We followed the approaches for conducting the current study based on the Cochrane handbook of systematic reviews on interventions [6]. During the drafting of our manuscript, we strictly followed the recommended reporting items for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. [7]
Search Strategy
The following electronic databases were systematically searched: Pubmed, Cochrane, Medline, Scopus, and WoS till 27 Oct. 2022. We used the following search strategy in the previously mentioned databases: ((Monkeypox) AND (cardi* OR Heart OR myocarditis or cardiomyopathy)). All the included studies’ references were screened to avoid missing any studies and guarantee high-quality screening.
Eligibility Criteria
We included the studies following the eligibility criteria as follow: any patient has cardiac complications (myocarditis, pericarditis, pericardial effusion or myopericarditis) after monkeypox infection, the study design included any original study design (case reports، case series, cohort, etc.). On the other hand, we excluded non-human studies, conference abstracts, review, and non-English studies.
Screening And Study Selection
Using Endnote software (version X20.4.1), we collected the different records from the different databases and removed duplicates. To determine the relevancy, the retrieved references were examined. The screening was done in two steps; title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening for final eligibility. Two independent authors conducted the screening, and after comparing their findings, group discussions were used to settle any differences.
Data Extraction
The following data was extracted from the included studies by two independent authors. Study ID, Setting, Study design, Sample, Age, Male gender, Presenting symptoms (Systemic, Non-systemic, and Cardiac), History of vaccinations, History of other infections, Homosexual/bisexual/MSM (Yes/No), Route of transmission, Immunocompromised (Yes/No), Treatment (Monkeypox and Myocarditis), Duration of hospitalization, and Investigation (Monkeypox, Myocarditis, and Follow-up). Arguments were later resolved through group discussion.
Quality Assessment
The quality of included studies was assessed using the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for case reports and case series. The tool assesses the quality of each study at the level of nine domains. Each domain, as well as the overall quality, is given a rating of good, fair, or poor [8]. Two independent authors assessed the quality of the included studies and arguments were later resolved through group discussion.
Data Synthesis
Qualitative analysis was done by collecting and summarizing non-numerical data to understand symptoms, criteria and how to manage the cases of mankeypox associated with cardiac complications.