Generational Effect on Nurses’ Work Values, Engagement, and Satisfaction in an Acute Hospital

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2252361/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Generational Effect on Nurses’ Work Values, Engagement, and Satisfaction in an Acute Hospital

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2252361/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 30 Mar, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Nursing →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background:

The present nursing workforce comprises four generational of nurses working side-by–side. While such generation blend adds invaluable diversity to the workforce, it also brings added complexity. The study aimed to describe and summarise work values and attitudes of four nursing generations, namely Baby boomers, Generation X, Y and Z.

Method:

A cross-sectional questionnaire study was adopted. A total of 778 nurses from an acute hospital in Singapore had completed the online questionnaire. The Work Value and Attitude scale measuring seven constructs (Work Centrality, Non-compliance, Technology Challenge, Work life balance, leadership, Power, and Recognition) was employed for data collection.

Results:

The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.714 for the overall instrument. Statistically significant differences amongst the four generations of nurses emerged in the Work Value and Attitude scale in the construct of non-compliance (p=0.007), technology challenge (p=0.027), work-life balance (p<0.001), and recognition (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences noted for the rest of the constructs.

Discussion and Conclusion:

The findings of this study highlights that differences in work values and attitudes exist amongst nurses of different generations. Generation-X are less likely to challenge the conventional norm and supervisors. Generation Y and Z are the most tech-savvy generations and can adapt quicker to new technology. There is also greater emphasis for work-life balance as the generation gets younger. Generation Y and Z nurses perceived that younger nurses do not get the due respect and recognition form their colleagues. Acknowledging the generational differences in work values and attitude can facilitate nursing management to tailor strategies to improve individual and organisation performance while creating a work environment that enhance intergeneration harmony and teamwork.

Generational effect

Generational differences

Values

Engagement

Satisfaction

Baby Boomers

Generation X

Generation Y

Generation Z

Among global scholars and practitioners, diminishing levels of employee work engagement has been one of the most alarming global economic phenomena which engender declining work performance and increasing employee turnover rates [1]. Work engagement, often defined as a “positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigour, dedication and absorption” [2], has been shown to coincide with high levels of individual and organizational performance standard, client satisfaction, job satisfaction, and employee retention [3, 4]. In the nursing context, further analysis also revealed that outcomes of nurses’ work engagement were decreased hospital mortality rates and significantly higher financial profitability of organizations [5]. With the continuous expansion of global competition, work engagement is an crucial driver of organisational success. Hence, researchers and human resource experts are increasingly focused on work engagement as a strategy to enhance the overall functionally of the organization and individuals so as to leverage organisational competitive edge [6].

A generation cohort is described as a group of individuals who share certain life stages and experiences during the same historic time frame [7]. The present nursing workforce comprises four generational cohorts that possesses unique values and traits. The nursing professional at a generational crossroad is experiencing an increasing share of nursing workforce predominated by Generation Y/Millennials born between the years 1994 and 1980, and Generation Z born between years 1995 to 2015 [8, 9]. Existing generations of the nurses include Baby Boomers born between the years 1944 to 1964, and Generation X, born between 1965 to 1979. There are prevalent beliefs about the existence of generation differences of work engagement in the workplace. Although research has shown that differences between work engagement and meaningful work amongst generational cohorts exist, results are still inconclusive as much research conducted were focused on the retiring cohort of Baby Boomers and Generation X [10].

Individuals in a generation cohort are born and share similar experiences of some major external events that attaches and shape the individual’s values and attitudes. These emerged values have significant effect on their lifestyles and remain relatively permanent throughout their lives [11]. As a result, the Generation Cohort theory espouses homogeneity of this group of individuals as similar historic and social happenings create cohesiveness, influences, and underpins much of daily attitudes, engagement, and long-term behaviours [12, 13]. With unique values, beliefs, and lifestyles which distinguishes one generational cohort from another, such generational diversity will certainly add complexity to the workforce and challenges to providing optimal care delivery in the healthcare setting [14]. However, nursing leaders can view these differences in values and behaviours as potential strengths. With better understanding of generationally driven variables, these insights can be leveraged upon to develop effective strategies to maintain the diverse yet shrinking nursing workforce. Generational differences can also be capitalized and employed to create positive work environments as well as enhance quality and productivity to foster better patient care delivery. As generational differences become significantly more crucial as a diversity factor, a better understanding of the dynamics between work engagement and meaningful work across different generational cohorts is imperative to design the right approach for each organisation’s distinct parameters [15]. Therefore, this study aims to explore the differences in work values, attitudes, and engagement of different generational frontline nurses.

