Cultural adaptation and validation of Sinhala version of Modified Caregiver Strain Index

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2245252/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Cultural adaptation and validation of Sinhala version of Modified Caregiver Strain Index

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2245252/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 04 Nov, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Palliative Care →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Care givers of Palliated patients are at risk of adverse physical, psychosocial and emotional sequelae in varied nature. Efficient and valid assessment tools facilitate early detection to take corrective measures. The Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI), composed of domains associated with caregiver strain is a simple and brief tool that can be used in both clinical and field settings. This study aims to adapt and validate this in order to cater effective palliative care services in Sri Lanka.

Methods

After cross-cultural adaptation, 200 primary caregivers in 3 teaching hospitals were recruited. The internal consistency, item-total correlations, of the 13-item S-MCSI were performed. The criterion validity was assessed by Pearson correlation between the total scores of S-MCSI, the Karnofky Performance Scale and the Barthel index. Construct validity was determined by the principal component analysis keeping the Varimax with Keiser normalization as the rotation method. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistics were also performed to determine the adequacy of the sample and correlations between items, respectively. The number of factors was determined by the Scree plot, percentage of variance explained by each component and number of Eigen values over 01 (Kaiser-Guttman rule).

Results

The total MCSI score ranged 0 to 26. The overall Cronbach’s alpha of the 13-item questionnaire was 0.80 while item-total corrections ranged 0.34 to 0.62, exception of one item (0.11). Inverse correlations were demonstrated in total scores of MCSI and Karnofky Performance Scale (r =- 0.32, p < 0.001) and Barthel index (r =-0.34, P < 0.001). A Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.79 (p < 0.001) for Bartlett’s test indicated adequate sampling and nonlinearity of factors. The Scree plot showed a three-factor structure explaining 57% of the variation. Items regarding personal wellbeing of caregiver loaded together while the effects on the family loaded separately. Adjustment of personal concerns and family issues along with time alteration grouped as the third factor.

Conclusions

The study showed that the Sinhala version of MCSI has adequate psychometric properties and reliability to be used as a validated tool to estimate the caregiver burden within a short time period for any health care workers.

Palliative Care

Caregiver Strain

Caregiver Burden

Caregiver Strain Screening Tools

Caregiver Burden Screening Tool

Modified Caregiver Strain Index

Palliative care is an organized interdisciplinary care approach intended to enhance the quality of life of patients with life-threatening illnesses as well as their families [1]. A family caregiver or informal caregiver refers to an unpaid family member, friend, or neighbour who provides care to an individual. The cared individual may have an acute or chronic condition needing assistance to manage a variety of tasks such as physical activities of daily living, administering medications, tube feeding, home oxygen delivery etc [2]. In addition to the patients, palliative care plans should incorporate informal caregivers since a terminal or incurable illness can potentially affect other members of the family. It is well-documented that family caregivers are prone to adverse physical, psychological, social and emotional sequelae [3]. These can potentially affect their well-being and quality of life. Hence, palliative care plans should be holistic, individualised and family-centred [4]. This is required as families with such patients need to make various adjustments and sacrifices to cope with the increased workload and stressors. Regular communication with family caregivers, especially information provision, is shown to lessen the burden of the caregiver. This is an important aspect of end-of-life care [5].

In Sri Lanka, there is a deficiency of pragmatic care guidance with suboptimal information delivery. This is due to poor awareness, lack of cooperation from healthcare workers and restricted provision of technical equipment for caregivers of palliated patients. The enhancement of awareness and improvement of non-technical skills of health care professionals are likely to be beneficial in the alleviation and prevention of caregiver burden. Recent studies have highlighted the need of estimating the impact of caring on caregivers to recognize the additional burden cast upon them [6]. This will assist in reducing their burden through early recognition and timely interventions [7].

McDonald et al, in an interventional study, found that caregiver quality of life is greatly determined by the interaction with the patient and the authors recommended measuring the quality of life of caregivers with specific questionnaires that include content related to confronting mortality and professional supports. [8].

The palliative care needs of cancer patients and their family caregivers are not adequately studied in Sri Lanka. A previous study by Ramadasa, et al. in a suburb of Sri Lanka has highlighted the hardships faced by family caregivers including financial difficulties, loss of income, transport difficulties, inability to engage in routine activities, and negative impact on job and education [9]. It was also revealed that the domiciliary caregivers of cancer patients have inadequate knowledge, experience and skills to provide palliative care. Malignancy is the second commonest cause of hospital mortality in Sri Lanka and epidemiological data have shown an upward trend in the incidence of malignancies in the country. Furthermore, the overall incidence of cancer has doubled over the past 25 years in Sri Lanka [10]. This will lead to a considerable burden on health care systems, supportive services and families of those affected. Hence family-based palliative care programs should be expanded to meet the increased demand.

