Neuroendocrine carcinomas refer to a group of heterogeneous malignant tumors that can develop in organs and tissues throughout the body, which are predominantly located in the gastrointestinal or respiratory tract[4]. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) originating in the urinary tract is very rarely found, accounting for less than 0.05% of the cases, with high proliferative and invasive, that are frequently detected at an advanced stage at the time of detection in the most cases[5,6]. The most common type of urinary neuroendocrine carcinoma is small cell carcinoma, followed by large cell carcinoma, which often occurs together with other cancerous components [7]. In 1986, Aboza et al. first described large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary system and considered it related to adenocarcinoma [8].
Grossly, the tumor is usually grayish-white and presents as a nodular or papillary mass within the ureter that invades the ureteral wall[9]. Diagnoses of primary urinary tract LCNECs are based on the criteria proposed for pulmonary LCNECs, which include the following: 1) Tumors have the morphological characteristics of neuroendocrine carcinoma (organoid nesting, palisading, rosettes, or trabeculae); 2) High mitosis activity; 3) Necrosis (usually over a large area). 4) Non-small cell carcinoma cytologic features, such as large cells, low ratio of nucleus to cytoplasm, vesicular or fine chromatin and/or frequent nucleolus. Some tumor cells with fine chromatin and lack nucleoli, but are rich in cytoplasm due to the large size of the cells still qualify as non-small cell carcinomas. 5) Positive immunohistochemical staining for one or more neuroendocrine markers, and / or neuroendocrine granules appear under electron microscopy[6]. The tumor histiocytic morphology of the patient in this case report is consistent with the appearance of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and postoperative immunohistochemistry showed that the neuroendocrine cell marker CD56 was diffusely positive, synaptophysin was partially positive, and the Ki-67 proliferation index was more than 80%, which met the criteria above. After excluding metastatic tumor, the diagnosis of primary ureteral large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was considered.
Given normal neuroendocrine cells have not been found in the urinary tract, the histogenesis of large cell neuroendocrine cell carcinoma in the urinary tract is not well understood [10]. At present, there are four most widely accepted hypotheses about the origin of this tumor. They believe that the tumor originates from (1) pluripotent urothelial stem cells, (2) neuroendocrine cells originally existing in submucosa or normal urothelium, (3) urothelial metaplasia, and (4) transformation of urothelial cancer cells [11-14]. More than 50% of urinary neuroendocrine cancers are found to be associated with other cell forms, such as urothelial carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The immunohistochemical heterogeneity of neuroendocrine carcinoma revealed by epithelial and neuroendocrine determinant staining to some extent supports the pluripotent stem cell theory [15]. However, the evidence provided by Chang MT et al. shows that the genomic changes in bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma are more like urothelial carcinoma than small cell lung cancer, which indicates that the carcinogenesis mechanism of neuroendocrine carcinoma is organ specific, which supports that urothelial neuroendocrine carcinoma originates from normal or metaplastic neuroendocrine cells of urothelial mucosa in a certain way [16]. It is important to differentiate bladder LCNEC from metastatic LCNEC originating from other organs, poorly differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma or lymphoma showing local extension, and primary bladder tumors such as high grade urothelial carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. 1) Metastatic tumors: it is necessary to refer to clinical history or chest computed tomography to exclude primary tumors in the lungs and other places. 2) High-grade urinary tract cell carcinoma: the tumor with poor differentiation and accompanied by small cell morphology needs to be distinguished. The immunohistochemical staining of high-grade urinary tract cell carcinoma does not express neuroendocrine markers, but expresses urothelial-specific markers. 3) Poorly differentiated prostate cancer or Locally invaded lymphoma, which can be distinguished by combining cell morphology and immunohistochemistry[17].
From our review of the literature, we found that up to 36% of cases had large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma accompanied by other cancerous components. It is not difficult to see that the concomitant occurrence of neuroendocrine cancer and other cancerous components is not an accident. Therefore, we support the introduction of the concept of mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) because it describes this phenomenon from a special perspective.[18]
The clinical manifestations of ureteral neuroendocrine carcinoma are diverse, among which the most common are low back pain and hematuria [19]. Ultrasonography can detect hydroureter caused by obstruction, but it is not sensitive to the detection of primary focus. Intravenous urography and retrograde urography can confirm the existence of lumen mass by showing the filling defect of urinary tract. However, in order to accurately judge the primary focus, spiral CT or magnetic resonance imaging is a better choice. Urinary tract neuroendocrine carcinomas rarely develop in the ureter. Due to the lack of specific imaging manifestations of large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract and the low positive rate of urine exfoliated cells, final diagnosis still depends on postoperative histopathology and immunohistochemistry[20].
According to the research of Ouzzane et al., they argue that the long-term prognosis of patients with the upper urinary tract neuroendocrine carcinomas in stage pT1-2 is better than that of patients in stage pT3-4, and adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial to the prognosis of patients [21]. Studies from N.W. Choong et al., M. Mukesh et al., D.N. Church et al. and N.S. Majhail et al. also confirmed that patients with urinary system neuroendocrine cancer benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy [22-25]. In a recent study of 70 patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, Nakasato T et al. believe that chemotherapy and radiotherapy combined with surgical therapy are likely to improve prognosis of patients with stage T1–2 [26]. Similarly, in the report of Dowd et al., a case of bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma did not recur within one year after treatment with surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy [27]. Coincidentally, according to data from the National Cancer Database, radical cystectomy plus chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were associated with better OS in the treatment of bladder endocrine cancer compared with monotherapy [28].
Like small cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma of ureter has a rapid course of disease and poor prognosis. Ureteral large cell carcinoma is a very rare tumor. At present, there is no specific treatment scheme. However, considering the good response of its lung counterpart to the standard chemotherapy scheme and the experience of the cure of related urinary large cell carcinoma by chemotherapy [29], we argue that platinum-based chemotherapy is effective for it and patients can benefit from it. The multimodal treatment scheme of surgery combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is the current standard scheme for the treatment of ureteral neuroendocrine carcinoma.