a. Sampling

Data for this study was collected from full-time employed frontline nurses aged 21 years and above, including both registered and assistant nurses of a 795-bed general and acute care hospital in Singapore – Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. To attain the objective of this study, stratified sampling method was adopted in which reported number of nurses in the hospital (n=1364) was stratified into four strata to provide a precise and representative sample based on the projected proportion of Baby Boomers, generation X, Generation Y/Millennials, and Generation Z nurses. A power analysis was performed which determined a minimum sample requirement of n=769 nurses with parameters set to achieve statistical significance level of 0.05 and power level of 0.80. To reduce sample bias considering that studies have revealed significant impact of job designation on work values and attitudes [16] , this study aims to obtain a representative sample reflecting the proportion of job designations (5% Nursing supervisors, 79% Registered nurses, and 16% Assistant nurses) as well as the proportion of generation cohorts (4% Baby boomers, 7.2% Generation X, 68.4% Generation Y, and 24% Generation Z),

b. Data collection

Data collection was performed using a two-section survey. The first section collected un-identifiable demographic characteristics of the participants including age group (generation cohort), gender, ethnicity, nationality, religion, marital status, children, designation, educational qualification, and years of working experience. The second section was a cross-sectional, self-administered survey adapted from the study by Gursoy, Chi, and Karadag [17]. The Work Value and Attitude Scale comprises 25 items reflecting seven constructs of work attitude, values and engagement - Work Centrality (five items), Non-compliance (four items), Technology Challenge (three items), Work-life Balance (five items), Leadership (two items), Power (four items), and Recognition (two items). Each of the 25 subscales within the instrument uses a 5-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 to 5 , with score 1 representing strongly disagree, score 2 disagree, score 3 neural, score 4 agree, and score 5 strongly disagree.

Considering the restrictions to physical contact due to the COVID-19 pandemic and varying shifts of frontline nurses, the survey was transcribed and administered through an online platform - form.gov.sg. In accordance with procedures approved by ethics review board, an electronic mail was sent to all nursing supervisors within the institution to disseminate the study information to frontline nurses in all inpatient wards, accompanied by a participant information sheet and study recruitment poster which embedded a QR code for participants to assess the online questionnaire at convenience.

c. Data analysis

Quantitative data were analysed through SPSS, using descriptive statistics to analyse the demographics of the sample and multiple tests to obtain inferential statistical data. A Cronbach Alpha’s reliability test was conducted to measure reliability of each of the seven constructs in the Work Value and Attitude Scale. A Cronbach Alpha value of .60 to .70 indicates an acceptable level of reliability and .80 or greater an excellent level [18]. The Shpiro-Wilks test for normality was performed to assert symmetry of the sample means. As the result of the normality assumption test also indicated that the data are not normally distributed with p-value of <0.001 for all dimensions, non-parametric statistical tests were employed for further analysis of the data collected. Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests were then conducted to establish if there were any significant differences among different generation cohorts in each construct of the work value and attitude scale, and further elucidate if other demographical factors significantly impact nurses’ work values and attitudes. For binary variables such as gender and children, the Mann Whitney U test was employed to identify differences between groups. To identify significant differences, the Dunn’s post hoc test was performed for categorial variables that were significant which tested all possible 2-way comparisons of the medians between subgroups. Although significant differences between gender and children groups were noted in several constructs, no post hoc tests are available for binary variables.

d. Ethical considerations

This study has been approved by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB) and permission to conduct the study was obtained from the chief nurse of the hospital. The participant information sheet described the purpose of the study, and provided contact information of the principal investigator should respondents have any additional questions. The administered online survey was anonymous as data collected involved no data attributable to personnel identification. As explicitly indicated in the participant information sheet, completion of the online survey indicated the participants’ implied consent to participate in the study. All data collected through the online platform was encrypted end-to-end and stored in encrypted format, ensuring that only researchers can access and view responses with a private digital key. Upon completion of data collection, all data were kept in a hospital password-protected computer.

