Data Acquisition and Processing
All the data utilized in this investigation have public access. Gene expression data and clinical history were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the GTEx databases. Then, to normalize raw expression data the Robust Multiarray Average was applied, and 58 genes associated with ferroptosis were selected.
Immunohistochemical Staining
SQLE staining was carried out on 149 OC tissues, 14 ovarian junctional ovarian tumors, and 6 benign ovarian lesions via the ABC Immunostaining program (Solebro, China). According to the blind randomized staining intensity assessments and stained cells percentage, microarrays were scored by 2 independent researchers. On a scale of 0 to 3; 0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = moderate, and 3 = strong. The percentage of positive staining cells ranged from 0 to 4: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), and 4 (76–100%). Final product scores were 0 to 12, and if the final SQLE expression score was ≥ 6 it was declared positive.
Cell Culture
Normal human ovarian epithelial cell lines (IOSE-80) and human OC cell lines SKOV-3, OVCAR3, ES2, A2780, HEY, and HO8910 were utilized in this investigation. A2780 and HO8910 cells were propagated in RPMI-1640 media. SKOV-3 in McCoy's 5A media, and ES2 and HEY cells in DMEM. All the mediums were augmented with 10% fetal bovine serum. All cultures were put in the incubator with a moist atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO2. The above cell lines were purchased from Pricella, Wuhan, China( https://www.procell.com.cn )All of them passed STR identification and mycoplasma detection.
ROS Detection
ROS levels in OC cells were evaluated by probe 2 ', 7'-DCFH-DA (Beyotime), this probe is oxidized to dichlorofluorescein (highly fluorescent) by intracellular oxygen. The cells were kept in dark augmented with a 10µM DCFH-DA for 30 minutes in the aforementioned incubator, followed by ice-cold PBS rinsing, thrice. Then the cells were re-dissolved in PBS (300µL) and their fluorescence intensity was determined by the flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), using FlowJo X 10.0. 7 Software.
Immunofluorescence Staining
A 24-hole plate was propagated with cells by a prearranged cell clamp, rinsed thrice with PBS, followed by fixation using 4% poly-formaldehyde for 15 minutes, and then transfused for 5 minutes in 0.1% Triton X, followed by overnight (4°C) incubation with an anti-incubation regimen targeting SQLE (diluted 1: 200), GPX4 (diluted 1: 200), ACSL4 (diluted 1: 200), COX2 (diluted 1: 200), NOX1 (diluted 1: 200), and for 1 hour with FTH1 (diluted 1: 200) at room temperature. Then, cells were kept in Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated dizumab (dilution 1: 1,000) with 4', 6-diamidine-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at environmental temperature for 2 hours. Images were acquired via the fluorescence microscope.
shRNA knockdown of SQLE
A lentiviral shRNA vector was constructed, directed at the SQLE coding region sequence (GCATTGCCACTTTCACCTA) and this was used to establish SQLE-knockdown in SKOV3 and HEY cells. Successfully established knockdown cells were separated by puromycin resistance selection.
Quantitative Proteomics Based On Tandem Mass Spectrometry Tags
We useQ-Exactive HF for proteomic analysis, and then use ProteomeDiscoverer 2.4.1.15 (ThermoFisher Scientific).The software searches qualitative and quantitative data according to the search results, and performs expression level analysis and function analysis respectively after quality evaluation and preprocessing. Several common databases were used to annotate and analyze the identified proteins.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
qRT-PCR was performed as previously described (14) Primers used were:
human SQLE forward: TGA CAA TTC TCA TCT GAG GTC CA; human SQLE reverse: GAG GGA TAA CCC TTT AGC AGT TTT; human GPX4forward: GAGGCAAGACCGAAGTAAACTAC; human GPX4 reverse: CCGAACTGGTTACACGGGAA; human ACSL4 forward: CATCCCTGGAGCAGATACTCT; human ACSL4 reverse: TCACTTAGGATTTCCCTGGTCC; human COX2 forward: CTGGCGCTCAGCCATACAG; human COX2reverse: CGCACTTATACTGGTCAAATCCC; human NOX1forward: TTGTTTGGTTAGGGCTGAATGT; human NOX1 reverse: GCCAATGTTGACCCAAGGATTTT; human FTH1forward: CCCCCATTTGTGTGACTTCAT; human FTH1 reverse: GCCCGAGGCTTAGCTTTCATT; human GAPDH forward: ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC; human GAPDH reverse: TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA
Western Blot Analysis
Western Blot Analysis
This analysis was carried out and quantified by the protocol described previously[19]. The following antibodies were utilized for probing the membranes; SQLE (proteintech Cat No. 12544-1-AP), GAPDH (proteintech Cat No. 60004-1-Ig), GPX4 (Affinity, catalog: DF6701), ACSL4 (Affinity, catalog: DF12141), COX2 (Affinity, catalog: AF7003), NOX1 (Affinity, catalog: DF8684), and FTH1 (Affinity, catalog: DF6278). The secondary antibody was HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse (proteintech Cat No. SA00001-1) and goat anti-rabbit (proteintech, Cat No. SA00001-2).
C11-BODIPY Staining
Cells were propagated in 6-well plates, followed by 30 min of 10µM C11-BODIPY (Thermo Fisher Scientific) treatment. The fluorescence intensity of C11-bodipy staining was assessed via the BD LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
Animal Experiments
Female BALB/c nude mice were selected for this investigation and categorized as sh-ctrl group (administered with SKOV3 cells) and sh-SQLES1 group (administered with SQLE knockdown SKOV3 cells). In the right dorsum of each mouse ̴ 0.2mL of a cell suspension (1000 × 104 cells) was administered. After the experiment ended, digital calipers were used to determine the size of the tumor in each mouse. The tumor volume was assessed every 5 days by calculating the width and length. 30 days later, each mouse was executed and the tumor tissue was removed and weighed. The nude mice used in this experiment were anesthetized with isoflurane gas using a small animal gas anesthesia machine in the injection of ovarian cancer cells and the dissection of tumor body. When the experiment was terminated, the nude mice were killed with chloral hydrate overdose anesthesia.Animal handling was performed according to institutional guidelines.
Statistical Analysis Of Cell Culture Experiments
Excel and Prism 9 (Graphpad software) were utilized for performing statistics. All experiments were repeated thrice minimum of three replicates per condition. Intergroup comparison was assessed and statistical significance was evaluated via two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.