The present study sought to identify the best predictive transdiagnostic factors of chronic insomnia in a sample of patients with chronic insomnia. The results demonstrated that all of the transdiagnostic variables evaluated in the current study had moderate to high correlations with insomnia severity, with the exception of clinical perfectionism (r = .13). Demographic characteristics, depression, and anxiety symptoms accounted for 10% of the variance of the ISI, with only depression, education level, and age being the significant contributing factors for insomnia severity. Furthermore, 30% of insomnia severity variance was explained by the transdiagnostic factors (in order of highest to lowest coefficients) of: physical concerns (ASI), repetitive negative thinking (RTQ), neuroticism (BFI), personal standards (CPQ), cognitive reappraisal (ERQ), cognitive concerns (ASI), and evaluative concerns (CPQ). Overall, physical concerns (ASI) and repetitive negative thinking (RTQ) served simultaneously as the most significant contributing variables for insomnia severity.
Among demographic characteristic, education level was one of the strongest contributing factors for insomnia severity. Lower education has been considered as a sociodemographic risk factor for insomnia and lower sleep quality in previous studies [11, 12], associated with the susceptibility to psychological and social stressors in less-educated populations [10]. In addition, age, as the second demographic factor, could predict insomnia severity. Consistent with this result, previous studies have demonstrated t that older patients will develop more severe insomnia [e.g., 11].
Depression emerged as one of the strongest predictors of insomnia severity in this study. In fact, it has been demonstrated that depression is usually accompanied by somatic symptoms and poor sleep, which, in turn, may exacerbate insomnia severity [68]. In line with our result, EO Bixler, AN Vgontzas, HM Lin, A Vela-Bueno and A Kales [69] showed that depression, followed by female gender, was the strongest variable predictive of insomnia in a sample of general population. Additionally in our study, anxiety was positively correlated with ISI; however, unexpectedly, it was not a significant predictor of insomnia severity, which is in contrast to previous evidence [70–72]. This difference may stem from different characteristics of the samples. For example, our study only included patients diagnosed with insomnia, while the abovementioned studies were on general population, patients with cancer, and military personnel. Hence, potential differences in the level of anxiety and insomnia in these different groups might be the cause of this discrepancy. Nonetheless, further examinations are needed to explore the nature of the link between these two variables in the presence of transdiagnostic variables.
Both cognitive reappraisal (ERQ) and expressive suppression (ERQ) indicated significant correlations with insomnia severity, which is consistent with previous findings [73, 74]. However, only cognitive reappraisal (ERQ) was a significant predictor of insomnia severity, which emphasizes the exclusive effect of emotion regulation strategies on insomnia severity. One possible explanation might be that although cognitive reappraisal during the day can regulate emotions via problem solving and negative affect management, it may play a negative role at bedtime by increasing sleep onset latency and reducing sleep quality [75].
Neuroticism was shown to be another significant transdiagnostic factor for predicting insomnia severity; this is in line with previous findings [see 76, 77]. High levels of neuroticism reflects negative emotions, guilt, moodiness, and poor active control in a person, leading to pre-sleep cognitive distortions, such as worrying, and active thinking at bedtime, which can be associated with over-excitation and hypersensitivity [31]. This lack of capability to stop or manage thoughts at night can lead to insomnia [78].
Psychological inflexibility indicated a high significant correlation with insomnia severity (r = .80), which is consistent with previous studies [79, 80]; however, it had no predictive role in our study. When a person engages in “experiential avoidance,” they may actively avoid experiencing symptoms or cognitions related to their sleep problems. This active avoidance may increase pre-sleep arousal and, as a result, lead to a delay in falling asleep [81]. Nevertheless, our study indicates that in the presence of other transdiagnostic factors which may be better predictors of insomnia severity, psychological inflexibility could not significantly predict insomnia.
This study, in line with previous studies [82, 83], found a significant but weak association between perfectionism and insomnia severity. Also, its two components of personal standards and evaluative concerns could significantly predict insomnia severity. Maladaptive perfectionism may lead to heightened insomnia through its association with excessive arousal [84] and chronic fatigue [85], which are thought to be amplifying factors for insomnia [86, 87]. Furthermore, perfectionists with chronic insomnia unrealistically expect to have excellent quality sleep and become extremely anxious or frustrated with any sleep deprivation. This may cause them to experience negative emotions, leaving them emotionally aroused, which can interfere with their sleep [88].
The present findings suggest that two anxiety sensitivity dimensions – namely physical and cognitive concerns – could predict insomnia severity, with physical concerns (ASI) being the strongest predictive factor among all the present transdiagnostic variables. This association is consistent with previous studies [89, 90]. According to AG Harvey [78]’s cognitive model, people with elevated anxiety sensitivity are more alert to the physical and cognitive signs and symptoms associated with poor sleep and are more likely to discover these signs and symptoms. As a result, they catastrophize these cues as predictors of insufficient sleep, an inability to fall asleep, or low levels of daily performance, which in turn, heighten a person’s arousal and increase the likelihood of sleep disturbance. In contrast to physical and cognitive concerns, social concerns failed to predict insomnia severity. In general, the previous findings on the sub-dimension of social concerns are scarce, perhaps because the body of research has concentrated only on physical and cognitive concerns [e.g., 39].
The study findings indicated that repetitive negative thinking had a strong correlation with insomnia severity. It was also a significant predictor of insomnia severity, which is consistent with previous studies [24, 25]. According to AG Harvey [78]’s cognitive model of insomnia, excessive worry and rumination (two components of repetitive negative thinking) about sleep, as well as long-term unresolved problems experienced during the day and night, result in attentional bias to sleep-related negative information, which trigger psychological arousal, and subsequently delay falling asleep.
Study Limitations And Future Directions For Research
Although our study provides new insights into the transdiagnostic factors that can predict insomnia severity, several limitations should be noted when drawing conclusions from our data. First, self-report measures are exposed to bias, owing to common method variance [CMV; 79]. Other methods, including actigraphy or daily sleep diaries, are suggested as alternatives, as well as conducting longitudinal studies to limit the effect of potential CMV biases [see 91]. Second, examining a clinical sample limits the generalizability to other samples. Thus, the findings must be interpreted cautiously. Future studies should examine our results in different samples (e.g., college students). Third, the majority of study participants were women. Although insomnia is more common in women than in men [13], we suggest that future studies consider equal number of men and women in their sample. This may increase the generalizability of their results to both male and female patients with insomnia and also provide the opportunity to explore the potential gender differences. Forth, low Cronbach’s alpha estimates for AAQ-II, CPQ, and BFI-10 may raise doubt about the reliability of these questionnaires. Therefore, the finding related to these constructs must be interpreted cautiously. Finally, the cross-sectional design used in this study prevents any causal conclusion. Research with longitudinal design is needed to further establish the role of transdiagnostic factors in insomnia severity over time.