Of the 1364 full-time nurses employed within all inpatient wards, 778 (57%) responses were obtained at baseline. Although the obtained sample met the minimum requirement of 769 nurses to achieve statistical power, among the 778 participants, three (0.38%) participants had missing data and were hence excluded from further analysis. Table 1 presents the demographic profile of the analysed sample (n = 775). As presented in Table 1, the Generation Y cohort (Age 26 to 40 years) accounted for 68.8% of the respondents. Majority of the respondents were females (92%), of Chinese (44.1%) ethnicity, Singaporean (38.6%), attained a Bachelor’s degree in Nursing (60.6%), and had 6 to 10 years of working experience (35.7%). While a diverse number of religions were reported among the respondents, majority were Catholics (34.5%) or Christians (24.5%). Additionally, although 70.5% of the respondents had reported not having children, only 59.1% of the respondents were reported to be single. The obtained sample was also relatively proportionate to the projected population of frontline nurses in terms of the designations and four generation cohorts in the hospital (Table 2 and Table 3).

Table 1

Demographic profile of respondents
Variable		Frequency (n)	Median	Percentage (%)
Age	Baby Boomers: 56 to 76 Years	36	80	4.6
	Generation X: 41 to 55 Years	28	79	3.6
	Generation Y: 26 to 40 Years	533	82	68.8
	Generation Z: 21 to 25 Years	178	85	23.0
Gender	Male	62	85.5	8
	Female	713	82	92
Ethnicity	Chinese	342	83	44.1
	Malay	111	84	14.3
	Indian	85	81	11.0
	Filipino	220	82	28.4
	Others	17	87	2.2
Nationality	Singapore	299	84	38.6
	Malaysia	163	83	21.0
	China	48	78	6.2
	Philippines	221	82	28.5
	Others	44	80.5	5.7
Religion	Buddhist	149	82	19.2
	Islam	116	84	15.0
	Hindu	49	81	6.3
	Christian	190	82.5	24.5
	Catholic	267	82	34.5
	Others	4	82	.5
Marital Status	Single	458	83	59.1
	Married	307	81	39.6
	Divorced/Separated	9	88	1.2
	Widowed	1	87	.1
Children	Yes	229	81	29.5
	No	546	83	70.5
Designation	Enrolled Nurse	125	82	16.1
	Staff Nurse	604	83	78
	Nursing Officer	46	81	5.9
Educational Qualification	Certificate in Nursing	50	83.5	6.5
	Diploma in Nursing	235	83	30.3
	Bachelor’s Degree	470	82	60.6
	Master’s Degree	17	82	2.2
	Others	3	76	.4
Years of Experience	< 2 Years	145	85	18.7
	2 to 5 Years	218	83	28.1
	6 to 10 Years	277	83	35.7
	11 to 20 Years	103	80	13.3
	> 20 Years	32	80	4.1

Table 2

Projected and sample proportion of job designation
Designation	Projected proportion	Sample
Supervisors	5%	5.9%
Staff Nurses	79%	78%
Assistant Nurses	16%	16.1%

Table 3

Projected and sample proportion of generation cohort
Generation Cohort	Projected proportion	Sample
Baby Boomers	4%	4.6%
Generation X	7.2%	3.6%
Generation Y	68.4%	68.8%
Generation Z	24%	23%

The Cronbach’s alpha tests established adequate to excellent reliability of all seven constructs, with Cronbach’s alpha scores between .70 and .817, except for the “work centrality construct” (.663) and “technology challenge construct” (.604). Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test presented in Table 4 revealed statistically significant differences among generational cohorts in four constructs – non-compliance, technology challenge, work-life balance, and recognition. Generational effects of each of the seven work value and attitude constructs are discussed below.

Table 4

Median score of generational cohorts for the seven work values and attitude constructs
	Baby Boomers	Generation X	Generation Y	Generation Z	p-value
Work Centrality
Median	19	19	19	19	0.951
Non-Compliance
Median	12	11	12	12	0.007
Technology Challenge
Median	7	7	6	8	0.027
Work-Life Balance
Median	16	17	18	21	< 0.001
Leadership
Median	8	8	8	8	0.564
Power
Median	12	12	12	13	0.117
Recognition
Median	4.5	4	5	6	< 0.001

Work centrality

The first factor “work centrality” refers to an individual’s perception of the job’s importance and job orientation which encompasses job security, idealism, professional development, and promotion. Primary analysis revealed no significant differences between the generational cohorts on work centrality (p = 0.951).

Non-compliance

“Non-compliance” deals with extrinsic behaviour including the need to challenge conventional workplace norms, rules, and management. Significant generational differences were found in the “non-compliance” construct (p = 0.007). Median scores for the construct of non-compliance were similar across all generational groups (median = 12) except for Generation X – age 41 to 55 years (median = 11). To further elucidate significant differences between the generational groups, results of the post hoc test showed significant differences in the median scores for the “non-compliance” construct between Generation Y and Generation Z (p = 0.042), Generation Y and Baby boomers (p = 0.024), as well as between Generation X and Baby boomers (p = 0.019). With the lowest non-compliance score, these results suggest Generation X as most compliant to rules and regulations as compared to the younger generations.

