to collect the soil samples. They were used for the degradation experiment. Vegetation, larger soil fauna and stones were removed from the soil prior to passing it through a 2-mm sieve (Test No. 307: Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Soil. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3 : Environmental Fate and Behaviour, n.d.). The collected soil samples were uniformly mixed and stored at 4°C until analysis. Air samples were collected at the Higashi-Yodogawa area in Osaka (OA, Fig. 1) (34.7532929, 135.5539568) between November 15 and 17, 2016, and the Sakyo area, Kyoto (KA, Fig. 1) (35.023530, 135.776898) between November 30 and December 2, 2016. These air sampling sites were downwind from the FP manufacturing facility. Air sampling and treatment of sampling media were conducted as previously reported(Oono et al., 2008). In brief, quartz fiber filters (QF, 8 inch × 10 inch; QR-100, Sibata, Tokyo, Japan) were used to obtain the particulate matter, and glass columns (90 mm i.d.) with a polyurethane foam (PUF, 50 mm) followed by activated carbon fiber felts (ACF, 10 mm; KF-1700F, Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) were used for the gaseous phase, using high-volume air samplers (HV-700F, Sibata, Tokyo, Japan) at approximate flow rates of 700 L min− 1 for 48 h. Field blanks (ACF, PUF and QF) were carried to the sampling sites with each set of samples. After the collection, the samples were delivered to the laboratory immediately and kept at 4°C until analysis.
Insert Fig. 1 here
Experimental Methods.
Degradation tests
Degradability tests were conducted following the method of Russell et al.(Russell et al., 2008) A total of 42 glass serum vessels were prepared and were capped with crimp-sealed aluminum foil-lined closures. The vessels were incubated statically at 20 ± 2°C. Approximately 25 g dry weight equivalent of test soil were added to 21 vessels for each of the Kyoto and Osaka samples. Bacteriostatic treatments were performed with 5000 µg of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide, respectively, to further inhibit the microbial growth. Sodium acetate (2 µg/g) was used as positive control of biodegradation.
Extraction
Three preparation groups were established for each soil: 1) PFOA addition (100 ng per 25 g soil in dry weight; 2) PFHxA addition (300 ng per 25 g soil in dry weight); and 3) no treatment (controls). Vessels from Group 1, 2 and 3 were extracted and analyzed at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks using the following method: 125 ml of acetonitrile, 10 ml of 200 mM NaOH and 10 µl of a 13C-labeled compound (MPFAC-MXA, Wellington Laboratories, Ontario, Canada) for calculating the recovery rate were added to each bottle, and stirred for 3 h on a swing shaker (Powley et al., 2005). After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated with an evaporator. After evaporating the solvent, 5 ml of tetrabutyl ammonium buffer was added and transferred to a 15-ml tube. Next, 10 ml of MTBE was added, and the mixture was treated for 3 min at 1500 rpm, using a centrifugal separator. The organic solvent layer was transferred to a glass test tube. The extract and internal standard solution (11H-Perfluoroundecanoic acid (11H-PFUnDA) were dried at 60°C for 30 min while blowing nitrogen gas. Then, 100 µl of benzyl bromide/toluene was put in the glass test tube and transferred to a vial, heated at 100°C for 60 min, and the concentrations of PFOA and PFHxA in the soil were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Agilent 6890 GC/5973 MSD)(Fujii, Yan, et al., 2012). The extraction recoveries of PFCAs were examined for soil samples (n = 7 fortified with PFCAs). Mean recovery rates of PFCAs were 94%, 88%, 95%, 98% and 93% for PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA and PFDA, respectively. Control experiments were conducted using agar powders (n = 5), while no significant contamination was observed.
Total oxidative precursor assay (TOP Assay)
For the oxidation test(Bolan et al., 2021; Houtz & Sedlak, 2012), 12 subsamples were taken from each soil sample. We analyzed five PFCAs (PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA, and PFDA) both before (n = 6) and after (n = 6) oxidation. The oxidation method was as follows: 25 mL of acetonitrile and a 10-mL aliquot of 200 mM NaOH was added to each sample. After the samples were extracted for 3 h using a gyratory shaker table set at 250 rpm, one fifth of eluate was passed through filter paper. The eluate was evaporated to 0.5 mL to avoid the loss of the target compounds during the drying process and 5 ml ultrapure water with 0.5 g of potassium persulfate and 1 mL of 5N KOH was added. The pH of the samples was adjusted between 5 and 9 using NaOH prior to the extraction, and samples were then heated at 85°C for 6 h. Prior to analysis, samples were cooled at room temperature and then analyzed with GC-MS(Fujii, Harada, et al., 2012).
FTOH analysis
Analysis of FTOHs in soil samples was conducted using the same soil samples. Two glass bottles were prepared, and 25 g dry weight of each soil was added. Then, 120 ml of 25% ethyl acetate in hexane and 1 ml of 13C-labeled FTOH were added, and the mixture was stirred with a swing shaker for 3 h. After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated using an evaporator. Hexane was added until the total amount reached about 30 ml, leaving about 2 ml of solvent. The extract was then washed with a silica gel column (Presep®-C Silica Gel, Wako Pure Chemicals), eluted in a glass test tube with 3 ml of 25% ethyl acetate/hexane and evaporated to 0.5 ml under high purity nitrogen. The extraction efficiencies of FTOHs were evaluated by spiking the standard solutions of FTOHs on a soil sample (n = 7). Mean recovery rates of analytes were 82%, 89%, 95%, 94% and 92% for 4:2 FTOH, 6:2 FTOH, 8:2 FTOH, 10:2 FTOH, and 8:2 FTOAc, respectively. The GC-MS analysis was based on the previous report(Mahmoud et al., 2009).
The FTOH analysis in air was conducted as previously reported(Oono et al., 2008). For extraction of samples, the three-sampling media were soaked for 10 min in 50 mL of ethyl acetate three times (150 mL total). The aliquots were combined and dried with sodium sulfate. Isotope-labeled 8:2 FTOH was added to all extracts to determine recoveries. The extracts were evaporated and reconstituted into hexane. The concentrates were cleaned on a silica gel column (Presep®-C Silica Gel, Wako Pure Chemicals). The eluates were combined with 5 mL of 25% ethyl acetate in hexane. Finally, 1H,1H-heptadecafluoro-1-nonanol was added as an internal standard just prior to the GC-MS analysis to correct for volume differences. The eluates were evaporated to 0.5 mL under high purity nitrogen and were then analyzed using GC-MS as described previously. In this study, the LOD was shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Detection limit of fluorotelomer alcohols in air and soil samples.
|
Limit of detection
|
|
|
Air (pg m− 3)
|
Soil (ng g− 1)
|
4:2 FTOH
|
8
|
0.1
|
6:2 FTOH
|
4
|
0.07
|
8:2 FTOH
|
2
|
0.05
|
10:2 FTOH
|
3
|
0.1
|
8:2 FTOAc
|
0.2
|
0.002
|
Insert Table 1 here
There is no decrease in concentration is not sufficient if there is nothing to show that the soil is microbially active.