The current palliative care programs in Sri Lanka do not incorporate an assessment of caregiver burden. This gap can be attributed to both poor awareness and the lack of validated and reliable tools to estimate the caregiver burden in the local community. The Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI) represents a set of domains associated with caregiver strain. This is a simple tool developed by Thornton and Travis (2003) with a limited number of questions that can be used in the community as well as in busy clinical settings [11].

The MCSI has been culturally adapted and validated in many countries to estimate caregiver strain in numerous conditions [12]–[14].

Consenting primary caregivers of palliated cancer patients from three cancer care units in Sri Lanka; Apeksha Hospital at Maharagama and Teaching Hospitals at Rathnapura and Colombo South were recruited for the study. Assuming 80% power of the study, Cronbach’s alpha for the null hypothesis of 0.5 and expected Cronbach’s alpha of 0.7, a sample of 190 was required. We recruited 200 primary caregivers of patients who presented to the study settings by purposive sampling method.

In selecting caregivers, patients with advanced malignancies directed for palliative care were considered regardless of the type and site of malignancy. Patients who were in remission or were being treated with curative intent were excluded. Caregivers were interviewed without the presence of patients and other members of the family in a place where privacy could be maintained. Data were collected by medical officers who were informed about the study and trained to collect the necessary information.

The cross-cultural adaptation of the MCSI was performed adhering to the standard guidelines described by Beaton et al [15]. The original English version was translated into the Sinhala language by two independent health professionals conversant in both languages. One person was informed of the details of the study while the other was not. The two translations were consolidated into one document by the principal investigator in the presence of the two translators. This was done to improve the clarity, ease of comprehension and unambiguity of the items. This version was reverse-translated to English by two different health professionals to determine the comparability with the original version. A group of experts consisting of two physicians, one oncologist and one community physician together with the principal investigator reviewed the translated questionnaire to ensure clarity, face validity, content validity and semantic equivalence.

The pre-final version was piloted among 30 caregivers selected from two study centres to ensure the internal consistency of the questionnaire. The final version (S-MCSI) was administered to 192 consented caregivers of patients with incurable malignancies, undergoing palliative care in study settings. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants before data collection. The tool was an interviewer-administered questionnaire without prompting. The Karnofky Performance Scale and the Sinhala-translated version of the Barthel index were also used in data collection[16].

The internal consistency of the 13-item S-MCSI was examined with Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlations. The criterion validity was assessed by Pearson correlation between the total scores of S-MCSI, the Karnofky Performance Scale and the Barthel index. Construct validity was determined by the principal component analysis keeping the Varimax with Keiser normalization as the rotation method. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (KMO) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistics were also performed to determine the adequacy of the sample and correlations between items, respectively. The number of factors was determined by the Scree plot, the percentage of variance explained by each component and the number of Eigen values over 01 (Kaiser-Guttman rule). Items were considered representative of a component if their item loading was ≥ 0.40 and in the cross-loading items, the factor, which had a higher loading value, was considered to determine the positioning of the respective factor.

Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka. The study was performed adhered to the ethical standards stated in the Declaration of Helsinki [17].

A total of 200 caregivers (74% women) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 46.2 (15.1) years completed the S-MSCI. Sixty-eight per cent of the primary caregivers were children while 30% and 2% were spouses and other relatives, respectively.

The mean age (standard deviation) of patients (64% women) undergoing palliative care was 62.0 (12.4) years.

The total S-MCSI score ranged from 0 (three subjects) to 26 (two subjects). The overall Cronbach’s alpha of the 13-item questionnaire was 0.80 while the item-total corrections varied from 0.34 to 0.62, except for item 12 which showed a correlation of 0.11 (Table 1).

Table 1

Corrected item-total correlations of the 13 items in the S-MCSI
Item number	Item	Corrected item-total correlation	Cronbach’s alpha if the item is deleted
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13	Sleep is disturbed Inconvenience Physical strain Confining Family adjustments Change in personal plans Other demands on time Emotional adjustments Upsetting behaviour Upsetting change of self Work adjustment Financial strain Complete overwhelmed	0.46 0.45 0.54 0.62 0.52 0.59 0.35 0.45 0.51 0.45 0.49 0.11 0.38	0.79 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.79 0.78 0.80 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.83 0.80

In criterion validity analysis, inverse correlations were observed between the total scores of S-MCSI and Karnofky Performance Scale (r =- 0.32, p < 0.001) and Barthel index (r =-0.34, P < 0.001). Factor analysis showed a KMO value of 0.79 (p < 0.001) for Bartlett’s test indicating adequate sampling and nonlinearity of factors. The principal component analysis (Eigenvalue > 1) and the Scree plot (Fig. 1.) showed a three-factor structure explaining 57% of the variation. Items 1, 2, 3, 8, 9 and 10 loaded on factor 1, while items 4 to 7 loaded together on factor 2. Items 12 and 13 are loaded separately on factor 3 (Table 2).