Technology challenge

“Technology challenge” refers to the impact of technology on individuals’’ work. Significant generational differences in technology challenge was also reported (p = 0.027). Median scores for the “technology challenge” construct were similar among the older generations (median = 7), while Generation Y and Generation Z revealed lower median scores (median = 6). These results suggest that Generation Y and Generation Z are the most tech-savvy generations and can adapt quicker to new technology as Generation Y were the first wave of digital generation born into the world of technology while Generation Z were born into a highly developed digital era.

Work-life balance

“Work-life balance” emphasizes on the need for distinct separation of work and personal life, including priories and importance of work. Significant differences in work-life balance was reported among the different generational cohorts (p < 0.001) which post hoc test revealing significantly different median scores for the “work-life balance” construct between all generational cohorts (p < 0.001). The results revealed that there is a greater emphasis for work life balance as the generation cohort gets younger as evidenced by the increasing median work-life balance scores from Baby Boomers to Generation Z. This suggests that younger generations possess high expectations for a healthy work-life balance as they value flexibility and freedom in their workplaces while the older generations holds greater emphasis on discipline and hard work.

Leadership

“Leadership” focuses on the individual’s need for leadership and direction at work. No significant differences among the generational cohorts were reported on leadership (p = 0.564). Median scores between all groups were consistent (median = 8).

Power

“Power” refers to the tendency of individuals striving for power, control, and to be in command of their own task as well as others. No significant differences were found between generational cohorts for the construct “power” (p = 0.117). All groups also reported similar median scores (median = 12) except Generation Z (Median = 13).

Recognition

Lastly, “recognition” emphasizes on the perception of individuals on the younger generation. This factor suggests that younger nurses are not respected or treated like a kid due to their age. There were significant differences among generations for recognition (p < 0.001). Median scores for the construct “recognition” varied between all four generational cohorts whereby Generation Z had the highest median score (median = 6) while Generation X had the lowest median score (median = 4). Post hoc tests revealed significant differences in median scores between all generational cohorts and the Baby Boomer generation. In addition, significant differences in median scores were also identified between Generation X and Generation Z (p = 0.033). These results suggest that Generation Y and Generation Z nurses perceive that younger nurses do not get their due respect and recognition (p < 0.001).

The aim of this study is to explore the differences in work values, attitudes, and engagement of different generational frontline nurses. With the in-depth knowledge of intergenerational work value, attitude, and engagement differences, this study seeks to provide strategies to improve work environment and conditions to encourage intergenerational harmony and teamwork among nurses.

The findings of this study revealed generational differences in the constructs of non-compliance, work-life balance, and recognition relating to nurses’ work values, engagement, and satisfaction. Compared to the other 3 generational cohorts, Generation X had lower median non-compliance scores which suggests lesser need to challenge workplace norms such as dress code, flex time, employee-supervisor relations, cliche rules, and management. This finding is deemed to have significant implications on managerial styles including workplace flexibility relating to work hours, shifts, and incentives. The result is supported by Stevanin et al. [19] which indicated that Generational X had the lowest scores with regards to flexibility while Generation Y had the highest score is also revealed in the present study whereby post-hoc test results revealed significant differences in non-compliance scores of the Generation Y cohort with Generation Z and Baby Boomers. In contrast to the other generations, the Generation Y cohort values flexibility, is adaptable to change, participates in discovering of new knowledge, challenging their own and other’s assumptions [20] in which it may be seen as a generational-specific attitude which entails more considerations by nursing leaders in the workplace. The lack of due consideration may result in tension, friction, and conflict among employees thereby decreasing job satisfaction and productivity. Managers need to understand individuals from different generational cohorts possess varying value sets and hence synergize the strengths of the cohorts to successfully engage intergenerational groups for workplace harmony. For instance, organisational flexibility can be leveraged upon to enhance performance and productivity especially in healthcare environments with resource restraints whereby flexible work practices can effectively and efficiently cover staffing needs such as short-term leaves of absence [21]. Flexibility of work practices can be conserved as a diversity initiative to retain a move diverse workforce which caters to the generational diversity, needs, and priorities of nurses.

