Questionnaire respondents
Twenty seven questionnaire responses (approximately 2.7% of potential respondents) were received. Twenty of the respondents were in the age group 18-24 years old, with seven aged 25-34. There was an approximately equal sex representation of respondents, with 14 (51.85%) being female. Both Universities and year groups were represented in the responses, with 4 from 2nd year and 1 from 5th year at Keele University, whilst 14 were from 2nd year and 8 from 5th year at QUB. Most participants were involved in sport, with 20 having been going to the gym regularly, 15 playing football/soccer, 10 cycling and swimming, 9 athletics, 8 badminton, and 7 rugby in the past 2 years. Indeed, on average, participants were doing 5 days of sport/physical activity in the previous week prior to questionnaire completion and on average, spending at least 30 minutes per day doing these activities. Of note, 10 study participants had suffered at least one concussion, 7 whilst playing sport, whilst 17 had no personal experience of a concussion.
Questionnaire responses
Ten (37%) people could not correctly identify the definition of a concussion, with 3 people not classifying concussion as a brain injury and one respondent (incorrectly) reporting that concussions can be seen on neuro-imaging. Five people incorrectly identified that to make the diagnosis of a concussion, a loss of consciousness is required. A number of respondents also incorrectly identified signs and symptoms of concussion, with 7 reporting that a fixed dilated pupil was a sign, 5 prolonged coma, 4 hemiparesis and papilledema and 3 intention tremor. Eighteen respondents also incorrectly identified that 3 or more symptoms had to be present to make the diagnosis of concussion.
In terms of the mechanism of injury for concussion, 7 felt (incorrectly) that a direct physical contact to the head was required for the diagnosis and 2 (wrongly) felt that a concussion was caused by damage to brainstem. For the management of concussion, one respondent felt that a concussed player can return to play in the same game or practice if examined by a physician; 11 felt the standard mini mental status exam at initial assessment is an adequate cognitive test for concussion; whilst 1 respondent felt that a MRI of the brain is mandatory following a concussion, whilst 5 felt that a CT brain was mandatory.
Red flags following a concussion
When asked about some of the “red flags” that may predict the potential for more prolonged symptoms and may influence investigation and management of concussion, 11 felt a nose bleed and 2 being hit on the left side of the head were “red flags”.
Long term consequences of concussion
For the long term consequences of repetitive concussive injury, 14 felt that there was an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke and 4 felt there was an increased risk of schizophrenia.
Previous undergraduate concussion teaching
When asked about undergraduate teaching for concussion, 11 (41%) said they had never received any concussion teaching. Other respondents reported that they had received concussion teaching, 8 by lecture and 1 during their clinical placement in A&E, during a Special Study Module (SSM), clinical teaching during a brain injury clinic and finally, one when working in a rugby club. Only 5 (18.5% of respondents) had actually seen a concussed patient, with only 2 (7.4%) students having seen a patient with post-concussive syndrome. When asked to grade their concussion knowledge, from 1 (inadequate) to 10 (completely adequate), the average score was 3.7.
Future medical school concussion teaching
When asked to grade concussion as something they wanted to learn more about as part of their medical curriculum and asked to score this 1 (not at all) to 10 (very much), the average score was 8.4. When asked about their preferred learning format, 17 said lecture, 7 seminar and 3 a workshop. Meanwhile, for resources the medical students are most likely to use to find out further information about concussion, 15 said Google, five PubMed, four using a relevant textbook, two Up-to-date (which can be found https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en-gb/solutions/uptodate) and one would use National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Knowledge Summary (CKS) guidelines.
Challenges facing doctors when diagnosing and managing concussion
When asked about the challenges, if any, facing physicians when diagnosing and managing a concussion, free text comments could be grouped into six subthemes:
1) Uncertainity
- Uncertainty around diagnosis.
- Wide variety of possible symptoms. Delayed presentation.
- It is difficult to diagnose and distinguish from other neurological conditions, E.g. A fixed dilated pupil could suggest a bleed in the brain, tinnitus, dizziness and vertigo could suggest an otopathy.
- Defining the severity confidently.
- Difficulty in getting an accurate history.
- They can be so varied in severity and recovery.
- Symptoms are vague, so recognition of the concussion (is difficult). Ability to rule out other, potentially more serious causes of symptoms.
- Doing this survey made me realise how little I know as a second year about concussions. Given how common they are I feel it would be useful to make them a more core part of the curriculum to give us a good foundation when it comes to placements.
- No definitive diagnosis - symptoms can be vague and non specific. If sustained in sport a lot of the time concussions may not be diagnosed or taken seriously leading to sportspeople continuing to play.
- Variety of symptoms experienced.
- Not witnessing concussion event. Unable to get clear history from patient. Blurred diagnostic lines.
- Heterogeneous presentation and patient can appear well
- Often a desire to return to sport or pressure if in a professional sport setting. Also signs and symptoms can be delayed and not initially evident.
- Dealing with patients post impact and not being present at the time of injury. Mixed history and inconsistent pre-hospital management from other healthcare professionals particularly in sports such as rugby.
2) SRC is not a serious injury
- Lack of attendance at EDs or GPs as may be perceived as not serious.
- Patient co-operation, they may think it is just a minor injury.
- Recognising and acknowledging the seriousness of concussion.
3) People participating in sport not wanting to be labelled with the ‘sick role’
- People don’t like to go to hospital, especially those who want to play sport.
4) Don’t want to be told not to play sport
- Most people know if they get diagnosed they can’t play for a period of time.
5) Missing a more ‘serious’ head injury
- Worry about missing a more serious injury vs over investigating.
- Recognising red flags.
- Knowing whether to scan or not.
- Complications/ differential diagnosis.
6) Insufficient concussion teaching during medical school
- I do not recall receiving any formal teaching on concussion during my undergraduate studies.
- Not having enough experience in diagnosing concussion.
- Inadequate knowledge (of concussion).