In order to generate mature, efficiently cleaved, functional Envs, the HIV-1 Env, following synthesis in the ER, has to traverse through the Golgi/trans-Golgi network to the plasma membrane during which it undergoes proteolytic processing as well as post-translational modifications (25, 39). The endosomal system is a complex network that sorts cargoes to different subcellular compartments like export from endosomes through retrograde transport pathways, recycles to the plasma membrane and transports them to the lysosome for degradation (40). HIV-1 Env undergoes retrograde transport during intracellular trafficking of Env in a retromer-dependent manner (28) and disrupting retromer integrity affects Env incorporation into nascent virions (28). This led us to study the transport/trafficking of the efficiently cleaved Envs 4 − 2.J41, JRCSF and JRFL Envs to understand whether they behave differently which may give insights into their differential properties.
We isolated EE (early endosomal) and LE (late endosomal) fractions from transfected 293T cells and demonstrate a defect in transport from the EE to LE compartments by western blot, leading to accumulation of the protein in early endosomal fractions, in case of 4 − 2.J41∆CT and JRCSFΔCT Env proteins but not in JRFL∆CT Env protein. These results suggest that retrograde transport of naturally occurring, efficiently cleaved Envs depend on their CT. Thus, retrograde transport of 4 − 2.J41∆CT and JRCSFΔCT Env proteins, whose CT deletion affects their ET integrity, are also affected by CT truncation. However, this is not the case with JRFL∆CT Env whose retrograde transport remains unaltered upon CT deletion and whose ET antigenicity/conformation also remains unaffected by CT truncation. It is to be noted here that we observed less Env in LE fractions as compared to EE fractions for both 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs but not JRFL Env which may be due to 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs entering the lysosomal degradation pathway.
We also evaluated the role of the highly conserved hydrophilic domain (CHD) or Kennedy epitope (KE) in the CT of Envs (22, 41), which restores cell surface ET conformation/antigenicity of 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs (24), in retrograde transport and found that indeed restoration of the CHD/KE-containing region in 4 − 2.J41ΔCT753 and JRCSFΔCT759 Envs restored the wild-type retrograde transport pattern in early and late endosomal fractions. Based on our data we hypothesize that viruses containing different efficiently cleaved Envs may be using different pathways for viral assembly and release (Fig. 6). While viruses containing Envs like 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF may be using the endosomal pathway for assembly and release, JRFL containing viruses are likely using the plasma membrane. This differential effect is dependent on the conserved hydrophilic domain (CHD) or Kennedy epitope (KE) of 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs which may be interacting with host cellular proteins involved in retrograde transport from the EE to LE compartments, a process necessary for proper assembly and release of viruses containing these Envs. Envs like JRFL which do not show a detrimental effect of CT deletion on ET integrity may have a different mechanism and/or different interaction partners and viruses containing this Env is assembled and released from the plasma membrane. We have previously shown that the known major motifs in the C-terminal tail of 4 − 2.J41, JRFL and JRCSF are conserved (24) suggesting that some novel mechanism(s) must be involved in these differential effects. One possibility is that two alternative models have been proposed for the orientation of the CT, particularly the CHD/KE (41), which may lead to different interaction partners and mechanisms leading to different transport pathways.
To further corroborate our findings, we studied the effect of the retrograde transport inhibitor Retro 2 on cell surface expression and formation of viral particles containing these Envs. Upon treatment with the retrograde transport inhibitor Retro 2, cell surface expression of 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs increased suggesting diversion of these proteins towards the plasma membrane pathway instead of the retrograde transport pathway. Treatment with Retro 2 caused a decrease in pseudovirus particles containing 4 − 2.J41 and JRCSF Envs suggesting that these Envs may be using the retrograde transport pathway for assembly and release. Diversion of these Envs from the retrograde transport pathway causes a reduction in pseudoviral particle formation. JRFL Env, on the other hand, had a different effect. Although we did not observe a significant change in cell surface expression, we did observe an increase in pseudoviral particle formation which may be due to diversion of the protein towards the plasma membrane pathway, the pathway which leads to assembly and release of viruses containing Envs like JRFL. Our results also suggest that these efficiently cleaved Envs have different mechanisms and pathways of transport and assembly of Envs leading to formation of viral particles. It is to be noted here that different HIV-1 isolates show different tropism for CD4 T cells and macrophages (42). Assembly and release of HIV-1 virions in T cells and macrophages seem to differ (42). While in T cells it occurs at the plasma membrane, in macrophages viruses assemble in late endosomes/multivesicular bodies (MVB) and are released either by late endosome fusion with plasma membrane or bud into the lumen of endocytic organelles which are then released as exosomes via fusion of MVB with plasma membrane (42).
Our studies are limited to these Envs as the number of efficiently cleaved Envs that have been identified is very limited. In future, these studies can be expanded to more efficiently cleaved Envs when they are identified. We have used a 293T cell transfection system for studying the properties of these efficiently cleaved Envs as this cell line and its derivatives are commonly used for cell surface antibody binding studies, pseudovirus production, virus-like particle production and protein immunogen production. While overexpression systems have their own limitations, they can still provide important initial insights into mechanisms and pathways. In future, it will be important to study the mechanisms and pathways that regulate different properties of these efficiently cleaved Envs, that we demonstrate here, in other cell lines including those that are physiologically more relevant to HIV-1 e.g. T cell lines.