NATR has been an important challenge to surgeons for a long time, due to the high rate of misdiagnosis of AATR more than four weeks 2. A large amount of scar tissue filled in the gap between the proximal and distal ends of the ruptured Achilles tendon, which will take a negative impact on the normal reconstruction of the tendon. Thus, an operation removing this scar tissue for a better functional recovery was required undoubtedly. However, the conventional operation repairing the Achilles tenon always need to perform a large skin incision. Therefore, a minimally invasive surgical approach that can complete the clear tissue is the direction that surgeons have been exploring.
Various operative techniques have been reported to repair NATR with a good outcome 8, 9, 19–22. For instance,V-Y tendon plasty combined with gastrocnemius aponeurosis turndown restoring the tendon length was reported by Bilgin et al. for repairing tendon defects of 4 to 6 cm successfully22. Furthermore, a case report published by Leitner et al. demonstrated that a tendon defect of up to 10 cm was treated by V-Y advancement in three patients23. Although such studies have illustrated the obvious recovery effect via the conventional open techniques, the perplexing complications that might be related to the large traumatic surgeries were not difficult to notice. In contrast, some researchers demonstrated that patients have a better functional recovery with more mild muscle injuries and low complications via minimally invasive technique24–28. However, the clinical outcome of patients with NATR who underwent a minimally invasive surgical approach still needs to evaluate furtherly. In the present study, we compared the 25 patients who underwent the conventional open operation (V-Y tendon plasty) with the 21 patients who were treated by the two separate minimally invasive surgical approaches that have been reported in our previous research to provide an experience for the operative selection to treat in NATR.
In this study, the minimally invasive surgical technique involved two joint incisions in the shape of a longitudinal flipped scythe or letter “J” is currently our technique of choice for repairing AT partial injury in NART patients, as we feel the additional biological properties of the minimal incision are important for the higher activity demands14, 17, 29. In this study, the two incisions were disconnected and shortened to approximately 3.5cm respectively16. Along the gap between the surface projections of Kager’s triangle and the posterior tibial artery to the border of Kager’s triangle, the curves were extended by the distal sections; the proximal sections stopped at 12-14cm approximately above the AT insertion on the posterior calcaneus. The liner sections' length of the incisions was almost 3-4cm. The veins which supply blood to the wound to promote healing were protected by this particular incision shape effectively. In addition, the separation of the proximal ends of the ruptured tendons from the surrounding tissues to pull out the tendon for tension-free suturing should be avoided to minimize the impact on the local blood circulation.
Apart from the above advantages, there was a modest impact on the local blood circulation, rapid recovery of sports function, and fewer complications are reported in the minimally invasive surgical approach too. In the eye of anatomy, the blood circulation of AT depends on the posterior tibial and peroneal arteries through the tendon sheath arteries. Besides, the sheath arteries were nourished by the proximal peroneal artery, which connects with the posterior tibial artery to supply sheath arteries to the heel together, in the middle of the surface projection of Kager's triangle (at the same horizontal level of the ankle joint). Since that, there are traffic veins between the saphenous and the small saphenous. Unfortunately, these veins are in the great possibility of damaged unavoidably when V-Y tendon plasty was performed, which will put a negative impact on tendon healing further. In our observation, compared with the conventional approach of the V-Y tendon plasty technique, the minimally invasive technique provides a better situation for patient’s postoperative exercise with less blood loss and short operation time (Table 2).
Complications related to the avascular nature of the posterior midline or “S” incision, are common, including high skin tension after suturing and wrinkled heavily, increasing the chance of necrosis of skin as well as soft tissue infection, which may cause tendon exposure eventually. In group A, there were three cases of soft tissue infection, two cases of superficial infections, and one case of deep infection, and there was one case of tendon exposure. In group B, there was one case of Achilles tendon re-rupture (Table 2). The same results have also been reported by Bąkowski et al. that patients who underwent traditional open techniques might be associated with a higher risk to develop the necrosis of skin and infection10. Furthermore, the pressure caused by the shortened Achilles tendon will act on the incision surface of conventional open operation, which may affect the healing of the incision, and increase the incidence of Achilles tendon exposure. And the functional exercise of plantarflexion can exaggerate the pressure and wrinkling of the skin further, which may increase the chance of infection16. The high rate of postoperative AT defects in largely invasive technique was reported by Mafulli et al., resulting in 20% of patients underwent a free gracilis tendon graft procedure and peroneus brevis tendon transfer was performed in 6% of patients30, 31. On the other hand, the study published by Mafulli et al. achieved a good outcome as operating peroneus brevis tendon transfer with minimally invasive in chronic AT rupture patients26. Therefore, it is inevitable that the conventional open surgery will damage the soft tissue in the ankle and the course of tendon restoring, but there is an obvious advantage engaged in this surgical plan to repair a large tendon defect after resection of scar tissue (Table 1).
In a word, the minimally invasive surgical approach takes advantage of subcutaneous adipose tissue between the malleolus and AT and beneath Kager’s triangle to promote incision closure and wound healing14, 17, 18, 32. The scythe-shaped incision chosen by the above surgery alleviates the pressure of the wound during early functional exercise, which can prevent tendon exposure and minimizes damage to the scar by shoes effectively. In this present study, the clinical outcome in two groups was evaluated by ARTS, AOFAS, dorsiflexion, calf circumference, and Heel raise test with least two years follow-up (Tables 3 and 4). Compared with group A, patients with the minimally invasive surgical approach experienced a desirable functional recovery at months 3, 6, and 12. However, the difference between the two groups was shrunk over time gradually and there was no difference between the two groups at year two (Table 3). Moreover, patients in group B had a better outcome in heel raise test compared with patients in group A at follow-up year two, which may relate to earlier functional exercise (Table 4). Patients with a minimally invasive technique more like to accept an early high-intensity ankle exercise, which will better for the early functional recovery and the heel raise. Therefore, for patients with large Achilles tendon defects, we still recommend the use of the conventional operation to repair, but for patients with the defect (≤ 6cm), we deem that the minimally invasive surgical approach with less trauma, fewer complications, and high aesthetics should be advised.