Table 2

Rotated component matrix showing factor loading
Item number	Item	Factor 1	Factor 2	Factor 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13	Sleep is disturbed Inconvenience Physical strain Confining Family adjustments Change in personal plans Other demands on time Emotional adjustments Upsetting behaviour Upsetting change of self Work adjustment Financial strain Complete overwhelmed	0.51 0.62 0.73 - - - - 0.84 0.80 0.48 - - -	- - - 0.73 0.84 0.81 0.48 - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - 0.86 0.83

The Scree plot in determining the number of factors is shown below (Fig. 1).

The high demand for care results in a huge burden. There is also stress generated due to empathetic suffering. There is a feeling of being overwhelmed and enduring financial and physical burdens [18]. The utilisation of caregiving within the family and how it is being trained have been studied. Caregiving in a home setting is an important component of patient care, while this experience is a noteworthy component that needs to be addressed to reduce the burden on the caregiver with the provision of appropriate support [19]. Studies by Schulz and Ugor have stated a multitude of care recipient-related determinants of caregiver strain including behaviour problems, functional disabilities and cognitive functions of the care recipient and the duration and intensity of care provided. [3] [14]. Most of these factors are potentially modifiable or avoided if sufficient attention is paid.

Caregiver assessment tools are required to identify the individual needs that are poorly identified. An efficient and valid method permits early detection of these needs and strains to take remedial actions. Furthermore, screening tools are helpful to identify those that are at high risk [20].

Most studies conducted to assess or screen the burden of caregiving have used quantitative measures which are not so effective and valid in measuring the gravity of the problem. The attitudes and commitment of caregivers and the stresses experienced in the process are likely to vary between cultures due to the differences in values, beliefs and attitudes. A cultural adaptation is therefore much needed when translating a tool into a different language.

Many tools related to caregiving have been translated into different languages to suit local populations (need a couple of references). This is logical as the needs of care recipients and the strain on caregivers are likely to vary in different cultures and ethnicities. The S-MCSI will identify different stressors faced by caregivers who are conversant in Sinhala. Subsequently, this information can be used in designing palliative care plans in Sri Lanka.

Our analysis demonstrates that the S-MCSI has adequate psychometric properties to be used as a validated tool to estimate the caregiver burden. The short time required to fill in the information and the convenience of administration allows a range of health care professionals including doctors, nurses and even social workers to gather this information.

The systematic translation and validation process ensured that the S-MCSI has psychometric properties similar to the original MCSI. While the original English version had an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90 [11], the Turkish[14] and Malaysian versions[13] showed marginally lesser internal consistencies of 0.77 and 0.79, respectively. These values are concordant with the internal consistency of 0.80 we observed. The factor analyses of S-MCSI have shown varying results and this could partly be due to the cultural and religious variations of study subjects. We observed a 3-factor structure of the questionnaire

The item-total correlations seen in this analysis show a high level of measurement reliability. In the factor analysis, items regarding the personal well-being of the caregiver such as effects on sleep, inconvenience, physical and mental strain and emotional adjustment loaded together (factor 1) while the impact on the family showed different loading (factor 2). Furthermore, adjustment of personal concerns and family issues along with alteration of time demands loaded together as factor 3.

The Turkish validation study showed a 4-factor structure which the authors had described in terms of themes [14]. We observe that such similar themes emerge in our study as well. It is noteworthy that factor 1 of S-MCSI was comparable to combined factors 2 and 3 of the Turkish version which were themed as ‘upsetting’ and ‘inconvenient’. The items in factors 2 and 3 of the Sinhala version were similar to Turkish factors 1 and 4, described as ‘adaptation’ and ‘overwhelming’ respectively.

We observe that there is some reluctance of caregivers to discuss the financial strains involved with caregiving and this again can be due to cultural and religious factors. The main religions practised in Sri Lanka; Buddhism, Christianity, Islam and Hinduism highlight the importance of love and care, particularly for those who are sick. These values are inculcated very early in life and may determine the way caregivers handle the pressure and strain associated with the long-term caregiving of their loved ones. Furthermore, patients with malignancies, especially those who are incurable, receive the sympathy of people and it is not uncommon for caregivers of cancer patients to show more resilience.

We conclude that the S-MCSI is a valid tool to estimate the burden and stress among Sinhala-conversant caregivers of cancer patients in Sri Lanka. This will help in identifying the caregivers who are under stress and their need to provide professional assistance to mitigate. Furthermore, measures to reduce the burden on caregivers can be included in holistic family-centred palliative care plans.