Additionally, results of this study suggests that the older generations including the Baby Boomers and Generation X presented higher technology challenge scores as compared to the younger Generation Y and Generation Z. Findings are consistent with existing literature that Generation Y and Z are quick to adapt new technology as they are born into the age of technology, virtual space, and social media [22]. This can be employed as strengths in the organization whereby technology is embraced through skills upgrading and technological advancements. Tailored training may be provided to the pioneering generations such as Generation X and Baby Boomers to upgrade their skills and knowledge in the use of technology, while younger generations including the Generation Y and Generation Z nurses whom are highly qualified and adaptable to the use of new technology may be empowered as champions in healthcare technological advancements to improve and streamline care processes with the use of new technology.

Results of the present study further revealed a statistically significant difference and positive correlation between the younger generations and the need for work-life balance. While baby boomers presented with the lowest scores for the work-life balance construct, Generation Z presented with highest scores in addition to the power construct. This requires significant consideration in the leadership and management of the younger generation nurses as it reveals that despite the need for separation of work and personal life adopted by the younger generation, there is nonetheless a strive for power, authority, and organization of their task and duties. Nevertheless, it is essential to consider the demographical factors which influences the work value and attitudes of individuals including supervisory and upper level managerial positions. Considering that majority of the supervisory and managerial positions are attained by baby boomers and the Generation X cohort with substantial working experience in the organization or speciality, it may be challenging for them to understand the work value and attitudes of the younger generation of nurses hold greater value to their personal life. Hence, consideration of what is most valued and prioritised by different generational cohorts may be an effective strategy for administrators in the approach of management and retention of the younger generation cohort while maintaining work satisfaction. Sherman, Saifman, Schwartz, and Schwartz [23] further supports that although younger generational cohort nurses such as the millennials do recognize the importance of nursing leadership in the delivery of patient care, work-life balance is a significant deterrent to the role. As Singapore and the international healthcare system faces a shrinking nursing workforce, it is crucial to not only retain but to also empower the younger generations which forms the largest generation within nursing to find their place in nursing leadership.

However, findings have also elucidated concerns towards support and respect towards the younger generation of the nursing workforce. Generation Y and Z which represents the youngest of the nursing generational cohort had presented with the highest recognition scores which suggested feelings that individuals do not get the due respect or consideration because of their age. Hence, intergenerational collaboration is critical that not only are the younger generational cohorts be willing to take on shared responsibility to shape the future of the profession through power and leadership, autonomy through the sense of independence and opportunities, as well as guidance such as through mentorship to bridge the knowledge and experience gap from the older generations are also essential.

Just as any other study, this study has limitations. As data of this study are gathered using a self-administered online survey though convenience sampling, results may not be the most representative of the studied hospital although the sample is relatively proportionate to the projected population of frontline nurses in the studied hospital, reflecting the proportion of the four generation cohorts and designations in the hospital. Additionally, as the study was only conducted in one local governmental hospital, findings may not be generalized to other healthcare organizations such as private hospitals due to differing operational policies and human resource management. Future studies should consider a larger scale sample involving multiple healthcare organizations and may also seek to study other factors that may possibility impact the work attitude and values of nurses including different specialization roles such as the intensive care and emergency department. Moreover, considering that this study had elucidated multiple demographical variables such as gender, ethnicity, working experience, and educational qualifications which have reported significant differences in the various work attitude and values, future studies may further examine the socio-demographical impact on work attitudes and values among the different generations.

In conclusion, results of this study elucidates that there are significant multigenerational differences in work attitude and values among frontline nurses. Knowledge and understanding of these generational differences and similarities are crucial and should be actively considered by administrators or managers to foster a harmonious inter-generational working environment while leveraging on these values and attitudes to increase productivity while retaining staff. Findings suggest that the younger generation including millennials and generation Z work to live with greater emphasis on work-life balance, while the older generational cohorts including baby boomers live to work with greater commitment to their jobs. The younger generation cohorts also desire greater power and autonomy at work with recognition and respect despite their young age. Identification of these generational differences and issues will also allow nursing leaders to better strategize approaches such as workplace flexibilities relating to shifts, working hours, and incentives to better cater to the needs of the different generational cohorts while increasing employee work satisfaction, morale, and care delivery to patients.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval have been obtained by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (DSRB) and permission to conduct the study was obtained from the chief nurse of the hospital. All methods of the study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

The participant information sheet described the purpose of the study, and provided contact information of the principal investigator should respondents have any additional questions. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

No funding was required for this study

Authors’ contributions

Both authors analysed and interpreted the data collected from the questionnaires. The main manuscript text and figures were written and prepared by Tan S.H.E. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Chalani Udhyami Ubeynarayana, Statistician, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital

Motyk B. Employee engagement and performance: A systematic literature review. Int J Econ Manag. 2018;54:227-44. doi:10.2478/ijme-2018-0018
Schaufeli WB, González-Roma MSV, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2015;3:71-92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326
Osborne S, Hammoud MS. Effective employee engagement in the workplace. Int J Appl Manag Tech. 2017;16:50-67. doi:10.5590/IJAMT.2017.16.1.04
Yang X, Feng Y, Meng Y, Qiu Y. Career adaptability, work engagement, and employee well-being among Chinese employees: The role of guanxi. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1-12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01029
Bargaliotti L. Work engagement in nursing: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2011;68:1414-24. doi:j.1365-2648.2011.05859.x
Guest D. Employee engagement: A sceptical analysis. J Organ Eff. 2014;1:141-56. doi:10.1108/JOEPP-04-2014-0017
Kowske BJ, Rasch R, Wiley J. Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. J Bus Psychol. 2010;25:265-79. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9171-8
Chicca J. A new generation of nurses is here: Strategies for working with Generation Z. Am Nurse Today. 2019;14:48-50.
Ludwig CM, Geisler AN, Fernandez JM, Battaglia G, Andorfer C, Hinshaw MA. The challenge of change: Resilience traits in Women’s Dermatological Society Forum participants by generation. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6:277-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.06.005
Coburn AS, Hall SJ. Generational differences in nurses’ characteristics, job satisfaction, quality of work life, and psychological empowerment. J Hosp Adm. 2014;3;124-34. doi:10.5430/jha.v3n5p124
Ting H, Lim T, Run EC, Koh H, Sahdan M. Are we Baby Boomers, Gen X and Gen Y? A qualitative inquiry into generation cohorts in Malaysia. Kasetsart J Soc Sci. 2018;19:109-15. doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.06.004
Biggs S, Lowenstein A. Generational intelligence: A critical approach to age relations. London: Routledge; 2011.
Christensen SS, Wilson BL, Edelman LS. Can I relate? A review and guide for nurse managers in leading generations. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26:689-95. doi:10.1111/jonm.12601.
Moore JM, Everly M, Bauer R. Multigenerational challenges: Team-building for positive clinical workforce outcomes. Online J. Issues Nurs. 2016;21. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man03
Hoole C, Bonnema J. Work engagement and meaningful work across generational cohorts. J Hum Resour Manag. 2015;13:1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v13i1.681
Hegney D, Plank A, Parker V. Extrinsic and intrinsic work values: Their impact on job satisfaction in nursing. J Nurs Manag. 2006;14:271-81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00618.x
Gursoy D, Chi CG, Karadag E. Generational differences in work values and attitudes among frontline and service contact employees. Int J Hosp Manag. 2013;31:40-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.002
Ursachi G, Horodnic IA, Zait A. How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Econom Financ. 2015;20:679-86. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9
Stevanin S, Palese A, Bressan V, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Kvist T. Workplace-related generational characteristics of nurses: A mixed-method systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74:1245-63. doi:10.1111/jan.13538
Hendricks JM, Cope VC. Generational diversity: what nurse managers need to know. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69:717-25. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2648.2012.06079.x.
MacPhee M, Borra LS. Flexible work practices in nursing. Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 2013.
Andrea B, Gabriella H, Timea J. Y and Z generations at workplaces. J Compt. 2016;8:90-106. doi: 10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Sherman RO, Saifman H, Schwartz RC, Schwartz CL. Factors that lead Generation Y nurses to consider or reject nurse leader roles. NursPlus Open. 2015;1:5-10. doi:10.1016/j.npls.2015.05.001

No competing interests reported.

WorkValuesandEngagementQuestionnaire.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 30 Mar, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Nursing →

Editorial decision: Major revision
05 Jan, 2023
Reviews received at journal
05 Jan, 2023
Reviewers agreed at journal
28 Dec, 2022
Reviews received at journal
27 Dec, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
25 Dec, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
30 Nov, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
27 Nov, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
27 Nov, 2022
Editor invited by journal
21 Nov, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
21 Nov, 2022
First submitted to journal
08 Nov, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Generational Effect on Nurses’ Work Values, Engagement, and Satisfaction in an Acute Hospital

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

1. Background And Introduction

2. Research Methodology

3. Results

4. Discussion

5. Limitations

6. Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1