The current study has a few limitations. The study sample included only the caregivers of cancer patients selected from three study locations. The applicability of this tool to caregivers of patients with other diseases such as end-stage kidney and liver disease needs to be established. Similarly, the questionnaire needs to be translated into Tamil to be validated as it is another national language of Sri Lanka. The questionnaire needs to capture various ethnic communities separately as each community may be speaking 1 or more official languages in Sri Lanka. Further qualitative studies should be done to identify and analyse culturally unique thoughts and emotions [18].

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for this experimental protocol had been obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka (ERC/FOM-SUSL/2021-A-07-10). Informed written consent to participate and publish data have been taken from each respondent. There was no intervention involved in this study but rather gathering of data from respondents which were done according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the approval of the above ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent to publish data have been taken from each respondent.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

There are no competing interest.

Funding

No external funding has been obtained for the project. All expenses have been borne by the authors.

Authors' contributions

U.R., S.S., U.U., S.P. and S.L. designed the study. U.U. and S.P. collected data. U.R., S.S. and S.L. analysed and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We extend our acknowledgement and thanks to all the study participants.

(WHO) WHO. Palliative-Care @ Www.Who.Int. Cuidados Paliativos 2020.
Reinhard SC, Given B, Petlick NH. Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); n.d., p. 14.
Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am J Nurs. 2008;108:23–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000336406.45248.4c. quiz 27.
Onyeka TC. Psychosocial issues in palliative care: a review of five cases. Indian J Palliat Care. 2010;16:123–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.73642.
Ateş G, Ebenau AF, Busa C, Csikos Á, Hasselaar J, Jaspers B, et al. “Never at ease” - family carers within integrated palliative care: a multinational, mixed method study. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0291-7.
Liu Z, Heffernan C, Tan J. Caregiver burden: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020;7:438–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.07.012.
Bee PE, Barnes P, Luker KA. A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:1379–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02405.x.
McDonald J, Swami N, Pope A, Hales S, Nissim R, Rodin G, et al. Caregiver quality of life in advanced cancer: Qualitative results from a trial of early palliative care. Palliat Med. 2018;32:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317739806.
Ramadasa GU, Pathirana GK, Karunathilake R, Perera MC, Siriwardhana L, Jayasekera CJ, Thaibudeen MA, Ranaweera SPAL, De Silva REE. Carer perception of palliative care service at Provincial General Hospital, Ratnapura. J Ceylon Coll Physicians. 2017;47:76–81. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.4038/jccp.v47i2.7787.
Control PNC. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Data Colombo District, Sri Lanka (Population Based Cancer Registry) 2013–2019. 2nd Edition. Colombo: National Cancer Control Program; 2021.
Thornton M, Travis SS. Analysis of the reliability of the modified caregiver strain index. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58:127-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.2.s127.
Ribeiro O, Brandão D, Oliveira AF, Martín I, Teixeira L, Paúl C. The Modified Caregiver Strain Index: Portuguese version. J Health Psychol. 2021;26:1597–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319883933.
Ramasamy MS, Rahimah I. Madon Zaina Zarshat. A Validity Study of Malay-translated Version of the Modified Caregivers Strain Index Questionnaire (M-CSI-M). Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies n.d.;3:217–25.
Ugur O, Fadiloǧlu C. “Caregiver strain index” validity and reliability in Turkish society. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:1669–75.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
Lekamwasam S, Karunatilake K, Kankanamge SKP, Lekamwasam V. Physical dependency of elderly and physically disabled; measurement concordance between 10-item Barthel index and 5-item shorter version. Ceylon Med J. 2011;56:114–8. https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v56i3.3603.
Association WM. WMA DECLARATION OF HELSINKI – ETHICAL PRINCIPLES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS n.d.
Bastawrous M. Caregiver burden–a critical discussion. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:431–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.005.
Zarit SH, Whitlatch CJ. Institutional placement: phases of the transition. Gerontologist. 1992;32:665–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/32.5.665.
Chan E-Y, Lim Z-X, Ding YY, Chan YH, Lim WS. Development of a Brief Caregiver-centric Screening Tool to Identify Risk of Depression among Caregivers of Hospitalized Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23:578–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1197-7.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 04 Nov, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Palliative Care →

Editorial decision: Major revision
12 Aug, 2023
Reviews received at journal
10 Aug, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
04 Aug, 2023
Reviews received at journal
11 Mar, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
07 Mar, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
07 Mar, 2023
Reviewers invited by journal
07 Mar, 2023
Editor assigned by journal
04 Jan, 2023
Editor invited by journal
22 Nov, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
22 Nov, 2022
First submitted to journal
07 Nov, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Cultural adaptation and validation of Sinhala version of Modified Caregiver Strain Index

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Figures

Introduction

Methodology

Results

Discussion & Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1